The court also sent me today the transcripts for the hearing of 14 September 2017, in some crazy way thinking that somehow justifies the judgement handed down by Cromptom on 22 November 2017.
When really, it only raises more issues of collusion between the court staff and the complainants, and is more proof that more perversions and corruption have occurred.
They are of course, yet another example of court transcripts being doctored, but which is still unable to hide the bullshit that is going on in the Albury Local Court room.
IN THE LOCAL COURT
THURSDAY 14 SEPTEMBER 2017
2016/00020395 R v Tracey Gwendoline BURT
HIS HONOUR: We have the got the part heard matter of Burt. Are you representing yourself today?
HIS HONOUR: The matter of Ms Burt is part heard, how many more witnesses are there?
PROSECUTOR: I have one. I take it though that that will be my lengthiest witness.
HIS HONOUR: I see.
ACCUSED: Sorry I didn’t hear what you said?
PROSECUTOR: That that would be a lengthy witness.
ACCUSED: Yes. (“and it will be a very lengthy cross examination”)
PROSECUTOR: My last witness.
(Yet at the outset of the hearing, they said they were going to call 3 or 4 police witnesses, and then only called one)
HIS HONOUR: I will just call through the rest of the matters and I will come back to you.
(He is refering to the rest of the matters on his list from other people, not that he will come back to calling my own matters, but was dismissing me until the start of the hearing. I had started to walk away, then I turned around and went back to the microphone and asked the question below)
ACCUSED: Excuse me, there was supposed to be other matters involving me listed for today. There was mention of the charge brought against me by the mediator of this courthouse.
HIS HONOUR: I don’t know about that. There are a lot of matters here but we are part heard in the one that was last before the Court on 20 June.
(Bullshit, he did not given any verbal answer or if he did, he stated that the only matter he would discuss with me was the hearing that was about to occur, that of write to Jon Williams as reflected above)
ACCUSED: Yes, that’s, that’s
HIS HONOUR: I’ll come back to you in a second I’m just going to go through the rest of the list, thank you.
ACCUSED: Excuse me, I was going to say I’ve got a notice of motion to lodge against the charge Gwen Bradley brought against me and I’ve got notices of motion for the AVO matters that were supposed to be heard today as well. The only one I’m willing to continue in this courthouse is the one that’s in progress.
HIS HONOUR: All right, thank you.
MATTER STOOD IN LIST
(Cromptom had commented that day that he didn’t appear to have enough time to hear all of the matters listed for hearing that day, and that some were children’s matters and would therefore be a closed court. Yet this hearing into my charge had been listed in June, and you’d think the court would have allocated ample time to hear it, if they were serious about doing so this time. Instead, after going through his list, calls it for the first matter to be dealt with before he started with the real hearings for the day)
HIS HONOUR: I think we will recommence the Burt matter now, just give me one moment. Ms Burt, just come forward.
HIS HONOUR: This is the matter with the H60077075?
PROSECUTOR: Yes, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Do you want to call your next witness?
PROSECUTOR: Thank you, your Honour. Susan Ward is my next witness.
ACCUSED: Excuse me, your Honour, before you commence I would just like to advise you that Constable Rowan Weekley has indulged in issuing more false paperwork which amounts to fraud. I’d like to hand this up to your Honour, it’s a witness list for this charge that’s in motion and it lists the charge as common assault
HIS HONOUR: Hold on. What’s this got to do with this matter?
ACCUSED: That Constable Weekley has sent me a witness list for this hearing before it started and he lists the charge as common assault.
HIS HONOUR: Well, that’s not what I’ve got. I’ve got that
ACCUSED: Exactly and that’s what I’m saying, Constable Weekley’s indulging in fraud again.
HIS HONOUR: Just hold on. This is a charge of contravene a prohibition or restriction and this is the part heard matter from June.
HIS HONOUR: So the prosecution has got one more witness to call.
HIS HONOUR: And you’ll have an opportunity to ask that witness questions.
ACCUSED: I would like you to look at this document, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: What’s it got to do with this matter?
ACCUSED: It is showing that the arresting officer – (who is accused of) first he illegally recorded a conversation, then he makes a false statement that he’s got a formal interview on recording, now he’s issuing false paperwork saying I’m charged with assault. Now the other thing that is relevant is that he set up an appointment for me to attend Albury Police Station on 7 June claiming that he had sensitive new evidence that they would not be showing in the courthouse and not be providing to me before the hearing that I had to come down to the station to look at it. So, I would like your Honour to have a look at this document because I want to get it on the record before we get started that the arresting officer has been up to acts of misconduct again.
(Prosecutor was objecting claiming to not have copies of either document. I told her that I did have a copy of one the list of witnesses for her, but that even if I don’t have one of the Sensitive Evidence document, that she should have had one supplied to her by police, since she is prosecuting the matter and police claimed to have new evidence)
I’d also advise that I have sent the brief for this matter to the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission, they’re currently investigating. They’ve already indicated to me that they’ve found issues of misconduct in it. They have investigated the one that I sent to them a week prior to that which is about Gwen Bradley’s charge. They have also come to the conclusion that there’s gross amounts of police misconduct involved in that as well.
(The LECC issued a decision letter after this hearing, which refutes my claim above. I believe that was deliberate, as the comment about the illegal actions on the part of the arresting officer, and other police officers stationed at Albury, were made verbally via phone call, and therefore never made it to any record that I am privvy to.)
(It’s obvious my next statement has been removed from the transcript, because Cromtpom answers it below. It was, that I had a copy of the infringement notice issued by Weekley on 19 January 2016 to give to the Magistrate)
HIS HONOUR: Right, hand it up to me and I’ll have a look at it. If you’ve got other material that’s not relevant to this matter
ACCUSED: Well, it is relevant.
