More Dodgy Dealings in the Albury Local Court


From: Karma
Sent: Monday, 26 June 2017 3:40 PM
To: Local Court Albury; local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au; Premier; investigations@abc.net.au; icac@icac.nsw.gov.au

Subject: Illegal Bail Hearing

Dear Mr Howard

At hearing on 20 June 2017, the charge bought against me by your employee, XXXX XXXXXXX of the CJC, was not mentioned in court. It was listed to be mentioned, for a new date for hearing to be set. You might recall that I lodged my defence brief with the office that morning, and with the police prosecutor in between hearings. However, the charge was not mentioned at all, and no date was set.

In fact, the Magistrate was quite clear that we would only be dealing with one charge on that day, being one of breach of ADVO bought against me by your pal, xxxxxx xxxx.

I believe we have not only had police change the date of the offence on their paperwork, but submit evidence that is not admissible, since this is the re-hearing of the charge, and not the first hearing of the charge, where all of that information should have been submitted. Since it wasn’t, I fail to see how it is admissible now.

However, I have allowed it all to be introduced, because it convicts both of the arresting officers of lying, but also because I intend to address XXXX’s witness statements during my cross examination of her, at the hearing’s continuation in mid September. However, I believe that changing the charge from contravene ADVO to Common Assault is simply not acceptable.

After that hearing had ended and the Magistrate had left the court room for the day, the prosecutor sent a clerk to instruct him to come back to his bench, to hear my bail application. I had mentioned earlier that I did want that addressed at hearing, along with XXXX’s false allegation of XXXXXX her.

Magistrate Cromptom returned to the bench and made an order that bail would continue until a date in mid September 2017. I can’t find my paperwork at the moment, due to have to relocate in my living arrangements late last week. However, that hearing in mid September relates to XXXX’s charge, and to Magistrate Murray’s ADVO applications were are being bought against me as an Act of Parliament.

I hardly think that it would be legal for the Magistrate to bail me until the next hearing of someone else’s complaint to police about me. Especially when it is the same party who’s previous collusions with xxxxxxx were the basis of my applications for motion.

Therefore, he has continued this bail indefinitely, due to not setting a new date for the hearing of the charge I am actually on bail for. I believe it is not legal to put someone on bail indefinitely.

I will be defending Murray’s new false allegations, due to the fact that Magistrate Cromptom assured me at hearing on 6 April 2017, that Magistrate Murray would no longer be involved in any matters involving myself at your court house, before dismissing my three applications for motion, as a compromise. I would have appealed his decision in the district court, but took him for his word that Murray would be kept out of proceedings from here on in. My time period to appeal that decision, has now expired.

Therefore, I will defend those new applications for ADVO’s, and which are an Act of Parliament, by submitting the transcript which shows that Magistrate Murray committed perjury on his bench on 12 December 2016, to cover up for the same collusions between XXXXXXX, XXXX and XXXXXX, when he was originally refusing to grant motion. Something I am long past being legally due, due to the amounts of corruptions in these proceedings, and which began at the outset.

Therefore, you better change the transcript when you prepare it this week. Make sure you add in remarks pretending to be from the mouth of the Magistrate, that a date was set for the hearing of (your employee)’s charge, or all of the above becomes very questionable.

I’m sure you will be able to fix that error, before it comes back to haunt you all, and to cover up for unlawful and illegal actions by both of your Magistrates.

Regards

Karma

Advertisements

Registrar Issues Subpoena to Self

I have received an email this morning from the current Registrar of the Albury Court House, being Elizabeth Leathbridge, confirming that she has processed a subpoena I emailed to the court house a couple of days ago.

The subpoena is addressed to the Registrar of the Albury court house. It requests that they provide the defence with a copy of the advice to Magistrate Murray that an incidence of violence had occurred, upon which advice he revoked matters from mediation, and went on to convict myself of false allegations without considering any of the defence evidence, or even the cases presented to support the applications made by two people against me.

So the Registrar of the Albury Court House, has had to process a subpoena directing herself to provide a record, which the court previously claimed to myself that they had not kept.

Going to be interesting this point, when it comes up in the court.

