The Targeted Individuals Program

People do not ask to join this program. People are referred to it, by government, covertly. It is a program designed to destroy the health, personality and life of the targeted person. These people are usually whistle-blowers.

This is your government in action, waging war against its own citizens. This is your tax paid dollars, being used to vilify and incarcerate innocent people, who have lodged a complaint about government corruption, and especially those who have blogged or published that information.

I was put on this program in around 2010, for threatening to sue a disability employment agency. They had deliberately sabotaged my application for a temporary disability pension, knowing that I would be unable to support myself and family during the illness I was experiencing. They had arranged for job capacity assessment officers to write untrue accounts of my interviews with them.

When things had gotten out of hand, I made an FOI request to that company, being On-Que Human Resources. They responded by telling me not to contact the company again, or they would take legal action. I made another request, as it was my legal right to look at the records they had kept on myself. They applied for an AVO against me.

I advised the court that I couldn’t attend on the day in question. It coincided with an appeal on the denial of that disability pension. I asked for an adjournment to give me time to get legal representation, as per my legal right. The company’s solicitor agreed to the adjournment and stated that they would agree to it at the hearing in my absence, and my request that no orders be made on that day. They walked out with an AVO.

Police are using that today, as an ‘antecedent’. Since I’ve had an AVO on me before, that means I am disorderly. Yet it was that company who were in breach of federal law, and were eventually directed by the Office of the Information Commissioner to supply a copy of same records. Turns out, they also claimed payment for handling my search for employment, while I was banned from attending their office, and received it.

I was then targeted by all Centrelink employees, and those of all other welfare agencies. I appealed the denial of my dsp application all of the way up to the AAT. Government officers acted corruptly all the way through, to cover up for the corrupt dealings I was being dealt, and which were designed to punish me for appealing in the first place. Deliberate attempts were made to render me homeless, and all of which I had to rectify myself, while suffering an illness myself and my son had a bone tumor.

Bond loan applications were sabotaged, rent certificates removed after having been lodged, payments constantly cancelled, etc, etc.

Once I’d been referred to the targeted individuals programs, things only got worse. My computer was hacked, and all of my dealings on the internet were monitored and analyzed. An attack on my life was planned, and some people from my past enlisted to help. One of whom happened to be employed by an employment agency at that time, and I was told that the other one associates with members of a pedophile ring. There is strong evidence to suggest that is true.

I survived that attack. I had to send the child I had been able to keep during the assault on my life and finances by Centrelink, to live elsewhere for his own safety, and I’ve been on the road since.

A big part of the plan is to drive the victim into acting crazy in public, so the government can seize on that, deem the person to be insane, and discredit and hopefully silence or destroy them once and for all.

The person who now has me in a position of being jailed, on the 20th of next month (June), is an employee of the NSW Community Justice Centre, which is a direct division of the NSW Attorney General’s Department.

Being a targeted individual, meant that when the situation started, none of my complaints were dealt with by the NSW government. It was the government and its employees who were out to get me the most, so they had no problems about government employees making life hard for me.

This has mean the situation has continued for over a year now, with more and more public servants joining in on the assault on myself,  and by allowing it to continue.

Gabrielle Upton appears to be complicit in an physical assault on myself, carried out by Albury police officers Minehand, Mifsud, Quiring and Bosch. She is aware that her employee ordered it, after I had written some very nasty comments about her on the Attorney General’s facebook page.

However, had the NSW Department of ‘justice’ not ignored my complaints, and the illegal behaviour of this employee, and which continued to escalate, those nasty comments would never have been written.

Now I am going to be sentenced to jail, for offending the person who, after three years of evading being captured by the controllers of this game of ‘gang stalking’, perverted the course of justice against me, and had me convicted of false allegations.

Yet none of the public servants who engage in this program, or the corruption which is being reported originally, suffer any consequences for their actions.

Complaints to the Ombudsman and other departments, merely set off a new round of attacks from the people being complained about, while those agencies treat the whistle-blowers with contempt and send letters explaining why there will be no investigation.

This is your government.

Don’t forget to pay your parking fine, while these people are allowed to break federal laws, be protected while doing it, and use your tax dollars to play sick games against the public.