HIS HONOUR: you’re just
ACCUSED: At the last hearing you questioned me about tearing up the infringement notice that Constable Weekley issued to me on the day that he pretends to arrest me at my house. I have a copy of that, as emailed me (to me by) the courthouse just to prove that that statement’s correct.
I have also got this is another document that outlines all of the police harassment I was put through last year after lodging the complaint about Rowan Weekley and his arrest in this matter. I’d like that on the record. That all occurred after I wrote to Weekley about it.
There’s another issue of housekeeping where in the brief there’s a transcript from 5 February (a hearing) before yourself, that’s being (been) investigated. Issues of the transcripts being tampered with by staff at this courthouse has been investigated (confirmed) by the General Counsel of New South Wales.
Now they agree that a statement I made at that hearing was left out so they’ve reissued the transcript and this time they’ve included my line in it that I have put in a complaint to the ICAC about Gwen Bradley. So, the transcript for that hearing in the brief has now been superseded by this transcript which I have again argued with. They still haven’t used my correct words. They’ve also found another issue with the transcript from 12 December.
I have (had) asked they have only looked at the two issues that I mentioned to them. I have now asked them to go back and look at all of the transcripts for all of these hearings and what else do we have (and check all of the recordings against the transcripts for discrpancies) And that’s all for now.
HIS HONOUR: Right, hand it all up, thank you.
PROSECUTOR: I note your Honour is entitled to look at this, but I object to all of this material. I just wanted to place it on the record.
HIS HONOUR: Thank you, I note your objection.
ACCUSED: I have a copy for the prosecutor of Constable Weekley’s fraudulent paperwork.
HIS HONOUR: There are matters which if you have a complaint about, ought be dealt with by a different Court to this one and you told me that you’ve got some matters with the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission. Now that being so, I’ve got these documents and I appreciate that you wish them to be added to the record in this hearing. The prosecution objects to the material but I’m going to accept the material and put it with the court file—
(The decision letter from the Judical Commission claims that he did not enter the documents into evidence, because he claimed they were irrelevant, yet the transcript claims that he did)
HIS HONOUR: Just wait. But as I say, it might be that these are matters that should be somewhere else. I’m focusing on the criminal charge that’s in front of me.
HIS HONOUR: And we are going to proceed with the prosecution witness and you understand that I’m focusing on this charge.
HIS HONOUR: And the prosecution has to prove this charge beyond reasonable doubt.
ACCUSED: Yes, but the Constable Weekley should have given the prosecutor a copy of those documents, the new witness list even though it was the same as the witness list previous to that, but those that form about the sensitive information you’d think the prosecutor would have been given a copy of that by the arresting officer.
(The above sentence has been moved, from where it was stated, to down here where it obviously does not follow on from the conversation in play)
HIS HONOUR: Well, that’s not for me to get into. Sergeant?
PROSECUTOR: Thank you, your Honour, when you say place on the court record, but does not form part of evidence in this hearing?
HIS HONOUR: Correct.
PROSECUTOR: Thank you very much, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Now can we have
ACCUSED: It’s evidence of police corruption.
HIS HONOUR: the witness please. Ms Burt, you can take a seat while the witness is giving her evidence, thank you.
<SUSAN GAYE WARD, SWORN (10.33AM)
<EXAMINATION IN CHIEF BY PROSECUTOR
Q. Can you please state your full name?
A. Susan Gaye Ward.
Q. Now you are the defendant’s sister, is that correct?
A. Sorry, say that again?
Q. You are the defendant’s sister?
Q. Tracey Burt’s sister?
Q. Now you work for BDS Huon in Lavington, is that correct?
A. BDS Huon, yes, correct.
Q. You’ve worked there since what date?
A. 29 September 2010.
Q. You’re still currently employed there, is that correct?
Q. I’ll take you to about 10.42am on Monday 11 January 2016. You were called into a meeting with your HR Manager, Leasa Brown, is that correct?
A. Yes, that’s correct.
Q. What happened?
A. She advised me that a letter had been left at John Williams’ home in Sarson Road, Norris Park which was a property I used to rent from John and it was a letter left by Tracey and they were bringing it to my attention.
Q. After that meeting with your HR Manager, later on that evening you attended the police station, is that correct?
A. Yes, that is correct, with my mother.
Q. Now I take you to about 1.20pm on 12 January 2016. You attended the Albury Local Court?
Q. To deliver some documents, is that correct?
A. I delivered a letter along with a copy of the letter she left. I was advised to take it down to the Court and try and get it before the Court even though it was outside of the lodgement date, yes, correct.
Q. Now, is this in relation to proceedings that you had before the Court with Ms Burt?
(Why was I never given a copy of that information or even advised that it had been lodged?)
Q. Now, due to those proceedings before the Court for an unrelated matter, you were collected some documents filed by Ms Burt in relation to that matter, is that correct?
A. Yes, they said I might as well get them while I was there, correct.
Q. Filed in the registry by Ms Burt?
Q. In relation to an AVO proceeding that was a contested proceeding?
Q. That was a proceeding between yourself and Ms Burt?
(Why is the prosecutor playing this game, and trying to deflect from the truth of the situation. My supporting case for my application for an ADVO against Ward was lodged in December 2015, yet they are pretending that was available for her to pick up on 12 January 2016. On the day I did lodged it, a clerk told me that Ward had been phoning them every day asking if I had lodged yet. She was also expecting me to lodge my defence against their allegations, but I knew that I had until mid January to do that. So on the day she attended the court office on 12 January 2016, she was there to pick up my defence statements, lodged on that day and the day after for both her application for an ADVO against me, and same for her mother’s. The cases couldn’t continue if I did not lodge on time, I would have just lost. So those documents were extremely important to them, they would have been stressing to see what I had offered up in defence of the allegations. They were also entitled to see my defence before the next hearing, as part of the protcols of civil actions, and so again, why are they pretending that it was not important for her to pick up those same defence documents and prepare for the hearing? Why are they pretending that the only real reason she went to the court house that day, was to lodge her allegation of breach against me for going ahead and writing to Jon Williams?)
