These half sentences comprised the whole of one application for an ADVO against me.
The complainants were forced to swear in the witness boxes that their applications were true and correct, because they made sure I was not present at that first hearing. Had I been there, my plea of innocence would have stopped any interim order having been made and the need for them to have done that.
I guess that’s what Gwennie was protecting them from as well … not only had they made false allegations in their applications, played games with evidence, and later lied in their supporting statements to the court, they had already committed purjery on the stand, on their very first day in court.
Disproving their evidence and allegations, really did put them in danger of being charged I guess, because they had done that. Had Gwen not convinced everyone at the court house that their problems were real though, again, things would not have ever reached those points.
Misleading Sentences in Janice O’Bryan’s AVO Application
(This follwing statements were lodged at the Albury Court House on 11 or 12 January 2016)
Addressing the sentences given by Janice O’Bryan in her application for an AVO against me, and putting them into the original context.
It is you and Susan who are fucked up drugged out mental cases
You and Susan are the drug addicts. Go take your antidepressants, to mask out the pain you still feel, from all of the mistakes you have made in your lives
Damn you to hell you fucking witch and your incestuous daughter and son, you all make the rest of us feel sick
It was the final line of an email, and so stood alone. However other evidence shows that my other brother Gary, hates Susan and Wayne too, for the bullying and abuse he also received from them both. The incest is what finally caused Gary to move out of home aged 15
Only a cunt would not help her sick child keep her family together:
Cameron’s mother told you lies. You chose to believe them. So when I couldn’t support her financially anymore either, along with Zig and my sick self, you sided with Cameron’s mother and therefore assisted them in removing her from my care. Only a cunt would not help her sick child keep her family together
I think you hate him because he gave you a dressing down for being a slut and getting pregnant:
You claim to hate your father because he was over domineering. Yet what have you been to everyone around you? I think you hate him because he gave you a dressing down for being a slut and getting pregnant. You can never forgive anyone who chastises you can you? Like Uncle Bob. Even when you are in the wrong, you just can’t handle having that pointed out to you.
Ruth was so outraged and unbelieving anyone could be such a cunt
Aunty Pat didn’t show your ugly letter about Stella (Janice’s sister) to everyone in Tallangatta. She rang Ruth and told her about it. Ruth was so outraged, and unbelieving that anyone could be such a cunt, that she drove right up here to look at it. And then they went and told Stella and Bob about it.
Note: Janice told me 18 years ago that she hates my Aunty Pat for betraying her by showing this letter around Tallangatta, and did it to turn everyone there against her, for no reason.
If you cut me out of the will you will regret that
If you cut me out of the will, you will regret that. Belinda will find out everything if you do. And I will do it all through official channels. I am sick of you hating me, for telling you, what he did.
(Meaning I will not only contest the will, but also ask for my eldest brother’s share of the estate, as compensation for the sexual assaults when I was a child, which in turn will lead to his daughter finding out that it happened. She had cut Gary out of the will two years ago, for attending his uncles funeral, and Susan’s always trying to get the rest of us cut out of it too. )
You can’t stop acting like a cunt, can you:
You destroyed your relationship with Gary (her son) and his family, when all you could do was act like a cunt. You just can’t stop acting like a cunt can you? I was happy to avoid you. I didn’t hang around to say hello when you returned from Queensland, because I would have had to ask what fucking game were you trying to play with Seaona?
I can call them liars, manipulators, bullies, thieves, child rapists, drug addicts, etc, etc:
… but the only insult they could think up to throw at me was ‘you are crazy, because you believe in UFO’s’.
LMAO. Well that is the truth, but also it is true that they were unable to bring up any real instance, where I had hurt any one of them personally.
Tomorrow if my bank balance is still less than $5, we’ll talk more about:
Kade. One word, Kade. Gary Burt’s son, who was assessed as having the IQ of an idiot when they sent him off to school at age 5, still unable to speak other than a mumble.
The above is proven in the blog. As stated in another defence, I’m not paying to print out the copies of it, Janice or Susan must do that, otherwise the court has to take my word for this.
(I had printed out 45 pages of the blog to submit in the defence evidence. They only introduced a copy of select pages, and did it in a deceptive and illegal manner. I wasn’t ashamed of what I had written, by they were. They didn’t want the court to read it, so they withheld it. I would have printed the whole thing, but as I stated above, why should I have had to. They wanted an order to have it removed from the net, they were required to present the initial pages of it, and which did not mention them at all, until Ward and her mother had come to my house, and then continued to make threats against me.)
I was convicted of the allegation of being mentally ill and blackmailing her for money for drugs, based on those half sentences above.
Her application was never proven in court, and the defence evidence ruled to be inadmissible, due to the allegation of breach against her daughter’s ADVO asking that I don’t contact her work place and dob her in for breaching client confidentiality regulations.
The application for the extension of the ADVO based on the above false accusations, was then turned into an act of parliament, with Magistrate Murray personally representing it this time.
You can understand why I am angry. It is only to prevent me from writing about all of this, for the next two years. Plus they again have the option to bring a false charge of breach against me, fine me, jail me and continue to harass me.
So I continue to harass all of these assholes back, by way of this blog.
Blog Actually Threatens to Never Speak to Them Again
As presented in the defence evidence lodged with the Albury Local Court on 11/12 January 2016
This blog is to shame my brother into paying a debt he has owed to me for the past 36 years.
I finally asked him to repay it recently, after I caught him out lying about me to relatives behind my back.
Now I will teach him to pay his debts, by the same methods they used in the olden days, by public shaming.
Once he has paid the money, I will take this off the internet. Until he does, I will send a link to a different family relative each day.
Then I’ll be glad to never see or talk to him ever again, obviously.
Comment Posted 5 November 2015
I, on the other hand, renounce these people once and for all. I am free of their shit, forever, because I will never speak to a single one of them again. They are not worthy of bothering with. All they do is create drama and conflict wherever they go, and then blame everyone else for it.
I will go the opposite way to them, as I always have.
Comment Posted 10 November 2015
As you can see, I grew up in a house full alcohol, drugs, sex, violence, abuse and sheer neglect.
Once Stella Psomas joined the clan, all that seemed like a good time, compared to the nightmare feud she bought with her.
Again, happy to leave them all to it. If they ain’t crazy, then I am happy to be it. 🙂
Comment Posted 10 November 2015
For an extension of that same ADVO, and which later became an Act of Parliament. I alleged that the new application sounded like the registrar herself had fed them both the information to put into them.
