A Quick Post to Show that I am Still Alive and that Albury Court House is Doctoring Transcripts

(Updated below)

I have received an email today which confirms that transcripts regarding my hearings at the Albury Local Court have been changed. The letter claims that they have been corrected now, and I have been sent new copies of same. They claim that ends the complaint.

However, during the quick look through I just had, I can see that they still have not fixed them properly. They have given me information about where I can take this complaint to next.

I had lodged a complaint with the Office of Public Prosecutions mid last year about that issue, and not only was it not investigated, it continued to happen right up until the end of the year.

I haven’t seen any of the transcripts for this year, of for any of the hearings after my first appeal in April last year, and so will be demanding that they now be supplied to me free of charge, so that I can check them all for same ‘inconsistencies’. The investigator also seems to have ignored the transcript from that appeal on 18 April 2015, and which was the one which showed me the extent to which these documents are being tampered with and falsified.

Here is the quote from the letter I have received:

The transcripts and recordings of 5 February and 12 December 2016 were reviewed as
part of the internal review. Discrepancies were identified between the recordings and the transcripts. Transcription Services were asked to review and correct the records for 5
February 2016 and 12 December 2016.

Since the Judicial Commission also works from the verbal recordings and not the transcripts, they would have also been aware of this matter, because I had pointed out same to them, and provided them with the copies of the transcripts which I did have in my possession, when trying to get all of this injustice overturned.

This confirmation though gives me grounds to continue to challenge the corruption occurring at the Albury court house.

I believe its time that the ICAC went through that place, and reviewed all of their records of AVO matters, and alleged breaches of same, because Maggot Murray and his AVO officer, seem to be running a scam, and which they cover up for, by way of changing the transcripts, and decisions made, after hearings.


Update: 7 August 2017

I had to stop blogging for a while, as you might have noticed. I’d moved out of a safe place, into somewhere very temporary (and had police phoning me there trying to get me to come down to the station), and then into a cheap motel. I could have stayed there for as long as I needed, but on the night I moved in I think an unmarked police car went through and ran a check on the rego plates of the guests there. There had been a carjacking nearby.

So police had accidentally stumbled upon my new hiding place, and I could not feel safe there after that. I couldn’t afford to ‘offend’ anyone at the Albury court house or police station, so I didn’t blog, so that they couldn’t take me into custody over anything I have written recently.

Isn’t that a joke? Having to be in hiding from corrupt police, covering up for their own illegal actions towards myself, as directed by an employee of the court house. Also, to hide from a corrupt Magistrate who wants to jail me for refusing to let him convict me of false allegations, and charges bought against me to cover up for his own illegal actions towards myself.

That’s life in Australia these days people. And things are getting worse. The right to tell the truth on the internet, especially about judicial corruption, is being taken away from the people. Our constitutional right to free speech, and publishing information about government corruption, is being removed without our consent, and which is against the constitution.

I was kept in Albury for longer than I wanted to be there, by ongoing issues with my car. On the other hand, I was afraid to try to head north and go back to the life I was leading before staff at the Albury court house and police station tried to send me into their human trafficking system. There is a police car on the highway every 100kms between there and Sydney. Any one of those could have pulled me over, and taken me into custody, for no reason, except to send me into that aforementioned system.

I am now out of Albury, but I didn’t go to Sydney. I also wasn’t able to resume my life, while I wait for the next hearing at the corrupt Albury Local Court, before the corrupt Magistrates who sit on the bench there. So I have not had anything interesting to blog about.

I do feel like things have changed a bit though, in that situation. I no longer feel so threatened by them. I think I have exposed the corrupt dealings at that court house enough that police aren’t currently planning to try to jail me over more false charges, and for which they have to create untruthful paperwork and perjurous statements of facts – for the time being.

Or maybe the new police Commissioner in NSW is actually doing his job, and have reprimanded them for the fraudulent paperwork sent to me in May of this year and told them to stop their illegal and corrupt bullshit.

I have just over a month now to wait for the continuation of the hearing, which if I am allowed to win, and justice is finally allowed to occur, I will finally be able to walk free of this mess. However, one can’t count on any justice occurring in the Albury Local Court. And certainly not if Magistrate Murray has anything to do with it.

Hopefully I might find some time to work on my book. I see that some of you have found your way to that blog. Sorry that I still haven’t had the time or the space to edit and post the main story. I still have to put working on my defence for the court hearing ahead of doing that.

BDS Huon, and the NSW Justice department are making a name for themselves as being run and staffed by completely corrupt and immoral people. The latest statistics for this blog is now 998 different readers. By tomorrow we will have reached 1,000 people, mainly in Australia, but we continue to have visitors from all over the world.

If you can’t beat them, because they lie and cheat in court, then exposing them is the next best thing.

I also have the opportunity available now to take all of this corruption to a new tribunal, based on the latest investigation again covering up the worst of their actions. Not sure if I will do that or not, but if I do, I will be demanding access to all of the verbal recordings of the hearings I’ve had to endure, so that they can be compared to the heavily edited typed versions they pretend to call a ‘transcript’.

I will be in Canberra in October, for a protest about that same issue. That the court system in Australia must provide a better way of recordings hearings, which eliminates the ability of court staff to change things afterwards.

Below is a post I made to a couple of facebook groups, about the letter I received from the Office of the General Counsel of NSW, as mentioned at the top of this article. I was not game post that information here, for the reasons mentioned above.

* * * * * * *

On 28 July 2017, I received confirmation from NSW Justice, by way of a complaint lodged with the NSW Information and Privacy Commissioner’s office, that transcripts of hearings involving myself at the Albury Local Court have been doctored/altered. The letter confirms that the verbal recordings were compared to the transcripts supplied by the Wagga Wagga court house and discrepancies were identified. The letter confirms that they have made two amendments to two separate transcripts, and supplies me copies of both of those.