Q. I’ll show you some documents. Are they the documents that you collected from the registry that were filed by Ms Burt?
A. No, they look different.
Q. Look different how?
A. I can’t remember whether the ones I picked up that day were printed in blue ink, green ink, pink ink, but they were her defence documents, you know, where you’re meant to lodge, I think we were to lodge our objections by 29 December.
Q. Can I just have those documents please?
A. But they look different to what I’ve got at home.
Q. That’s because I’ve given you the wrong documents, I apologise. I’ll show you these documents.
A. Each different charge was in a different colour or something.
Q. I’ve given you the wrong documents.
Q. Those are the documents that you collected from the registry?
Q. Filed by Ms Burt in relation to the AVO proceedings?
PROSECUTOR: I tender the bundle of material, I just wish to draw your Honour’s attention to, I’ve tendered the whole bundle out of fairness, but there’s only specific ones that I am relying on. Would your Honour like me to mark that with a Post it note of the specific pages I am relying on?
HIS HONOUR: Yes, please.
EXHIBIT #6 BUNDLE OF DOCUMENTS FILED BY TRACEY BURT AND COLLECTED BY SUSAN WARD ON 12/01/16, ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION
Q. After receiving those documents, you read one of the pages?
Q. It related to what you’d been brought into your HR Manager about?
Q. The meeting?
Q. So you took those documents over to Albury Police Station?
Q. And you made a statement, is that correct?
A. That is correct.
HIS HONOUR: This is your opportunity to ask the witness questions but please try to focus your questions to the matters contained for this matter, for this charge, right?
ACCUSED: Yes. I did mean to say at the start of this hearing that I’d like to advise you that I have no confidence in this courthouse to receive any sort of fair dealings and I have no respect left for you personally. You gave me your word in April that Magistrate Murray would not be involved in any more matters against me and then he had part heard matters against me the very next month. You denied my motion back in April claiming that Murray would be kept out of things and you went back on your word and allowed him to part hear a matter within a month.
So, I just meant to say that at the beginning, so I will now continue. I just wanted to let you know that. At the last hearing I was not aware that Magistrate Murray had been allowed to do that. I had not picked up my mail at the time so I did not become aware of that until, until afterwards.
<CROSS EXAMINATION BY ACCUSED
Q. So Susan Ward, it says in your police station(as said) you moved to Albury in 2010, you told me in 2014 that you keep your car registered in Victoria rather than pay the cost of transferring the registration across to New South Wales?
A. What’s that got to do with the charge?
Q. The fact is
A. Ask a question to do with the charge.
Q. Why did you apply for your AVO in a false name, in your maiden name?
A. I didn’t apply in a false name.
PROSECUTOR: I object to that question.
HIS HONOUR: What’s the objection?
PROSECUTOR: Based on relevance, your Honour.
Q. I was issued with a summons to Court in relation to matters to do with Susan Gaye Burt. You have not used the name Burt since you married over 30 years ago.
Q. That is my question?
A. Correct, correct.
Q. Why did you apply under your maiden name?
A. I didn’t. I did not. That is incorrect and false.
Q. Why would the registrar put your maiden name on this document?
HIS HONOUR: Just excuse me for one moment.
PROSECUTOR: Your Honour, I object to that.
WITNESS: Your Honour, should I answer the question and explain what happened?
HIS HONOUR: Just excuse me for one second.
PROSECUTOR: I object to that, your Honour, how is this lady meant to know how a registry document came into effect.
HIS HONOUR: It’s of no relevance, Ms Burt.
ACCUSED: Yes, it is.
HIS HONOUR: Excuse me. If you do not mind, I’ll be the one to decide what is relevant and what is not relevant in this Court. Now, ask your questions. Again, I will remind you to try to focus your mind on what’s relevant to this charge. You’re the person who’s charged with an offence here, not the witness. So why don’t you use the time that you have effectively and cross examine her about the evidence that she has given in this Court today.
ACCUSED: Well the document’s not legal when it’s issued in the name of a Susan Burt and signed in the name of Susan Ward, that is the relevance.
HIS HONOUR: Well that’s what you
ACCUSED: That is the relevance.
HIS HONOUR: That’s what you say.
ACCUSED: Now when I applied for an AVO against her I read that I had to show current ID, driver’s licence, I didn’t have to bring any special documents to the courthouse to apply, I had everything I needed in the in my wallet.
HIS HONOUR: Ms Burt. Ms Burt.
ACCUSED: The mother
HIS HONOUR: Ms Burt
ACCUSED: did not apply under a maiden name.
HIS HONOUR: Do you have questions for this witness? I’m going to give you an opportunity to ask this witness three questions about her evidence, three questions.
ACCUSED: Three questions?
HIS HONOUR: Correct. And then this matter will be proceeding.
Q. So your next claim to police that on 3 November you emailed me because I was bombarding your mother with hundreds of text messages and emails and had gone crazy?
HIS HONOUR: Thank you, what’s your next question.
Q. The police statement says that. How can you say it’s not correct
HIS HONOUR: That’s another question, you’ve got one left.