This is a little email exchange I had with a woman at the Office of the General Counsel of NSW this week.
From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Tuesday, 12 September 2017 7:32 PM
To: Rebecca Jeyasingam
Subject: Who writes the ADVO applications?
You stated in your decision letter of July 2017 that the applicants for ADVO’s write the wording for their applications, and that the Registrar has nothing to do with it.
That was not the case when I applied for my order against Susan Cunt Ward. The registrar created each sentence or paragraph, and then ran it by me, before typing it into their computer.
In preparing to publish all of the transcripts for these matters, that I have available to me, I come across this statement, from the very first hearing:
Corrupt Sex fiend Magistrate: Q. Ma’am did somebody assist you insofar as the orders that you sought? Did you draft these yourself?
Janice Lying Cunt O’Bryan: A. No, no, someone at the courthouse.
So you lie again you corrupt piece of f***** shit, from a department full of disgusting turds.
From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Tuesday, 12 September 2017 11:29 PM
To: Rebecca Jeyasingam
Subject: Who writes the ADVO applications?
However, in relation to that statement made in the previous email, that ‘someone at the court house’ wrote up her ADVO application, bear in mind that it was a series of sentences, for which only half of the complete sentence had been quoted, so that it appeared to have a sinister meaning when it did not.
Which means Mrs Lying cunt O’Bryan has just pointed the finger, in court, under oath, that Elizabeth Leathridge is responsible for constructing that perversion of truth.
Then Mrs Lying Cunt O’Bryan affirms under oath that they are all true.
Yes they are all true words, authored by myself. But the meaning of every single one of them has been misrepresented to the court, by O’Bryan and Leathbridge.
This is the email, for which she was granted a three year ADVO over, claiming I was threatening and blackmailing her for money. Apparently its illegal to call your own mother a cunt, via email, even if she is one. Especially if she has a friend employed at a court house, or at least the Albury one.
Be advised that I did not accept your invitation to come and see you to receive a dressing down from you about the fact that (my son) is still living there, for the following reasons:
1. You have not acted like a parent in the time that I have been here. Therefore, you have no right to try to play that role now.
2. Your sudden new anger at me, seems to have started on the same day that you played cards last week. It is this anger which is also now driving you to be threatening (my son) that he will be out on the street at the end of one month. Why are you doing this to him, when he is trying to start a new job with confidence and self esteem?
3. We have already advised you that we are once again looking for a place, and that he no longer wants to be there, being a burdeon on you, and you on him. We have been going through the processes of that.
4. Is your anger really about the fact that the ladies from cards received some information from ‘one of your own daughters’ shooting down a few of the lies you have been telling them, and confirming other things about you and your circumstances?
5. Yes, that was me. The lady in question even bought me a coffee in a coffee shop, once I’d started running you down to her, so that she could hear more. How is that (my son)’s fault?
6. There was a reason I did that to you. Do you recall insisting that (my daughter) come see you in Queensland, before coming to Albury to see me for her birthday? You were of course unaware of our plans for her 21st birthday, because you and Susan make it impossible to invite ‘family’ to any celebration, until I let it slip when I had to talk to you about the washing machine, that she was coming to Albury.
7. The day after (my daughter) arrived, she gave me a lecture about how I should not start all of the fights with Susan, that I start all the time. That I should accept that Susan and I are different people, and have different views, and therefore not hassle her about hers. Yet it was Susan who would not let me voice an opinion of my own when I ‘was staying in her house’. And Susan who has started every fight we have had in the past 52 years. Don’t you recall me often trying to run away from home to get away from her? Oh, that’s right, you never knew who was home, and who wasn’t, because you yourself was never there.
8. (my son) and I convinced (my daughter) that you had misled her, and blamed the innocent one for what Susan does to not only me, but everyone around her. Treat them in an emotionally abusive fashion, and then threaten them with violence if they dare to complain about that, or try to stand up to her in her onslaughts of angry and jealous rages.
9. So this email is a warning to you, and to point out the lessons of the above situations to you. If you ever run me down like that again to her, or my son, I will go out and do the same to you amongst your own family and friends. I am sick of it.
You know this is not a one off, or isolated instance, you have been doing this for the past 20 years, after I came ‘home’ to accept an offer of ‘help with my children’ from ‘family’. Its time it ended. My children lived at home, and attended high school longer than any of yours did. Since Gary was out of home by 15, he had no hope of finishing even 4th form. Susan wouldn’t have even finished 2nd form. So as a parent, it is I who have done the better job, despite your manipulations and plots to ruin the relationships of all of your children and grandchildren.
10. Yes, I have spoken to Gary, on his birthday. A few days later, Stella jumped in and started being an idiot, so I haven’t spoken to them since. You and her and Susan, are all alike and have fought for 30 years now.
11. Yes, I have seen Aunty Stella. Ken came up two days before you left for the winter, and we went to see her then. She gave me the old Burt photos. I explained to Ken at the time, that you were busy packing the van and would be annoyed if he dropped in and interrupted that process. She has held your great grandson, and you have not. I have seen her photo of that.
12. We now come to your next ‘punishment’ or lesson. I have taken the Braidwood book away from you. You obviously have no input to make to it, or are just stalling the process, which is costing me money on my ancestry site fees.
Apart from thinking you had some right to lecture me about (my son) being there, when in planning to move back here, you had tried to manipulate him into disagreeing with me, and coming here to live in Albury with you, when I was refusing to come too. You ended up getting what you tried to implement, and to manipulate us both into. Coming to live in Albury, when you moved back here.
Now, you have tried to run me down to Ken, out of spite. You have bitched and moaned about the money you chose to donate, and then used that correspondence to get back at me for gossiping about you, by running me down to Ken. As usual, by using distortions of the truth to do so.
Ken and I have worked hard, and worked well together on that book. We have become good friends. The only things you have contributed is all that I scanned and typed up while staying there, which you bitched and moaned about when you got home, and knew that I had been accessing the ‘family documents’ chest’. Until you saw the book. Then your attempts to treat me nicely were just so hypocritical and false, that it was almost sickening. Now you turn around and sabotage the book, just near its completion, by beginning to set about turning Ken against me, and the very day after I had told you that he was my acting as my personal reference for any rental properties I applied for!