Murray could argue that he assumed that the allegation and charge of breach, involved an incidence of violence, since they related to an order which prevented violence from occurring. However, no threat of violence had ever been made, apart from by the complainants, in the lead up to lodging their applications to the court.

Which is the whole problem here. An AVO or ADVO is an order to prevent any acts of violence, or contact designed to instill fear, towards the protected person. The protected person, was never under any threat of that. So the ADVO was a misuse of process.

Then when the Magistrate claims to have seen that a charge of breach had been bought against the accused, he jumps to the conclusion that it involved an incidence of violence.

When it reality, all it involved was a typed letter to one of the owners of BDS Huon, and which had been left at an empty house, and was not found until more than a month later.

However, Murray makes those claims about an incidence of violence, and the charge of breach, at hearing for that charge on 15 February 2016. He had me summoned to court to hear that charge, and it was the only matter listed that day for hearing against me, on the list outside the court room.

However, he didn’t hear it. He didn’t read the letter either, because it was never tendered into evidence by the arresting office, Constable Rowan Weekley. If he read the charge sheet and statement of facts created by that same officer, then he would have seen that no incidence of violence had occurred at all.

The matter was adjourned, until 29 February 2016. You’d think that by then he would have read the charge sheet, and even asked the police to submit a copy of the letter, for his determination as to whether or not it constituted an illegal act.

Yet, he is still pretending that the charge of breach involved an act of violence, when he convicted me of it two weeks later.

How did the result of the hearing on 5 February 2016 come to his attention in the first place? He was not the presiding Magistrate, and the matters had been dealt with on that date. The applications for ADVO’s had been ordered to be sent to mediation, and the charge of breach ignored by the Magistrate, until it had been determined whether or not the ADVO’s were appropriate, and/or proven by the applicants.

Why did Murray revoke matters from mediation when he was not aware of the circumstances of the allegation of breach, nor what it really involved?

Why did he make a judgement on it, when the Magistrate who had read the defence statements which related to it, had ignored it completely based on those?

Why did Murray not read those same defence statements, and which had been lodged with the court prior to the hearing of the charge on 5 February 2016, before convicting me of it?

In fact, I never even got the chance to enter a plea. The charge was never mentioned in court in my presence. However, I had attended court on the day it was listed for hearing, and the Magistrate chose to ignore it, to be dealt with after 18 March 2016, when we were all to appear in court again, after mediation.

Is that legal, for me to have been denied the right to enter a plea, before being convicted, and despite having been in attendance on the day the charge was supposed to have been heard?

Why did Magistrate Murray award the ADVO’s just so that he could convict me of the allegation of breach, without considering any of the evidence surrounding them?

Because his colleague from the CJC had asked him to do so.

I have also emailed a new subpoena to the Albury court house this morning. This one is for NSW Police, asking them to produce a valid record of service of one of the ADVO’s, prior to seeking prosecution in court for alleged breaches of that same ADVO.

I have read that a signed record is no longer required in court, just an ‘electronic’ copy of it. Therefore the subpoena asks that if police plan to continue with these prosecutions, without providing a signed record of service, then the serving officers will be required to appear in court, on 20 June 2016, to swear in the witness box that they served two ADVO final orders, and not just the one on the day in question.

I wonder if the cops will commit perjury in court? All of the arresting officers so far have, so I guess I can’t rely on these two officers not to do the same.

 

 

While I was typing up this post, I received an email from the Albury Court house confirming that my second Subpoena has now been made official, and is ready to be served on NSW police.

I also stated in my advice to the Registrar about the first one, that I would expect her not to claim any witness costs, when she gives evidence on 20 June 2017, since she will be on paid duty at the court house anyway.

Lets see if the court tries to add it to my bill though, or your tax bill.

 

scan0001scan0002

Complaints to Federal Police, Re: Albury Court House & NSW Police Officers

Lodged online 15 February 2017

Thank you for your submission to the Australian Federal Police (AFP). Your submission has been received and will be assessed by the AFP. The AFP endeavours to provide a response to complainants, when considered appropriate, within 28 days of receiving a submission. Please be aware that, at times, due to operational priorities this may not be possible.