Q. What’s your answer—
(Magistrate and Prosecutor both objecting loudly so she could not answer, or be heard if she tried to)
ACCUSED: I won’t even bother. Now, please call the matter that I’m on bail for and mark down that I appeared in Court today and I will appeal the decision that you make after I leave this courtroom to the District Court because of unfair hearings in this courthouse. Constantly. Right from the beginning. She’s allowed to apply under a false name and you’re charging me on a document that is not only illegal because of the signature on the back of it, but because it was never served and you know that and it was granted illegally at hearings that should have been declared as mistrials because Magistrate Murray revoked matters from mediation
SPEAKER: Ma’am, leave the courtroom please. (If this was said, I did not hear him because I was speaking the above angrily at him)
ACCUSED: based on an allegation
SPEAKER: Just leave the courtroom, thank you, ma’am. (Again, if this was said, I did not hear it, but it was obvious to him that I was preparing to leave, I was packing up all of my documents and folders while making the statements above and below)
ACCUSED: of assault that didn’t even occur.
(Accused leaves the court room, without the Sherriff laying a hand on me or even looking like she might. I stopped in the aisle and waited for my friends to pick up their possessions, before the three of us walked out)
WITNESS: Am I excused, your Honour?
Q. Yes, you’re excused.
A. Jesus, thank you.
<THE WITNESS WITHDREW
CLOSE OF CASE FOR PROSECUTION
PROSECUTOR: Does your Honour wish the matter to stand for a short time?
HIS HONOUR: What I will do is I am going to reserve my decision. I’m going to give my decision in the week of 13 November. I’ll be in Wagga, I’ll give it via AVL in this Court. Let me just have a look at that week the Thursday is the 16th what about 2 o’clock?
PROSECUTOR: Thank you, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Just let me double check the diary. This matter will be for decision on 16 November 2017 at 2pm. There will be AVL link to Wagga. Now, the registrar is to notify the defendant of the decision date.
ADJOURNED PART HEARD TO THURSDAY 16 NOVEMBER 2017 AT 2.00PM FOR DECISION
16 November 201
Mr EJ Schmatt
Chief Executive Officer
NSW Judicial Commission
Dear Mr Schmatt
It is surprising to see a man of your age and status resort to telling outright lies. But the corruption and criminal behaviour stemming from the Magistrates who staff the Albury Local Court is far too complex now to resort to your usual tricks and word games used to dismiss all complaints lodged with your office.
In fact I once read an article which describes the tricks one can expect from the NSW Judicial Commission if you lodge a complaint about a corrupt Magistrate, and noticed that all of your correspondences with myself fitted their description to a tee.
You claim that Magistrate Cromptom did acknowledge all of the charges that were listed for mention or hearing on 14 September 2017, and stated that he would deal with them after the hearing into the allegation of breach had occurred.
That is an outright lie, and the verbal recordings would prove that. Of course, your office and the court itself won’t ever release those to myself, so that I can prove that beyond a shadow of a doubt. They won’t even release a typed copy of that transcript, ready for appeal in the District Court.
Not only did Magistrate Cromptom not say that, he deliberately did not make any audial response at all. He merely looked around the court room, feigning ignorance.
None of those matters were listed outside of the court room that morning, and if there was any honest clerks working at that court house, then one would have to admit that she deliberately asked Susan Ward what she was there for that day. Ward replied the ‘Burt matter listed on the board’ above her. The only matter that was listed for that day outside the court room, which involved myself.
Unfortunately I did not think to take a photo of the list to prove that, although I did realize it was significant at the time.
You then go on to claim that the ADVO hearing was therefore not held in secret. You assert that had I not walked out of the hearing, I would have been present when those matters were called.
Had the Magistrate not been acting corruptly by protecting the witness from answering questions, and showing showing actual bias towards the complainant, then I would not have abandoned the proceedings.
You claim that I could have asked him to be allowed to ask more questions, but he had just firmly told me that I was not allowed to do so, and any attempt might have seen me charged with contempt for defying him.
You claim that he let me ask two irrelevant questions, and offered me three more after that, and which I relinquished by walking out.
Yet again, the actual recording of the hearing would show that is another lie by yourself, seeking to protect this corrupt Magistrate, and who you are fully aware has been seeking to protect Magistrate Murray by these acts of misconduct towards myself.
I still have the file and print out of all of the questions I intended to ask that day. Every one of them relates to the statements she gave to police. Not one of them is irrelevant as they would have demonstrated that she lied to the court originally, and to police afterwards. She continues to do so, in all of her other statements made to police after that one. Hopefully that will come out at the other hearings, if I am allowed a real opportunity to cross examine her.
You infer that my second question to her was irrelevant, yet it was about her main complaint made to the court in her ADVO applications, and which she had then repeated to police. You would think that quite an important piece of testimony to establish it whether or not it was truthful, that I was attacking her mother via hundreds of emails and text messages, on the date that Ward first approached me, with her menacing and threatening email of 3 November 2015.
You state that my first question was irrelevant, yet it would have shown why she applied for her ADVO under her maiden name. That is what causes the whole document to be illegal, because she signed it with her legal name on the back. It also proves deception, and her desire to have her matters heard at the court house where her next door neighbour and friend, was the ADVO mediator.
And which is why both the police prosecutor and Magistrate would not allow her to answer the question, even after she had agreed to do so.
It also shows she broke the law when she made her original ADVO application, when she failed to show valid ID to disguise the fact that it was all held in an address in Victoria, and that she had no right to start any court action, in a NSW court house.
At least you do confirm that the Sherriff and Susan Ward are both lying, when they claim that I had to be ejected from the court room, for misconduct towards the corrupt Magistrate. And which is why I will not appear before him again, nor in the Albury Local Court.
I also believe Cromptom deliberately incited me to walk out, and the court had deliberately pretended they weren’t going to deal with those matters on that day, so he could award those orders he illegally started on 13 February, and which Murray illegally continued in May 2017, and that is criminal conduct on his part.
No matter how many lies you tell, to try to suggest otherwise.
Yours in absolute disgust of yourself and NSW Justice, as usual
Here is the real news Albury – Tracey Gwendoline Burt
Alias Karma Two and many more
(by Susan Ward, BDS Huon, 16 September 2017)
I attended Albury Court House on 14 September 2017 and would like to correct some truths about what actually happened on this day.