It has had the opposite affect with him. I have also run into a few people lately, who have filled me in on things I was not aware of. You have no right to be throwing mud at anyone. You need to grow up. I am aware that both Aunties Ruth and Pat have told you that. What your kids think of you, is becoming a real joke, to those people you have turned into your enemies. You need to think about that.
While I don’t wish to give you an excuse to go into 6 months of self-pity and pretended depression, threatening suicide, and pretending to yourself and everyone else that I was nasty to you for no reason. As you always do. Why don’t you instead, change your ways.
Gary cannot bring himself to forgive you. Your grandchild is soon to be married, in California in the USA, and you won’t be invited. She is also living in Sydney. Close enough to visit, but with no intention of seeing you. YOU created that.
You have been playing your games for too long now. Everyone is awake up to them, and sick of them. Only Terry and Susan support you in your bullshit. Susan because she is usually involved, or jumps in on any drama. And Terry because he is too weak to you, to stand up to you and tell you the truth. That YOU create it all.
If you want a new life in Albury, then stop making a fool of yourself, but cutting the throat of your own family members. You are not anonymous here, as you were on the Gold Coast. You have a much wider audience now. What show will you put on? Forgiveness and mending the break down of the relationships, or just more of your usual tantrum.
If you cut me out of the will, you will regret that. Bindy will find out everything if you do. And I will do it all through official channels. I am sick of you hating me, for telling you, what he did.
If Susan comes near me, to give me any more grief, while I am in Albury, I will phone her employers and advise them of her breaches of the privacy of their clients’ financial details, by gossiping about that information with you, every afternoon after work. I will put her on welfare.
‘Threat’ bolded above, is what the BDS Huon employee applied for her ADVO over, and was granted a three year restraining order against myself, which they think means I can’t even mention the words BDS Huon online.
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 23:36:13 +1000
Subject: RE: Your Bills
So … I hear that your reaction has been to try to destroy my relationship with (my son). Not that you haven’t been trying to do that the whole time he has been here, and for most of our lives.
This just sickens me even further.
I have been talking to Gary, Connie and Stella tonight. I don’t think you’ll be invited to the wedding. We all agreed it is best to just keep away from you, and your henchmen, Susan and Terry.
I hear you got fired from the Lavvy Sports Club. I hear the board of directors banned you from ever working there again, for being a trouble maker.
So that’s why you moved to Wollongong. And that eventually destroyed Terry’s life’s work.
Tell Terry not to come near me. He also does not have the right to act like a parent , or even an adult. He is Susan No 2.
I had to take a restraining order out on the man at the guest house, who tried to rape me, when I ended up in the street over it all. Which you didn’t care about of course. But the police knew I was being truthful, and then so did the judge.
If Terry comes near me I will go and make a complaint about Wayne, for attempting to rape me when we first moved to Qld. Last year of primary school, so what 10 or 11 years old. This was after years of course, of him getting me to get into bed with him to hear a bedtime story, and then him rubbing his penis all over me from behind.
Susan and him eventuated to actual sex.
I didn’t work, so that did not happen between my children, while I was not at home. You fed Mr Cole a home cooked meal, every time that he came over to molest Susan, at the dinner table under your nose.
The people at Tallangatta see Wayne as a bit of a joke too apparently. The women find him sleezy and creepy, and its been noticed he mainly visits Greg when he wants to borrow his boat to go water skiing. Someone commented on Wayne showing up to the funeral wearing jeans and a matching jean jacket, with pointy toed shoes. Wayne quipped back that ‘bob never dressed up, so why should he have’. What a fine example he sets for you there.
He went to the Burt reunion in Ballarat years ago, for Anna’s 80th birthday. I’m glad to know that Anna has since met Kristina and Gary at Bob’s funeral, and knows we all aren’t junkie sleeze bags. Who got me back on smack in Wollongong when I came up from Melbourne? W A Y N E.
Who’s friend came to Sydney and left me some for free, because Wayne had just got him hooked on it too? W A Y N E. Wayne soon followed, again with more heroin, because he wanted to stay at my house for a night and me to drive him to pick his girlfriend up from jail the next day. Her mother had already been there and spirited her away from him before he could get to her again.
I guess the police will find my allegations more credible when I tell them about Wayne and statutory rape with Debbie, until she turned 16. Then he turned her into a prostitute to feed his drug habit. Andrew in Sydney remembers Wayne as hanging around with a paraplegic in Kings Cross, to scab all his pension off him. He sold Andrew’s fridge to buy smack for himself.
Yet you criticize me as a mother. My life with my two children would have been great, had I not come back to give them some family. I would have managed on my own, and they would have instead met their fathers. Scumbags that they are, they might have still been better than the scumbags in your home.
I didn’t accept your offer to come home to get money, I knew it would be a nightmare being back near you. I’d only just escaped and healed myself. But they had no dad’s, so no family. They still don’t. The head of their family doesn’t know the meaning of the word.
So you showed (my son) the email I sent, at the lowest point of mine and his relationship. Even though, as boisterous and sometimes naughty as he was, we had always managed to have a good and loving relationship. Unlike you and your two sons. You have tried to destroy that. You destroyed your relationship with me, when I came home with my children and all you could do was act like a cunt. Susan as well of course.
You destroyed your relationship with Gary and his family, when all you could do was act like a cunt.
You just can’t stop acting like a cunt can you. I was happy to avoid you. I didn’t hang around to say hello when you returned from Queensland, because I would have had to ask what fucking game were you trying to play with (my daughter)?
On the day following the conversation about you lying to her about me and Susan, she then bought up how much Gary had hurt you recently. Again, I had to explain to her that her grandmother is a liar.
How sad. For you both.
I have been happy to avoid you all while I am here. I am only here for Ziggy. Yet you wanted me to come. But when I didn’t do it under your orders, but drifted down later due to some bad circumstances in my life, now you don’t want me here.
I was so glad when you left. So glad to finally be finished with another 20 years of your bullshit. I also am pissed off, that the attempted kidnapping of my son drove me out of where I was and down to here. I ended up with the proof that it was them, during the following 6 to 12 months of being on the run. Yet you didn’t want to hear about that, when I tried to tell you. And then suggested to Terry that it was a lie anyway.
Well it wasn’t cunt. It is truth. You don’t know what that is. You and Susan tell so many lies, you can’t remember truth. You don’t even know the meaning of the word.