My case is now proof of the targeted individuals program. Under examination by an impartial Magistrate, it would be shown that I have committed no crimes at all. Yet I am facing jail.

Yet I have appeared in court around 25 times over the past 18 months, commencing with attempting to defend false allegations, to now facing six false criminal charges.

A police sargent who has fabricated my ‘criminal history’ in a bail report he completed after his officers falsely arrested, falsely charged and assaulted me, that I will be going to jail over their charges against me. Those charges merely involving lodging complaints about three Albury police officers, to the Ombudman and Attorney General’s department, and all of which involved the employee of the CJC.

I did have an angry reaction to 11 months of having been defamed by the false convictions this person arranged against me, because originally, I had been summoned to court house as an innocent person, but left framed, charged, convicted, fined and stuck with the court costs.

Albury court house. Signing the paperwork to convict an innocent person of non-crimes, and to punish me for going on to write about pedophile rings in Australia, after it appeared that the government had sent in officers from that organization, to enact the program they had tailed to suit the attack on myself and my life.

It would be interesting to know what the overall bill for it all was.

BDS Huon, voluntarily chose to involve themselves in assisting to bring five of those false charges against me, to protect an employee who was being accused of illegal conduct towards their own clients.

Once NSW police had been bought into civil matters, the game of gang stalking was bought right back under the umbrella of the higher players.

The NSW Justice system also seems to play a very big part in it all.

How do whistle-blowers get convicted of false allegations and wind up in jail or mental health establishments? Staff at the justice system allow and support it. It now appears to me, that they also help to enact it.

The current NSW Attorney General, Mark Speakman, is aware of the truth of the whole situation, yet refuses to act.

Partly because it would be shown that the offending staff member from his own agency, the CJC, should have been removed from the picture before she perverted the course of justice against me, and once exposed, should have been directed to have those false convictions overturned.

Why did the Attorney General’s employee try to frame me in the first place? Because her daughter’s tenant had been threatened with exposure for corrupt behaviour, which might have resulted in the termination of her employment. She sought to protect that person’s employment, and in the same process, her own daughter’s ability to continue to receive rent payments.

But … a whistle-blower has been trapped, due to acts of misconduct arising from the CJC and staff at Albury court house, and is now caught in the justice system.

They can’t let me escape without a conviction, or they let the whole government gang stalking game down.

Magistrate Anthony Murray – An Act of Perjury While on His Bench

In court on 6 April, I described the following document as a fabrication, which didn’t reflect the true proceedings of that day. I’d only read it once, after returning home from the corrupted dealings on 13 February 2017, and only thought about the biggest errors in it.

In looking again though, it does actually still show Magistrate Murray committing perjury, from his bench, to protect his co-conspirator, the court house mediator.

He asserts he doesn’t know her, on the first page, but by page 5, has to admit that he works with her at the Albury Court House on a regular basis. On the day in question, he even smiled broadly as he spoke of her. However, at least one person was unable to stop himself from laughing out loud, when he did so.

Then he tries his usual game of belittling me, and pretending that I’m not following, and unable to follow, the proceedings.

Yet it was all simple to me. I’d lodged one application for motion the moth before, which was listed for hearing by Magistrate Cromptom on 11 November 2016, for 12 December 2016.

On 12 December, I arrived with a second Notice of Motion, and tried to lodge it at hearing, but then did as he said, and lodged it at the office. He then made me wait until the end of the day to deal with that one.

The office had changed that one notice of motion, into five, because it related to all matters before the court relating to one ADVO. They had to create a pile of paperwork, by insisting they make a different application relating to each charge. Each was a reproduction of my original. Only Murray pretends that there is just too many matters, and too much paperwork before the court, from him to be able to understand it all.

He most certainly did, and so did I.

On 6 April 2017, Magistrate Cromptom listed the first of the illegal breach charges for hearing again, with the others to be listed one by one after that, at the Albury Local Court, with himself as the presiding Magistrate, or an assortment of others who would be flown down at the tax payer’s expense, to cover for Murray. Meaning, Murray has agreed to be allowed to be disqualified from matters relating to the second set of applications, but still wants Albury Court House and a Magistrate he can control, to convict me of all five false charges, and against the evidence that would exonerate me.