One of those transcripts just happens to be the one where Magistrate Tony Murray commits perjury, while on duty on his bench. The investigator fails to comment on that aspect. However, while they claim to have rectified the issues, the new wording is still incorrect, and to again clouds or changes the real meaning of the sentence that was spoken in the court room.

I plan to advise them that I want them fixed properly. Also, they have failed to address the one which I first identified as having been extensively edited. I will be insisting that they ‘fix’ that one too.

They claim that since the transcripts are prepared in Wagga, staff at the Albury Local Court are exonerated from any wrong-doing. I will be pointing out that the ‘cleverness’ of the editing suggests it was done by someone who was already aware I was being framed in the local court, by way of acts of misconduct by the court ‘mediator’ and Magistrate, and was seeking to hide and disguise that. Therefore, since the staff at Wagga have no knowledge of what has been going on, apart from what they hear on those tapes, NSW Justice needs to re-examine the path that the files took once they were received at the Albury Court House.

However, it is the first win for me. After all of the complaints I have lodged, and which were dismissed because they proved the guilty were guilty of misconduct and crimes against justice, so therefore could not be acted on, I finally have confirmation of just one aspect of this whole injustice.

The investigator advises where I can have her decision reviewed, and I will pursue that. In the meantime, I’m still waiting for the continuation of the illegal hearing started against myself in June 2017 to be heard in September. If I win that, then it is proven I have been put through 22 months of false arrests (6) and false convictions (5), and I will be seeking compensation for same. If I loose, then it will be a glaring example of the corruption which is going on in that court room, and then I will start the appeals process, and which will expose that corruption even more.


“The worst disease in the world today is corruption.
And there is a cure: transparency.”
– Bono










More Dodgy Dealings in the Albury Local Court

From: Karma
Sent: Monday, 26 June 2017 3:40 PM
To: Local Court Albury; local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au; Premier; investigations@abc.net.au; icac@icac.nsw.gov.au

Subject: Illegal Bail Hearing

Dear Mr Howard

At hearing on 20 June 2017, the charge bought against me by your employee, XXXX XXXXXXX of the CJC, was not mentioned in court. It was listed to be mentioned, for a new date for hearing to be set. You might recall that I lodged my defence brief with the office that morning, and with the police prosecutor in between hearings. However, the charge was not mentioned at all, and no date was set.

In fact, the Magistrate was quite clear that we would only be dealing with one charge on that day, being one of breach of ADVO bought against me by your pal, xxxxxx xxxx.

I believe we have not only had police change the date of the offence on their paperwork, but submit evidence that is not admissible, since this is the re-hearing of the charge, and not the first hearing of the charge, where all of that information should have been submitted. Since it wasn’t, I fail to see how it is admissible now.

However, I have allowed it all to be introduced, because it convicts both of the arresting officers of lying, but also because I intend to address XXXX’s witness statements during my cross examination of her, at the hearing’s continuation in mid September. However, I believe that changing the charge from contravene ADVO to Common Assault is simply not acceptable.

After that hearing had ended and the Magistrate had left the court room for the day, the prosecutor sent a clerk to instruct him to come back to his bench, to hear my bail application. I had mentioned earlier that I did want that addressed at hearing, along with XXXX’s false allegation of XXXXXX her.

Magistrate Cromptom returned to the bench and made an order that bail would continue until a date in mid September 2017. I can’t find my paperwork at the moment, due to have to relocate in my living arrangements late last week. However, that hearing in mid September relates to XXXX’s charge, and to Magistrate Murray’s ADVO applications were are being bought against me as an Act of Parliament.

I hardly think that it would be legal for the Magistrate to bail me until the next hearing of someone else’s complaint to police about me. Especially when it is the same party who’s previous collusions with xxxxxxx were the basis of my applications for motion.

Therefore, he has continued this bail indefinitely, due to not setting a new date for the hearing of the charge I am actually on bail for. I believe it is not legal to put someone on bail indefinitely.

I will be defending Murray’s new false allegations, due to the fact that Magistrate Cromptom assured me at hearing on 6 April 2017, that Magistrate Murray would no longer be involved in any matters involving myself at your court house, before dismissing my three applications for motion, as a compromise. I would have appealed his decision in the district court, but took him for his word that Murray would be kept out of proceedings from here on in. My time period to appeal that decision, has now expired.

Therefore, I will defend those new applications for ADVO’s, and which are an Act of Parliament, by submitting the transcript which shows that Magistrate Murray committed perjury on his bench on 12 December 2016, to cover up for the same collusions between XXXXXXX, XXXX and XXXXXX, when he was originally refusing to grant motion. Something I am long past being legally due, due to the amounts of corruptions in these proceedings, and which began at the outset.

Therefore, you better change the transcript when you prepare it this week. Make sure you add in remarks pretending to be from the mouth of the Magistrate, that a date was set for the hearing of (your employee)’s charge, or all of the above becomes very questionable.

I’m sure you will be able to fix that error, before it comes back to haunt you all, and to cover up for unlawful and illegal actions by both of your Magistrates.



Magistrate Murray Has Commenced an ADVO Hearing Against me, As an Act of Parliament

Collected some mail tonight. Some incriminating evidence against police, which had been put in an enveloped marked as being from the desk of the Area Commander, was amongst it.

The other notices are from the Albury Local Court, that Magistrate Murray has started a hearing against me, in my absence, and during its continuation, I will be charged by police with more false allegations, and convicted for them by the corrupt Magistrates at the Albury local court house, seeking to cover up for their own misconduct.

It is noted on the paperwork that Magistrate Cromptom will continue the hearing.