Further information can be located on the AFP’s website.

Please do not reply to this message. This e-mail is an automated notification, which is unable to receive replies.

The following details were submitted via the AFP website:

Form Information

Site Name AFP
Site Id 71
Folder Name Online forms
Folder Id 93
Page Asset Listing Name Report a Commonwealth crime
Page Asset Listing Id 2478
Page Standard Name Report details
Page Standard Id 2655
Url https://forms.afp.gov.au/online_forms/report_a_crime/report_details
Submission Id 31334
Submission Time 15 Feb 2017 1:24 pm
Submission IP Address

Yes, I am reporting a Commonwealth crime

Staff at Albury Court House are doctoring typed versions of transcripts of court proceedings and hearings. I have been able to see this quite easily for myself, in the transcripts I have been supplied. It is also quite easy to prove this, by simply comparing the two copies, being the recordings made in the court room of proceedings, and what appears in the typed versions created afterwards. This is being done to cover up for illegal actions by Magistrate Tony Murray, the Registrar and a court employed mediator, contracting to that court house, through the Community Justice Centre. The mediator has been perverting the course of justice, in relation to matters her personal friends’ bought before the court. It was illegal to do that, and the proof of the corruption and perversion of justice, is still recorded and proven by the transcripts, despite them being heavily edited. In particular, statements made by the Magistrate are being changed to make it appear he has acted in accordance with the law. My own defence statements are being edited, to hide crucial points of my defence statements. I have lodged complaints about this to the Office of Public Prosecutions, in Wagga Wagga. Transcripts for Albury Court are prepared there, and then changed by staff at the Albury Court house upon receipt of same. The OPP refused to contact me in relation to this complaint. I have lodged two complaints about this issue to the ICAC. They also have ignored those complaints. I have lodged complaints with the Chief Excutive of the NSW Judicial Commission about same, who has also refused to act. The OPP, Judical Commission and ICAC are refusing to act on my complaints, due to how many of their own staff members who will be affected by being exposed for same. I need a higher authority to act on these complaints, and one which operates on a commonwealth level, due to the NSW Attorney General also being implicated in covering up for illegal and unlawful actions committed against me, by staff of the Albury Court House, and NSW Justice Department.

Your contact details

Surname: Karma
Given names: Karma
Date of birth:
Email address: Karma
Phone number:
Postal address: I do not wish to provide my address. I am about to go into hiding from corrupt Albury police who have assisted the court to do this to me. I have already been assaulted by Albury Police once, and am in danger of being jailed by them, due to being on bail.
State/Territory: NSW

Acceptance of AFP’s Privacy Statement

Yes, I understand and accept the AFP’s Privacy Statement

Second Complaint Lodged Just Now

Thank you for your submission to the Australian Federal Police (AFP). Your submission has been received and will be assessed by the AFP. The AFP endeavours to provide a response to complainants, when considered appropriate, within 28 days of receiving a submission. Please be aware that, at times, due to operational priorities this may not be possible.

Further information can be located on the AFP’s website.

Please do not reply to this message. This e-mail is an automated notification, which is unable to receive replies.

The following details were submitted via the AFP website:

Form Information

Site Name AFP
Site Id 71
Folder Name Online forms
Folder Id 93
Page Asset Listing Name Report a Commonwealth crime
Page Asset Listing Id 2478
Page Standard Name Report details
Page Standard Id 2655
Url https://forms.afp.gov.au/online_forms/report_a_crime/report_details
Submission Id 31336
Submission Time 15 Feb 2017 1:51 pm
Submission IP Address