Firstly, Tracey did not walk out of the Court room, she was removed by the Sherriff for her open abuse and tirade at the Local Magistrate Crompton.
Secondly you were only given three questions after you continued to ask questions irrelevant to the charge and you were cautioned by the Magistrate about this.
Perhaps you should have prepared your questions like the prosecutor did and state the facts and you would have got more questions in because you dwell on untruths and asked stupid questions which were not the facts or in fact even true.
Unfortunately, your lawyer, that would be you did not prepare that well (perhaps you should try and hire another lawyer, I am sure you have another lawyer within you).
Thirdly the case was in fact finished, you will not get the opportunity to cross examine me again in relation to this charge – 16 November 2016 at 2.00pm is in fact to sentence you via video link from Wagga, perhaps you should have stayed to hear to outcome, oh that’s right you were removed from the court room– try telling your readers the truth for a change.
Lastly is the fact of the interim ADVO orders – you do not have to worry about the ADVO’s being heard on 18 November or at any future court date. Finalised and extended for a further 2 years without hesitation.
Your reading of the disappointment on our faces when we left the court house was misread, in fact we were extremely happy with the outcome but in shock of the day’s events, mostly your abuse and behaviour in the court, so again your powers are letting you down. Was Marilyn and her mother extremely proud of your court behaviour – not sure they will bother with getting the train up from Melbourne anytime soon to support you.
Your blog contains a lot of accusations to several people who have mental illness but it is clear to all who read your blog that there is only one person with the mental illness (and no I do not have a medical degree, just like you do not have a legal degree).
I am sure the police have better things to do than put a hit out on you, just another fantasy from the pot smoking paranoid person that you have become.
SO GUESS WHAT TRACEY BURT – NO WIN FOR YOU YESTERDAY.
Also note that the court has not provided any advice of what occurred in the District Court on Monday 20 November 2017.
One can only assume that my appeal of the granting of the applications for extensions of their illegally gained ADVO’s, by the same corrupt Magistrate who illegally listed them for hearing on 13 February 2017, and part heard them instead of the two applications for motion (change in venue) was denied.
After having made an informal request to the registrar for motion and the recusal of both Murray and Cromptom from being allowed to decide the above matter, or any matters again, I made the same request to the District Court Judge on 6 November 2017.
Cromptom has been allowed to hand down his latest conviction of myself on 22 November 2017, despite those requests, and despite the fact that I have tried to lodge an application with the Federal Court, about all of the judgements being handed down in all allegations being made against me by Gwen Bradley’s personal friends, at the Albury Local Court.
I had also issued the Attorney General, being the absolutely corrupt Mark Speakmann, a request that he grant a permanent stay in all criminal charges against me at that same court, as it was his employee who enlisted police to bring them against me, so that her friends could win their civil matters.
There was no police involvement in these matters leading up to their civil applications, and their first involvement was when the court had me arrested for writing to Jon Williams, as arranged by Gwen Bradley, and the court then convicted me of that, based on the documents alleging that breach, without making me aware of them, or allowing me to address them. The address would have been simply that the court already is aware of that letter, and my reasons for writing it. I don’t think I really need to address that any further.
However, I did address the police charge, which was then applied to O’Bryan’s interim ADVO.
At no time though was I ever informed by the court that was the case, and been given a chance to defend the police allegations, that it was somehow a breach of O’Bryan’s interim ADVO. Her’s contained no extra clauses forbidding contact with BDS Huon, nor the mention of Ward gossiping about client’s affairs outside work hours, with O’Bryan.
It merely prevented me from contacting her by any means, and the cop who tried to serve it tried to claim it also prevented me from speaking to any that she is related to. Why is that? Been lying to relatives has she, for the past 20 years, and doesn’t want to be shown to be a liar?
Mrs O’Bryan is not related to Jon Williams, and the envelop was addressed to BDS Huon group, and began Dear Sir, as I did not know William’s name. O’Bryan is not a blood relative of the company BDS Huon.
I also told the cop that day that I hardly think any ADVO order could be so broad, and also prevent me from speaking to my own children, both of whom are also unfortunately related to that lying cunt.
I also informed him that her application had been disproven by evidence, and I refused to accept their dodgy court order.
When reading the next transcript, bear in mind that it is shown in this blog that I prepared subpoena’s for the court to issue against both Ward and O’Bryan, back in May or June of this year, asking that they be forced to provide evidence to the court of this mental illness they allege I have.
I have always maintained that any angry emails sent to them were sent out of justifiable anger, not a mental illness that I don’t even have.
The registrar refused to issue the subpoena, and sent me a form to appeal that decision. I did that recently, but the court will only hear that application for that decision by the registrar to be reconsidered, by a Magistrate, if the hearing happens at their court house. Thereby robbing me of the chance to appeal it, as we all know what the result will be – myself served with the final orders stemming from the transcripts shown below, and myself charged and jailed for ‘breaching’ them.
Yet as usual, the protected people are allowed to threaten, menace and attempt to intimidate me with threats of jail and fines, and slander and suffer no consequences for that. Even though they both did the same, within days of those orders being granted.
Back to my point … and O’Bryan is still trying to play the mental health card at this hearing, even after all that occurred.
You are a sick woman O’Bryan. I mentioned in my first angry email to you that your Narcissim has now gone beyond the classification of a personality disorder, and has grown into full on mental illness.
And Susan, well, she might be able to hold down a job using one of her personas, but everyone who knows her outside of her workplace, knows she is mentally unwell, and has been for decades. You keep her that way, by playing her games, and pretending that you are the innocent and good people, and that everyone else around you has no right to be upset by the dramas and bullshit you both cause for everyone around you.