Now back in April of this year, when dismissing my applications for motion, Magistrate Cromptom assured me that while Murray had already disqualified himself from hearing the charge against me bought by his colleague at the court house, he would also now be excluded from hearing any of the criminal charges bought against me, by her friend, the BDS Huon employee.

However, a month later, Magistrate Murray was conducting the hearing, that I chose not to attend, since it involved civil matters only. My spidey senses were also picking up on lots of foul play being put in place, to be sprung on me when I did appear. So I didn’t bother dragging myself out of my sick bed to do so.

So Murray is not allowed to hear any criminal charges against me. But he can issue two ADVO orders, personally vouched for by himself and which then makes them an Act of Parliament, due to his ‘authority’.

However, he will also be for be summoned as a witness by the defence against those same criminal charges, which are to be heard on the same day. Magistrate Cromptom will also be summoned by the defence. Looks like we are going to need another Magistrate.

I’d already been petitioning parliament for Murray’s removal, due to him perverting the course of justice against me last year, other assorted acts of illegal misconduct, perjury and because he has been nominated as having been involved in the murder of William Tyrrell.

So now he goes an advises parliament that I am such a bad person, that he has acted as the judicial officer to personally accept two ADVO applications on behalf of his buddy’s personal friends, and ensure they are granted by way of more false allegations by way of the NSW Police force.

Way to go Murray. Might have been easier to just drop all this bullshit, and vexatious proceedings.

Good thing I found that last piece of evidence which convicts you all of colluding with the complainants, including NSW police, and which will finally give me grounds for motion to be granted. I will be making that application to the NSW Supreme Court, and the additional grounds for same, will be the transcript displayed on this blog, which shows perjury on the part of Magistrate Murray.

The new matter of fraud by NSW police?

They have issued a hand written document claiming that I was facing a charge of common assault on 20 June 2017, and that the witnesses for that were Jon Williams, Constable Rowan Weekley, and one more person.

Yet I prepared a brief against an allegation of writing a letter to Jon Williams, part-owner of BDS Huon, and delivering it to any empty house. All the paperwork I received last year, in relation to the charge reference number they use, stated that arrest was for that letter.

I was convicted for writing that letter on 29 February 2016. I appealed that decision in April 2016, and that was denied. However, in the district court, on appeal in August 2016, it was ruled that the case had never actually been heard in the local court in the first place. Just myself convicted on the word of a police officer, who was refusing to produce any evidence at all to the court, or willing to show any to the accused.

And by a Magistrate who was already aware that it was a false charge, and that he was being asked to hand down a conviction that would enable his colleague’s personal friends, to win their false cases against me. The defence evidence which had disproven them both, was arranged to have been dismissed by the Maggot Murray.

The conviction was set aside in the District Court and the matter sent back to the local court. As I said, I prepared a defence against that allegation and original conviction.

Police should have had to rely on the only evidence they used last time to have me convicted. A three page statement written by a crooked cop. He didn’t even tender the letter he charged me for writing, to the court. It is supposed to be a re-hearing, of the same allegations, but this time in  my presence.

Yet the constable got busy running around gathering up witness statements, and having to write his own one long after he had obtained conviction without doing any of that. The arrangement had been in place, ‘she gets convicted, regardless of the facts, so don’t both too much with it’.

Police had changed the date of the offence, in their new paperwork issued in November of last year. However, that was understandable, since I was at home that night they orignally alleged that the ‘crime’ took place, and I have witnesses to prove that I was. So now they nominate a new time and date of the ‘crime’ against BDS Huon.

But changing the offence completely. I don’t think that’s allowed.

I guess that’s also due to the fact that they had originally imposed a levy on the fine for that conviction, for having committed a violence crime, and which I later appealed. There had been no violence, nor threats of same, made by myself towards anyone.

So now we have changed the offence, so that the levy applies?!?

NSW Justice. More corrupt than one could ever imagine. And continuing to get away with it all.

I don’t have my printer set up at the moment to scan the document. I’ve taken a photo of it though.



I’ll have to edit the arrest documents, and which show the same reference number quoted in the top photo, to remove any identifying names, before I can post it here.

Back soon with that.

Police have changed the date of the offence, and I have allowed that. The cop deliberately framed me, made an illegal recording of a conversation with myself then claimed I had confessed in a formal interview. The court and the police area commander both denied me access to their evidence against me, which flies in the face of Australian Law. However, I have allowed his false statement of facts to be admitted, at this stage.

But changing the offence, I don’t think I should have to put up with this shit any longer.

I had taken the arrest documents off the blog, to ensure that the blog cannot be seen to be in breach of the gag order placed on me by Murray originally, to cover up the truth.

However, in light of this new disgraceful example of corruption between both police and the court, I now repost the arrest documentation for the charge which is now being classed as ‘common assault’ – Charge No: H60077075.

So … will Jon Williams be appearing court to bear witness that I physically assaulted his employee, or is his employee person the witness in a charge that I have assaulted Jon Williams?

The transcript for the hearing, which went on to convict me, clearly shows that Magistrate Murray had somehow become aware that someone had been assaulted in February of last year. But he wasn’t sure who was the victim was, and who was the accused was. The prosecutor had no idea that any assault had occurred, and later describes same as one email and one phone call.

Rather than sort that issue out, the Magistrate was merely told that I was the one charged for a breach … therefore I must be the one who assaulted someone. Therefore I was convicted and fined, with a levy added for having committed a violent crime.

Mr Williams was excused from cross examination this week, by the Magistrate who accused me of berating him, and asking him questions that he shouldn’t have to answer. The same favour was done for the lying Cop, Framer Weekley.

