Magistrate Anthony Murray – An Act of Perjury While on His Bench

In court on 6 April, I described the following document as a fabrication, which didn’t reflect the true proceedings of that day. I’d only read it once, after returning home from the corrupted dealings on 13 February 2017, and only thought about the biggest errors in it.

In looking again though, it does actually still show Magistrate Murray committing perjury, from his bench, to protect his co-conspirator, the court house mediator.

He asserts he doesn’t know her, on the first page, but by page 5, has to admit that he works with her at the Albury Court House on a regular basis. On the day in question, he even smiled broadly as he spoke of her. However, at least one person was unable to stop himself from laughing out loud, when he did so.

Then he tries his usual game of belittling me, and pretending that I’m not following, and unable to follow, the proceedings.

Yet it was all simple to me. I’d lodged one application for motion the moth before, which was listed for hearing by Magistrate Cromptom on 11 November 2016, for 12 December 2016.

On 12 December, I arrived with a second Notice of Motion, and tried to lodge it at hearing, but then did as he said, and lodged it at the office. He then made me wait until the end of the day to deal with that one.

The office had changed that one notice of motion, into five, because it related to all matters before the court relating to one ADVO. They had to create a pile of paperwork, by insisting they make a different application relating to each charge. Each was a reproduction of my original. Only Murray pretends that there is just too many matters, and too much paperwork before the court, from him to be able to understand it all.

He most certainly did, and so did I.

On 6 April 2017, Magistrate Cromptom listed the first of the illegal breach charges for hearing again, with the others to be listed one by one after that, at the Albury Local Court, with himself as the presiding Magistrate, or an assortment of others who would be flown down at the tax payer’s expense, to cover for Murray. Meaning, Murray has agreed to be allowed to be disqualified from matters relating to the second set of applications, but still wants Albury Court House and a Magistrate he can control, to convict me of all five false charges, and against the evidence that would exonerate me.







From: Karma
Sent: Monday, 23 January 2017 11:43 PM
Subject: The Never Ending Acts of Corruption by Magistrate Tony Murray, Albury Local Court

Dear Mr Schmatt

Please find attached, as promised, complaint number 5 about Tony Murray.

Maybe its time you did something about him. Finally. As previously advised, I will be seeking a review of all of your decisions in the Federal Circuit Court next month, in yet another attempt to end the miscarriages of justice being committed against me, by your corrupt employees at the Albury Court House.

I will also be complaining to Mr Brandis about it all. He will really appreciate having me filling up his email inbox each day, until something is done about XXXXXX AND TONY MURRAY WORKING TOGETHER TO CONVICT INNOCENT PEOPLE OF CRIMES WHICH DID NOT OCCUR.

See you in the federal court, you condoner of injustice and unlawful court dealings.


I don’t seem to have a scan of the signed copy of this, posted to the Judicial Commision in January 2017.

Complaint Against a Judicial Officer

To — The Judicial Commission of NSW

I, Karma, of XXXXXX, West Albury NSW 2640, wish to complain against ­­­­­­­­­­­­ Magistrate Murray of the Albury Local Court.

My complaint is as follows:

At hearing in November 2016, Magistrate Cromptom listed an application for motion for decision on 12 December 2016. Magistrate stated at that hearing, on 12 December 2016, that he would disqualify himself from being able to hear it, but did not rule on whether or not he would agree to a change of venue. I planned to appeal any denial of the application for a change of venue, to the District Court.

At same hearing on 12 December 2016, I lodged a second application for motion, regarding five illegal breach charges, stemming from an unserved ADVO. Magistrate Murray stated that he would hand down a decision on that Application for Motion on 9 February 2017.

Against my wishes, he asked to be allowed to list one of the breach charges for mention on that same date, being 9 February 2017. I stated that none of those five allegations of breach should be listed for hearing until police have provided a signed statement of service.

In checking the court listings online, I found on 20 January 2017, that he has instead listed one breach charge for hearing, and the other four for mention on 9 February 2017. He has not listed the Application for Motion for decision, at all.

Office staff from the court house advised via email dated 23 January 2017, that Magistrate Murray has recorded that he dismissed that application for motion on 12 December 2017. That opposes my recollections of the events and decisions made at that same hearing. I believe this is yet another instance of corruption by Magistrate Murray, to protect his colleague XXXXXX.

I also do not consent to the first application for motion, having been settled without myself having the chance to argue that I had changed my mind about allowing a different Magistrate to hear it at Albury Court House, due to involvement of all staff there, in these conspiracies to bring false allegations against myself. Magistrate Murray will be seeking to cover up once again for his own illegal involvement in XXXXXX’s conspiracy to bring false allegations against myself, and will instruct the replacement Magistrate to rule in a way that brings that about.

When listening to the verbal transcript of the two separate hearings held on 12 December 2016, one in the morning and the other very late in the afternoon, you will hear Magistrate Murray denying knowing XXXXXX at all, and deny that she works at the Albury Court House. A few minutes later, he had to change his own words, and confirm that he does work with her nearly every day, and that she does in fact contract to Albury Court House through the CJC.