Your court orders have no validity, because of the illegal and corrupt way in which they were granted, and in that they should never have been listed at all, before the court hell bent on convicting me, to protect Gwen Bradley and the Magistrates involved. Also those corrupt assholes working out of the office there, and including all of your pretend registrars.
IN THE LOCAL COURT
THURSDAY 14 SEPTEMBER 2017
2015/00337982 ‑ JANICE O’BRYAN v TRACEY GWENDOLINE BURT
COMPLAINT Application to vary apprehended violence order
Applicant O’Bryan appeared in person
No appearance of or for the Respondent Burt (respondent had ‘been asked to leave’)
HIS HONOUR: Now the next one is Ms O’Bryan. Now your application to extend the order is that right?
APPLICANT O’BRYAN: Yes, thank you.
HIS HONOUR: I’m just reading the application. (Well then he should be fully aware that it is a farce, after all the times he saw them jeering at myself, and making rude guestures towards myself, in the court room in front of him all through the hearings conducted in 2016)
THE APPLICATION WILL BE GRANTED, THE ORDER IS EXTENDED FOR A FURTHER TWO YEARS.
APPLICANT O’BRYAN: Your Honour, may I ask a question?
HIS HONOUR: Yes.
APPLICANT O’BRYAN: Will they be in force even if they’re not served on her because she doesn’t accept them or you can’t find her?
HIS HONOUR: Well, they certainly will be enforceable at law. They’re orders of this Court.
SPEAKER: The interim order will remain in force until the final order is served.
HIS HONOUR: Until the final order is served.
APPLICANT O’BRYAN: The other thing is the AVO is not working for us very well because she just continues on the internet to destroy us really.
HIS HONOUR: I’m sure it’s extremely difficult, I can’t give you any legal advice I’m afraid.
APPLICANT O’BRYAN: No, but do we have any other options?
HIS HONOUR: I’m not sure‑‑
APPLICANT O’BRYAN: Okay.
HIS HONOUR: ‑‑is the short answer.
APPLICANT O’BRYAN: Maybe if she were on a bond or something that would threaten her enough for her to stop doing what she’s doing.
HIS HONOUR: Well, as I say, I can’t give you any legal advice but as the matters progress through the Court and depending on what the decisions are in the criminal matters ‑
APPLICANT O’BRYAN: Yep.
HIS HONOUR: If she is convicted of the criminal matters there will be a penalty of some description.
APPLICANT O’BRYAN: Mental health ‑ there’s not mental health help? (Some mental health help would help her, and Susan)
HIS HONOUR: That’s not something that I ‑ that would be appropriate for me to comment on.
APPLICANT O’BRYAN: Okay, all right.
HIS HONOUR: Perhaps there are ‑ have you spoken to anyone at Legal Aid?
APPLICANT O’BRYAN: Yes, many times, several times they’ve been up to see her they can’t do anything. (No they have not seen me, but they should examine her and her daughter who is mentally ill – Susan Ward)
HIS HONOUR: I see. Thank you.
IN THE LOCAL COURT
THURSDAY 14 SEPTEMBER 2017
2015/00337884 ‑ SUSAN GAYE WARD v TRACEY GWENDOLINE BURT
COMPLAINT Application to vary apprehended violence ordeR
Applicant Ward appeared in person
No appearance of or for the Respondent Burt (respondent had ‘been asked to leave’)
HIS HONOUR: Can I just mention these matters, Ms Ward is the applicant in one and Ms O’Bryan is the applicant in the other. Ms Ward, just come forward if you wouldn’t mind. Now, this is your application to vary ‑ just come to the microphone because it’s all being recorded. This is your application to vary the AVO.
APPLICANT WARD: To extend it, yes.
HIS HONOUR: To extend it yes, and this matter was listed for hearing today
APPLICANT WARD: Correct.
HIS HONOUR: The defendant was present but is now not before this Court. I’m just reading the application. The application will be granted and the order will be extended for a further two years. It’s not a police matter is it? You don’t want to be heard? Thank you.
I GRANT THE APPLICATION AND THE ORDER IS EXTENDED FOR TWO YEARS.
APPLICANT WARD: Thank you. Leave?
HIS HONOUR: Yes, thank you.
IN THE LOCAL COURT
THURSDAY 14 SEPTEMBER 201
2016/00133248 ‑ R v Tracey Gwendoline BURT
2016/00139235 ‑ R v Tracey Gwendoline BURT
2016/00194166 ‑ R v Tracey Gwendoline BURT
2016/00202606 ‑ R v Tracey Gwendoline BURT
2016/00315621 ‑ R v Tracey Gwendoline BUR
Sergeant S Lewis for the Informant
No appearance of or for the Accused (Accused had asked the Magistrate to call these matters while going through his list earlier on this same day. He refused. Accused had abandoned proceedings in front of this corrupt Magistrate earlier in the same day and left the court house)
HIS HONOUR: All these other matters should be listed for a future date to set hearing dates.
PROSECUTOR: Now that this matter is finished and your Honour is not coming down, obviously your Honour can’t ‑ should not hear the other matters.
HIS HONOUR: Correct.
PROSECUTOR: It’s my submission that the matters should be put over for Monday, the next one in time can be given a hearing date given that we’re setting hearing dates now either in December or January.
HIS HONOUR: Well, if I list all matters on Monday Magistrate Brender will be here and his Honour can fix dates.
HIS HONOUR: While I’ve got you here, all of those other matters for Ms Burt, I’m listing them all on Monday for the purposes of dates being fixed for them if possible
PROSECUTOR: Thank you, your Honour.
ADJOURNED TO MONDAY 18 SEPTEMBER 2017 AT 9.30AM
WANTED: Be on the look out for this dangerous criminal,
pictured here wandering the streets of Albury on her birthday a few days ago.