I’m thinking of asking to be allowed to recall both of them, just for the last few questions I had to put to them. I could also ask them about this ‘common assault’. Also funny that I’d advised the police commissioner’s office that I will be taking a civil matter to court, for common assault, against three of his police officers not long ago, so again, they are just playing games.

So now we have a police officer pretending that I am being charged with common assault instead, for writing a letter to Jon Williams, of BDS Huon, and advising him that his employee is mentally ill, out of control, and is about to disgrace his company’s name even further by way of her actions in the local court house.

Jon had me arrested for delivering that bit of advice to him. See you in the Federal Court Mr Williams, shortly after we take this charge to the NSW Supreme Court.


arrest 1 p2 - Copy

arrest 1 p3

arrest 1 p 4

Senior Cunstable Rowan Weekley, Albury Police (not his real photo ;p) was promoted after framing me twice, making an illegal recording, tampering with evidence and perjury to the court. No wonder the police force is being held in such disdain by the people these days, because of rampant corruption.



IMG_20170624_105148 EDITIMG_20170624_105200 EDITIMG_20170624_105226 EDITIMG_20170624_105250 EDIT


The blog post on this site, which clearly shows Murray committing perjury while on his bench, seeking to protect the court house ‘mediator’ in December of last year, was published on 9 April 2017. The above court order is dated 22 May 2017. Now who appears to be seeking revenge?

I made the post, because the court refused to grant motion, after 4 or 5 months of jerking me around. It was made to prove that my application for motion, was valid, and should have been granted.

How can you rely on a Magistrate who lies to your face in court, and then gets laughed at by people in the audience when he has to admit to your face, that he was lying just now?

Why has Maggot Murray made this order 6 weeks afterwards?

Revenge and a strong desire to clear his own name, by having me convicted of more false allegations, even if he has to use one of his buddies to do it for him this time.


Murray also goes on to dictate some additional conditions on the back of the paperwork. He writes that from that point on, no one will be excused from hearings, unless they can provide a valid medical certificate.

Yet when I tendered a legal letter from my GP to explain my absence on the day that I was convicted, he simply refused to accept it. On appeal months later, the District Court Judge couldn’t see what his problem was, and ruled the letter to have been acceptable.

Murray knows that I am on disability pension, and suffer an ongoing illness. So these remarks being recorded now, are so he can make it hard for me to appeal, if I miss a hearing.

Yet when one of the complainants failed to attend a hearing last year, and without giving any valid reason why, he allowed that, and adjourned me until it was convenient for her to attend. She does work for BDS Huon afterall, and their staff do whatever they want, at the Albury local court, with the support of NSW Police.

He is also very aware that I set him up one day last year, by failing to appear. I emailed the court that morning, explained why I was ill, asked them not to hear the cases in my absence or to make any rulings while I was not there. I also offered a short defence, just in case, for two of them, but also pointed out that I assume the hearing that day would have to be postponed, until another application going through the court had been decided. If that had been decided in my favour, then the charges I was facing on the day I didn’t attend, wouldn’t not have gone ahead.

Murray used it as an opportunity to convict me of two charges, and fined me outrageously for same. So I lodged a complaint with the Judicial Commission about his actions that day. I knew he would do that, and the idiot took the bait, lol.

The convictions were easily overturned, during an appeal which they didn’t let go through to the district court, which was the other thing I was aiming for. Instead, the other Magistrate overturned them, after reading the email I had sent to the court but didn’t appear to have been put on file, or in the record. What a joke Murray is. So full of himself.

Actually I heard he was looking pretty sick and hung over one day a couple of weeks ago. Apparently years ago he was an alcoholic and would show up for court hung over and nasty. Then apparently he got his act together a bit, and appeared to have stopped drinking. Seems he slipped off the wagon recently. Maybe too much stress to deal with, coming at him through this blog.

What sort of image is that for the Queen to have representing her? A very ugly looking man, all sweaty and hung over, berating people from his bench, because he isn’t able to keep control of his temper, especially when he has a hangover.

On the days that he is in a foul mood, the sheriffs move around the foyer, quietly telling everyone to turn off their mobile phone. There are signs on display to do so, but after recesses or lunch, people often forget to turn them off, or didn’t see the sign. Any person who’s phone makes a noise in his court room is instantly berated, and moved to be last in line for the day.

I think the Queen needs to take a good hard look at some of these people sitting on ‘her’ benches in courts in Australia, and ask herself if she would like to be judged by one of them. Maybe she should have a good long look around parliament house too, and weed out some of the more corrupt politicians.

I’m going to write her a funny letter about Murray. I hope she enjoys reading it 😉

I’ll be sure to post it to the blog.
























Hiding out from Corrupt Albury Police

As commented elsewhere on this blog, I had to vacate the flat I’d been renting for the whole of these court dramas, being over 18 months now.

For the first time, in that same amount of time, I have not been harassed by corrupt Albury police, nor put up on any new false charges, designed to punish me for lodging valid complaints about their initial actions towards me, and that of staff at the Albury court house.

Somewhere in this blog is also an allegation that Magistrate Anthony Murray and at least one corrupt Albury police officer, were involved in the murder of William Tyrrell. I bet police are not investigating that. No one has contacted me about the matter either. However, it does leave me living in fear of what police would do to me now, if they got hold of me.

The only information I have about that potential murder of the missing toddler, was given to me by a man I met at the Albury court house. He told me that it is the word on the street here, in the housing commission area where he lives. I have no proof of what he says, nor has Magistrate Murray ever given me any reason to believe that he might be innocent.

One could accuse me of libel, in making that post to the internet. However, if it is the truth, the rumour needs to come up off the street, and into being officially investigated.

Magistrate Murray deliberately and unlawfully convicted me of false allegations on 29 February 2016, by perverting the course of justice against me. This resulted in large amounts of defamation of character, and slander and libel.