From: Karma
Sent: Monday, 23 January 2017 11:43 PM
Subject: The Never Ending Acts of Corruption by Magistrate Tony Murray, Albury Local Court

Dear Mr Schmatt

Please find attached, as promised, complaint number 5 about Tony Murray.

Maybe its time you did something about him. Finally. As previously advised, I will be seeking a review of all of your decisions in the Federal Circuit Court next month, in yet another attempt to end the miscarriages of justice being committed against me, by your corrupt employees at the Albury Court House.

I will also be complaining to Mr Brandis about it all. He will really appreciate having me filling up his email inbox each day, until something is done about XXXXXX AND TONY MURRAY WORKING TOGETHER TO CONVICT INNOCENT PEOPLE OF CRIMES WHICH DID NOT OCCUR.

See you in the federal court, you condoner of injustice and unlawful court dealings.


I don’t seem to have a scan of the signed copy of this, posted to the Judicial Commision in January 2017.

Complaint Against a Judicial Officer

To — The Judicial Commission of NSW

I, Karma, of XXXXXX, West Albury NSW 2640, wish to complain against ­­­­­­­­­­­­ Magistrate Murray of the Albury Local Court.

My complaint is as follows:

At hearing in November 2016, Magistrate Cromptom listed an application for motion for decision on 12 December 2016. Magistrate stated at that hearing, on 12 December 2016, that he would disqualify himself from being able to hear it, but did not rule on whether or not he would agree to a change of venue. I planned to appeal any denial of the application for a change of venue, to the District Court.

At same hearing on 12 December 2016, I lodged a second application for motion, regarding five illegal breach charges, stemming from an unserved ADVO. Magistrate Murray stated that he would hand down a decision on that Application for Motion on 9 February 2017.

Against my wishes, he asked to be allowed to list one of the breach charges for mention on that same date, being 9 February 2017. I stated that none of those five allegations of breach should be listed for hearing until police have provided a signed statement of service.

In checking the court listings online, I found on 20 January 2017, that he has instead listed one breach charge for hearing, and the other four for mention on 9 February 2017. He has not listed the Application for Motion for decision, at all.

Office staff from the court house advised via email dated 23 January 2017, that Magistrate Murray has recorded that he dismissed that application for motion on 12 December 2017. That opposes my recollections of the events and decisions made at that same hearing. I believe this is yet another instance of corruption by Magistrate Murray, to protect his colleague XXXXXX.

I also do not consent to the first application for motion, having been settled without myself having the chance to argue that I had changed my mind about allowing a different Magistrate to hear it at Albury Court House, due to involvement of all staff there, in these conspiracies to bring false allegations against myself. Magistrate Murray will be seeking to cover up once again for his own illegal involvement in XXXXXX’s conspiracy to bring false allegations against myself, and will instruct the replacement Magistrate to rule in a way that brings that about.

When listening to the verbal transcript of the two separate hearings held on 12 December 2016, one in the morning and the other very late in the afternoon, you will hear Magistrate Murray denying knowing XXXXXX at all, and deny that she works at the Albury Court House. A few minutes later, he had to change his own words, and confirm that he does work with her nearly every day, and that she does in fact contract to Albury Court House through the CJC.

Magistrate Murray is now guilty himself of perjury, in his continued attempts to protect XXXXXX from being held accountable for perverting the course of justice in relation to matters involving her personal friends and intimidation of a witness for the defence in those same matters.

Albury Police, who illegally searched my possessions, put me on very questionable bail and once again lie in all of their statement of facts, will be seeking to have me convicted of all of these false charges to conceal their own unlawful actions. Therefore, there will no impartiality in the mind of the prosecutor, who will be seeking to cover up for these unlawful police actions, and to protect the person who instructed them to all act in that manner, being XXXXXX.

I will be once again seeking to take the NSW Judicial Commission to the Federal Circuit Court next month, by way of appeal against the last decision letter sent to me, exonerating Tony Murray of misconduct on 29 February 2016, when he granted two false ADVO applications, which had both been disproven by evidence, and by way of using a false allegation of breach, created by a police officer who was sent to deliberately frame me for same, and then by way of denying the accused access to the evidence police fabricated and then to used in court against me.