Aunt Stella said she can barely bring herself to forgive Susan for phoning her house, several times on the night that nan had had a stroke and was dying, demanding that you come and fucking sort out the domestic arguement she had started with Don.
Yet you think she is normal, and everyone else if fucked up. Man. Get a grip on reality. It is YOU and SUSAN who are fucked up drugged out mental cases. You took too much serapax while we were growing up.
Get pregnant to dad while you were dating. Went out with married men once single again. Still don’t have a happy marriage. Your ex friend thought it hilarious that you weren’t able to make it work with such a nice man as Terry. She had also heard that Terry is no longer the same though.
Other people say it. Terry O’Bryan is a wreck of a man. Is that what you did to my father? I think so.
Don’t take this out on (my son) when he finally has a good job and a real chance to now move out. If its not with me, it will be with friends, because he has learned today that you are not worth knowing. But he will forgive me, for whatever you have done. Because I was always at home for him, and protected him, and showed him love, when he wasn’t getting in trouble for something.
Dam you to hell you fucking witch. And your incestuous daughter and son. You all make the rest of us feel sick.
Janice O’Bryan by Tracey Burt, Defence Statements (lodged by the defence in January 2016)
Janice O’Bryan is a liar, a master manipulator, and a trouble maker. She only feels powerful when she is standing over, or causing trouble for someone else. When caught out, she merely laughs and shrugs it off, regardless of the damage and pain she has caused to that person, and then continues with those same behaviours.
Now she is lying to, and trying to manipulate a court into teaching me a lesson for simply refusing to be a victim of her games any longer, and threatening to deny her access to my children.
In evidence she submits for her case against me, some of which is the same page repeated 3 times, but with the all of the paragraphs sitting in different places on the page, she highlights the word ‘cunt’ 9 times. The one page which contained 3 instances of that word, is presented 3 times.
I stand accused of sending her over 100 emails and text messages filled with foul language, threats, intimidation, harassment and am also trying to blackmail her for money.
The statistics and my evidence show, there were 16 emails only. Comprised of 21 pages in total, and most of those only contain a paragraph or two. 11 pages had no swear words on them at all. Of the 9 pages with an assortment of swear words on them, there are only 20 of those in total. More than half are just general uses of those words, and only 9 of them were actually directed at her.
I assure the court, that the text messages I admit to sending her, are again, a gross misrepresentation of their true contents and their number.
For the allegation of blackmail, she uses an email sent to my brother asking him to pay money he owes to me, and he which merely forwarded to her. It had nothing to do with her. In her own evidence, she submits that email asking him for the money, and tries to pretend that I have demanded it from her. Then began threatening her to pay it to me, via emails and text messages, and threats against her.
1. Janice O’Bryan claims that I have been diagnosed with a mental illness. I ask that she be made to prove this, or the statement be dismissed.
a. It is merely a lie that she has tells everyone because she cannot accept my new age beliefs and lifestyle, and claims they equal insanity.
b. It is a lie to explain to her friends, why I rarely have much contact with her, and little respect.
c. To reinforce this lie to the court, she claims I was officially diagnosed. Again, not true.
d. Janice then claims it is affecting my behavior towards her. Not true, she knows she is guilty of what I have told her off over, and is merely angry that I stood up to her, and asked her to stop.
2. She claims that we have not had a close relationship since I was 18. This is partly true, but also a deception. That condition is bought about by her own attitudes towards me, and the way she treats me.
a. I moved out of home at age 18. We clashed for a few years after that when she refused to let me live my own life, and still does. We rarely saw each other in my 20’s and I’ve deliberately tried not fight with her for the past 20 years in front of my children, and just walked away instead
b. When I had children at aged 30+, I was living in Katoomba. Both Susan and Janice tried to convince me to move to Albury, so that Janice could ‘help me out’. I declined at first, but the next time they tried to talk me into it, I agreed, but made two conditions.
i. That Janice not interfere with the ‘new age’ beliefs I would be teaching to my children. She agreed not to.
ii. That Janice never run me down to my children. Janice protested that she would never do that. Susan was present, and actually supported me, reminding her that she had done so with all of her other grandchildren, and their mothers’ already.
c. Janice agreed, but has reneged on both of those agreements for the past 20 years. She fed my children meat when I was raising them to be vegetarians. She told them not to be an idiot like their mother and believe in the stupid things that she does. She continues to do the same to this day.
d. Now that they are older, she is trying to convince them that I am insane, was all through their years of growing up, attacking her that whole time, and without them even being aware of either.
e. Janice really began to hate me, once I told her about the sexual abuse Susan and I both experienced from my eldest brother Wayne. It is due to this hatred that we have not been able to have a reasonable relationship, since I was aged 34. It comes from her.
f. She offered that my son could come and stay with her in Albury to look for work before moving back here three years ago. When our personal circumstances bought that about two years ago, pretends now that I abandoned him, don’t want to live with him, that she had to rescue and now support him for me, because he and I cannot get along. Again, all lies.
g. I have a right to be angry that Janice has been doing this to me for the past 20 years, and to finally let her know that I am sick of it
h. I did not do that in a way that was frightening for her, abusive, threatening, nor irrational. Which is why she has not supplied the emails and text messages that she did receive to the court.
I have had to in my own defence of her, and at my expense of time and money.
3. All of the quotes Janice used in her initial application for the AVO are addressed in the document called – Misleading Sentences Given As Grounds for AVO.
a. All of them have been used out of context, and when put in the right sentence do not say what they first appear to when standing on their own. This was a deliberate manipulation, by her.
4. Janice claims that all of my emails to her were offensive. Is an AVO warranted for something that has merely caused offence?
a. They were only offensive to her, because she didn’t like hearing the truth.
b. They were offensive, because she is a liar who spreads lies, and I made her aware that I’d started undoing some of the ones she has been telling lately.
5. She goes on to claim again, that the emails were offensive, and harassing. Yet my own evidence shows that each time she received a new set of emails, or of text messages, it was after she had been shown to be spreading more lies about me, and in particular to my son, or organized for someone else to attack me on her behalf.