Maybe it is his own karma to have now been shamed on the internet, and not just for that issue, but for his corruption of court proceedings and unprofessional conduct while on his bench. He has held me up for ridicule and openly mocked and berated me in a public court room, while he was the one acting corruptly at the time. Now he is being subject to the same treatment.

However, he appears to not be interested in taking a civil case against me. Instead, he is preferring to use the previous false convictions that he handed down against me, to silence and punish me. And to put me into the hands of Albury police, once again.

Albury court house continues to insist on hearing a charge bought against me, by one of their own employees, at that same court house. It was to be heard before Magistrate Murray, and police had already advised him that he would be handing down a jail sentence upon myself.

For causing offence to the person who arranged for Murray to pervert the course of justice against me in the first place, in February of last year.

Police assaulted me during the arrest for that charge, and charged me with resist arrest. They added in a second charge of resist arrest on a day that I was not arrested, and hadn’t seen a cop for over a month.

The charge is illegal, due to it involving a legal complaint to the Ombudsman and NSW Attorney General, about police corruption in Albury, as organized by staff of the court house.

The charge also cannot be proven against me in a court of law, because police have failed to match the email address of the ‘offensive’ emails to an IP address or a valid telecommunications account.

Yet Murray plans to use this charge, to silence and punish me. That was put in place, before I made the information public, regarding the allegation of his involvement in this unsolved crime. He might have been aware that I had made the report, and I did go on to advise the Chief Executive of the NSW Judicial Commission that I had done so, but no one else was aware of that ‘grudge’ he might hold against me. Which is why I posted it here, and to another location on the internet.

Slander and libel, against someone who had done the same to me? No, I made the post to protect myself.

After making a report about same to crime stoppers, Albury police showed up at the house the sim card I’d used to send the emails from, was registered to. They laughed off their visit, when it didn’t lead them to myself, but to another person involved in the matters before the court.

As stated elsewhere on the blog, if police had gone there in relation to the charge of ‘offence’ via internet, then they would have included that information in their charge sheet, and pointed out my relationship to the owner of the sim card, to the court.

Instead, they choose to keep that visit very quiet. They don’t seem to want anyone to know that my IP was in fact traced.

But maybe not from emails sent to a private email address, but from the IP that connected to the crime stoppers website, and nominated Murray and an Albury police officer as having been involved in the murder of William Tyrrell, after he had been abducted from the north coast of NSW.

I guess Murray can’t afford to have a conviction by himself handed down against the owner of the IP who made that report about him, on the record, in light of future appeals made against the sentence.

Which I guess is why he was happy to disqualify himself in the end, and rely instead upon another Magistrate to enact his revenge for me.

Again, I make this post as an act of self protection and self preservation. The police have not known where I have been staying for the past 6 weeks or so, nor been able to easily trace my mobile phone, as I have limited reception, made worse recently by clouds and rain.

They have had no way to punish me, or silence me, for making that post here on the blog since the time that I made it. I have stayed home, out of town, to avoid being detected by them, so that I could remain free to prepare for their upcoming cases against myself.

I did not appear in court the last time I was supposed to, on 22 May 2017, for the same reasons.

That hearing was for civil matters, and I’d been having such bad vibes in the lead up to that hearing, that I chose not to attend. I was also suffering a migraine headache from the stress of it all.

Whatever trap they tried to spring on me that day, was thwarted. I believe I have been sent some mail, relating to that day, but I have not yet been able to pick that up.

Now I find that an officer from the Albury police station phoned me a few days ago. I guess they are calling to instruct me to hand myself in, because they are revoking my bail. Her voice mail message was breaking up constantly, when I tried to listen to it. I couldn’t try again, as I lost reception completely after that.

I have lodged further complaints about staff of the Albury court house during the weeks that I have been in hiding, including concrete proof of the conspiracy to frame me for false allegations initially, and which involved a staff member at same court house.

I guess I have caused offence.

Yet I am the one who has evidence of Magistrate Murray deliberately perverting the course of justice against me, committing perjury during a hearing he was presiding over, changing decisions after hearings and listing criminal charges that are not even valid, and were bought against me illegally, by corrupt police working on instruction from his court house.

But yes, it appears I will be in jail before being able to finish preparing my defence, for any of these charges, because this blog, outlining corruption in a state run revenue raising business, is offensive to all of the people involved in it.

Yet it is my common law right to do so.

Maybe the cop is just phoning to say why the hearing of the charge at which I was to be sentenced to that jail term, has been delayed. I’d mentioned in a complaint the other day, that I might seek a permanent stay in that hearing, due to the delays being experienced and that I have not been notified as to why they are occurring.

However, its best to assume the worst when dealing with Albury police and court house.

I have to appear in the Albury court again next wee. I was originally facing two criminal charges, both of which just happened to be illegal.

One has been relisted for mention only, to set a new date for its hearing. Which also means the NSW Attorney General has still not acted to direct his employee to drop her illegal charge against me.

The other charge, is for writing to BDS Huon, in December 2015. If I can defend that successfully this time, and having been provided with the police brief has certainly increased my ability to do so this time, then all of the other charges stemming from it will just fall away, and I will finally be free of this shit.

I wouldn’t even bother attending that hearing, since it is an invalid charge which cannot be legally heard in court, due to lack of service of a final order, but they have me on bail for the one that has been postponed, so that I have to attend.

I need to go to where it is warm, for winter. I am sick, with other issues which have arisen during these proceedings, apart from my usual slipped discs and arthritic pain. I need some rest, and to recover from this 18 month long ordeal, and to find the strength to continue to fight it. I might have to ask for a three month adjournment.