She is wanted for telling the truth in court, and then for publishing information
about corruption at the Albury Local court and in cahoots with corrupt
police officers also located in Albury.
She is most wanted though, for making allegations against
Magistrate Tony Murray and Detective Glynn, Albury police,
regarding the rape and murder of William Tyrrell.
A warrant for her arrest has been issued by the Albury District court.
Also, be very afraid if you run into the woman mentioned below.
Even just talking to her will give her reason and ammunition to start spreading lies about you. Its what she does, for a hobby.
Subject: Your emails
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 19:51:38
Enough is enough, you have made your points with your emails and letters sent to everyone and (bullshit and lies).
(Bullshit and lies)
I am extremely disappointed that you have decided to tell XXX XXXXXX and Stella Burt in Tallangatta about Wayne and that subject, it is not your right to speak on my behalf and it is time to shut up about this and move on and stop causing trouble for everyone including Belinda, if you do not stop this talk then I will certainly have to think about what action I will have to take against you including telling your children a few truths.
When you are ready to ring my work please do so and I will happily put you through to my boss, you can discuss any issue you have with conversations you heard in my home or Mum’s but the consequence of this will be that at the first working day I have off I will be at Centrelink making things very hard for you, I will make it my mission to have you removed from the disability pension and back to Newstart to make your life even more uncomfortable that it is, could be as much as $300.00 per fortnight to you so have a good look at yourself.
Next if you see me coming I suggest you turn and run the other way and I would also suggest that it is time for you to pack up and leave Albury because once Wayne finds out what you have done including your 10 page letter to Debbie your life will not be worth living, (more bullshit and lies).
Subject: RE: Your emails Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 09:03:42 +1000
Fuck off mental case.
Yes, I did write to Debbie. She had the right to know. Now I have posted it to the net, and it will stay there, until Gary pays me $220.
By the way, I didn’t read much of your bullshit. I’ve had enough of that over the years.
According to Connie, you have had me cut out of the sluts will, for a crime I did not even commit. At least having all that money to yourself, will mean that you can eat yourself to death a lot sooner.
You don’t even know XXX XXXXXX, so shut the fuck up about him, and what I talk to him about. Cunt.
Now I did mention that both Susan and I had been molested, to my aunt in Tallangatta, but I did not say who had done that. I have always believe that it was Gary Burt in Western Australia who filled them in on that part of the story.
All I had talked about that day was how much Janice has hated me since the day I told her, and some of the awful things she has done to punish me for that.
But there it is, her own admission, that I should not speak on her behalf about what he did to her as well.
That’s because I didn’t participate, and she did. She has a lot to answer for, and if she hadn’t been so willing to drop her pants and let him screw her, then he might not have ever tried to rape me.
Gary Burt and his wife are aware of that situation, from our ‘childhoods’, and his wife alludes to it in one of her emails to me.
Debbie Robertson is the third victim I refer to in the sign above. Her mother could confirm, as could Janice, that Debbie was only 15 when Wayne started dating and then living with her. She turned 16 a few months into their relationship. However, he was in his late 20’s and she was 16. He soon got her addicted to heroin, and prostituted her on the streets of Port Kembla to make money for their habit.
She can’t confirm this, because she committed suicide about 20 years ago.
XXX XXXXXX could also confirm that I told him about it, under duress from himself, long before any of these court actions, designed to cover it all up, had commenced.
He also wrote a reference for me on the day they sent mental health workers to my door, stating that I was of high intelligence and sound mind, because we’d been working on his book every day for months at that stage, and he knew I was sane all of the way through that.
Plus during all of the time we associated, via email and in person, in the 11 months leading up to that. I wrote on another page is this blog, why is this man not allowed to have his own opinion of me. Why must they constantly phone him up and try to change his mind about me?
I’ve been meaning to go back and add to that, when he is the one who I spoke with every day in the several months leading up to these court proceedings.
Ward and I had not only not seen each other for the 18 months prior to these events, we also had not spoken. Prior to that we had not spoken for years, and rarely ever have anything to do with each other.
I’d also not been speaking to O’Bryan in the lead up to these events. XXX XXXXXX (who doesn’t want to be mentioned on the blog) would also have to confirm, that the argument started when O’Bryan emailed him trying to tell him lies about me.
When he didn’t believe her, or want to listen to her, she started sending him angry emails. I have copies of those, and which continued even after she’d started this court case.
A day after they’d sent the mental health workers, they also obtained his phone number, and Gary Burt phoned him up telling more lies about me.
Yet he had always enjoyed my company, and had just transferred $700 into my bank account for me to purchase the books for him, that we had just published, on behalf of himself and his family members.
I warned Ward last year that I would write about the nail polish game she invented when we were kids on the blog, if she did not stop her false charges and false allegations.
Ward was the first person to sexually molest me, long before Wayne tried. And which also gives cause to wonder if it wasn’t her who molested him first, and again, why she doesn’t want any details of their relationship to come out.
I would have only been about 7 years old when this happened. Dad had left when I was six. I think Janice was in the home for the first year, or some short period, then she started working nights and leaving us all alone. So basically I was left unprotected from abuse of all kinds, from the age of 7 upwards.
Susan and I shared a bedroom back then. She asked me one night if I wanted to play a game she had thought up. I agreed.
She came and got into my bed, laid herself on top of me, and had put a bottle of nail polish between her legs, and started making motions of humping me with it.
I didn’t find anything fun or interesting about the game at all. It seemed pretty dumb to me. I’d never been stimulated sexually by that stage in my life, so even if she did have it in the right spot, it wasn’t given me any kind of sensations or pleasure.
She wanted to play that game on another occasion, and I can’t say how many more after that. I went along with it, since it seemed to make her happy, even though I couldn’t not fathom what the game was supposed to entail.