6. The main set of emails she received starting on 11 Oct – 12 Oct, were sent after I had been abused for two hours by a grandchild that hates her. Every insult that girl threw at me had been created from lies told to her parents by Janice, or by Janice personally. Which is why I then took that out on Janice in return. Those are where I first begin to swear at her, and mainly in the first one.
a. Those emails, which are the bulk of everything I did send to her, were all sent in succession over a 2 hour period, starting at 11.30 pm on the 11th and ending at 2 am on the 12th.
b. They were not even sent on different days, even though the dates would imply they are, until you look at the time stamps.
c. Of those 9 emails, 5 have no swearing at all. Of the 4 that do, she uses one of those pages repeated three times, as her evidence against me. Yet accuses me in court of lies and slander.
d. I sent her one more on the 13th October, just to clarify one point, and was finished.
e. I ended up sending her 3 more very short ones at the beginning of November, just to warn her that her son Gary would betray her, as he had just done to me, to her, and that it was him who convinced me that she was a ‘slut’, before marrying Terry O’Bryan.
7. She again claims that she feels scared of me harassing her. All she had to do was stop lying to my son, and it would have stopped. In fact it had stopped, three weeks before she came to my residence with my sister to bash me up over them, and six weeks before she applied for this AVO.
8. She claims that due to her age, the abuse and intimidation causes her stress. Yet she is not too old to be texting threats to me that she is going to have her eldest son beat me up. She is not too old to go on missions with Susan Ward, to seek me to rough me up, and not too old to lie about those events afterwards.
a. The ‘poor me’ act, is one of her most used weapons in her games against other people, and she now tries to manipulate the court using it in her grounds for the AVO application.
9. She claims that I use cannabis, and in conjunction with the mental illness that I don’t have, it causes me to act erratically.
a. Janice O’Bryan has no idea how often I have smoked pot in this past year, when she has rarely even seen or spoken to me.
b. The only time that Janice is aware that I used cannabis while in Albury, was one day in September when I arrived at her house stoned. My son called me to come and pick him up, and I had planned not to go inside for that reason. He was not ready, and because Janice had been sending messages via him that she wanted to talk to me about the ancestry book I was making, I decided to go in and get the visit over with.
c. Janice and I sat there talking about it all. She was amazed at what I had learned, amazed by the book I was making, one I had already done, and very impressed with it all. She knew I was stoned, yet sat there having an actual conversation with me, when she rarely bothers. It was the only time we have communicated as a normal mother and daughter would, in the whole year that I have been in Albury.
d. Janice highlights any mentions of cannabis in my emails to her. Is she relying on getting me offside with the court for that, because she has no real evidence of abusive or threatening correspondences with her?
e. Janice was aware that her eldest son Wayne was growing cannabis on a large scale in his backyard in Wodonga when his daughter was 6 years old, and personally selling all the drugs he grew to make money. Yet she didn’t go to the police about that.
f. When Janice arranged to move herself and children into a house owned by the Lavington Sports Club, while Terry O’Bryan was the manager, he not aware that Wayne soon had a crop of cannabis plants growing under the house. The Sports Club paid the electricity bill, and Terry signed the cheques. Therefore, she put Terry O’Bryan in a position of enabling and funding the production of cannabis for resale, with funds belonging to a registered club, and on the premises of same.
g. Gary Burt picked up a large quantity of cannabis from the airport one night, which he’d had flown into Albury, and took it to that same house. I helped him and his friend package in all up into 23 x 1 oz bags, just to hang out with the big boys, and be helpful. I was 15. Once finished I went to my bedroom. Gary came and offered to sell me one for half price, for helping them bag it up. I’d only tried it a couple of times, at that stage.
h. Proceeds from robberies of chemist shops by Wayne Burt, were all bought to that Lavington Sports Club owned property, and resold, along with many other drugs bought on the black market. Gary claimed to me at the time that he and Wayne were the biggest drug dealers in Albury, proud of it, and to only buy off them. Now she pretends to not understand why I sometimes smoke pot.
i. Janice O’Bryan used to buy stolen goods, when she worked in pubs, while I was growing up.
j. Janice O’Bryan worked for decades under a false name, while claiming the single parent pension and often had another job as well.
k. Janice O’Bryan lodged a tax return under her maiden name after marrying Terry O’Bryan.
The tax office sent her a bill for $4,000, and she was furious at being caught out.
l. Yet Janice now pretends to be an upstanding citizen, and I am a scummy drug addict that she just can’t deal with.
10. Janice states that I ask her for money, in an email dated 6 November. Yet the only emails I sent that day were to Susan and Gary.
a. Gary merely forwarded it to Janice. It was written to him. The request is made of him.
b. The email asked Gary to pay money he has owed me for 36 years. There are other emails to him, asking him to pay me, in the lead up to the creation of the blog.
c. The blog is about how he came to owe me the money, and the disgraceful reasons why.
11. Her quote regarding the adding of another $20 to what I had originally asked for, comes from another email to Gary, merely forwarded to her. However, this shows that I had only ever asked for what was owed me, but was now adding on extras because of his refusal to acknowledge the debt.
12. I sent Gary an email advising him that I would take legal action to recover the money. While I stated that email gave me the right to take legal action 14 days hence, I am aware it did not meet the legal requirements for a first letter of demand. I bluffed anyway. His response was the extremely nasty email from his wife, calling me a pathetic looser and mental case. Gary’s daughter tried sending me more abusive text messages, but stopped when I ignored them all. Gary phoned me, yelling that he would have me committed to a mental home for even asking for it. He stated that he would use Janice to put me there. Susan sent her email demanding I stop emailing ‘everyone’. They all ganged up on me, and I stood my ground and did not back down to any of them. I already had my next weapon loaded. I’d written the blog, venting while I had no internet access, and it was ready to go online the moment I could afford to recharge my phone.
13. What other option did I have left, to recover the debt? I was in severe financial distress, and both Janice and Gary had caused that when plotting against me. Public shaming via the internet was the only thing I could think of, and which is becoming an accepted way to modify anti-social or illegal behaviours in people who have no regard for other people’s safety. I was in danger of starving.
14. Blackmail means asking for money that is not owed to you. The money is owed to me, I’d just never asked for it back before. Gary works in the mining industry in WA, and earns a huge wage. I had a good wage when he took my savings from me, and he had a low paying job. I have my pension now, and he is flush with money.
15. I have a spare ATM card for my son’s bank account. I am able to help myself to it anytime I am short of cash. I repay him the next week. I had no need of money from Janice, and have not asked her for any since my son has been living them.
16. After Janice drove me out of my last rental property, and while by plotting against me with Gary, I’ve had to borrow more heavily from my son than ever before, and have not been able to pay him this time. My debt to him continued to grow larger. Which is why I kept on pressuring Gary, with more and more blog comments designed to shame him. She now uses that to convince my son that I’m now bludging off him, because I am just no good.