Magistrate Murray is now guilty himself of perjury, in his continued attempts to protect XXXXXX from being held accountable for perverting the course of justice in relation to matters involving her personal friends and intimidation of a witness for the defence in those same matters.

Albury Police, who illegally searched my possessions, put me on very questionable bail and once again lie in all of their statement of facts, will be seeking to have me convicted of all of these false charges to conceal their own unlawful actions. Therefore, there will no impartiality in the mind of the prosecutor, who will be seeking to cover up for these unlawful police actions, and to protect the person who instructed them to all act in that manner, being XXXXXX.

I will be once again seeking to take the NSW Judicial Commission to the Federal Circuit Court next month, by way of appeal against the last decision letter sent to me, exonerating Tony Murray of misconduct on 29 February 2016, when he granted two false ADVO applications, which had both been disproven by evidence, and by way of using a false allegation of breach, created by a police officer who was sent to deliberately frame me for same, and then by way of denying the accused access to the evidence police fabricated and then to used in court against me.

I have since become aware of evidence that Con Weekly did not submit to the court on that same date, which would have exonerated me, and therefore is again guilty of tampering with evidence, along with creating a false and tampered with recording of an unlawful interview with myself. I will submit that new evidence to the Federal Circuit Court, in an attempt to have all decisions made by Tony Murray on 29 February 2016, overturned due to corruption of processes.

I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believe the same to be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Oaths Act 1900.

Declared at: Albury on 24 January 2017                      


From: Karma
Sent: Thursday, 2 February 2017 12:16 PM
Subject: Re: The Never Ending Acts of Corruption by Magistrate Tony Murray, Albury Local Court

Dear Mr Schmatt

I have been forgetting to post the signed copy of this complaint to you. Rest assured though that it will be posted before the end of this week. And this time, I will be seeking true justice, if not from you, but through the Federal Court.

Might I also remind you of the following statements taken from your own website.

Judicial officers

In a case of attempting to pervert the course of justice, a custodial sentence will be imposed where the offender is a judicial officer: R v Farquhar (unrep, 29/5/85, NSWCCA). The court stated at pp 30–31:

Where, as here, the offence is committed by a person holding judicial office in the judicial hierarchy of the State the attempt to commit the offence strikes at the very core of the integrity of the administration of justice. Such a person is in a commanding position to attempt to pervert the course of justice and when he seeks to abuse his position to achieve that end, public confidence in the judicial system will be lost unless it is made clear that such conduct will bring a prison sentence.

The court made clear that since the public is entitled to expect a judicial officer will be of good character and integrity, previous good character or reputation of a judge convicted of attempting to pervert the course of justice will be of far less weight than in a different type of offence: R v Farquhar at p 31. In Einfeld v R (2010) 200 A Crim R 1 at [81], Basten JA said:

… it is beyond question that for a senior legal practitioner and former judge of a superior court to commit offences against the administration of justice is apt to give rise to public disquiet about the integrity of the judicial system. These were offences to which the present status of, and the offices formerly held by, the applicant were of great significance.

There is “a risk that judges will deal more harshly than some would think appropriate with those from within their own ranks”: Einfeld v R at [82]. Notwithstanding that danger, it is accepted that an offender’s status as a senior legal practitioner and former judge rendered perjury and perverting the course of justice more serious than they would otherwise have been: Einfeld v R at [82]. Basten JA also stated at [83] (Latham J agreeing at [196]; RS Hulme J agreeing at [195]) that the applicant’s former positions removed:

… an element of ignorance which might otherwise have diminished the degree of culpability. It was not merely a matter of knowing that it is a crime to lie on oath or seek to pervert the course of justice: it was a matter of understanding the significance accorded to such conduct by the law and the heightened seriousness of offences when committed by a person with the applicant’s background and experience.


From: Karma
Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2017 2:00 PM
Subject: Complaint against Tony Murray of the Albury Local Court No. 6

Dear Mr Schmatt

Please find attached complaint number six, against Tony Murray of the Albury Court House. I refuse to address him using the term Magistrate, because he does not conduct himself with honour, or with any respect to the laws of Australia.

I will be seeking a permanent stay in all proceedings against me, at the Albury Local court, due to his misconduct, that of XXXXXX of the CJC and Constable Rowan Weekley, who arrested me in an unlawful manner and fabricated evidence, which was denied to the defendant in a deliberate ruse to have ADVO applications made by XXXXXX’s personal friends, awarded, without the defence evidence which had disproven both of those, being considered.

Yours in disgust of NSW Justice


From: Karma
Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2017 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: Complaint against Tony Murray of the Albury Local Court No. 6

Dear Mr Schmatt

I realized after sending this that I had not attached any supporting evidence. I will scan the 14 pages of lies which have been written up, purporting to be a transcript of the hearings on 12 December 2016, and email those later tonight, along with the new applications from the ADVO holders. You will have it all by morning, along with a scan of the signed complaints, which I will post on Friday.


Murray 6 p 1 editMurray 6


I don’t have anything to hide, yet I am the one who has been found ‘guilty’.

I’m quite happy to have myself and my actions exposed on the internet. But only the truthful version of same, not the one others have been seeking to impose onto me.