While I have destroyed the melanoma, or potentially cancerous ulcer, which had formed on my chest last August, by using a natural remedy, the hole it has created in my skin will simply not heal and close up. It’s time I consulted a GP. However, I would have liked more time to continue to treat it naturally, before agreeing to having it treated with life threatening cancer treatments.

A bit less stress would go a long way to helping it heal. I have a different kind of skin cancer on my face, which appeared at the height of these proceedings last August, and which is also refusing to clear up.

(BDS Huon have been advised by way of a previous blog that they should drop all of these ‘SLAP’* cases against me, because I need to attend to these medical conditions. They declined to allow that, and instead chose once against to continue with them, even though that constantly becomes to their own detriments.

Murray was advised at the hearing on 12 December 2016 that I was trying to have the melanoma treated. It is shown in the transcript on display here. I was also asking for a few months off, from their assault on me, due to that and the health issues which were still affecting me after the assault by police on 22 October 2016.

He is once again completely ignoring those two issues, plus the issues which put me on dsp in the first place, and making rulings in May 2017 that I am not allowed advise that I am too sick to attend a hearing, and setting it up that I cannot appeal on the basis of not being present. Yet when I was present in court in the lead up to all of this drama, he couldn’t convict me when I was there to argue the truth, only when I was too sick to attend, or setting him up to disgrace himself. Which is why I really didn’t appear in May this year, so that they could convict me of the new allegations, and then I could just appeal it up to the District court and out of Murray’s cesspit of a court room. Instead, they only part heard it, when they had every legal excuse to grant it without hearing it in my presence, so that they could continue it later on, and again, prevent me from stepping up to the higher court. More waste of tax payer’s funds, and themselves keeping themselves in work, even if that is by criminal actions against a person who was innocent when first summoned there, and still is innocent of any act that could be defined as criminal, in its own right?)

That will also give some government agencies and the Tax Practitioners’ Board time to finally investigate all of the allegations of corruption I have been making since January 2016, and maybe end proceedings before any more injustices occur.

I can’t rely on the local court to do that, because it is the local court who is covering up for itself, and won’t let me out of its arena. Murray continues to try to convict me, to protect himself, and his colleagues, of allegations of proven misconduct.

I was also told in the final days of last year, that a person had called his connection at the Albury police station, to make enquiries about all of the charges I am facing. He was told that police were not aware of me, or any other charges. My friend was advised that the police are not putting them on the books, or the record.

I noticed with the very first charge, they had logged it with a police officer in Griffith, and two were later logged with an officer in Holbrook. One place I have never been to, and the second, I do drive through whenever I travel between here and Sydney, which hasn’t been often.

So once I am sentenced by Murray, and if those charges don’t actually appear in any real police records, where do I end up? Do the court records then simply disappear as well?

I did have all the transcripts published here previously, and which prove this all happened, along with all of the police arrest documents and defence statements, but had to take them out when threatened with a new gag order.

Also, police assaulted me once they’d read the defence documents, and knew they would lose all of their cases. If I get the matters before an honest Magistrate that is.

Is there one of those in NSW? Please advise me if you know of one, and I will apply for a change of venue to his court, and have all this shit overturned, due to its corrupted processes.

There is also an investigation finally starting now, into the Registrar and matters of collusion. I’ll be asking the matters involved in that investigation be postponed from being heard until after that has been finalized.



I might also do some research into what Shane Dowling from Kangaroo Court is doing, and start advising all of the Attorney Generals, in each state, that violations of common law rights, and therefore federal law, is going on at the Albury local court and needs to be stopped.

Removing Murray from the bench would go a long way to fixing the problem. I’d already started petitioning politicians to remove him from the bench, so going through the AG’s might be a way of bringing that about.

Can I get him investigated, and/or fired, before he can jail me of false accusations and false charges? The race is on.


Its a shame he has implicated Magistrate Cromptom in this as well, and stained his career, at it outset, just to keep his own corrupt decisions in play.


The level of corruption on at the Albury court house, cannot be allowed to continue, if anyone is to have any faith in law enforcement in this area.

Law enforcement will not be honest, unless the staff of same are kept honest, by open investigations into allegations of corruption, and disciplinary acts being affected.

The NSW Ombudsman, ICAC and Police Commissioners Office all dropped the ball on this one and allowed it to continue, for reasons of their own.

Yet it has not yet gone away, it continues to throw itself in their faces, and will do so until they resolve it in a legal and honest fashion.

Not by throwing me in a jail cell, to silence me about their own illegal behaviours.


At least I can say I didn’t go quietly ;D

June 14 Stats


Nearly 100 new blog viewers, within just the past 9 days. I bet we make it to 700 today, due to the links I have placed on some facebook groups.

june stats.









Registrar Issues Subpoena to Self

I have received an email this morning from the current Registrar of the Albury Court House, being Elizabeth Leathbridge, confirming that she has processed a subpoena I emailed to the court house a couple of days ago.

The subpoena is addressed to the Registrar of the Albury court house. It requests that they provide the defence with a copy of the advice to Magistrate Murray that an incidence of violence had occurred, upon which advice he revoked matters from mediation, and went on to convict myself of false allegations without considering any of the defence evidence, or even the cases presented to support the applications made by two people against me.

So the Registrar of the Albury Court House, has had to process a subpoena directing herself to provide a record, which the court previously claimed to myself that they had not kept.

Going to be interesting this point, when it comes up in the court.

Murray could argue that he assumed that the allegation and charge of breach, involved an incidence of violence, since they related to an order which prevented violence from occurring. However, no threat of violence had ever been made, apart from by the complainants, in the lead up to lodging their applications to the court.

Which is the whole problem here. An AVO or ADVO is an order to prevent any acts of violence, or contact designed to instill fear, towards the protected person. The protected person, was never under any threat of that. So the ADVO was a misuse of process.