I have since become aware of evidence that Con Weekly did not submit to the court on that same date, which would have exonerated me, and therefore is again guilty of tampering with evidence, along with creating a false and tampered with recording of an unlawful interview with myself. I will submit that new evidence to the Federal Circuit Court, in an attempt to have all decisions made by Tony Murray on 29 February 2016, overturned due to corruption of processes.

I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believe the same to be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Oaths Act 1900.

Declared at: Albury on 24 January 2017                      


From: Karma
Sent: Thursday, 2 February 2017 12:16 PM
Subject: Re: The Never Ending Acts of Corruption by Magistrate Tony Murray, Albury Local Court

Dear Mr Schmatt

I have been forgetting to post the signed copy of this complaint to you. Rest assured though that it will be posted before the end of this week. And this time, I will be seeking true justice, if not from you, but through the Federal Court.

Might I also remind you of the following statements taken from your own website.

Judicial officers

In a case of attempting to pervert the course of justice, a custodial sentence will be imposed where the offender is a judicial officer: R v Farquhar (unrep, 29/5/85, NSWCCA). The court stated at pp 30–31:

Where, as here, the offence is committed by a person holding judicial office in the judicial hierarchy of the State the attempt to commit the offence strikes at the very core of the integrity of the administration of justice. Such a person is in a commanding position to attempt to pervert the course of justice and when he seeks to abuse his position to achieve that end, public confidence in the judicial system will be lost unless it is made clear that such conduct will bring a prison sentence.

The court made clear that since the public is entitled to expect a judicial officer will be of good character and integrity, previous good character or reputation of a judge convicted of attempting to pervert the course of justice will be of far less weight than in a different type of offence: R v Farquhar at p 31. In Einfeld v R (2010) 200 A Crim R 1 at [81], Basten JA said:

… it is beyond question that for a senior legal practitioner and former judge of a superior court to commit offences against the administration of justice is apt to give rise to public disquiet about the integrity of the judicial system. These were offences to which the present status of, and the offices formerly held by, the applicant were of great significance.

There is “a risk that judges will deal more harshly than some would think appropriate with those from within their own ranks”: Einfeld v R at [82]. Notwithstanding that danger, it is accepted that an offender’s status as a senior legal practitioner and former judge rendered perjury and perverting the course of justice more serious than they would otherwise have been: Einfeld v R at [82]. Basten JA also stated at [83] (Latham J agreeing at [196]; RS Hulme J agreeing at [195]) that the applicant’s former positions removed:

… an element of ignorance which might otherwise have diminished the degree of culpability. It was not merely a matter of knowing that it is a crime to lie on oath or seek to pervert the course of justice: it was a matter of understanding the significance accorded to such conduct by the law and the heightened seriousness of offences when committed by a person with the applicant’s background and experience.


From: Karma
Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2017 2:00 PM
Subject: Complaint against Tony Murray of the Albury Local Court No. 6

Dear Mr Schmatt

Please find attached complaint number six, against Tony Murray of the Albury Court House. I refuse to address him using the term Magistrate, because he does not conduct himself with honour, or with any respect to the laws of Australia.

I will be seeking a permanent stay in all proceedings against me, at the Albury Local court, due to his misconduct, that of XXXXXX of the CJC and Constable Rowan Weekley, who arrested me in an unlawful manner and fabricated evidence, which was denied to the defendant in a deliberate ruse to have ADVO applications made by XXXXXX’s personal friends, awarded, without the defence evidence which had disproven both of those, being considered.

Yours in disgust of NSW Justice


From: Karma
Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2017 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: Complaint against Tony Murray of the Albury Local Court No. 6

Dear Mr Schmatt

I realized after sending this that I had not attached any supporting evidence. I will scan the 14 pages of lies which have been written up, purporting to be a transcript of the hearings on 12 December 2016, and email those later tonight, along with the new applications from the ADVO holders. You will have it all by morning, along with a scan of the signed complaints, which I will post on Friday.


Murray 6 p 1 editMurray 6


I don’t have anything to hide, yet I am the one who has been found ‘guilty’.

I’m quite happy to have myself and my actions exposed on the internet. But only the truthful version of same, not the one others have been seeking to impose onto me.


You wonder why the other people involved in all this, seem desperate to seek some in appropriate gag orders, to cover it all up?


Justice in the Albury Court House?
– proven to be contrary to what they work towards there –