You wonder why the other people involved in all this, seem desperate to seek some in appropriate gag orders, to cover it all up?


Justice in the Albury Court House?
– proven to be contrary to what they work towards there –


NSW Judicial Commission Decision

This is the decision, posted to me in December 2016, that I could have appealed to the Federal Circuit Court last month. I would have had until about 11 January to do so, 28 days from date of issue.

I’d packed up all my court papers and put them away in a cupboard over Christmas, and took time out from having to look at them, and think about them. So I didn’t think to jump at this chance, to have this obviously flawed decision, examined in much higher court, and one which would also take federal regulations surrounding taxation accountants into consideration.

However, I’d lodged the two applications for motion in November and December, and was awaiting hearing on those. Rather than risk being stuck with court costs in the Federal Court at a minimum of $1,600, I’d chosen to continue to fight the original false criminal charges, in an impartial arena instead. The cheaters just won’t allow that, because them and their complaints would promptly be thrown out of the court room and court house.

By the time I’d found out that Murray was playing games again, and now with the applications for motion, on about 20 January, I was already just outside my time period to appeal it to the Federal Court.

Notice that Mr Schmatt exonerates Murray of any wrong doing on 5 February, 29 February and 18 April 2016, but does not mention the 15th, which was the main date of my allegations of corruption and perversion of justice.

Murray wasn’t on the bench on 5 February, so of course he didn’t do anything corrupt on that date. He soon undid the judgements made by the impartial Magistrate who in charge of proceedings that day, and who had dismissed matters to mediation, unworthy of even a hearing in court, and from a position outside of the court room.

15 February was the day that Murray admits in the transcript that he revoked matters from mediation, due to an allegation of an incidence of violence, that not only did the prosecutor not know what he is talking about, the potential victims also do not deny or confirm that one of them had been assaulted, and their is no record of any official advice to the court house of same. He couldn’t convict me on that day, because I’d already walked out of the court house, once I saw mediation had instead been turned into a criminal hearing against myself, and a deliberate trap was waiting to be sprung on me in the court room.

At the continuation of that hearing, on 29 February, he then doesn’t mention the incidence of violence, used to revoke, but instead convicts me of writing a letter to the complainants’ employers, about her legal actions against me. The court had been advised the arrest was unlawful and that police were refusing to give me access to their ‘recorded full confession’. Murray convicted me in my absence, without even hearing the charge. And then grant’s his buddy’s friends’ ADVO applications.

At the appeal, on 18 April, he and the prosecutor both verbally denied me the right to see the evidence they claim to have used against me on 29 February, to gain a conviction, and which I was by then appealing in April. They both even mocked me outloud for even asking to be provided with that, based on a letter from the Superintendent that I would be given a copy at hearing. Murray then stole the letter off me, by keeping it after demanding to be allowed to see it. The transcript was later changed to read that they politely asked me if I wanted that letter tendered into evidence. No, I was asking to see some evidence of the criminal action I had been convicted of.

I had a copy scanned to my computer though, which they hadn’t counted on. I guess they will be wanting to seize my computer soon, to remove all trace of their own corruptions. I guess they will cite ‘my internet crimes against the court mediator’, of blogging about corruption at the Albury Court House, as their reason to do so.



At the start of proceedings on 13 February, into the notice of motions, Magistrate Cromptom tried to get it onto the record that my complaints to the Judicial Commission were not found to be proven, therefore Murray is innocent of any wrong doing, and therefore there is no need for the court to grant me motion.

When I stated in court that the Commission is actually fully aware that my complaints were proven, but covered up for Murray, he then tried to make issue of the fact that my application for stay in proceedings requested time to be able to take the matter to the Federal Circuit Court. He asked the prosecutor if that was even possible.

She, of course, did not know either. But then she also unaware that police must provide the defence with a copy of their brief and evidence, either.

I assured the Magistrate that the Federal Court had accepted my last application, for a judicial review into EJ Schmatt’s decsion, and that I had it half lodged at the Federal Court’s site when the police found out about that, and therefore as did the court mediator, and so they conspired to assault me, put me up on a new false charge, and instructed me to plead guilty to everything, or leave town.

I could appeal it all to the NSW Supreme Court, I saw last week. But then the site gives the public no links or information on how to do that. Albury Court House then went out of the way to print me out a that same piece of information, so that I could take the matter there, if I insist on doing so.

However, since I’m calling the Chief Executive of the NSW Judicial Commission a corrupt liar who has handed down a decision which he is fully aware is incorrect, I don’t want to do that in a NSW court house. Even if it is its highest one in the state.

I assume he won’t have quite so much influence, over a Federal Court.

I am still waiting for another letter from Mr Schmatt, stemming from my 5th complaint about Murray, and which is probably the most serious of them all. That Magistrate Murray committed perjury, while perched on his bench, to cover up for his association with the court mediator I accuse of organizing Murray’s acts of misconduct against me.

Once received, I will have 28 days to appeal that decision. It usually takes him a couple of months, to type up a two page letter. I hope I receive it before the next hearing listed for April, in the Albury Local Corrupt Court.