Then when the Magistrate claims to have seen that a charge of breach had been bought against the accused, he jumps to the conclusion that it involved an incidence of violence.

When it reality, all it involved was a typed letter to one of the owners of BDS Huon, and which had been left at an empty house, and was not found until more than a month later.

However, Murray makes those claims about an incidence of violence, and the charge of breach, at hearing for that charge on 15 February 2016. He had me summoned to court to hear that charge, and it was the only matter listed that day for hearing against me, on the list outside the court room.

However, he didn’t hear it. He didn’t read the letter either, because it was never tendered into evidence by the arresting office, Constable Rowan Weekley. If he read the charge sheet and statement of facts created by that same officer, then he would have seen that no incidence of violence had occurred at all.

The matter was adjourned, until 29 February 2016. You’d think that by then he would have read the charge sheet, and even asked the police to submit a copy of the letter, for his determination as to whether or not it constituted an illegal act.

Yet, he is still pretending that the charge of breach involved an act of violence, when he convicted me of it two weeks later.

How did the result of the hearing on 5 February 2016 come to his attention in the first place? He was not the presiding Magistrate, and the matters had been dealt with on that date. The applications for ADVO’s had been ordered to be sent to mediation, and the charge of breach ignored by the Magistrate, until it had been determined whether or not the ADVO’s were appropriate, and/or proven by the applicants.

Why did Murray revoke matters from mediation when he was not aware of the circumstances of the allegation of breach, nor what it really involved?

Why did he make a judgement on it, when the Magistrate who had read the defence statements which related to it, had ignored it completely based on those?

Why did Murray not read those same defence statements, and which had been lodged with the court prior to the hearing of the charge on 5 February 2016, before convicting me of it?

In fact, I never even got the chance to enter a plea. The charge was never mentioned in court in my presence. However, I had attended court on the day it was listed for hearing, and the Magistrate chose to ignore it, to be dealt with after 18 March 2016, when we were all to appear in court again, after mediation.

Is that legal, for me to have been denied the right to enter a plea, before being convicted, and despite having been in attendance on the day the charge was supposed to have been heard?

Why did Magistrate Murray award the ADVO’s just so that he could convict me of the allegation of breach, without considering any of the evidence surrounding them?

Because his colleague from the CJC had asked him to do so.

I have also emailed a new subpoena to the Albury court house this morning. This one is for NSW Police, asking them to produce a valid record of service of one of the ADVO’s, prior to seeking prosecution in court for alleged breaches of that same ADVO.

I have read that a signed record is no longer required in court, just an ‘electronic’ copy of it. Therefore the subpoena asks that if police plan to continue with these prosecutions, without providing a signed record of service, then the serving officers will be required to appear in court, on 20 June 2016, to swear in the witness box that they served two ADVO final orders, and not just the one on the day in question.

I wonder if the cops will commit perjury in court? All of the arresting officers so far have, so I guess I can’t rely on these two officers not to do the same.



While I was typing up this post, I received an email from the Albury Court house confirming that my second Subpoena has now been made official, and is ready to be served on NSW police.

I also stated in my advice to the Registrar about the first one, that I would expect her not to claim any witness costs, when she gives evidence on 20 June 2017, since she will be on paid duty at the court house anyway.

Lets see if the court tries to add it to my bill though, or your tax bill.



Albury Local Court – Denial of Common Law Rights to Fair Trials

  1. Fair Trial – A common law right


The right to a fair trial has been described as ‘a central pillar of our criminal justice system’, ‘fundamental and absolute’ and a ‘cardinal requirement of the rule of law’.

Fundamentally, a fair trial is designed to prevent innocent people being convicted of crimes. It protects liberty, property, reputation and other fundamental interests. Being wrongly convicted of a crime has been called a ‘deep injustice and a substantial moral harm’.

Fairness also gives a trial its integrity and moral legitimacy or authority.

Furthermore, fair trials are presumably more likely to reach correct verdicts than unfair trials, and therefore they may not only help prevent wrongful convictions of the innocent, but also indirectly promote the prosecution and punishment of the guilty.

The right to a fair trial is ‘manifested in rules of law and of practice designed to regulate the course of the trial’.

Strictly speaking, it is ‘a right not to be tried unfairly’ or ‘an immunity against conviction otherwise than after a fair trial’, because ‘no person has the right to insist upon being prosecuted or tried by the State’.



This chapter discusses the source and rationale of the right to a fair trial; how the right is protected from statutory encroachment; and when Commonwealth laws that limit accepted principles of a fair trial may be justified. It focuses on some widely recognised components of a fair trial that have been subject to statutory limits, for example

  • a trial should be held in public and the court’s reasons for its decision should be delivered in public;
  • a defendant has a right to a lawyer; and
  • a defendant has the right to confront the prosecution’s witnesses and to test the evidence said to prove his or her guilt.
    denied 3.jpg

The right to a fair trial ‘extends to the whole course of the criminal process’.

It has been said that there is ‘no aspect of preparation for trial or of criminal procedure which is not touched by, or indeed determined by, the principle of a fair trial’.


Attributes of a fair trial

Widely accepted general attributes of a fair trial—some traceable to the common law, others to important Parliamentary reforms—may now be found set out in international treaties, conventions, human rights statutes and bills of rights.