17. Why would I risk being arrested and potentially jailed, to blackmail someone for such a small amount of money? Why is Janice pretending to the court that it was asked of her, and the blog created to force her into paying me, when the evidence clearly shows otherwise? Spite.
18. Janice states that I wrote I would send a link to everyone from our extended family. I did, but just to the people who’s email addresses I had, and she would have been aware that number would be very small. I hadn’t kept in touch with our extended family for decades. The only ones I did have, were through recent contact, for ancestry research and were the younger generations only.
19. Janice claims the above statement caused her to feel blackmailed. Janice states that she does not owe me any money.
a. I have never said that she did, nor asked her for any, and she is fully aware of that. The request is made to Gary Burt at all times, apart from once when I offered to let her settle the bill for him, instead of having me illegally beaten up to be rid of the blog.
b. Janice is only trying to have the blog removed, because Gary is refusing to pay, and had chosen to simply ignore it being there. He didn’t care that Susan and Janice were left embarrassed by it, and its contents, because he hates them both.
c. Threatening me with violence was the only solution she could come up with. Talking to me, negotiating with, or even apologizing to me, did not to occur to her at all.
20. Janice states that she has given me money for all of my adult life, even a car. I do not dispute that, apart from the gift of the car. It was a manipulation to try to get me agree to come to Queensland with her and Terry on their retirement, and since I didn’t have one, I accepted it.
a. I am not the only one of Janice’s children she has had to give money to as an adult. Yet I am the only single parent, who was on welfare.
21. Janice then starts to complain about the blog and its contents, and again states that she feels harassed and intimidated by it.
a. Liars are always intimidated by truth, especially when it starts to get out.
22. Janice states again that the blog was created to blackmail her into providing me with money.
a. Yet the request for money is made to Gary Burt, over and over again, via the blog itself and email, and all of the evidence, even her own, clearly shows that.
23. Janice claims that she is seeking an AVO to have the blog removed from the net, and that I not contact her, with harassment and intimidation. She wants it to stop.
a. Janice was told by police that the blog is a civil matter not a criminal one, unless it becomes criminal defamation of character. This hearing is not about defamation of character.
b. An AVO is for people who are living in fear of someone causing them physical harm, or destroying their property. Janice has never been threatened with any of those things, but is in fact guilty of that herself. She is just angry that I stood up to her and threatened to end her contact with my children.
c. I understand that to humiliate someone in public is not very nice, and at some stage passes into being a crime. However, Janice is being humiliated by stories of her own neglect of her children when they were young, and later in stories demonstrating how manipulative she is, and what a bully and unstable person Susan is. I could call a dozen witnesses to verify both of those statements.
d. My ‘angrier’ emails to Janice had stopped over a month before she applied for the AVO.
e. Janice claims she has real fears about my communications with her. Yes, she doesn’t want to hear the truth about herself, and the state of her relationships with her immediate family. She wants it all to be made to go away, by some other authority, because she has no leverage over me anymore.
24. Janice wants the court to believe that I have written these emails to her, and the blog to blackmail her, because I am unstable. Yet a friend who sees me all the time, has seen no indication of that being true. See witness statement by Joshua White.
a. Why has she not been able to get police involved if I have acted so badly and illegally?
b. Why I am standing in a criminal court when police have not interviewed me, nor given me a chance to demonstrate the truth of the situation, and show my innocence to them?
c. Why has she not called a mental health unit, or a drug counselling service?
d. Why is she trying to deny that she triggered it all, when the reasons for it are given clearly in my email to her of 9 October, and entered into evidence by all parties involved.
25. I feel that Janice’s AVO should be dismissed, due to the lies and manipulations of truth she had to use in her application to even get it in motion. She wasn’t required to show evidence back then, and now that she is, has not been to be able to do.
26. I feel it is not relevant because I have made no threats to her, nor to Terry O’Bryan, or to their property.
27. I feel the AVO is not relevant because Janice herself has been the aggressor each time, and which has triggered a reaction from me which displays no compassion for her.
28. I feel that Janice O’Bryan’s AVO should be dismissed, because not only has she not supplied much evidence to support her case, but has deliberately omitted emails which would show that she is the one at fault. No evidence of the ‘abusive’ text messages either. I assure the court, they are just like the emails provided. They bring up past issues between us, and not one of them makes any threat to her.
29. I feel that Janice O’Bryan’s AVO should be dismissed as she was making threats of violence towards myself in the lead up to her own application. She even came to my residence with the intention of watching Susan assault me physically on 6 Nov 15. Then signed a sworn statement lying about the events of that night.
30. Addressing Janice O’Bryan’s statements to support her AVO application:
31. She claims that she needed to go to the police, in the evening of 6 November because of abusive text messages and emails. Yet the only emails I sent her close to that date were a friendly warning about Gary. The only text message I sent to her in Nov 15, was when I replied to one of her threats to send her eldest son to beat me up, sent via my son, directly to her own phone.
a. She claimed to me via a text message of 14 Oct, she had already been to police about that short spate of emails, and was applying for an AVO against me then. She obviously was told she had no grounds for one then, and still doesn’t, when she’s had no contact to complain of in the time since then. That text message is shown in my evidence in an email to Ken Pearce on 14 October 15.
32. She claims I am constantly moving around, and they often do not know where I live.
a. She knew vaguely where I lived in North Albury because I’d personally given her a description of where the house was situated. When she’d asked the same question of my son, in general conversation, he had given her similar information.
b. She recalled those conversations to try to find me, when she wanted to send Terry O’Bryan to verbally abuse me, just after I had written the email of 9 October to her.
c. When my son advised her that my landlady had offered to call police for me if he did, and had advised me to seek an AVO against him, she dropped that idea and tried to get one herself instead.
d. Had Janice had shown any interest in me at all during the past 12 months that I have been in Albury, she would have known where I lived. She didn’t know, because she didn’t care to see me, because Susan was forcing her to ignore me, and to take her side in events from the year prior.
33. From a vague description given to her by my son, she and Susan went off to find me on
6 November, she claims.
a. They did not have a vague description, they forced very detailed directions out of him, and it took him a long time to finally describe my new location, against his will.
b. They both stood over him, bullying and demanding it, until he was in tears.
c. Email dated 6 November to Gary Burt, demonstrates this. I linked more people to the blog because of it. I sent that email before my son phoned from his car, to warn me that they were definitely coming, and to ‘get out of here’, because they intended to do me harm.