Yes, I am reporting a Commonwealth crime

On 19 January 2016, Con Rowan Weekely, from Albury Police Station came to my rented property and asked to have an information conversation with me of an allegation of breach on an ADVO which had not yet been decided at hearing. He asked to be allowed to record a few of my answers as his notes. He then stood up and informed me I was under arrest, and issued me with an infringement notice. I attended the police station the to get his name and lodge a complaint. Instead I was accidentally handed his CAN and full statement of facts. In that, he claims that he conducted of formal interview and had a full confession from myself, recorded onto his personal mobile phone. Upon returning home, I phoned the police station and asked them to listen to his recording and compare it to his statement of facts. They hung up on me, twice. I lodged a complaint with the police commissioner’s office. They refuse to look into it. They directed his superiors to do so, who Instead threatened to charge me for lodging a complaints about their officers. Police continued to harrass and bring more false charges against me, to deter me from seeking justice. I was convicted in court on 29 February 2016 of that allegation, in my absence due to illness, which was confirmed by my GP in a letter to the court. The court refused to overturn the conviction on appeal. I had lodged defence statements prior to the hearing, outlining all of the illegal and unlawful actions committed by Con Weekley on that day. On appeal in the District court, the conviction was set aside. The Judge stated that he was not able to overturn it, because it had never been properly heard in the local court. He could only set it aside, and send it back to the local court for rehearing. Before that could happen, police assaulted me, put another false charge on me for which they attached bail, and instructed me to leave town. The NSW Police Commissioners office is fully aware that I have valid and proveable complaints about officers at Albury Police Station, and which they are refusing to investigate. In preparing for the re-hearing of the charge, Albury Police have now edited and added content of that same recording. Including a formal introduction stating he is about to conduct the formal recorded interview, which is not made in my presence, nor even in my home. Again, this is easily proveable. Albury Police and/or NSW Police are guilty of making an illegal recording and tampering with it afterwards. The NSW Ombudsman refuses to act, and is covering up for the actions of police corruption in Albury. The NSW Judicial Commission is covering up for the court convicting me on evidence which should have been under investigation at that stage, by both police and ombudsman. I have nowhere else to turn now to have this investigated.

Your contact details

Surname: Karma
Given names: Karma
Date of birth:
Email address: Karma.com
Phone number:
Postal address: Again, I will not provide my address, I should be in witness protection, but have to go into hiding without that support.
State/Territory: NSW

Acceptance of AFP’s Privacy Statement

Yes, I understand and accept the AFP’s Privacy Statement

 

Both of the above complaints have been forwarded to the Judicial Commission and the Crown Solicitor General of NSW, also to the Mediator Standards Board, and some other assorted people involved with all of this corruption.

 

Oh, and to the two local accountancy firms named in the two new applications for extensions of the original ADVO’s. Along with this one below, and to the ABC, for investigation by their journalists. 

Thank you for your submission to the Australian Federal Police (AFP). Your submission has been received and will be assessed by the AFP. The AFP endeavours to provide a response to complainants, when considered appropriate, within 28 days of receiving a submission. Please be aware that, at times, due to operational priorities this may not be possible.

Further information can be located on the AFP’s website.

Please do not reply to this message. This e-mail is an automated notification, which is unable to receive replies.

The following details were submitted via the AFP website:

Form Information

Site Name AFP
Site Id 71
Folder Name Online forms
Folder Id 93
Page Asset Listing Name Report a Commonwealth crime
Page Asset Listing Id 2478
Page Standard Name Report details
Page Standard Id 2655
Url https://forms.afp.gov.au/online_forms/report_a_crime/report_details
Submission Id 31339
Submission Time 15 Feb 2017 2:37 pm
Submission IP Address