As found in art 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights(ICCPR), these include the following;

Independent court:

  • the court must be ‘competent, independent and impartial’;

    denied 4

Public trial:

  • the trial should be held in public and judgment given in public;


Presumption of innocence:

  • the defendant should be presumed innocent until proved guilty—the prosecution therefore bears the onus of proof and must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt;

    denied 3

Defendant told of charge:

  • the defendant should be informed of the nature and cause of the charge against him—promptly, in detail, and in a language which he or she understands;

Time and facilities to prepare

  • the defendant must have adequate time and facilities to prepare a defence and to communicate with counsel of his own choosing;

    denied 3

Trial without undue delay

  • the defendant must be tried without undue delay — that is, undue delay between arrest and the trial, perhaps having regard to such things as the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, and whether there was any prejudice to the accused;

Right to a lawyer

  • the defendant must be ‘tried in his presence, and to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing; to be informed, if he does not have legal assistance, of this right; and to have legal assistance assigned to him, in any case where the interests of justice so require, and without payment by him in any such case if he does not have sufficient means to pay for it’

    appeal denied

Right to examine witnesses

  • the defendant must have the opportunity to ‘examine, or have examined, the witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him’;



The elements of a fair trial appear to be related to the defining or essential characteristics of a court, which have been said to include*  the reality and appearance of the court’s independence and its impartiality; the application of procedural fairness; adherence, as a general rule, to the open court principle; and that a court generally gives reasons for its decisions.

denied 4


Application for a change in venue to an impartial and non-corrupt court house with a non-corrupt Registrar and Magistrates:

application denied




Email to George Brandis, Attorney General of Australia

From: Karma
Sent: Monday, 10 April 2017 12:28 PM
To: senator.brandis@aph.gov.au
Subject: Corrupt Magistrate at Albury Local Court – Magistrate Anthony Murray

Dear Mr Brandis

Please find attached link to where I have put on public display, on the internet, proof that Magistrate Anthony Murray committed perjury, more than once, while carrying out his duties in the Albury Local Court. Within a few minutes, when confronted with evidence of his own untruthful statements, he then had to admit that what he has been saying prior to that, was completely untrue. In front of the whole court room full of witnesses, one of whom could help but laugh out loud.

I have been updating the NSW Attorney General, about his misconduct, ever since he took over that role from Gabrielle Upton. I had also been letting her know that all of the corrupt proceedings against me at the Albury Local Court, and which have dragged on for nearly 18 months now, was instigated by an employee of her own agency, the Community Justice.

This woman is employed by that agency, as a mediator, and has used her position at the court house where she is regularly employed, to bring false complaints against, and false judgements against an innocent person, as a favour to two of her personal friends.

Defence evidence has proven that I am innocent of every false allegation, but that has all been deliverately discounted by Magistrate Murray, and now Magistrate Cromptom as well, to cover up for their colleague.

The Albury Local court and Albury Police, are trying to use a restriction from an unserved ADVO to force me to take the evidence of their own corruption off the internet. They are trying to jail myself, of crimes they are aware I am innocent of, to protect themselves from my own truthful complaints about them, lodged with a variety of agencies, including the ICAC, the NSW Ombudsman, Office of Public Prosecutions, Police Commissioner’s Office and the NSW Attorney General’s own office.

To conform with a corrupt ruling handed down last week, which continues that restriction, I have removed the names of the ADVO holders, and myself, from all of the documents on display on the blog called “Framed in the Albury Local Court”. However, their ADVO does not prevent me from writing about what has happened, proving I’ve been harassed and falsely convicted for defending the matters in the first place, and continuing to name all state employees involved in this mess.

I will not be tricked into removing the blog from the internet, and from public view, by an gag order issued by Magistrate Murray, when he had not even read the blog the complainants’ had named as being offensive and threatening. It was not threatening, was in no way untrue, and was legal for those reasons, and was justified. I was gagged for having a legal blog on the internet, and which would have been removed voluntarily had it not become the basis of these court dramas, by a Magistrate who had never been given a copy of it to read, and who claimed at hearing in January 2016, to have never read much of the defence evidence either.

However, a Magistrate who did read all of the defence evidence, and most of the blog itself, as tendered into evidence by the defence, did not rule it to be criminal, offensive or in any way threatening. In fact, he dismissed the complainants case against it to mediation.

Once matters then fell right into the hands of the complainants good friend at the court house, she was then easily able to pervert the course of justice, and had the gag order made by having the ADVO’s granted, and myself convicted and fined for another false allegation, to punish me for having made fools of them all, by tendering the truth into evidence on 11 and 12 January 2016.

These matters will continue before the local court for all of this year, if no one steps in to stop it, and end the injustices being committed against me. However, I will not allow them to continue in that corrupt court house, and under the management of Magistrate Tony Murray.

On 6 April 2017, Magistrate Cromptom dismissed my three applications for a change in venue, and which cover all false charges and allegations, and began to relist all of those for hearing in the Albury Local Court.

The ADVO I am charged five times for breaching, was never served on me, rendering all of those charges illegal. The sixth charge was bought against me by the employee of the CJC herself, for lodging more complaints about the police misconduct she instigated towards me, with the Attorney General’s Department and the Ombudsman. You would be aware that it is illegal for her to have done that. Her employers have been advised, but have done nothing to force her to drop the charge, and it has once against been listed for hearing, in June 2017.

I will be appealing Cromptom’s decision, to relist any matters involving these people against myself, at the Albury Local Court.

Staff at that court house have also been doctoring transcripts, all of the way through this, to cover up for their own misconduct, and to hide key points of defence, which I have mentioned in the court room. I advised the OPP of that in July last year.

I have since taken to lodging complaints with the Federal Police, since the state agencies which should have intervened and ended what was being done to me, have consistently failed to act. While that remains the case, I will continue to publicize just how much corruption can go on in one court house in Australia, and not only not be halted by the state, but condoned and assisted by it instead. All at the expense of the tax payer.

The following links will take you to my blog about it. The blog is getting lots of traffick and interest. It is disgracing not only the NSW Justice Department, but also the whole concept of Australians having the right to fair and impartial dealings, when summoned to attend court.








Yours sincerely