34. Janice states that I do not want my son living with me, yet for the past 18 months I have been trying to take him off her hands, and she sabotages that every time. I would bet that Terry O’Bryan doesn’t even understand that is the real reason why he is still living in their home.
a. This argument began when she sent an email to the person was acting as my personal referee for rental applications, after I had just told her myself that he had spoken highly of me, and my strong desire to have my son back with me, to a real estate agent. The email he sent letting me know that she had done it, is submitted in evidence, as well as the email she sent to him, and his reply to her. You can see they are all dated just a few days before my first email to her. I’d warned him that she might try to attack me to him, once I realized she’d heard I’d spoken to one of her enemies, and ran her down. He replied that she already had, and a couple of days later he sent it to me.
35. Janice states that she and Susan drove to a house where they recognized it had a granny flat behind it.
a. The granny flat is not visible at all from the road.
b. Susan’s statement about how they knew it had a granny flat, contradicts Janice’s, in that she states she already just happened to know that particular house had a granny flat
36. Janice makes several statements about events that occurred once they thought they had identified the right house.
a. The diagram of the property, shows that Janice is lying in her own statement, and again in her signed statement in support of Susan’s objection to the AVO I have applied to have placed on her.
b. Janice claims that the landlady stood near the front door area and watched us, yet the landlady was in the back yard, and not even visible to me.
c. Janice claims that Susan never walked away from the car, yet both myself and landlady saw her at the bottom of the driveway, looking up at me where I had run to. The landlady didn’t hear what Susan’s said, but saw Susan’s lips moving.
d. Janice claims that Susan did not speak at all, on their second visit. Again, that is an outright lie designed to protect Susan, and mislead the court about their behavior and intent on that night.
37. Janice claims that all of my emails contained abuse and foul language.
a. Abuse usually describes something unwarranted or out of line. Janice fully deserved to receive all of those emails, and what they said in them.
b. I deliberately called her a cunt, to trigger pain in her, so that she would remember what I had said, and to hurt her as much as she was trying to hurt me.
38. I called her a slut because Gary spent the first 10 minutes of the conversation I had with him on 16 August, speaking about how many married men she had had relationships or affairs with. He made sure that I understood that they all had wives and kids at home, knowing that I was too young to fathom that at the time. He insisted to me, that she is a woman with no morals.
39. The first fallout Janice had with Gary Burt’s wife Stella, was when Susan told her that Janice called her ‘the dog’, behind her back.
a. Janice and Susan later changed that nickname to be the ‘wog’. Susan taught Stella’s daughter to parrot the phrase ‘daddy married a wog’, while Janice stood by and laughed. When it was repeated to Gary and his wife one day at their home, Janice simply laughed off his anger about it.
b. They have continued to refer to that woman as ‘The Wog’ for the past 30 years, then she has the hide to highlight it in an email when I finally did the same. I called her that simply because I knew how much it hurts her that Janice does it. An email from Stella Burt confirms the same.
c. I refer to Gary’s wife as Effie, in emails and the blog. Effie is a lovable Greek comical character loved by most Australians. Which is worse, Effie or ‘The Wog’?
40. I was easily able to wind Gary up and push all of his buttons, by using a nickname from his childhood made up by Wayne, and used by Susan to torment him. Tablet. That is all I called him. It refers to when he complained to Janice that Wayne was constantly beating him up while she was at work, so she took him to a GP and had him put on medication for a nerves. Wayne told all their friends that Gary was mentally ill, was on medication for same, dubbed him Tablet, and had a new weapon to use against him instead of just his fists. Janice never asked Wayne to stop beating him up. Susan and I had to watch them come to blows in the lounge room on a regular basis, and try to break up their fights.
41. The ‘foulness’ of my language, is merely that she hates to be chastised for anything, and felt unable to control, dominate and manipulate the person saying them to her, anymore.
42. Then Janice claims that I have breached the AVO by emailing Gary Burt after the first hearing. Again, she leaves out all of the reasonable emails sent to him, and provides only the two angry ones. Those were driven by my anger that I have now to go to trial, over what is just another a family argument. Just because I called his wife an idiot, and informed her that I see through her games of manipulation and deceit as well, and they are why she cannot get along with his family.
43. Was Gary Burt even protected by the AVO preventing contact?
a. Both Janice and Susan applied for, and were granted interim AVO’s which prevented me from contacting them, in any form. I have complied, long before they were even granted in Susan’s case.
b. Gary has taken no action over my emails, nor the blog, therefore is not automatically covered by theirs, as far as I can see.
c. The emails to Janice were over very different matters to the emails to Gary Burt, again, disqualifying him from being protected by these proceedings.
d. One email to Gary in December requested that he supply a copy of the text messages his daughter sent to me, for the trial of these matters. He did not respond. Again, therefore cannot be considered to be a valid participant in these matters, when he is withholding information which would clear me of these accusations of attacking the ‘whole’ family, for ‘no reason’.
e. I have submitted some of the emails between myself and his wife, and printed them all out. I can present them if the court wants to determine who was in the wrong in my squabble with him. However, until the court has read them, it has no grounds to assume I am guilty in that situation.
f. Janice and Susan have fought with Gary’s wife for 30 years. I have just done so for the first time. Now Janice wants to claim to a court that I had no right to do so.
g. Janice and Gary had not been speaking to each other for the past two years, until Gary stabbed me in the back to get back into her good books recently. Terry O’Bryan would have to confirm both of those statements to be true, and I will call upon him to do so.
h. Gary had been cut out of her will two years ago, which is why I bring the topic up to her at all, and she uses that in her application, pretending that I am warning her not to do it to me, or else she will suffer consequences. She’d cut him out for attending his uncle’s funeral.