One night she’d gone to bed really angry and upset. I didn’t know what had happened. To try to cheer her up, I asked if she wanted to play the nail polish bottle game.
‘No”, she replied angrily, “and if you ever ask again I will tell mum that you did’.
It was then I realized that the game must be naughty and something I would get in trouble for.
So the next few times she asked me to play it, I declined.
Then she stopped asking. I guess she found that Wayne had a bottle between his legs she could play with instead.
She was already being abuse by Mr Cole, a teacher at our primary school by this stage, and which is why she was now seeking sexual gratification in other ways and other places.
I won’t try to bring charges against her for this.
I’ll just punish her here where the truth is told, and not in court where only liars are allowed to be heard.
But now you are starting to see what a sick bitch she really is, and why she is so mentally ill.
And what deplorable conditions I grew up in. Apart from sexually assaulting his sisters, Wayne Burt used to physically beat up our other brother on a regular basis.
When he complained to Janice about that, she treated him like he was mentally ill for saying it, and had a doctor issue him with some medication to calm him down.
Wayne and Susan then spread it around that Gary was on mediation, ‘for being mentally ill’ and tormented him even more. Which is how he gained the nick name of Tablet.
Yet Gary told me that Susan used to disappear into the bedroom with Wayne, whenever she wanted Wayne to bash Gary up for her. So he didn’t just cop a beating when Wayne had the shits with him, he used to get one when Susan had the same.
Janice, apart from when she was working, was doing a great deal of screwing around herself. So on her nights off from work, she was not at home with any of us. Gary claims that some of her longest running boyfriends were actually married men.
Someone dobbed her into Centrelink (Social Security) not long after we’d moved to Queensland, back then. For working and earning money. Janice lied her way out of it, but then got caught when a male friend rocked up and asked if she was working that night. She had to quickly lie her way out of that then too.
It occurred to me recently that the person didn’t dob her in just because she was earning a bit of cash while on the single parent pension. I think the person wanted her reported to welfare, for leaving 4 kids alone every night of the week, and who were drinking and having loud parties, and aside from disturbing the whole street, there was one child there who was too young to be being exposed to it all, nor left alone.
No one every called DOCs on me Janice, nor even ever thought about it. Same can’t be said for you, eh?
I would have been in year 7 in Queensland, or first form had we stayed in NSW, so 11 or 12 years old, when a friend told me that her older sister had told her that my sister is a lesbian. I was a bit nervous the next time she walked in on me getting changed. But since she wasn’t ever home much, that didn’t happen often.
The next year I had to witness one of her boyfriends bite her on the ear, and hold her captive for a few hours in the bedroom, threatening to rip it off if he wasn’t left alone to deal with her
I’d called mother at work, and she called the police. Janice still didn’t come home. The police had to negotiate him for hours, with myself trying to help. He was angry that she’d played up on him, after their short relationship had ended.
When I was 15, I had to stand there and watch Albury police search Wayne’s room in the house owned by the Lavy Sports club, knowing that he had all sorts of drugs in there. Unbeknown to me though, he had come the night before and whisked them all away, on a tip off they were all about to be busted for the chemist robberies.
He served two and a half years for that. All of this stuff is proveable, none of their lies about me are. Gwen Bradley would have been already aware, that Susan came at John Ivers with a knife one night.
Don McDowell, who also had the misfortune to date her, would confirm that I phone him, at the end of their relationship and told him about her previous relationship with her brother. Susan had given me permission to do that, and in front of Janice O’Bryan.
Don replied that I had just confirmed what he had always thought, that Susan is suffering from the symptoms of severe sexual abuse, and from his guess, that had been at an early age. He offered to arrange counselling for her, but did not want her back.
Her ex-husband, Len Ward would confirm that he took a restraining order out on her, after throwing her out of their home for punching him in the face, at his workplace.
The only restraining orders ever taken out against me were my disability employment agency, who were trying to prevent having to grant a copy of my file, as part of a legal FOI order. And a dickhead in WA, who I took to petty claims court. The restraining order was comprised of lies, and was designed to stop me from being able to serve him, and start my case against him. Neither of those orders achieved what they wanted back then, and neither did these.
I guess when people apply for them for nefarious reasons, it doesn’t help them in the long run. Whereas someone who had actually been making threats of violence or any other kind, would stop, the moment an order was in place.
Who’s mentally ill in this family. Well since Gary and his wife have just stood up for Susan and Wayne in all of these matters, I have to say that they all are.
And the great Terry O’Bryan who’s previous reputation has ensured all of this support from city officials, is just an abuser himself now, after suffering 40 years of abuse at the hands of his own wife, but they aren’t aware of that, having not seen him for the past 20 years.
If I am insane, then it was living with them that sent me that way.
However, I believe that I am not, and there has never been a doctor who has suggested otherwise, not officially or unofficially, to myself.
I do believe a few have accused Janice of being that though. Plus she is the one who has to take anti-depressants to cope with her own guilt and feelings of self loathing. Same with Susan.
Me, I just blow a joint occassionally, to lift myself up and out of the distress and anguish they cause for everyone around them.
By the way Janice, the person you claim you raised, told me the other night that he has been told by the optometrist that his eye sight is deteriorating rapidly, that he is almost legally blind now.
But you would be too busy telling lies in court to have spoken to him about that, and continue to ensure that he can have no support from myself during this new health crisis, because I will be in jail, and unable to arrange for and attend appointments for him with an eye specialist, to find out what is going on.
Grandmother of the year award? I think not.
Scum of the earth award? I think so, but that title must be shared with Susan Ward, and Gary Burt.
Transcripts for all of the original hearings, and showing the obvious perversion of the course of justice, as it occurs on 15 and 29 February 2016, at the hands of Maggot Murray.