Yes, I am reporting a Commonwealth crime

Belinda Brady, Registrar at the Albury Court house is allowing orders made by visiting Magistrates to be changed after hearing, at the Albury Court House. There have been three instances of this now, however, she was not working there for the first occurrence of same. Hearings into the outcomes of applications made to the court, are being removed from the court list, and replaced with criminal charges against myself. This has occured twice, and during the third instance, while they did not remove the application from the list, they added new charges against my name all around it, to cloud the issue. The applications listed for hearing that day, were not dealt with, due to the confusion being caused by all the new charges. At the hearing prior to that, where Magistrate Tony Murray had already had to disqualify himself, a new Magistrate from Sydney was flown down for the hearing of two applications for motion, a change in venue, to a less corrupt court house, and which is not already seeking to protect members of their own staff from being found guilty of corrupt and illegal actions. That Magistrate stated quite clearly, that no new charges would be listed against me, or the existing ones, until after the Applications for motion had been decided. The Registrar has defied that order, and not only listed new charges, but has allowed them to be bought against me knowing full well that they are not true, and she has supplied information for the complainants to use in those. Belinda Brady is also covering up for the fact that she is aware that the complainants (2) had made false allegations against me, which were defeated by defence evidence, and the evidence submitted by the complainants. Belinda Brady is aware that those two ADVO’s were granted due to perversions of the course of justice, by a court employed mediator, XXXXXX, acting on behalf of her personal friends, and with the assistance of Magistrate Tony Murray. She is aware that one of those never came into affect, due to having never been served on the accused. Yet she continues to allow false charges of breach to be listed in relation to that, and has even allowed the protected person now apply for an extension of that illegally gained ADVO, and which was designed to protect the applicant to continue to break federal regulations which apply to staff of taxation accountancy firms. The NSW Department of Justice is covering up for her actions, and those of the Magistrate, the mediator, and her personal friends. As is the NSW Ombudsman, the NSW Attorney General and the ICAC. I cannot report any of these people to the Commonwealth Ombudsman, due to their own rules on who they will accept complaints about. Yours is the only agency I can now complain to and ask for an investigation into corruption at the Albury Court House, and Albury Police Station, and which Belinda Brady has been enabling since June 2016, and continues to do so.

Your contact details

Surname: Karma
Given names: Karma
Date of birth: 22/11/1962
Email address: Karma@outlook
Phone number:
Postal address: I do not wish to divulge my address. Please contact me via email, to arrange an interview, or phone for more information.
State/Territory: NSW

Acceptance of AFP’s Privacy Statement

Yes, I understand and accept the AFP’s Privacy Statement

Thank you for your submission to the Australian Federal Police (AFP). Your submission has been received and will be assessed by the AFP. The AFP endeavours to provide a response to complainants, when considered appropriate, within 28 days of receiving a submission. Please be aware that, at times, due to operational priorities this may not be possible.

Further information can be located on the AFP’s website.

Please do not reply to this message. This e-mail is an automated notification, which is unable to receive replies.

The following details were submitted via the AFP website:

Form Information

Site Name AFP
Site Id 71
Folder Name Online forms
Folder Id 93
Page Asset Listing Name Report a Commonwealth crime
Page Asset Listing Id 2478
Page Standard Name Report details
Page Standard Id 2655
Url https://forms.afp.gov.au/online_forms/report_a_crime/report_details
Submission Id 31340
Submission Time 15 Feb 2017 2:47 pm
Submission IP Address

Yes, I am reporting a Commonwealth crime

In relation to my complaint about Albury Police, lodged earlier today, below is confirmation that what I saw is true, provided to me by a journalist at the local newspaper, the Border Mail.

Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 09:37:08
From: tahlia.mcpherson@fairfaxmedia.com.au
To: Karma@outlook.com
Subject: Border Mail Comment

Hi Karma,

Tahlia from The Border Mail Here, how are you? I saw your comment which came through saying:

Local police have been acting unlawfully themselves recently, all with the blessing of Superintendent Quarmby. Seems he’s been wasting resources himself, on harassing members of the public, and protecting a policeman who falsified evidence to be able to arrest an innocent person, as a favour to a ‘mate’.

I was wondering if we may be able to chat further about it, as we have been getting this feedback quite often in relation to Albury Police. It is something I take seriously and have been looking into for some time. Let me know if you would like to discuss.
Regards, — Tahlia McPherson Journalist –
The Border Mail Australian Community Media t 02 6024 0530 m 0475 951 384 tahlia.mcpherson@fairfaxmedia.com.au 1 McKoy Street, Wodonga, 3690 http://www.bordermail.com.au Twitter: @TahliaMcPherson

Your contact details

Surname: Karma
Given names: Karma
Date of birth:
Email address: Karma@outlook.com
Phone number:
Postal address: Not willing to disclose, for my own safety. I have too much evidence of corruption against too many NSW public officials to feel safe now.
State/Territory: NSW

Acceptance of AFP’s Privacy Statement

Yes, I understand and accept the AFP’s Privacy Statement