44. What Janice is trying to draw the court’s attention to, is that I also updated the blog after the first hearing.
a. At first I did not touch it, even to delete it, when I was served with the notices of her AVO.
b. I believe that the AVO’s don’t really affect it, because it is not what Janice has portrayed it to be in her application, and does not have any tone intimidation. It is also not lies or slander, because it is all true. There is nothing in it that is not absolutely true, and it was not to blackmail her or anyone else for that matter.
c. Both Janice and Susan called it by an incorrect name in their applications, therefore they are not technically valid. The blog was always called ‘The Gary Burt Family Roasting’. That headline was on the page banner in large letters on the screen, with a subtitle ‘shaming a jerk into paying his dues’.
d. The name they used, “Gary Burt Rips Off His Younger Sister to Buy Heroin, was the name of an article, or a post. I made sure I did not update that article.
e. After the hearing, I removed the surname Burt from the blog, to disguise their identities.
f. I removed the page about Susan and her breaches of client privacies, to comply.
g. As stated in my defence of Susan’s AVO, Gary Burt and his family stopped attacking me, once the blog was in place and live on the air. It protected me from more abuse from his family. It was my own personal AVO, implemented by myself.
h. I have tendered what I posted to the blog after the hearing into evidence in the case with Susan Ward. All of it is written to Gary’s daughter, to address the misconceptions she has about me, all lies told to her by her parents, Janice O’Bryan and Susan Ward.
i. I did not write about Susan or Janice on the blog after their legal maneuvers. However, I did refer to them in one comment, and then emailed that to Gary. I realized I was probably not allowed refer to them either, and so deleted it. It was only on the site for 10 minutes. Yet they produce a copy of it for the court, as emailed to Gary, and want me charged for breaching both of their AVO’s.
45. The blog has been taken off the internet, because someone who read it sent me $200, a bunch of flowers, a bottle of wine and a box of chocolates. It was a gift so I could have a merry Christmas too, after all they had, and still were, putting me through.
a. I took it off the internet out of a sense of goodwill, and Christmas spirit, and not because of the court order. I have retained all of the text of it.
b. Gary still has not settled the debt, and I am still annoyed with him because of that. The ‘threatened’ shit storm that might hit his life this year, might just be me taking proper legal action over same debt, and him having to explain in a court of law why he won’t repay me.
c. I have no need to carry on this argument with any of these people. The fact that they have made these false allegations about me in a court of law, has finally given me the excuse to never forgive them, and to never give them another chance to be my in my life again. I usually walk away from conflicts from them all. This time I not only stood my ground, but I fought back. They didn’t like getting a taste of their own medicine, while I found it all be a healing experience for myself,
and am finally free of them, forever.
46. In granting an AVO against me, for events which Janice claim stem from a mental illness I don’t even have, the court will be merely giving her something to finally pretend that condition is real, and prove her lie for her. It will also give her an excuse to ‘prove’ that I was out of line, and that she didn’t deserve to receive those emails, even after 20 years of both her and Susan insulting everything I wore, did and thought during that time, to my face and behind my back. It will also give her another tool to manipulate my children into thinking I am the bad guy, and she has always tried her best to get along with me, while I make that impossible for her.
47. I think that what Janice is the most angry about, is that have I been to visit an Aunt who we are banned from seeing, because Janice accused her of something she didn’t even do 18 years ago and still hates her for it. It was her husband who’s funeral Gary attended.
a. In that process, which was mainly for ancestry related research, I have learned some uncomfortable truths about Janice at a time I had threatened to reveal her true self to her friends, and enemies in Albury. She is merely trying to prevent that from happening, by intimidating me with this court action.
b. Shortly before the email I sent her on 9 Oct 15, I had just found out that she had been unfaithful to my father. Is that why I lost him? Is that why I went through all of the horrible experiences described in the blog?
c. I had a right to be angry, after finding out that she has deceived us about their relationship for the past 47 years. I was six when she kidnapped us, and refused to bring us back to the family home unless he agreed to leave. He gave her the house so that we would be ok. Instead, she then left us in it, left Wayne in charge of us instead of paying a baby sitter, and went off and had a good time. While we all suffered. She never let us see our father again, and he died several years later.
d. If Terry O’Bryan is suffering in this argument, I don’t care. He allowed her to work at the Lavington Sports Club under a false name, knowing she had a day time job, a single parent pension, and was leaving four little kids at home alone. If that has rebounded back on him when he married her a decade later, in that we are all dysfunctional now, then that is his karma.
48. I ask that all court costs be awarded against Janice O’Bryan, for making a false complaint in a court of law.
49. I ask that she be fined for doing so, so that it might teach her not to cry blackmail, when no one has even asked her for any money, let alone demanded it.
50. She has acted purely out of spite towards me, and knows I would never physically harm her, nor another human being. She is a vexatious litigant, and her case has been proven to be just that by all of the evidence. She is relying heavily on the Magistrate assuming that a mother would not lie about her own daughter. Janice O’Bryan is one of the exceptions to that scenario.
51. It is Janice O’Bryan who should hang her head in shame, and apologize to myself and to the Magistrate, not the other way around.
52. True stories are not slander. They are truth, and the truth is legal. It is Janice who is guilty of lying and acts of slander, not only against me, but many other people as well. Now she has tried to slander me in a court, and knows that will damage my reputation here in Albury. It is I who have the case of defamation of character against her.
53. I vow never to speak to, contact, or see her ever again. I don’t need an AVO against me to make that happen. That is how it will be, from hereon in.
54. I wish to point out that I have written, typed and prepared all of these submission on my own, with no assistance from anyone. It has taken me ten days to go through their three short pages of lies and attempted manipulations, and point out all of their inconsistencies, and provide the truth about all of same. Plus to print out all of the evidences they failed to supply. Does my defence look like it was prepared by a mentally ill homeless drug addict, so desperate for another fix of some drug, that I resorted to blackmailing my own mother to get it?
55. On a side note, in the infamous email of 9 October 2015, I remind her that she is not anonymous here, as she was on the Gold Coast, because we all have old friends here, and extended family in the region. I asked her what show will she put on to them, forgiveness and mending the breakdown of her relationships, or just throw another one of her usual tantrums?
You have seen the performance she chose to put on. In bringing it into the court, she has not only made her friends in Albury aware of it all, but I have kept the extended family up to date on it all as well, via email. Drama Queen, that’s all she is, and Susan Ward is exactly like her mother.
Application for an extension lodged with the Albury court in February 2017, asking for a two year period, in which to be able to bring new false charges against me, and have me fined and jailed at the Albury court house, by Gwen Bradley and her buddy, Tony Murray.
Application granted on 14 September 2017, at a secret hearing, which is was denied the right to attend, or to defend myself in any way at all, as an Act of Parliament, by the NSW Government.
Also, granted on that same day, and in the same manner, a new one for BDS Huon: