How Much Can A Liar Lie?

I’ve been meaning to post these emails for the past little while.

They show what I was really doing during the time between the hearing on 5 February 2016, where Magistrate Cromtpom dismissed all maters to mediation (including the allegation of criminal breach), and when matters were revoked, and the hearing on the 15 February occurred. I walked out on that ambush, and was convicted a fortnight later when I was too sick to attend and defend myself.

I’ve always thought these emails are what prompted Murray to give me leave to appeal the conviction of the first charge of breach in the district court.

They were supplied to the Judicial Commission, as supporting evidence for my second complaint against him. The instructions for lodging one of those states that all of the information provided to the Commission would be provided to the Magistrate being accused of misconduct. I had nothing to hide, so that didn’t phase me.

At the first revoke hearing in August, the court played games and messed me around. Ward couldn’t get the day off work to attend, and defend her ADVO, so the court pretended that she hadn’t been served. I was due to be convicted of two more charges of breach a couple of weeks later, as far as the court was concerned, so they had no intention of revoking, or holding that hearing my application had created.

At the second one though, Murray suddenly played innocent and asked if I had been convicted of a breach against Ward’s ADVO. He knew full well that he had convicted me of one, in acts of misconduct on 15 and 29 February 2016, and then denied an appeal on 18 April 2016.

When I affirmed that I had, he stated that he could not revoke an ADVO that had a charge of breach against it. But he suggested that I did appeal it, and gave me special leave to do so.

The office staff were stunned. Tried to say he could not, but then they found he could, and they had to book the hearing.

Maybe he just didn’t count on the district court hearing my appeal. It did, and set aside the conviction. Murray was free to revoke, in August last year.

However, when I went back for the third revoke hearing, after he’d been advised of that result, he’d already convicted me of the other two allegations of breach, and dismissed my application to revoke. However, I lodged a statutory declaration swearing that the final order had never been served, and which is the truth, and that renders the charges invalid.

Unless the court wants to claim that they are, because an interim order was served. But the criteria to have been granted an interim one were never met, and then there is the issue of the application having been made under a false name, and then signed under the legal name.

Back to the point, I wondered if these emails, and which I would have produced in the district court, and any other higher appeals, were what had made him think he should back down. I believed that Bradley would have been the one who talked him out of that, because she had do much to loose if their orders and charges were dismissed.

Don’t forget that I was convicted by Murray, by the way of judging that the contents of O’Bryan’s ADVO application were all true, of being a mentally ill drug addict who was stinging so hard for a fix I’d been trying to blackmail her for money to buy drugs.

 

From: XXXXXXXXXXXX@bigpond.com
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com
Subject: Re: Good morning
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:49:17 +1100

I am happy to pay for the whole lot now & will talk to XXXX about what she wants to do a bit later on. When you get the final quote for the job let me know & I will put enough money into your account to cover it including any other costs that are associated with getting the job completed.

I want you to gather any receipts for anything you have paid for, including a rough calculation of data doing research etc. I think we should add all expenses where we can & use that as a base to set the price per copy.

I am not oblivious to the amount of hours you have willingly & lovingly applied to the whole production not only of the Pearce/Braidwood Book but also the extended Braidwood family book including yours which some family members may like to have as well.

When you see this the court will be over so I just want to say that I hope it went well for you.xx

Love Cuz.

 

From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 2:58 PM
To: XXXXXXXXXXXX
Subject: RE: Good morning

Hi there

Court was disappointing in that it didn’t all end today.

As I said in the text message, Susan was still trying to argue that it needed to all be dealt with today, because I was ’emailing and phoning’ her boss. The judge didn’t care.

She also bought up that I had verbally abused their friend ‘who has been helping them’ in the street one day, so I pointed out to the court that I had lodged a complaint with her to the ICAC, to justify my anger and behaviour.

Josh and I arrived 10 or 15 minutes late, and they had already started without us. Then I was merely asked to come forward while the judge explained to me that he has ordered it to be sent to mediation, and then we come back in a month’s time.

It seemed like Susan was already arguing with him about that decision when we entered the room, and when I had officially accepted it, kept trying to push him into changing his mind.

They didn’t come out for a long time. They were harrassing the clerk court when we left, outside the court room itself, and must have continued to do that for a long time. Josh and I got bored and left, went to get him some cigs, and then went back towards the court house, through the shopping centre, and encountered them.

Our two opposing groups were walking towards each other, so Susan and Janice walked into a shop to avoid  the eye contact that was already happening. Terry didn’t join them, but seemed to have called Josh a fuckwit as we walked past. I guess they are annoyed that his witness statement in just a few short sentences, shot down their lies.

He also said they were glaring at him in court, trying to intimidate him into not supporting me. They just cannot grow up.

Mediation is going to be extremely difficult, when they never negotiate, only ever demand and have tantrums when they don’t get their own way. Also having to sit there with them, when I really never want to see them again will be distasteful.

But in the long run, the mediator might be able to get them to drop their cases, and point out to them, that it will only end badly for them, if they don’t. I will continue with my AVO against Susan though, as she is mentally unstable, and a real threat. That’s all for now.

 

From: XXXXXXXXXXXX@bigpond.com
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com
Subject: Re: Good morning
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 17:17:14 +1100

I was so relieved when you texted me to say that you were out of court already.

I just keep on thinking how hard you have worked on it all & wanted to have a little over to hand back to you that was generated by your own effort, but then I doubt if you would accept it because as you have just explained that you have enjoyed the experience also, although I am sure there were many frustrating moments you went through in the process. mostly not of your own making either.

I thank you for the donation of your time & computer expertise, intelligence & generosity & of the many hours of time you have put in to the project Tracey. I do hope you will be able to find some way of generating some extra income to supplement your pension in the near future. I know Jill has enjoyed helping out with the on-going cost just like I have.

Thank you for the kind words of appreciation Tracey.

When it is all finalized & printed & delivered I will be saddened by the void that will be left. I have so much enjoyed looking for you email to see what you have for me today.

I like to think that I not only found a Cousin a few months ago but a life long friend that I can respect & admire for the rest of my days.

Yes it would have been good to have the court thing over & done with today i can understand your disappointment but never mind they will probably loose more sweat than you for the next month.

I imagine the mediation will be very awkward having to sit there with those that seem to hate you so much for just wanting the truth to be ousted so that justice might clear a pathway to some form of recovery of family acceptance over time. Then again! how could you ever trust them again anyway. Perhaps they will decide to just drop the whole thing.

Thank you for sharing. Take it easy over the week end.

Love Cuz.

 

Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:39:48 +1100
Subject: RE: The Most Beautiful Braidwood Book
From: XXXX2@gmail.com
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com

Hang in there .

I can only think that them being so angry & aggressive is not doing them any favours. Would be good if it could be settled out of court.

JILL

 

Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 10:16:37 +1100
Subject: Re: Greatest Print Solution !!!!
From: XXXX2@gmail.com
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com

This sounds good to me Tracey. I would be happy to buy 3. Not sure what Ken thinks but I reckon he would agree with us. I will give him a ring.

Thank you for going to so much effort to do this.

You are a gem.

 

From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 6:21 PM
To: XXXXXXXXXXXX ; stellab1625@gmail.com (cc’d to Gary Burt’s wife by mistake)Subject: Progress

Hi There

I did four hours solid this morning, and then just had to get out for a while. Caught a taxi home, thank you very much Ken. 🙂

Leonie and I have just been sorting out some furniture, so I bought up some way I could get some rent assistance from Centrelink to be able to say on longer.

She instantly dropped the rent by $40, to make me stay, and called me an awesome tennant 🙂 I’m also getting a desk from her 🙂

*XXXXXX had sent me $100 worth of taxi vouchers, to make it easier for me to get around

 

From: XXXXXXXXXXXX@bigpond.com
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com
Subject: Re: Progress
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 18:59:22 +1100

You are going great guns. what can I say.? Glad you could get a Taxi. Great about Leonie & a desk too. That’s all for now as I know your busy girl.

Love your work.

 

Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:09:18 +1100
Subject: RE: Can we identify this boy
From: XXXX2@gmail.com
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com

No worries Tracey.  Don’t stress, your doing a top job.

Jill

 

From: traceyburt1@outlook.com
To: XXXX2@gmail.com
Subject: RE: Can we identify this boy
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:18:39 +1100

Thanks. Not stressing, but am anxious to see it in all its gory again, in the form of a book. Sure did take some hours though last night. 😦

Tracey
From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 9:38 AM
To: XXXXXXXXXXXX
Subject: RE: Book costings

Good morning

I have no cigs today, or one left now. Not sure if I will smoke butts all day or go out and borrow some money from Ziggy. Either way, I might end up too stressed to focus on anything.

 

From: XXXXXXXXXXXX@bigpond.com
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com
Subject: Re: Book costings
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:19:38 +1100

Good morning to you to. I hope you had a good sleep.

I just tried to access my online banking but the slowness won’t let it open, my intention was to drop $50 into your account so you can get some sig’s

Try not to stress over the book wait till you are feeling better

talk later.

Cuz.

 

From: traceyburt1@outlook.com
To: XXXXXXXXXXXX@bigpond.com
Subject: RE: Book costings
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:42:33 +1100

Hi XXXXXX

Thanks for the offer of money. I’d already borrowed $40 off Zig the other day, so didn’t like to ask him again. Plus he’s been upset this week about something, Janice upset him the other night, and then I upset him the next day (over not supporting me), so I still don’t know what she did to him as he’s being very distant to me.

 

From: XXXXXXXXXXXX@bigpond.com
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com
Subject: Reference
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 06:11:44 +0000

Tracey I have spent a little time in the last hour to put this reference together for you.

please let me know what you think & do you approve. Cuz.

 

From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 5:37 PM
To: XXXXXXXXXXXX
Subject: RE: Reference

Thank you. That was more than I could have asked from you. I really appreciate it, and all that you said within it. I’ll print it out, and definitely submit it during mediation.

(snip) Otherwise, we will just have to guess at those two costs, when you transfer the money to me. Based on the $550 or so I said last time, I’d think that $650 would be more than ample. I’d have money in the bank to cover it, if there was any shortfall

 

From:  XXXXXXXXXXXX (XXXXXXXXXXXX@bigpond.com)
Sent: Thursday, 11 February 2016 6:01:49 PM
To: Tracey Burt (traceyburt1@outlook.com)

 

See the second reference!! No problem at all.

I will transfer $700.00 to cover Shipping as well. Are the hard backs still available ??

I will have to use my phone to do the transfer but that is ok. It will be easier than going to the library it will be closed now anyway.

I estimate we need 16 soft & 4 hard if that is not possible now then go with 22 Soft.

If you are sure you have the book set up correctly now, then go for it. I will do the transfer now.

Cuz

 

From: XXXXXXXXXXXX@bigpond.com
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com
Subject: Re: Reference
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:13:35 +1100

Good Morning.

Please confirm if money arrived in you account when you know.

I hope you don’t have any Idiot callers today. It won’t be long now & you will be able to slow down a bit & take it easy.  (MEANING MENTAL HEALTH WORKERS AND CORRUPT DETECTIVES)

I take it the books will be delivered to your address.

 

From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 10:34 AM
To: XXXXXXXXXXXX
Subject: RE: Reference

Hi there

I’m up late today. I just checked the bank account, and yes the money is there, all cleared. I’ll skip Ray if I have to, but it would have been good to see him and one last chance to fix that photo of Andrew. I found a letter in the mail box just now. Mediation is set for Tuesday. So no chance of having a copy of the book by then.

 

From: XXXXXXXXXXXX@bigpond.com
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com
Subject: Re: Reference
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:49:48 +1100

Sounds all good. Not much notice of when the mediation is though.

Ray Rang me yesterday to see if I had heard from you, he was worried that you might not be well. It is his Birthday today, he will be 83. He did say he had expected you during the week. I told him you had been unwell for a couple of days.

talk soon.

Love Cuz.

 

From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 11:10 AM
To: XXXXXXXXXXXX
Subject: RE: Reference

Thanks. I’ll definately call Ray today then, even if I don’t have time to see him. Just uploading now, for the hard cover edition. Getting close now. Should get it all done before I go out. Will let you know, when I am clicking buy, and we can celebrate at the same time 😉
From: XXXXXXXXXXXX@bigpond.com
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com
Subject: Re: Reference
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:22:26 +1100

Wonderful!!!! Go Girl Go. You are amazing.!!

 

Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 20:09:17 -0500 (USA DATE STAMP – 12 FEBRUARY AUS)
From: noreply@lulu.com
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com
Subject: Your Order Receipt

Order Receipt #11504555
Thank you for your recent Lulu order!
 

Order Date: 11 February 2016
Order Number: 11504555
Order Total: $654.02

 

Shipping Address Billing Address Payment Method
Tracey Burt Publishing 834 Lamport Crescent West Albury NSW, 2640 Australia 0452579522 N/A PayPal

 

Item Quantity Total Price
The Family History of Archibald John Braidwood (Printed) *This item has been automatically discounted as per our special pricing for creators. 4 $44.08
The Family History of Archibald John Braidwood (Printed) *This item has been automatically discounted as per our special pricing for creators. 16 $28.59
Subtotal $633.76
Discounts
Shipping $13.72
Tax
Total $33.98
$0.00
$654.02

 

From: XXXXXXXXXXXX@bigpond.com
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com
Subject: Re: Your Order Receipt
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:15:11 +1100

Tracey you must be so relieved to know this exercise is over for now.

When you do the next book you will know your way around it like you know the back of your hand.

What a great job you have done! I am so proud of you.!

Love your work.

Cuz.

 

From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 6:28 PM
To: XXXXXXXXXXXX
Subject: RE: Your Order Receipt

Good evening ;P

I’ve been having an offline day, after having read your email this morning. I too am relieved its all over, but so pleased with the result I am just tickled pink, at the same time. I’ve phoned Ray today and he is coming over tomorrow.

In fact, I’m going to take him to lunch, for his birthday. He admitted he had no money when I suggested we could have lunch at a coffee shop, so I said I would shout, from the extra money you’d given towards the book printing costs. We’ll grab something cheap, because I really feel like taking him for a stroll in the Botanic Gardens, so should make it a picnic.

Either way, I’ll make sure its enjoyable for both him and I. Especially when with him praying for me all week, I got through not only unscathed, but had good things happening for me. 🙂 In between we can be doing the Braidwood writings books, and any other projects we want.

I can get an ABN number if I need to, to put money through, to satisfy Centrelink, if I did start doing more with it all.

In fact, it now becomes more important that I insist Janice be charged for defamation of character. If I am to become a writer of local history, I can’t afford to have that crazy woman spreading lies about my mental health around the area.

This all might have just back fired on her more than either of us would have imagined.

 

From: XXXXXXXXXXXX@bigpond.com
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com
Subject: Re: Your Order Receipt
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 09:01:33 +1100

Good Morning Princess!!

You have excelled throughout our expedition & well deserve to sit  back & savour the delight of having achieved such a wonderful project, which should bring a lot of enjoyment to many family members.

I was feeling quite a bit of relief last night to know that you had pushed the GO button & that particular project was completed.

Thanks to your capability I was able to sleep right through the night without waking & then lying there thinking about the little things that you had to keep working at all the time to get it just right.

Cuz.

 

Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 09:47:27 +1100
Subject: RE: Link to the book online From: XXXX2@gmail.com
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com

You should be very proud of your work.

I had a good flight to Darwin, will be back in Melb on 23rd but will stay there for a few days before coming home..

Hope all goes well for you Tues.  Good luck.

Luv Jill

 

Hi XXXX

I hope you had a nice trip up to Darwin.

We ordered the books this morning, and should have them within two weeks. Here are the links to them both, online, if you wish to show it off 😉

Tracey xo

http://www.lulu.com/shop/tracey-burt/the-family-history-of-archibald-john-braidwood/paperback/product-22562650.html http://www.lulu.com/shop/tracey-burt/the-family-history-of-archibald-john-braidwood/hardcover/product-22562674.html

 

From: XXXXXXXXXXXX@bigpond.com
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com
Subject: Re: Your Order Receipt
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:40:08 +1100

I am so glad you & Ray had a good time getting around & having Lunch together, I kept seeing you both sitting somewhere in the botanic gardens & soaking up each others company. Yes he would have thought it wonderful to have someone take him out for a few hours Especially you.

It is good to see that you are beginning to have some sort of a vision to generate some income to enable you to work from home & still supplement your income.

Defamation of character, yes I have had that thought running through my head to for a while now & wondered if you had thought of it to especially if she does not relent with her efforts to discredit you to her friends & the public.

love from XXXXXX & XXXXX. xxoo.

 

  • Janice O’Bryan had Gary Burt phone XXXXXX just after we had ordered the books, and so he wasn’t speaking to me by the time they were delivered. He lived in Melbourne and would have travelled up to pick up the books from my place. Instead the other person working with us had to get them, distribute the copies locally that had been ordered and printed, and send the rest down to XXXXXX.
  • It was O’Bryan’s email to this same man four months earlier, which triggered the emails which started this latest family fight, and her false allegations made against me down at the local court house, and with the guarantee of her good friend Gwen Bradley that it would be granted. 
  • Susan Ward was aware that I might go through with my threat to contact BDS Huon, after they’d come to my home to assault me on 6 November 2015, and continued to threaten me in the weeks afterwards. I made a post that I might contact BDS Huon now finally, and they were down at the court house within days of me writing that. Yet it was still only a threat at that stage.
  • Which is why I did contact that company, in the end, thinking that they would tell her to pull her head in, and not drag their name through the court, in the family fight that she had started. Then I could have just focussed on O’Bryan’s easily proveable lies, in court, at hearing. That never happened. Once the court had seen the evidence showing how much her and Ward both lied, they perverted the course of justice to protect them.
  • And still are.

 

Her email to XXXXXX, which triggered my email to her, which is the contents of her original ADVO application.

She’d become aware, after I’d put them in touch with each other months earlier, a friendship which she chose not to pursue, that not only were he and I still friends, but that he’d been up to visit me a few times.

She was also aware that we were compiling the book together, then later cries to him that I am destroying that book by planning to write nasty things about her.

 

From: Janice O’Bryan
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 7:25 PM
To: XXXXXX
Subject: Headstone

Hi XXXXX

Have just forwarded you $200 for the headstone for Great Grandfather Braidwood, hope it was successful.

I’m not very confident at these things on the computer, you had better let me know if you don’t see it in your account soon.. It’s really good of you to be involved in all this family history.

You seem to be getting along well with Tracey, I don’t know what she leads you to believe but we would dearly love for her to  make an effort and take Ziggy to live with her as it is far to much for us, we have had him for 2 1/2 years now (1 year really) because she was going to put him out on the street as they weren’t getting along, so we had to take him in rather than have that happen, she just doesn’t seem to realise how hard our life is now, he’s hard work and costly and we need to have our life back.

I would expect you don’t say anything to her about this it’s my problem to deal with but it’s hard enough coping with just the 2 of us at our age, it doesn’t matter how much we care about Zig it should not be our responsibility..

Enough wingeing hope you are well, and call in one day to see us.

Regards

Janice

 

Now she tries to blame him for the family fight that had erupted, for taking me to see my aunt who he also wanted to catch up with after not having seen her for decades, and then tries to say that I am claiming that all the information gained that day came from him:

From: Janice O’Bryan
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 5:21 PM
To: XXXXXX
Subject: Fwd: Tracey

XXXXXX. This is the result of you and Tracey visiting Stella Burt Tallangatta, you betrayed me by telling her what I emailed to you. I wanted to tell you she has problems but was not sure I could trust you , that proved correct.. All hell has broken out here and my advise to you is stay out of it , I’m sending you a bit of the email’s I am receiving all day and her input of me into the Braidwood family book my lovely Grandmother would die of shame of what is going on here.

janice

Begin forwarded message:

From: Gary Burt <gary.burt16@gmail.com>
Date: 11 October 2015 10:54:04 PM AEDT
To: janter37@gmail.com
Subject: Fwd: Mother

This is the email that Tracey sent me the other day and because I didn’t respond and asked Stella to responded and Stella did in a very kind way, she has since sent us a continuation of emails, even as I am writing this. Her emails are cruel and abusive against first Stella then myself and she is suggesting that everything has come from you. It is late now and I am going to bed, but I will send you the rest tomorrow

 

From: Tracey Burt <traceyburt1@outlook.com>
Date: 10 October 2015 at 9:11:25 AM AWST
To: Stella Burt <gary.burt16@gmail.com>
Subject: Mother

Hi Gary

I was going to email you soon to say I’d posted another copy of the Braidwood book for you to look at. Instead, mother has been causing dramas, and preventing that from happening yet, but I’ll do so soon.

I was at Aunty Stella’s again last week. Dad only married mum because she got pregnant when they were dating, and then ‘lost the child’. Makes me wonder if there even was one, or if she just wanted to beat Stella down the aisle.

Uncle Bob put a house on the block of land that mother and dad bought in Tatura, and they were supposed to pay him. Mum made dad rip him off. So our house in Lavington, was partly funded by Uncle Bob.

If I get cut out the will, I’d already planned that I will argue that our father left us a house, so we would be provided for. Mum and Terry used that house, and a loan from his employer, to get their house in Wollongong. So all of their properties since then, have been partly funded by our fathers house.

He probably sold his truck to pay it off for her, and why he went back to being an employee, after he’d been thrown out of ‘mother’s house’.

Mother also forced dad into going into business against Bob. Mum and Dad were living in a cabin in a trailer park down at Lake Eildoon when they first married. Dad must have owned or bought it. They sold it to buy the land in Tatura. When they moved up here, and dad said they were going to start a removalist business up here, Bob said he didn’t there was enough work for the two of them. Dad said there would be, and he and mum were gonna get rich. I bet that was her talk.

Bob then had to give dad work, because he wasn’t getting enough to survive. And when he did, he would show up with no petrol in his truck and no money in his pocket. So yes, mum must be the greatest businesswoman on earth 😉

Now the clincher. Stella told me that mum played up on dad. I was too shocked to ask questions. Now I have 1,000. I don’t want to get her in shit with mum though, by asking them.

This is a copy of what I sent to her yesterday. Yes, I insult your wife at one stage, but you guys can’t sort things out, unless Stella takes some of the blame too.

Mum won’t get a copy of the Braidwood book, so neither will Wayne or Susan. I’ll make sure you can download a copy of it. Attached are some photos Stella gave me last week of our nan as a toddler. I can’t even show them to mum, without risking getting cut out of the will (for admitting I went to see my aunt who Janice hates, and made up lies about, and hasn’t spoken to for 25 years).

Yet she desperately loves and wants this book about her and her family. What a crock of shit.

Tracey
From: Janice O’Bryan
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 5:21 PM
To: XXXXXX
Subject: Fwd: Finished the Braidwood Book

 

Begin forwarded message:

From: Tracey Burt <traceyburt1@hotmail.com>
Date: 13 October 2015 12:48:56 AM AEDT
To: “janter37@gmail.com” <janter37@gmail.com>
Subject: Finished the Braidwood Book

Hope you like what I wrote about you, and my life growing up in your household.  I’m sure all the future descendants of your children, will feel ashamed that their branch, comes from your page.

 

There are more emails which XXXXXX didn’t send me until much later. I can’t put my mouse on them at the moment, and am going to bed. I’ll post them tomorrow, and a scan of the above bio. Which was never tendered into evidence, but would have been, had been allowed to finished cross examining Ward.

She refers to it, in her notes on my defence statements, and it is mentioned in the original evidence, but wasn’t presented. I couldn’t find my copy of it at the time, and didn’t want to waste ink on printing it again, due to the photograph on it. Had it just been text I would have, but the photo was relevant.

So this is why these idiots did really loose in court. I had copies of all emails and internet activity to prove that they all started the hostilities, and they couldn’t present anything into evidence, because it again proved that.

O’Bryan claims I was sending her abusive text messages, and I know that she did keep them all. But she doesn’t show any to police, or didn’t get any action if she had tried, and doesn’t type any of them up to present as part of her case against me. Again, because there were text messages, but they were not threatening, menacing or abusive. Just the truth about herself and the conditions of hate she has created within her own family, hurt her when she read about it.

Stella Burt and her daughter in Western Australia were the ones sending abusive, libellous and offensive text messages. But of course they weren’t prepared to admit that, and since they were trying to protect themselves from being exposed, from behind the scenes, they didn’t have to submit any evidence or defence of their own disgusting behaviour towards myself.

Again, all of these idiots are trying to cover up 20 years of telling lies, about me, and about each other.

When I was pregnant again, and already had one child, as a single mother, Janice asked me to move home so that she could help me out. I laughed at that and declined. Susan was enlisted to then asked me, and I again declined.  Until life became too hard doing it all on my own, and I finally agreed to.

As soon as I did so, the backstabbing started. Their usual nasty stuff. I was told that Susan was telling people that I probably only moved home to dump my kids on Janice while I went out to party. WTF?

The ‘help’ they gave me over the past two decades, after causing me to move away from where my children’s fathers were, and who might have eventually come to the party if I’d stayed there, is now being spruked as having been too much money, and demanded from them, and they resent every little thing they have done for me during that time.

Now that I have no reason to have any contact with Janice again, because she won’t stop lying about me, and was trying to turn my own children against me once they didn’t live at home any longer, they have done this to me. Claimed that I am only in Albury to scab off them, and try to move in with them. WTF? Any visit with them that runs longer than 10 minutes becomes unbearable.

I don’t have a ‘domestic relationship with my mother’. We have no friendship, spend no time together, and I stopped trying to have any real conversations with her over 20 years ago. When any attempts to do so were met with put downs and scorn. Mainly because she was still smarting over my advice to her and Wayne and Susan. Things have only deteriorated since that point.

But this witch won’t allow anyone else to have any respect or liking for me, again, to punish me for that. She has spread these lies, through Susan and Gary, so that now I cannot even have a relationship with my cousins, or even walk around Albury without being ashamed to be seen as being how she tries to tell people that I am.

Its funny that they say I am a drug addict and welfare bludger, when those are the things that they tried to teach me, when I was a child. Oh, and a slut, despite the fact that I have been celibate for a very long time.

I grew up in a house where alcohol and sex were touted as the best things since slice bread. Then it was the drugs, pot at first then harder and harder drugs. Everyone was screwing around, and getting wasted. I was just trying to go to school and get an education. Susan and Wayne didn’t work for several years after leaving school. Their personal hijinx were far more important than that.

After leaving school, working for a few years, I then fell into their way of life. The only way of life I had ever been shown or taught, to take drugs, and party.

Eventually I found self development courses and books. I found new age religion, and later found God. I’m no born again Christian, but I have developed my own morals and spiritual beliefs, sourced from many different ideologies. I have had incredible spiritual adventures and learnings, and contact with other beings. My friend are aware of all of those things, including XXXXXX above, who got to know me quite well.

I do not lie. I do not steal. I raised two well mannered children, who also understand the spirit world, and that this man made reality is not all there is, but that we still have to conform to it, while it continues to exist.

I do smoke pot though. Does that automatically make me a liar and a thief?

No. I buy what I can afford, and go without when I can’t.

My ‘family’ have all given up their own wild ways. Now they pretend to be upright citizens. They have jobs, homes or are retired from their years in the work force.

Instead, they now lie, backstab, manipulate and play social games against each other, and all of their associates for their own amusement. They continue to lash out at each other and the world, due to the pain of events from long past. They think that if they can blame someone else for their own suffering, that will make it go away.  No, it doesn’t.

So they point their fingers at me, the only way who had found ways to be happy and self confident. They try to take all that away from me, to make me like themselves again.

They pretend that I am on hard drugs, and talk up my penchant to smoke. I haven’t been drinker since my early 20’s. While they have all had to have a few drinks each evening of their lives, to suppress their pain. Pot helps me to release mine, and feel free and happy. Until I run into one of them.

They run me down, to try to make their own lives sound better. They claim to have raised my children, because they turned out so well. Had they not, it would have been a very different story, that Janice would make up, while having nothing to do with them.

When I first came down to visit, my son said to me, ‘mum you must talk to your niece, she believes all this crazy stuff about you that isn’t true’. That’s been Janice at work, and for decades. Now, instead of me having been able to address that, since the outset of this argument which ended up in court, thanks to Gwen Bradley, Janice has been trying to convince my son now that all those stories she made up are true. She has lied so long and so hard at him, that he has even began to be brainwashed into forgetting the truth, and believing her shit.

Yet she claims to be the victim in all of this, and the loving family person seeking to protect the victims from the aggressor.

But that is not the truth, and the defence evidence showed all of that and more.

Which shows and explains why all of these court proceedings have had to be so twisted and perverted. To be able to declare them the winner, a lot more lying had to be done, and all honesty and fairness removed from the court process.

No matter how long they manage to send me to jail for, they will still be the losers in all of this. Because they loose at everything they do, because they do it for negative and malicious reasons.

And O’Bryan is still lying in court, and then as you saw from her post to this blog on 18 September 2017, still making threats to harm me, if I continue to expose Gwen Bradley and BDS Huon for having used all of their might and contacts, to win a family argument, on behalf of the liars and aggressors.

You should have just let her make a fool of herself, and Susan, instead of making fools of yourselves trying to protect them from being exposed.

I think Cromptom will have to look pretty stupid, when his $4,000 fine is re-examined, when he doesn’t even have the right complainant, and the police ‘evidence’ was all falsified.

Because the truth does come out in the end, Cromptom, and Weekley will be exposed for that fabricated evidence, which you have convicted me against, without even listening to it.

I delivered one copy of the book locally yesterday. To someone who watched some of these events from the sideline. Now he will understand what I was being put through, and by whom, BDS Huon, their employee and her mother.

I didn’t delivered the other ones yet, as I have to wait for the newest version to arrive in the mail, in which I have corrected a few errors. However, I will give two to my neighbours here, so that when they watch police smash down the door to take me away, again, they know the full story of what that happened.

I have nothing to feel ashamed about. I have committed no crimes. The only charges against me were bought by corrupt cops, working on Gwen Bradley’s instructions, to save face for herself and her lying buddies, at the court house. No criminal threats had been made by myself, so no police were involved in any of these matters. However, Ward and O’Bryan should be charged with attempted assault, on 6 November 2015.

I have done nothing wrong at the court house, except defend these lies and applications with truth. The court staff only got upset once I refused to be falsely convicted and continued to fish for any evidence of why that occurred. They are only angry that they have to keep lying, and acting illegally, to cover up for what they did to me, and what they are also doing to other people.

I believe Gwen is the mastermind behind the ADVO rorting going on down there, and which is ruining people’s lives and relationships, all so that Gwen and the boys in blue, and the court staff, can pretend they are in control of law and order and society here. Yeah, jobs, profits and promotions for the boys, while the innocent pay for it all. And their drug dealing of course.

It is no me who has to show remorse, nor hang my head in shame. But the people who should be doing that, are too arrogant to do so, and refuse to do so, because then everyone would know the truth about what they have just tried to do to me, and why.

So they just continue to lie. Under oath, and before Magistrates who are aware they are lying, but that they have to protect them.

Justice will eventually catch up with them all. But I will be long gone before then, and happy to leave them all to continue to suffer for their own sins.

Susan accused me last year of ‘bragging’ about my ancestry books. No, I was not bragging when I bring them up. I am merely trying to point out that or the 7 months leading up to these court dealings, I was doing ancestry research. I tried to share some of what I had learned with my immediate family. They told me to piss off, basically.

But they were worried that I’d been contacting any relatives, and that would blow their lies that I am a mentally ill drug addict, who sits around getting stoned all day.

The books prove that a mentally ill person, addicted to drugs, could not have put them together so professionally, nor in the time frame in which they were done.

The books started the fights, but the books also prove their lies.

That even once they made their false allegations against me at the local court house, and were continuing to pretend that they were under attack from myself, that I just kept on doing what I was really doing. Putting all the information I uncovered, and with the help of XXXXXX, into two books. Books that any other family would like to have and would treasure. But not mine.

Everyone who has seen those books, in their physical form has complemented me on them. I had a right to feel proud of them, and still do.

It is only Janice’s kin who had to slag them off, just because I made them.

And eventually, because they got left out of them, due to their own bad behaviour, and their own court orders.

Karma.

 

Gangsta granny replies, once she has a court order to hide behind, and threaten me with. The first time she has spoken to me since I sent her the email of 9 October 2015, asking her to stop lying from me, apart from one day at the court house where she sneaked up behind me, touched me on the head and sarcastically asked me ‘when are you going to stop all this’.

Her and her husband both laughed at my reply that I would continue to defend their false charges, and that they should stop bringing them against me. The thought that was funny, lol. Yet they say I have mental health issues. Of course the registrar declared that no breach on their part, as did the police officer I mentioned it to.

Tracey Burt

I have received the court orders you must abide by for my new ADVO against you and is in place until 13 of September 2019.

It clearly states that you must not use any electronic communication devices such as phone, email, Facebook or any other social media or telecommunications network to defame and intimidate me and that you must remove all blogs related to me that you have posted.

I will give you 2 days to remove all mention of myself and my family, Gwen Bradley and all reference to the BDS Huon accounting group from the internet or I will have you charged with breaching my ADVO.

The penalties are huge at $5,500 a charge and/or 2 years in prison, you would be foolish to ignore this warning, which you do not deserve but I am willing to offer you just once – so no longer presume I will not charge you as I will not take any more of your filth and intimidation.

If you fail to adhere to the current ADVO conditions during the next two years I will charge you EVERYTIME you post anything with the names of the people above or a story with any reference to them.
Janice O’Bryan
Submitted to the blog by Susan Ward on behalf of Janice O’Bryan at her request
18 September 2017

The police and court have become more and more desperate to come face to face with me ever since, so they can bring her new false charges against me, against her illegally gained two year extension of her original bullshit.

And I am still calling her a liar, and the mother from hell two years after she began proceedings for a court order forbidding me to call her that or anything else.

While she runs around making up more and more lies about me, and about this whole situation.

So that is not a confession, to be used in court against me, it is a statement that I have continued to retaliate against her assaults on my life, because the court order comprises the same lies and manipulations that I set out to address with her.

It does not protect her, because it is just more of her continued propaganda war on myself. And I legally do not have to tolerate continued criminal defamation and slander and libel. I am entitled to take action about that.

The first step in a civil suit against all of them, would have involved first asking them to stop the behaviour, preferably in writing, and which I did and emailed to them all.

They committed more acts of criminal defamation and libel, by pretending those emailed requests were an attack on themselves, and libellous. Same as NSW Justice did with Shane Dowling, of Kangaroo Court.

No wonder the Magistrates at the court house can’t keep up with it though, they make no sense in the long run, when they spin their lies. Too many holes, and too many discrepancies.

The court should have been able to recognize that though, and did, which is why they had to pervert the course of justice for those piles of garbage to have been judged to have been the winning submissions.

To the mother from hell

Be advised that I had decided today that I would not administer this site any more. The evil pedo’s of the world are now using it to access my energy, and that affects and infects my own. In fact, they gave me a migraine today, why is why I did not find your message until very late tonight.

You might recall that this site has been on the internet for all of this year, despite your previous illegally gained false allegation orders, and the dodgey interim ones the court encouraged you both to apply for this year, in an attempt to get this blog off the internet.

I would like to point out to yourself, and the readers, that you had nothing to say about it while it did not identify you. Gwen was identified by her position only, at the court house, the Magistrates and corrupt Albury police who enacted all of these personal but illegal soap operas you have continued for another year, were all identified by the blog. They all wanted it removed.

It was not in breach because it did not identify yourself, Ward, or even Bradley by name.

Yet you sat back and allowed all of them to be shamed, hoping they could keep up the corruption long enough that you would never be exposed, for being the real instigator and teller of lies, behind this charade.

You might recall that the first time I allowed your names to appear here, was on 14 September 2017, when once again, both the Magistrate and police prosecutor had to act illegally, immorally and corruptly, to protect Ward and her lies, and therefore those of your own. That was in one post only, which is the affidavits to the Supreme Court of NSW, so no slander or libel in either of those. Your names were not removed because I have wasted so much of my time and energy on this crap, that I wasn’t prepared to waste more on editing those documents, to protect you.

Again, don’t forget there are witnesses to what occurred in the court house that day, and those witnesses and the court room and foyer security footage will not support the lies your daughter posted to this blog. Already the court house is now claiming that I was not actually convicted the other day, that the matter was not yet finalized, as you can see from the emails from the court house on display here.

It was only after your daughter Susan Gaye Ward posted my own name to the blog on 16 September 2017, determined to expose who I was, that I then released some posts I would not have put on the internet, and allowed your names to freely be seen.

Again, your new orders are so questionable its just not funny, and would be overturned the moment I can bypass the corruption of the clerks at the Albury Court House, and get an appeal lodged. In fact, today I uploaded a civil case against Local Court of NSW to the justice website. I had intended to pay for that, if it wouldn’t accept my concession details, but then it was $250.

I didn’t want to pay out that large amount of money, but was trying to lodge by the close of today, so that it would be lodged, and have a date set for it. $10,000 is all I am asking for, but that will give me the funds to continue to fight. The website will be functioning all weekend, maybe I should go ahead and do it, and then arrange for a refund of what the difference between the two costs is. By the time I thought of that, my migraine was coming on, so I haven’t had time to think more about that.

The blog is to combat the lies that you tell, as have all the blogs been. They are legal in that they are justified. They are legal in that they are truthful. They are all sworn and legally binding documents on display here, apart from my own commentaries. The only lies, or criminal defamation of character that occurs within these pages, comes from your own statements, and those of your daughter.

The blog last year was to combat your lies that you obtained ADVO’s against me, because I was here to menace and torment you people. That blog demonstrated you obtained those by having Gwen Bradley pervert the course of justice against me, when I had remained in town to fight your lies, again, out of a sense of self defence, and needing to end your criminal assault on my life, and subsequent abuse of my children that causes.

This blog, created after I had voluntarily removed the other from the internet, in an attempt to sort matters out amicably, once all of the convictions had been overturned.

But no, you still wanted the convictions, to create more suffering for myself, and to continue to pretend to people that your orders were valid and justified.

This blog continues to show that you people are the aggressors, the liars, and the ones using corrupt public servants, to try to win a family fight. One would wonder why you are so desperate, and so nasty.

Because you have twenty years of lying to cover up for. And not just you, but Ward as well and the nasty troll in Western Australia, who was the one that started this war via internet.

I guess all the proof of why I had to dispose of all of my possessions, send my son to Albury, and become transient really makes a fool of you too. When you daughter was in trouble, all you could do was lie, and spin stories that made you the hero, and me the drop kick. As you always do, as does Susan. You destroy my confidence and credibility, in some sick attempt to pretend that you have some of your own.

This time though, I am trying to retain that, by standing up to you two, and destroying your own. You could have stopped this at any stage, but the more you were humiliated by the truth appearing on the internet, the more aggressive and deceitful you, and therefore the courts, became.

I will remove references to BDS Huon from this site, when and if they contact me about it, and make some offers of settlement. Not necessarily of the financial kind, but would involve forcing Ward to drop all of her illegal charges of breach, just so that I don’t have to bother with the formalities of defeating them all at hearing. I meant to prepare the briefs for all of those, which includes all of the defence evidence against them, ready to serve on the court and police, and to post a link to them on this blog.

I will remove Gwen Bradley’s name from the blog, when I have assurance from the Community Justice Centres of NSW that all of the corrupt dealings from the Local Court that Gwen arranged, has been overturned, and undone.

The blog was also updated to expose and shame you both, when you almost had me jailed earlier this week. You created all of those updates, with that sick and inhuman behaviour. By the way, part of the reason that Terry is becoming so nasty, is that evil being I saw walk into your house one night a couple of years ago. It will cause you all to continue to implode.

As stated above, once I post this message, I will consider this blog to be complete. A record of why I have been unable to achieve any happiness, or anything at all, in the past twenty years that I allowed you to stain my own life, so that my children could have some kind of ‘family’, dysfunctional as that was, is, and will always be.

If you are sending me to jail for writing this true story, then it might as well remain on the internet, so that at least this circus has resulted in something tangible.
In the meantime, I’ll continue with my efforts to now turn all of this around on all of you, and beginning summoning all of you into the evil court system.

Local courts might be willing to settle for a $10,000 payment to myself, knowing that is a bargain for what I could take them for. That will just be my fighting fund though, and I’ve already discussed having a gofund me campaign on the police watch site, asking for donations to help me take a civil case against NSW Police, in relation to several serving police officers in Albury.

Once again, I’m not even going to bother to proof read. I have no time for perfection at the moment. Also, again, excuse odd words here and there that don’t fit in, I’m seized up with arthritis and pain, and its very hard to do anything at the moment, especially be on the run from corrupt police, and a family made mentally ill, by its matriarch.

Once again, I point out to you that your new ‘court orders’ will be suspended the moment I lodge an appeal with the district court in Sydney. However, that might still be with the Supreme Court of NSW, since I spend some much time writing those affidavits, all I have to do is change the cover page, to submit them, but asking for different orders that I was seeking last time. Which is all I did last week, for my new applications for motion, changed the cover page to lodge them at the Albury local court, but with the same affidavits.

This site is filled with copies of sworn statutory declarations made by myself, refuting all of the tricks and lies you played after submitting your original ones. Yet you people make none of those, except to police who have no idea what is really going on, and then object when those and ones you submit in private to the court are published in public.

The court refused to allow me to question Susan in court, so the questions I would have asked now appear here, in public, instead. You created that.

I really don’t understand why police even listen to either of you when you walk in there, after all the shame and exposure and complaints you have bought unto them. One day they will just charge the both of you instead, and hopefully include Terry too, since he is covered by your lies too.

On the court records, but not here, with the truth is shown.

I almost deleted my other sites, linked to this one, tonight. Then left them here. But once again, this woman nearly wasted the time and effort I took in placing those things on the internet, for other people to read. But then they reflect the real me. The one she says does not exist, and only her created one does. So I left them there, to once again show, that what I really do with my life, and what really happens in it, is a far cry from the lies this woman creates.

Such a shame, that at her age, she still cannot compromise, cannot negotiate, cannot stop lying and making threats, and cannot communicate with any of her children in any positive way, apart from the one who is happy to play a role in all of her charades, dramas and games of gaslighting everyone around them. Not just myself, anyone they come into contact with, is laughed and ridiculed behind their backs.

Janice O’Bryan was unable to one make new friend, in 20 years of being retired on the Gold Coast. A friend tried to set her up with some of her inlaw relatives, but Janice couldn’t relate to the woman. She was a free thinker, and just too much like me. So Janice came back to Albury, in the hope of having a social life. She has already destroy Gwen Bradley’s career, her long time friend. Her other friends, who were happy they were home, ran away from them while on holidays with her, and don’t speak to her now. She has made a fool of herself in front of all of her relatives, who have seen the games she plays. She does not speak to her own sister, after lying about her 20 years ago, claiming that she had ripped her off over their parent’s will. Therefore none of her nephews speak to her.

Gary spreads her lies about me, to them, so this blog continues to shame both him and his wife for doing that. Again, they created that, because his wife wanted revenge on me, after she started the argument that led her daughter to find out that daddy used to be a junkie. As some relatives also found out, not long after, due to their reaction to that.
And as I say somewhere else on the blog, this is why Janice, Susan and Terry spend every Christmas day alone, ever since they moved back here. No grandchildren present, no other siblings present, because Susan is there.

 

 

 

 

angel

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

What is the NSW Judiciary Hiding Now?

I really don’t think that my threat to sue Gwen Bradley personally was enough to drive the disgraceful behaviour stemming from Cromptom at the moment.

I believe it probably has more to do with this bit of information which went around government offices recently:

This post is now released into view of the public, in light of the decision handed down by Criminally Corrupt Cromptom on 22 November 2017

From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Tuesday, 7 November 2017 10:12 PM
To: ADR_Directorate@agd.nsw.gov.au; auburn@parliament.nsw.gov.au; bwickham@hcourt.gov.au; complaints@judcom.nsw.gov.au; cjc@justice.nsw.gov.au; contactus@lecc.nsw.gov.au; crownsol@cso.nsw.gov.au; crogers@hcourt.gov.au; director_justicelegal@agd.nsw.gov.au; dean.marshall@hcourt.gov.au; Office of the General Counsel; eLodgment_admin; ElectorateOffice Auburn; fairfield@parliament.nsw.gov.au; Grant_Office_Email; investigations@abc.net.au; info@justice.org.au; jsmart@hcourt.gov.au; john.botherway@hcourt.gov.au; keira@parliament.nsw.gov.au; liverpool@parliament.nsw.gov.au; leader.opposition@parliament.nsw.gov.au; maitland@parliament.nsw.gov.au; media@courts.nsw.gov.au ; media@lecc.nsw.gov.au; newcomplaints@humanrights.gov.au; Office of the General Counsel; Ombudsman; Office@upton.minister.nsw.gov.au; Premier; senator.brandis@aph.gov.au; secretary@jca.asn.au; vaucluse@parliament.nsw.gov.au; Vince Blatch; walt.secord@parliament.nsw.gov.au ; Zari.Austin@fedcourt.gov.au

Subject: Magistrate Murray Albury Local Court

It would be worth looking into why this man got such a light sentence, for 15 dope plants, and four guns.

His lawyer was telling him for months he was going to do serious jail time, and incur hefty fines. His lawyer is actually accused of being involved in some of the shady dealings and deals done at same court house.

I gave him some information about Murray, and he already had some, which related to sex offenders in Albury.

By the time he got to court for sentencing, Murray seems to have gone very lightly on him.

(link  to the border mail article provided is removed for this post)

That involved magistrate Tony Murray putting XXXXXX on a community service order, involving 60 hours of unpaid work on one charge and a further 20 hours on another. XXXXXX pleaded guilty to cultivate a prohibited plant (‘small though indictable quantity’), possessing unregistered firearms and three counts of not keep firearm safely.

Seventeen plants with an estimated street value of $31,000 were recovered.

XXXXXX was also convicted and fined $300.

 

Its not what you did in Albury, that matters, its who you know at the police station and court house that matters the most.

Email ends

 

 

I have to change this post. I just found my email to the bloke involved in this, and it is dated after he was sentenced. However, he must have found some way to blackmail Murray into the light sentence he was handed.

 

Police urge parents on teaching kids ‘stranger danger’ after men try to lure girl into car

POLICE are appealing for information after a teenage girl was approached by three men in a car in southwest NSW.

The Jindera incident is the fourth such approach made public in the past two days, prompting police to renew their call for parents to educate children about stranger danger.

The 15-year-old girl was walking along Creek Street last Thursday about 7.30pm when the men pulled up in a car similar to a Nissan Skyline and demanded she get in.

The girl ran away and contacted Albury police, giving them a detailed description of the men – all of whom are of Caucasian appearance and aged in their early 20s – and the vehicle.

The first man is described as tanned, with a thin build, dark brown hair and light blue eyes, and was wearing a long-sleeved black hoodie with the word “Fox” in white lettering, grey track pants, brown Vans shoes and a dark blue, flat-peak cap with white writing.

The second had a fair complexion, blonde wavy, shoulder-length hair and was wearing a dark green hoodie with a black zip and a dark, flat-peak cap.

The third wore a black hoodie and a purple cap with a symbol on the front.

The car had NSW registration plates in black and yellow that started with the letter “B”, a thick scratch along the driver’s side, a dent underneath the front grill, silver rims and dark blue seat covers.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/police-urge-parents-on-teaching-kids-stranger-danger-after-men-try-to-lure-girl-into-car/news-story/ec61e35e8fcf34204479d26c46638c54

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transcripts for the Hearing I’ve Been Fined $4,000 + For

The court also sent me today the transcripts for the hearing of 14 September 2017,  in some crazy way thinking that somehow justifies the judgement handed down by Cromptom on 22 November 2017.

When really, it only raises more issues of collusion between the court staff and the complainants, and is more proof that more perversions and corruption have occurred.

They are of course, yet another example of court transcripts being doctored, but which is still unable to hide the bullshit that is going on in the Albury Local Court room.

 

IN THE LOCAL COURT
ALBURY

MAGISTRATE CROMPTON

THURSDAY 14 SEPTEMBER 2017

2016/00020395 R v Tracey Gwendoline BURT
PART HEARD
HIS HONOUR: We have the got the part heard matter of Burt. Are you representing yourself today?

ACCUSED: Yes.

HIS HONOUR: The matter of Ms Burt is part heard, how many more witnesses are there?

PROSECUTOR: I have one. I take it though that that will be my lengthiest witness.

HIS HONOUR: I see.

ACCUSED: Sorry I didn’t hear what you said?

PROSECUTOR: That that would be a lengthy witness.

ACCUSED: Yes. (“and it will be a very lengthy cross examination”)

PROSECUTOR: My last witness.

(Yet at the outset of the hearing, they said they were going to call 3 or 4 police witnesses, and then only called one)

HIS HONOUR: I will just call through the rest of the matters and I will come back to you.

(He is refering to the rest of the matters on his list from other people, not that he will come back to calling my own matters, but was dismissing me until the start of the hearing. I had started to walk away, then I turned around and went back to the microphone and asked the question below)

ACCUSED: Excuse me, there was supposed to be other matters involving me listed for today. There was mention of the charge brought against me by the mediator of this courthouse.

HIS HONOUR: I don’t know about that. There are a lot of matters here but we are part heard in the one that was last before the Court on 20 June.

(Bullshit, he did not given any verbal answer or if he did, he stated that the only matter he would discuss with me was the hearing that was about to occur, that of write to Jon Williams as reflected above)

ACCUSED: Yes, that’s, that’s

HIS HONOUR: I’ll come back to you in a second I’m just going to go through the rest of the list, thank you.

ACCUSED: Excuse me, I was going to say I’ve got a notice of motion to lodge against the charge Gwen Bradley brought against me and I’ve got notices of motion for the AVO matters that were supposed to be heard today as well. The only one I’m willing to continue in this courthouse is the one that’s in progress.

HIS HONOUR: All right, thank you.

MATTER STOOD IN LIST

(Cromptom had commented that day that he didn’t appear to have enough time to hear all of the matters listed for hearing that day, and that some were children’s matters and would therefore be a closed court. Yet this hearing into my charge had been listed in June, and you’d think the court would have allocated ample time to hear it, if they were serious about doing so this time. Instead, after going through his list, calls it for the first matter to be dealt with before he started with the real hearings for the day)

HIS HONOUR: I think we will recommence the Burt matter now, just give me one moment. Ms Burt, just come forward.

MATTER INTERPOSED

HIS HONOUR: This is the matter with the H60077075?

PROSECUTOR: Yes, your Honour.

HIS HONOUR: Do you want to call your next witness?

PROSECUTOR: Thank you, your Honour. Susan Ward is my next witness.

ACCUSED: Excuse me, your Honour, before you commence I would just like to advise you that Constable Rowan Weekley has indulged in issuing more false paperwork which amounts to fraud. I’d like to hand this up to your Honour, it’s a witness list for this charge that’s in motion and it lists the charge as common assault

HIS HONOUR: Hold on. What’s this got to do with this matter?

ACCUSED: That Constable Weekley has sent me a witness list for this hearing before it started and he lists the charge as common assault.

HIS HONOUR: Well, that’s not what I’ve got. I’ve got that

ACCUSED: Exactly and that’s what I’m saying, Constable Weekley’s indulging in fraud again.

HIS HONOUR: Just hold on. This is a charge of contravene a prohibition or restriction and this is the part heard matter from June.

ACCUSED: Yes.

HIS HONOUR: So the prosecution has got one more witness to call.

ACCUSED: Yes.

HIS HONOUR: And you’ll have an opportunity to ask that witness questions.

ACCUSED: I would like you to look at this document, your Honour.

HIS HONOUR: What’s it got to do with this matter?

ACCUSED: It is showing that the arresting officer – (who is accused of) first he illegally recorded a conversation, then he makes a false statement that he’s got a formal interview on recording, now he’s issuing false paperwork saying I’m charged with assault. Now the other thing that is relevant is that he set up an appointment for me to attend Albury Police Station on 7 June claiming that he had sensitive new evidence that they would not be showing in the courthouse and not be providing to me before the hearing that I had to come down to the station to look at it. So, I would like your Honour to have a look at this document because I want to get it on the record before we get started that the arresting officer has been up to acts of misconduct again.

(Prosecutor was objecting claiming to not have copies of either document. I told her that I did have a copy of one the list of witnesses for her, but that even if I don’t have one of the Sensitive Evidence document, that she should have had one supplied to her by police, since she is prosecuting the matter and police claimed to have new evidence)

I’d also advise that I have sent the brief for this matter to the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission, they’re currently investigating. They’ve already indicated to me that they’ve found issues of misconduct in it. They have investigated the one that I sent to them a week prior to that which is about Gwen Bradley’s charge. They have also come to the conclusion that there’s gross amounts of police misconduct involved in that as well.

(The LECC issued a decision letter after this hearing, which refutes my claim above. I believe that was deliberate, as the comment about the illegal actions on the part of the arresting officer, and other police officers stationed at Albury, were made verbally via phone call, and therefore never made it to any record that I am privvy to.)

(It’s obvious my next statement has been removed from the transcript, because Cromtpom answers it below. It was, that I had a copy of the infringement notice issued by Weekley on 19 January 2016 to give to the Magistrate)

HIS HONOUR: Right, hand it up to me and I’ll have a look at it. If you’ve got other material that’s not relevant to this matter

ACCUSED: Well, it is relevant.

HIS HONOUR: you’re just

ACCUSED: At the last hearing you questioned me about tearing up the infringement notice that Constable Weekley issued to me on the day that he pretends to arrest me at my house. I have a copy of that, as emailed me (to me by) the courthouse just to prove that that statement’s correct.

I have also got this is another document that outlines all of the police harassment I was put through last year after lodging the complaint about Rowan Weekley and his arrest in this matter. I’d like that on the record. That all occurred after I wrote to Weekley about it.

There’s another issue of housekeeping where in the brief there’s a transcript from 5 February (a hearing) before yourself, that’s being (been) investigated. Issues of the transcripts being tampered with by staff at this courthouse has been investigated (confirmed) by the General Counsel of New South Wales.

Now they agree that a statement I made at that hearing was left out so they’ve reissued the transcript and this time they’ve included my line in it that I have put in a complaint to the ICAC about Gwen Bradley. So, the transcript for that hearing in the brief has now been superseded by this transcript which I have again argued with. They still haven’t used my correct words. They’ve also found another issue with the transcript from 12 December.

I have (had) asked they have only looked at the two issues that I mentioned to them. I have now asked them to go back and look at all of the transcripts for all of these hearings and what else do we have (and check all of the recordings against the transcripts for discrpancies) And that’s all for now.

HIS HONOUR: Right, hand it all up, thank you.

PROSECUTOR: I note your Honour is entitled to look at this, but I object to all of this material. I just wanted to place it on the record.

HIS HONOUR: Thank you, I note your objection.

ACCUSED: I have a copy for the prosecutor of Constable Weekley’s fraudulent paperwork.

HIS HONOUR: There are matters which if you have a complaint about, ought be dealt with by a different Court to this one and you told me that you’ve got some matters with the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission. Now that being so, I’ve got these documents and I appreciate that you wish them to be added to the record in this hearing. The prosecution objects to the material but I’m going to accept the material and put it with the court file—

(The decision letter from the Judical Commission claims that he did not enter the documents into evidence, because he claimed they were irrelevant, yet the transcript claims that he did)

ACCUSED: The

HIS HONOUR: Just wait. But as I say, it might be that these are matters that should be somewhere else. I’m focusing on the criminal charge that’s in front of me.

ACCUSED: Yes.

HIS HONOUR: And we are going to proceed with the prosecution witness and you understand that I’m focusing on this charge.

ACCUSED: Yes.

HIS HONOUR: And the prosecution has to prove this charge beyond reasonable doubt.

ACCUSED: Yes, but the Constable Weekley should have given the prosecutor a copy of those documents, the new witness list even though it was the same as the witness list previous to that, but those that form about the sensitive information you’d think the prosecutor would have been given a copy of that by the arresting officer.

(The above sentence has been moved, from where it was stated, to down here where it obviously does not follow on from the conversation in play)

HIS HONOUR: Well, that’s not for me to get into. Sergeant?

PROSECUTOR: Thank you, your Honour, when you say place on the court record, but does not form part of evidence in this hearing?

HIS HONOUR: Correct.

PROSECUTOR: Thank you very much, your Honour.

HIS HONOUR: Now can we have

ACCUSED: It’s evidence of police corruption.

HIS HONOUR: the witness please. Ms Burt, you can take a seat while the witness is giving her evidence, thank you.

<SUSAN GAYE WARD, SWORN (10.33AM)

<EXAMINATION IN CHIEF BY PROSECUTOR

Q. Can you please state your full name?
A. Susan Gaye Ward.

Q. Now you are the defendant’s sister, is that correct?
A. Sorry, say that again?

Q. You are the defendant’s sister?
A. Correct.

Q. Tracey Burt’s sister?
A. Correct.

Q. Now you work for BDS Huon in Lavington, is that correct?
A. BDS Huon, yes, correct.

Q. You’ve worked there since what date?
A. 29 September 2010.

Q. You’re still currently employed there, is that correct?
A. Correct.

Q. I’ll take you to about 10.42am on Monday 11 January 2016. You were called into a meeting with your HR Manager, Leasa Brown, is that correct?
A. Yes, that’s correct.

Q. What happened?
A. She advised me that a letter had been left at John Williams’ home in Sarson Road, Norris Park which was a property I used to rent from John and it was a letter left by Tracey and they were bringing it to my attention.

Q. After that meeting with your HR Manager, later on that evening you attended the police station, is that correct?
A. Yes, that is correct, with my mother.

Q. Now I take you to about 1.20pm on 12 January 2016. You attended the Albury Local Court?
A. Correct.

Q. To deliver some documents, is that correct?
A. I delivered a letter along with a copy of the letter she left. I was advised to take it down to the Court and try and get it before the Court even though it was outside of the lodgement date, yes, correct.

Q. Now, is this in relation to proceedings that you had before the Court with Ms Burt?
A. Yes.

(Why was I never given a copy of that information or even advised that it had been lodged?)

Q. Now, due to those proceedings before the Court for an unrelated matter, you were collected some documents filed by Ms Burt in relation to that matter, is that correct?
A. Yes, they said I might as well get them while I was there, correct.

Q. Filed in the registry by Ms Burt?
A. Yes.

Q. In relation to an AVO proceeding that was a contested proceeding?
A. Correct.

Q. That was a proceeding between yourself and Ms Burt?
A. Correct.

(Why is the prosecutor playing this game, and trying to deflect from the truth of the situation. My supporting case for my application for an ADVO against Ward was lodged in December 2015, yet they are pretending that was available for her to pick up on 12 January 2016. On the day I did lodged it, a clerk told me that Ward had been phoning them every day asking if I had lodged yet. She was also expecting me to lodge my defence against their allegations, but I knew that I had until mid January to do that. So on the day she attended the court office on 12 January 2016, she was there to pick up my defence statements, lodged on that day and the day after for both her application for an ADVO against me, and same for her mother’s. The cases couldn’t continue if I did not lodge on time, I would have just lost. So those documents were extremely important to them, they would have been stressing to see what I had offered up in defence of the allegations. They were also entitled to see my defence before the next hearing, as part of the protcols of civil actions, and so again, why are they pretending that it was not important for her to pick up those same defence documents and prepare for the hearing? Why are they pretending that the only real reason she went to the court house that day, was to lodge her allegation of breach against me for going ahead and writing to Jon Williams?)

Q. I’ll show you some documents. Are they the documents that you collected from the registry that were filed by Ms Burt?
A. No, they look different.

Q. Look different how?
A. I can’t remember whether the ones I picked up that day were printed in blue ink, green ink, pink ink, but they were her defence documents, you know, where you’re meant to lodge, I think we were to lodge our objections by 29 December.

Q. Can I just have those documents please?
A. But they look different to what I’ve got at home.

Q. That’s because I’ve given you the wrong documents, I apologise. I’ll show you these documents.
A. Each different charge was in a different colour or something.

Q. I’ve given you the wrong documents.
A. Correct.

Q. Those are the documents that you collected from the registry?
A. Yes.

Q. Filed by Ms Burt in relation to the AVO proceedings?
A. Correct.

PROSECUTOR: I tender the bundle of material, I just wish to draw your Honour’s attention to, I’ve tendered the whole bundle out of fairness, but there’s only specific ones that I am relying on. Would your Honour like me to mark that with a Post it note of the specific pages I am relying on?

HIS HONOUR: Yes, please.

EXHIBIT #6 BUNDLE OF DOCUMENTS FILED BY TRACEY BURT AND COLLECTED BY SUSAN WARD ON 12/01/16, ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION

PROSECUTOR ?????

Q. After receiving those documents, you read one of the pages?
A. Yes.

Q. It related to what you’d been brought into your HR Manager about?
A. Yes.

Q. The meeting?
A. Correct.

Q. So you took those documents over to Albury Police Station?
A. Correct.

Q. And you made a statement, is that correct?
A. That is correct.

HIS HONOUR: This is your opportunity to ask the witness questions but please try to focus your questions to the matters contained for this matter, for this charge, right?

ACCUSED: Yes. I did mean to say at the start of this hearing that I’d like to advise you that I have no confidence in this courthouse to receive any sort of fair dealings and I have no respect left for you personally. You gave me your word in April that Magistrate Murray would not be involved in any more matters against me and then he had part heard matters against me the very next month. You denied my motion back in April claiming that Murray would be kept out of things and you went back on your word and allowed him to part hear a matter within a month.

So, I just meant to say that at the beginning, so I will now continue. I just wanted to let you know that. At the last hearing I was not aware that Magistrate Murray had been allowed to do that. I had not picked up my mail at the time so I did not become aware of that until, until afterwards.

<CROSS EXAMINATION BY ACCUSED

Q. So Susan Ward, it says in your police station(as said) you moved to Albury in 2010, you told me in 2014 that you keep your car registered in Victoria rather than pay the cost of transferring the registration across to New South Wales?
A. What’s that got to do with the charge?

Q. The fact is
A. Ask a question to do with the charge.

Q. Why did you apply for your AVO in a false name, in your maiden name?
A. I didn’t apply in a false name.

PROSECUTOR: I object to that question.

HIS HONOUR: What’s the objection?

PROSECUTOR: Based on relevance, your Honour.

ACCUSED

Q. I was issued with a summons to Court in relation to matters to do with Susan Gaye Burt. You have not used the name Burt since you married over 30 years ago.
A. Correct.

Q. That is my question?
A. Correct, correct.

Q. Why did you apply under your maiden name?
A. I didn’t. I did not. That is incorrect and false.

Q. Why would the registrar put your maiden name on this document?

HIS HONOUR: Just excuse me for one moment.

PROSECUTOR: Your Honour, I object to that.

WITNESS: Your Honour, should I answer the question and explain what happened?

HIS HONOUR: Just excuse me for one second.

PROSECUTOR: I object to that, your Honour, how is this lady meant to know how a registry document came into effect.

HIS HONOUR: It’s of no relevance, Ms Burt.

ACCUSED: Yes, it is.

HIS HONOUR: Excuse me. If you do not mind, I’ll be the one to decide what is relevant and what is not relevant in this Court. Now, ask your questions. Again, I will remind you to try to focus your mind on what’s relevant to this charge. You’re the person who’s charged with an offence here, not the witness. So why don’t you use the time that you have effectively and cross examine her about the evidence that she has given in this Court today.

ACCUSED: Well the document’s not legal when it’s issued in the name of a Susan Burt and signed in the name of Susan Ward, that is the relevance.

HIS HONOUR: Well that’s what you

ACCUSED: That is the relevance.

HIS HONOUR: That’s what you say.

ACCUSED: Now when I applied for an AVO against her I read that I had to show current ID, driver’s licence, I didn’t have to bring any special documents to the courthouse to apply, I had everything I needed in the in my wallet.

HIS HONOUR: Ms Burt. Ms Burt.

ACCUSED: The mother

HIS HONOUR: Ms Burt

ACCUSED: did not apply under a maiden name.

HIS HONOUR: Do you have questions for this witness? I’m going to give you an opportunity to ask this witness three questions about her evidence, three questions.

ACCUSED: Three questions?

HIS HONOUR: Correct. And then this matter will be proceeding.

ACCUSED

Q. So your next claim to police that on 3 November you emailed me because I was bombarding your mother with hundreds of text messages and emails and had gone crazy?
A. Incorrect.

HIS HONOUR: Thank you, what’s your next question.
Q. The police statement says that. How can you say it’s not correct

HIS HONOUR: That’s another question, you’ve got one left.

Q. What’s your answer—

(Magistrate and Prosecutor both objecting loudly so she could not answer, or be heard if she tried to)

ACCUSED: I won’t even bother. Now, please call the matter that I’m on bail for and mark down that I appeared in Court today and I will appeal the decision that you make after I leave this courtroom to the District Court because of unfair hearings in this courthouse. Constantly. Right from the beginning. She’s allowed to apply under a false name and you’re charging me on a document that is not only illegal because of the signature on the back of it, but because it was never served and you know that and it was granted illegally at hearings that should have been declared as mistrials because Magistrate Murray revoked matters from mediation

SPEAKER: Ma’am, leave the courtroom please. (If this was said, I did not hear him because I was speaking the above angrily at him)

ACCUSED: based on an allegation

SPEAKER: Just leave the courtroom, thank you, ma’am. (Again, if this was said, I did not hear it, but it was obvious to him that I was preparing to leave, I was packing up all of my documents and folders while making the statements above and below)

ACCUSED: of assault that didn’t even occur.

(Accused leaves the court room, without the Sherriff laying a hand on me or even looking like she might. I stopped in the aisle and waited for my friends to pick up their possessions, before the three of us walked out)

WITNESS: Am I excused, your Honour?

HIS HONOUR

Q. Yes, you’re excused.
A. Jesus, thank you.

NO RE-EXAMINATION

<THE WITNESS WITHDREW

CLOSE OF CASE FOR PROSECUTION

PROSECUTOR: Does your Honour wish the matter to stand for a short time?

HIS HONOUR: What I will do is I am going to reserve my decision. I’m going to give my decision in the week of 13 November. I’ll be in Wagga, I’ll give it via AVL in this Court. Let me just have a look at that week the Thursday is the 16th what about 2 o’clock?

PROSECUTOR: Thank you, your Honour.

HIS HONOUR: Just let me double check the diary. This matter will be for decision on 16 November 2017 at 2pm. There will be AVL link to Wagga. Now, the registrar is to notify the defendant of the decision date.

ADJOURNED PART HEARD TO THURSDAY 16 NOVEMBER 2017 AT 2.00PM FOR DECISION

 

16 November 201

Mr EJ Schmatt
Chief Executive Officer
NSW Judicial Commission

 Dear Mr Schmatt

 It is surprising to see a man of your age and status resort to telling outright lies. But the corruption and criminal behaviour stemming from the Magistrates who staff the Albury Local Court is far too complex now to resort to your usual tricks and word games used to dismiss all complaints lodged with your office.

In fact I once read an article which describes the tricks one can expect from the NSW Judicial Commission if you lodge a complaint about a corrupt Magistrate, and noticed that all of your correspondences with myself fitted their description to a tee.

You claim that Magistrate Cromptom did acknowledge all of the charges that were listed for mention or hearing on 14 September 2017, and stated that he would deal with them after the hearing into the allegation of breach had occurred.

 That is an outright lie, and the verbal recordings would prove that. Of course, your office and the court itself won’t ever release those to myself, so that I can prove that beyond a shadow of a doubt. They won’t even release a typed copy of that transcript, ready for appeal in the District Court.

 Not only did Magistrate Cromptom not say that, he deliberately did not make any audial response at all. He merely looked around the court room, feigning ignorance.

 None of those matters were listed outside of the court room that morning, and if there was any honest clerks working at that court house, then one would have to admit that she deliberately asked Susan Ward what she was there for that day. Ward replied the ‘Burt matter listed on the board’ above her. The only matter that was listed for that day outside the court room, which involved myself.

 Unfortunately I did not think to take a photo of the list to prove that, although I did realize it was significant at the time.

 You then go on to claim that the ADVO hearing was therefore not held in secret. You assert that had I not walked out of the hearing, I would have been present when those matters were called.

 Had the Magistrate not been acting corruptly by protecting the witness from answering questions, and showing showing actual bias towards the complainant, then I would not have abandoned the proceedings.

You claim that I could have asked him to be allowed to ask more questions, but he had just firmly told me that I was not allowed to do so, and any attempt might have seen me charged with contempt for defying him.

 You claim that he let me ask two irrelevant questions, and offered me three more after that, and which I relinquished by walking out.

 Yet again, the actual recording of the hearing would show that is another lie by yourself, seeking to protect this corrupt Magistrate, and who you are fully aware has been seeking to protect Magistrate Murray by these acts of misconduct towards myself.

 I still have the file and print out of all of the questions I intended to ask that day. Every one of them relates to the statements she gave to police. Not one of them is irrelevant as they would have demonstrated that she lied to the court originally, and to police afterwards. She continues to do so, in all of her other statements made to police after that one. Hopefully that will come out at the other hearings, if I am allowed a real opportunity to cross examine her.

You infer that my second question to her was irrelevant, yet it was about her main complaint made to the court in her ADVO applications, and which she had then repeated to police. You would think that quite an important piece of testimony to establish it whether or not it was truthful, that I was attacking her mother via hundreds of emails and text messages, on the date that Ward first approached me, with her menacing and threatening email of 3 November 2015.

You state that my first question was irrelevant, yet it would have shown why she applied for her ADVO under her maiden name. That is what causes the whole document to be illegal, because she signed it with her legal name on the back. It also proves deception, and her desire to have her matters heard at the court house where her next door neighbour and friend, was the ADVO mediator.

And which is why both the police prosecutor and Magistrate would not allow her to answer the question, even after she had agreed to do so.

 It also shows she broke the law when she made her original ADVO application, when she failed to show valid ID to disguise the fact that it was all held in an address in Victoria, and that she had no right to start any court action, in a NSW court house.

 At least you do confirm that the Sherriff and Susan Ward are both lying, when they claim that I had to be ejected from the court room, for misconduct towards the corrupt Magistrate. And which is why I will not appear before him again, nor in the Albury Local Court.

 I also believe Cromptom deliberately incited me to walk out, and the court had deliberately pretended they weren’t going to deal with those matters on that day, so he could award those orders he illegally started on 13 February, and which Murray illegally continued in May 2017, and that is criminal conduct on his part.

No matter how many lies you tell, to try to suggest otherwise.

Yours in absolute disgust of yourself and NSW Justice, as usual
Tracey Burt

 

Here is the real news Albury – Tracey Gwendoline Burt
Alias Karma Two and many more

(by Susan Ward, BDS Huon, 16 September 2017)

I attended Albury Court House on 14 September 2017 and would like to correct some truths about what actually happened on this day.

Firstly, Tracey did not walk out of the Court room, she was removed by the Sherriff for her open abuse and tirade at the Local Magistrate Crompton.

Secondly you were only given three questions after you continued to ask questions irrelevant to the charge and you were cautioned by the Magistrate about this.

Perhaps you should have prepared your questions like the prosecutor did and state the facts and you would have got more questions in because you dwell on untruths and asked stupid questions which were not the facts or in fact even true.

Unfortunately, your lawyer, that would be you did not prepare that well (perhaps you should try and hire another lawyer, I am sure you have another lawyer within you).

Thirdly the case was in fact finished, you will not get the opportunity to cross examine me again in relation to this charge – 16 November 2016 at 2.00pm is in fact to sentence you via video link from Wagga, perhaps you should have stayed to hear to outcome, oh that’s right you were removed from the court room– try telling your readers the truth for a change.

Lastly is the fact of the interim ADVO orders – you do not have to worry about the ADVO’s being heard on 18 November or at any future court date. Finalised and extended for a further 2 years without hesitation.

Your reading of the disappointment on our faces when we left the court house was misread, in fact we were extremely happy with the outcome but in shock of the day’s events, mostly your abuse and behaviour in the court, so again your powers are letting you down. Was Marilyn and her mother extremely proud of your court behaviour – not sure they will bother with getting the train up from Melbourne anytime soon to support you.

Your blog contains a lot of accusations to several people who have mental illness but it is clear to all who read your blog that there is only one person with the mental illness (and no I do not have a medical degree, just like you do not have a legal degree).

I am sure the police have better things to do than put a hit out on you, just another fantasy from the pot smoking paranoid person that you have become.

SO GUESS WHAT TRACEY BURT – NO WIN FOR YOU YESTERDAY.

Regards

Susan Ward

 

Also note that the court has not provided any advice of what occurred in the District Court on Monday 20 November 2017.

One can only assume that my appeal of the granting of the applications for extensions of their illegally gained ADVO’s, by the same corrupt Magistrate who illegally listed them for hearing on 13 February 2017, and part heard them instead of the two applications for motion (change in venue) was denied.

After having made an informal request to the registrar for motion and the recusal of both Murray and Cromptom from being allowed to decide the above matter, or any matters again, I made the same request to the District Court Judge on 6 November 2017.

Cromptom has been allowed to hand down his latest conviction of myself on 22 November 2017, despite those requests, and despite the fact that I have tried to lodge an application with the Federal Court, about all of the judgements being handed down in all allegations being made against me by Gwen Bradley’s personal friends, at the Albury Local Court.

I had also issued the Attorney General, being the absolutely corrupt Mark Speakmann, a request that he grant a permanent stay in all criminal charges against me at that same court, as it was his employee who enlisted police to bring them against me, so that her friends could win their civil matters.

There was no police involvement in these matters leading up to their civil applications, and their first involvement was when the court had me arrested for writing to Jon Williams, as arranged by Gwen Bradley, and the court then convicted me of that, based on the documents alleging that breach, without making me aware of them, or allowing me to address them. The address would have been simply that the court already is aware of that letter, and my reasons for writing it. I don’t think I really need to address that any further.

However, I did address the police charge, which was then applied to O’Bryan’s interim ADVO.

At no time though was I ever informed by the court that was the case, and been given a chance to defend the police allegations, that it was somehow a breach of O’Bryan’s interim ADVO. Her’s contained no extra clauses forbidding contact with BDS Huon, nor the mention of Ward gossiping about client’s affairs outside work hours, with O’Bryan.

It merely prevented me from contacting her by any means, and the cop who tried to serve it tried to claim it also prevented me from speaking to any that she is related to. Why is that? Been lying to relatives has she, for the past 20 years, and doesn’t want to be shown to be a liar?

Mrs O’Bryan is not related to Jon Williams, and the envelop was addressed to BDS Huon group, and began Dear Sir, as I did not know William’s name. O’Bryan is not a blood relative of the company BDS Huon.

I also told the cop that day that I hardly think any ADVO order could be so broad, and also prevent me from speaking to my own children, both of whom are also unfortunately related to that lying cunt.

I also informed him that her application had been disproven by evidence, and I refused to accept their dodgy court order.

When reading the next transcript, bear in mind that it is shown in this blog that I prepared subpoena’s for the court to issue against both Ward and O’Bryan, back in May or June of this year, asking that they be forced to provide evidence to the court of this mental illness they allege I have.

I have always maintained that any angry emails sent to them were sent out of justifiable anger, not a mental illness that I don’t even have.

The registrar refused to issue the subpoena, and sent me a form to appeal that decision. I did that recently, but the court will only hear that application for that decision by the registrar to be reconsidered, by a Magistrate, if the hearing happens at their court house. Thereby robbing me of the chance to appeal it, as we all know what the result will be – myself served with the final orders stemming from the transcripts shown below, and myself charged and jailed for ‘breaching’ them.

Yet as usual, the protected people are allowed to threaten, menace and attempt to intimidate me with threats of jail and fines, and slander and suffer no consequences for that. Even though they both did the same, within days of those orders being granted.

Back to my point … and O’Bryan is still trying to play the mental health card at this hearing, even after all that occurred.

You are a sick woman O’Bryan. I mentioned in my first angry email to you that your Narcissim has now gone beyond the classification of a personality disorder, and has grown into full on mental illness.

And Susan, well, she might be able to hold down a job using one of her personas, but everyone who knows her outside of her workplace, knows she is mentally unwell, and has been for decades. You keep her that way, by playing her games, and pretending that you are the innocent and good people, and that everyone else around you has no right to be upset by the dramas and bullshit you both cause for everyone around you.

Your court orders have no validity, because of the illegal and corrupt way in which they were granted, and in that they should never have been listed at all, before the court hell bent on convicting me, to protect Gwen Bradley and the Magistrates involved. Also those corrupt assholes working out of the office there, and including all of your pretend registrars.

 

IN THE LOCAL COURT
ALBURY
MAGISTRATE CROMPTOM

THURSDAY 14 SEPTEMBER 2017

2015/00337982  ‑  JANICE O’BRYAN  v  TRACEY GWENDOLINE BURT
COMPLAINT     Application to vary apprehended violence order

Applicant O’Bryan appeared in person
No appearance of or for the Respondent Burt (respondent had ‘been asked to leave’)

‑‑‑

HIS HONOUR:  Now the next one is Ms O’Bryan.  Now your application to extend the order is that right?

APPLICANT O’BRYAN:  Yes, thank you.

HIS HONOUR:  I’m just reading the application. (Well then he should be fully aware that it is a farce, after all the times he saw them jeering at myself, and making rude guestures towards myself, in the court room in front of him all through the hearings conducted in 2016)

THE APPLICATION WILL BE GRANTED, THE ORDER IS EXTENDED FOR A FURTHER TWO YEARS.

APPLICANT O’BRYAN:  Your Honour, may I ask a question?

HIS HONOUR:  Yes.

APPLICANT O’BRYAN:  Will they be in force even if they’re not served on her because she doesn’t accept them or you can’t find her?

HIS HONOUR:  Well, they certainly will be enforceable at law.  They’re orders of this Court.

SPEAKER:  The interim order will remain in force until the final order is served.

HIS HONOUR:  Until the final order is served.

APPLICANT O’BRYAN:  The other thing is the AVO is not working for us very well because she just continues on the internet to destroy us really.

HIS HONOUR:  I’m sure it’s extremely difficult, I can’t give you any legal advice I’m afraid.

APPLICANT O’BRYAN:  No, but do we have any other options?

HIS HONOUR:  I’m not sure‑‑

APPLICANT O’BRYAN:  Okay.

HIS HONOUR:  ‑‑is the short answer.

APPLICANT O’BRYAN:  Maybe if she were on a bond or something that would threaten her enough for her to stop doing what she’s doing.

HIS HONOUR:  Well, as I say, I can’t give you any legal advice but as the matters progress through the Court and depending on what the decisions are in the criminal matters ‑

APPLICANT O’BRYAN:  Yep.

HIS HONOUR:  If she is convicted of the criminal matters there will be a penalty of some description.

APPLICANT O’BRYAN:  Mental health ‑ there’s not mental health help? (Some mental health help would help her, and Susan)

HIS HONOUR:  That’s not something that I ‑ that would be appropriate for me to comment on.

APPLICANT O’BRYAN:  Okay, all right.

HIS HONOUR:  Perhaps there are ‑ have you spoken to anyone at Legal Aid?

APPLICANT O’BRYAN:  Yes, many times, several times they’ve been up to see her they can’t do anything.  (No they have not seen me, but they should examine her and her daughter who is mentally ill – Susan Ward)

HIS HONOUR:  I see.  Thank you.

 

IN THE LOCAL COURT
ALBURY

MAGISTRATE CROMPTOM

THURSDAY 14 SEPTEMBER 2017

2015/00337884  ‑  SUSAN GAYE WARD  v  TRACEY GWENDOLINE BURT

 COMPLAINT     Application to vary apprehended violence ordeR

Applicant Ward appeared in person

No appearance of or for the Respondent Burt  (respondent had ‘been asked to leave’)

‑‑

HIS HONOUR:  Can I just mention these matters, Ms Ward is the applicant in one and Ms O’Bryan is the applicant in the other.  Ms Ward, just come forward if you wouldn’t mind.  Now, this is your application to vary ‑ just come to the microphone because it’s all being recorded.  This is your application to vary the AVO.

 APPLICANT WARD:  To extend it, yes.

 HIS HONOUR:  To extend it yes, and this matter was listed for hearing today

 APPLICANT WARD:  Correct.

 HIS HONOUR:  The defendant was present but is now not before this Court.  I’m just reading the application.  The application will be granted and the order will be extended for a further two years.  It’s not a police matter is it?  You don’t want to be heard?  Thank you. 

 I GRANT THE APPLICATION AND THE ORDER IS EXTENDED FOR TWO YEARS.

 APPLICANT WARD:  Thank you.  Leave?

 HIS HONOUR:  Yes, thank you. 

 

 

IN THE LOCAL COURT
ALBURY

 MAGISTRATE CROMPTOM

THURSDAY 14 SEPTEMBER 201

2016/00133248  ‑  R  v  Tracey Gwendoline BURT
2016/00139235  ‑  R  v  Tracey Gwendoline BURT
2016/00194166  ‑  R  v  Tracey Gwendoline BURT
2016/00202606  ‑  R  v  Tracey Gwendoline BURT
2016/00315621  ‑  R  v  Tracey Gwendoline BUR

Sergeant S Lewis for the Informant
No appearance of or for the Accused (Accused had asked the Magistrate to call these matters while going through his list earlier on this same day. He refused. Accused had abandoned proceedings in front of this corrupt Magistrate earlier in the same day and left the court house)

HIS HONOUR:  All these other matters should be listed for a future date to set hearing dates.

 PROSECUTOR:  Now that this matter is finished and your Honour is not coming down, obviously your Honour can’t ‑ should not hear the other matters.

 HIS HONOUR:  Correct.

 PROSECUTOR:  It’s my submission that the matters should be put over for Monday, the next one in time can be given a hearing date given that we’re setting hearing dates now either in December or January.

 HIS HONOUR:  Well, if I list all matters on Monday Magistrate Brender will be here and his Honour can fix dates.

 MATTERS INTERPOSED

 HIS HONOUR:  While I’ve got you here, all of those other matters for Ms Burt, I’m listing them all on Monday for the purposes of dates being fixed for them if possible

PROSECUTOR:  Thank you, your Honour.

ADJOURNED TO MONDAY 18 SEPTEMBER 2017 AT 9.30AM

 

WANTED: Be on the look out for this dangerous criminal,
pictured here wandering the streets of Albury on her birthday a few days ago.

She is wanted for telling the truth in court, and then for publishing information
about corruption at the Albury Local court and in cahoots with corrupt
police officers also located in Albury.

She is most wanted though, for making allegations against
Magistrate Tony Murray and Detective Glynn, Albury police,
regarding the rape and murder of William Tyrrell.

A warrant for her arrest has been issued by the Albury District court.

20171122_205354

 

Also, be very afraid if you run into the woman mentioned below.
Even just talking to her will give her reason and ammunition to start spreading lies about you. Its what she does, for a hobby.

 

Janice sign 2Janice Sign

 

 

From: susanward013@bigpond.com
To: traceyburt1@hotmail.com
Subject: Your emails
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 19:51:38

Tracey

Enough is enough, you have made your points with your emails and letters sent to everyone and (bullshit and lies).

(Bullshit and lies)

I am extremely disappointed that you have decided to tell XXX XXXXXX and Stella Burt in Tallangatta about Wayne and that subject, it is not your right to speak on my behalf and it is time to shut up about this and move on and stop causing trouble for everyone including Belinda, if you do not stop this talk then I will certainly have to think about what action I will have to take against you including telling your children a few truths.

When you are ready to ring my work please do so and I will happily put you through to my boss, you can discuss any issue you have with conversations you heard in my home or Mum’s but the consequence of this will be that at the first working day I have off I will be at Centrelink making things very hard for you, I will make it my mission to have you removed from the disability pension and back to Newstart to make your life even more uncomfortable that it is, could be as much as $300.00 per fortnight to you so have a good look at yourself.

Next if you see me coming I suggest you turn and run the other way and I would also suggest that it is time for you to pack up and leave Albury because once Wayne finds out what you have done including your 10 page letter to Debbie your life will not be worth living, (more bullshit and lies).

Regards

Sue

From: traceyburt1@hotmail.com
To: susanward013@bigpond.com
Subject: RE: Your emails Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 09:03:42 +1000

 

Fuck off mental case.

Yes, I did write to Debbie. She had the right to know. Now I have posted it to the net, and it will stay there, until Gary pays me $220.

By the way, I didn’t read much of your bullshit. I’ve had enough of that over the years.

According to Connie, you have had me cut out of the sluts will, for a crime I did not even commit. At least having all that money to yourself, will mean that you can eat yourself to death a lot sooner.

You don’t even know XXX XXXXXX, so shut the fuck up about him, and what I talk to him about. Cunt.

Tracey

 

Now I did mention that both Susan and I had been molested, to my aunt in Tallangatta, but I did not say who had done that. I have always believe that it was Gary Burt in Western Australia who filled them in on that part of the story.

All I had talked about that day was how much Janice has hated me since the day I told her, and some of the awful things she has done to punish me for that.

But there it is, her own admission, that I should not speak on her behalf about what he did to her as well.

That’s because I didn’t participate, and she did. She has a lot to answer for, and if she hadn’t been so willing to drop her pants and let him screw her, then he might not have ever tried to rape me.

Gary Burt and his wife are aware of that situation, from our ‘childhoods’, and his wife alludes to it in one of her emails to me.

Debbie Robertson is the third victim I refer to in the sign above. Her mother could confirm, as could Janice, that Debbie was only 15 when Wayne started dating and then living with her. She turned 16 a few months into their relationship. However, he was in his late 20’s and she was 16. He soon got her addicted to heroin, and prostituted her on the streets of Port Kembla to make money for their habit.

She can’t confirm this, because she committed suicide about 20 years ago.

XXX XXXXXX could also confirm that I told him about it, under duress from himself, long before any of these court actions, designed to cover it all up, had commenced.

He also wrote a reference for me on the day they sent mental health workers to my door, stating that I was of high intelligence and sound mind, because we’d been working on his book every day for months at that stage, and he knew I was sane all of the way through that.

Plus during all of the time we associated, via email and in person, in the 11 months leading up to that. I wrote on another page is this blog, why is this man not allowed to have his own opinion of me. Why must they constantly phone him up and try to change his mind about me?

I’ve been meaning to go back and add to that, when he is the one who I spoke with every day in the several months leading up to these court proceedings.

Ward and I had not only not seen each other for the 18 months prior to these events, we also had not spoken. Prior to that we had not spoken for years, and rarely ever have anything to do with each other.

I’d also not been speaking to O’Bryan in the lead up to these events. XXX XXXXXX (who doesn’t want to  be mentioned on the blog) would also have to confirm, that the argument started when O’Bryan emailed him trying to tell him lies about me.

When he didn’t believe her, or want to listen to her, she started sending him angry emails. I have copies of those, and which continued even after she’d started this court case.

A day after they’d sent the mental health workers, they also obtained his phone number, and Gary Burt phoned him up telling more lies about me.

Yet he had always enjoyed my company, and had just transferred $700 into my bank account for me to purchase the books for him, that we had just published, on behalf of himself and his family members.

I warned Ward last year that I would write about the nail polish game she invented when we were kids on the blog, if she did not stop her false charges and false allegations.

Ward was the first person to sexually molest me, long before Wayne tried. And which also gives cause to wonder if it wasn’t her who molested him first, and again, why she doesn’t want any details of their relationship to come out.

I would have only been about 7 years old when this happened. Dad had left when I was six. I think Janice was in the home for the first year, or some short period, then she started working nights and leaving us all alone. So basically I was left unprotected from abuse of all kinds, from the age of 7 upwards.

Susan and I shared a bedroom back then. She asked me one night if I wanted to play a game she had thought up. I agreed.

She came and got into my bed, laid herself on top of me, and had put a bottle of nail polish between her legs, and started making motions of humping me with it.

I didn’t find anything fun or interesting about the game at all. It seemed pretty dumb to me. I’d never been stimulated sexually by that stage in my life, so even if she did have it in the right spot, it wasn’t given me any kind of sensations or pleasure.

She wanted to play that game on another occasion, and I can’t say how many more after that. I went along with it, since it seemed to make her happy, even though I couldn’t not fathom what the game was supposed to entail.

One night she’d gone to bed really angry and upset. I didn’t know what had happened. To try to cheer her up, I asked if she wanted to play the nail polish bottle game.

‘No”,  she replied angrily, “and if you ever ask again I will tell mum that you did’.

It was then I realized that the game must be naughty and something I would get in trouble for.

So the next few times she asked me to play it, I declined.

Then she stopped asking. I guess she found that Wayne had a bottle between his legs she could play with instead.

She was already being abuse by Mr Cole, a teacher at our primary school by this stage, and which is why she was now seeking sexual gratification in other ways and other places.

I won’t try to bring charges against her for this.

I’ll just punish her here where the truth is told, and not in court where only liars are allowed to be heard.

But now you are starting to see what a sick bitch she really is, and why she is so mentally ill.

And what deplorable conditions I grew up in. Apart from sexually assaulting his sisters, Wayne Burt used to physically beat up our other brother on a regular basis.

When he complained to Janice about that, she treated him like he was mentally ill for saying it, and had a doctor issue him with some medication to calm him down.

Wayne and Susan then spread it around that Gary was on mediation, ‘for being mentally ill’ and tormented him even more. Which is how he gained the nick name of Tablet.

Yet Gary told me that Susan used to disappear into the bedroom with Wayne, whenever she wanted Wayne to bash Gary up for her. So he didn’t just cop a beating when Wayne had the shits with him, he used to get one when Susan had the same.

Janice, apart from when she was working, was doing a great deal of screwing around herself. So on her nights off from work, she was not at home with any of us. Gary claims that some of her longest running boyfriends were actually married men.

Someone dobbed her into Centrelink (Social Security) not long after we’d moved to Queensland, back then. For working and earning money. Janice lied her way out of it, but then got caught when a male friend rocked up and asked if she was working that night. She had to quickly lie her way out of that then too.

It occurred to me recently that the person didn’t dob her in just because she was earning a bit of cash while on the single parent pension. I think the person wanted her reported to welfare, for leaving 4 kids alone every night of the week, and who were drinking and having loud parties, and aside from disturbing the whole street, there was one child there who was too young to be being exposed to it all, nor left alone.

No one every called DOCs on me Janice, nor even ever thought about it. Same can’t be said for you, eh?

I would have been in year 7 in Queensland, or first form had we stayed in NSW, so 11 or 12 years old, when a friend told me that her older sister had told her that my sister is a lesbian. I was a bit nervous the next time she walked in on me getting changed. But since she wasn’t ever home much, that didn’t happen often.

The next year I had to witness one of her boyfriends bite her on the ear, and hold her captive for a few hours in the bedroom, threatening to rip it off if he wasn’t left alone to deal  with her

I’d called mother at work, and she called the police. Janice still didn’t come home. The police had to negotiate him for hours, with myself trying to help. He was angry that she’d played up on him, after their short relationship had ended.

When I was 15, I had to stand there and watch Albury police search Wayne’s room in the house owned by the Lavy Sports club, knowing that he had all sorts of drugs in there. Unbeknown to me though, he had come the night before and whisked them all away, on a tip off they were all about to be busted for the chemist robberies.

He served two and a half years for that. All of this stuff is proveable, none of their lies about me are. Gwen Bradley would have been already aware, that Susan came at John Ivers with a knife one night.

Don McDowell, who also had the misfortune to date her, would confirm that I phone him, at the end of their relationship and told him about her previous relationship with her brother. Susan had given me permission to do that, and in front of Janice O’Bryan.

Don replied that I had just confirmed what he had always thought, that Susan is suffering from the symptoms of severe sexual abuse, and from his guess, that had been at an early age. He offered to arrange counselling for her, but did not want her back.

Her ex-husband, Len Ward would confirm that he took a restraining order out on her, after throwing her out of their home for punching him in the face, at his workplace.

The only restraining orders ever taken out against me were my disability employment agency, who were trying to prevent having to grant a copy of my file, as part of a legal FOI order. And a dickhead in WA, who I took to petty claims court. The restraining order was comprised of lies, and was designed to stop me from being able to serve him, and start my case against him. Neither of those orders achieved what they wanted back then, and neither did these.

I guess when people apply for them for nefarious reasons, it doesn’t help them in the long run. Whereas someone who had actually been making threats of violence or any other kind, would stop, the moment an order was in place.

Who’s mentally ill in this family. Well since Gary and his wife have just stood up for Susan and Wayne in all of these matters, I have to say that they all are.

And the great Terry O’Bryan who’s previous reputation has ensured all of this support from city officials, is just an abuser himself now, after suffering 40 years of abuse at the hands of his own wife, but they aren’t aware of that, having not seen him for the past 20 years.

If I am insane, then it was living with them that sent me that way.

However, I believe that I am not, and there has never been a doctor who has suggested otherwise, not officially or unofficially, to myself.

I do believe a few have accused Janice of being that though. Plus she is the  one who has to take anti-depressants to cope with her own guilt and feelings of self loathing. Same with Susan.

Me, I just blow a joint occassionally, to lift myself up and out of the distress and anguish they cause for everyone around them.

 

By the way Janice, the person you claim you raised, told me the other night that he has been told by the optometrist that his eye sight is deteriorating rapidly, that he is almost legally blind now.

But you would be too busy telling lies in court to have spoken to him about that, and continue to ensure that he can have no support from myself during this new health crisis, because I will be in jail, and unable to arrange for and attend appointments for him with an eye specialist, to find out what is going on.

Grandmother of the year award? I think not.

Scum of the earth award? I think so, but that title must be shared with Susan Ward, and Gary Burt.

 

https://alburypolicecorruptionblog.wordpress.com/2017/11/03/master-manipulators-at-work/

 

Transcripts for all of the original hearings, and showing the obvious perversion of the course of justice, as it occurs on 15 and 29 February 2016, at the hands of Maggot Murray.

https://alburypolicecorruptionblog.wordpress.com/2017/09/15/transcripts-prove-that-i-received-no-fair-hearings-and-as-just-convicted/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transcript Emails From 2016

Update:

I was working getting the following emails ready to post this morning, and was almost at the point of doing so, when I received the notice of the result of the ‘hearing’ on 22 November 2017, before the very dishonourable Michael Cromptom.

On 22 Nobember 2017, I was fined $4,000 by Magistrate Cromptom, for a breach of one person’s interim ADVO, and for which the charge was assigned to a different person’s ADVO. In my absence, and after the dodgied court transcripts shows he ordered me to leave the court room.

Is that legal, to deliberate make a finding against me in my absence, by ordering me to leave?

Cromptom Misconduct

I will be emailing politicians and all Attorney General’s, calling for Cromptom’s dismissal from the bench, based on the above document.

However, I was reading in the Wiki entry for the Judicial Commission this morning, that the Commission was set up to take that power away from parliament, and place it with the Commission. However, the Commission claimed to me initially, that they had no power to do anything about my complaint, except to dismiss it to protect the corrupt Magistrate.

Instead of appealing that conviction to the Supreme Court of NSW, which has been shown to be equally if not more corrupt than the Albury and Wagga Local and District Courts, maybe I will just start paying it off, at $15 per fortnight, while I take civil action against NSW Police for fabricating the evidence they claimed they would use in court against me, and which they then never provided to the court.

Also the illegal recording, writing a false statement of facts on behalf of NSW police, and then refusing to supply the accused with a copy of the evidence they planned to use in court against me. 

 

Emails from 2016 asking for reasons and proof
of why the ADVO orders were granted

It wasn’t until May that I began asking for a copy of the transcripts. I’d been convicted on 29 February of the criminal charge of contravene, and the two ADVO’s awarded on that same date.

I didn’t bother to appeal them, and had to accept that the registrar was going through with her threat that I would not be allowed to defend them, and would be punished if I tried.

However, I did appeal the severity of the fine for the criminal conviction. I think my mindset at the time was that appealing the conviction itself was of no point either, for the same  reason given above.

However, I did expect the reasoning for the convictions to be revealed at the appeal in the local court, before Murray, and myself given a chance to address whatever had been added to the original complaints which saw the ADVO’s granted.

Also why I was convicted of this criminal charge, despite it being obvious the cop had framed me, and proven in that the police were now refusing to prove his ‘evidence’ to myself, and to the court too it turned out, and when the court was already aware I had written that same letter, and lodged it with the court before he arrested me for it.

I then didn’t appeal to the district court, because I figured it must be just as corrupt as the Local court at the Albury Court House. However, the emails also show that I was deliberately not supplied with those transcripts, until after that appeal period for the district court had expired.

Later I was granted leave to appeal there, by Murray himself, and the conviction of the criminal charge set aside in the district court. Which is why it had to be reheard this year, under Cromptom this time, again in the local court. And done equally as badly as the first time, I must say.

The information about fair hearings displayed on the previous page mentions double jeopardy laws. Those were changed in Australia a year or so ago, so that point is not longer valid.

However, can you be charged in court, for the same charge, three times?

I guess that is what Cromptom is trying to avoid in his judgement above, restarting the case under the right name, before a jury and in an impartial venue.

 

From: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au
Sent: Tuesday, 15 March 2016 1:34 PM
To: Tracey Burt

Subject: Re: Case No 2016/00020395

Dear Ms Burt I acknowledge receipt of your email below. The court record shows that you were charged by Police with – “Knowingly Contravene Restriction/Prohibition in AVO”. I advise the following: A transcript may be applied for in writing.  The usual fee for a transcript is $85.00 for the first 10 pages plus $10.50 for every page after that. Please allow a minimum of 6 weeks for a transcript to be prepared. You may apply to the Registrar for waiver of the fee, using the form attached, if you have insufficient funds

(See attached file: Application postpone fee_2014_10_07_12_39_11_220.pdf)

Since you were not in Court when the orders were made, you may be entitled to apply for annulment of the conviction and setting aside of the order for monetary penalty. No guarantee can be given as to the success of such an application, and you may wish to seek legal advice before commencing.

The fee for lodging an annulment application is $89.00. It is possible to apply to the Registrar for waiver of the fee. Following are links to websites that may provide more assistance with your enquiry. Yours faithfully Elizabeth Leathbridge | Clerk | Albury Local Court | Courts & Tribunal Services

 

traceyburt1@outlook.com
Date: 01/05/2016 04:04 PM
To “local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au” <local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au

Subject: Transcript of Proceedings and Decision

Dear Corrupt Employee of Albury Court House

Please provide me with the transcript and other relevant details regarding the granting of the false and vexatious AVO’s against myself, on behalf of Susan Ward and Janice O’Bryan, as fixed and organized by Gwen Bradley of the Albury Community Justice Centre.

Please provide me with the allegations made, which resulted in the AVO’s being granted, and myself charged for a breach of one of those. Please provide me with the evidence submitted to support these allegations, including a witness statement from Jon Williams confirming that he did actually accompany Susan Ward to his house to intercept a letter addressed to his company, and that she did not still have a key to that same premises, and simply let herself in and stole the documents.

You only have her word for the fact that he let her into the place, and have not considered that he might not agree with the statements she made to police.

She has also lied to police again, in her latest accusation, and I will require Ross Griffin attend the hearing on 29 May 2016, to confirm that he accuses me of slandering her, when in fact it was he who bought the subject of her gossiping about client affairs after hours, by asking me if it was true. I merely confirmed his statement. Susan alleges I bought the subject up to him, and I dispute that. Just more lies from a foul mouthed liar, with a mentally ill parent. I will forward the appropriate completed form to summon a witness, before the hearing.

PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE ONLY INDEPENDENT WITNESS ATTENDS COURT THIS TIME, TO CONFIRM OR DENY SUSAN WARD’S UNTRUE ALLEGATION.

Please provide me with the reasons why the AVO’s were granted, when all of the evidence shows they were unwarranted, and were merely false allegations, with no evidence to support any of their ‘truths’ or statements. This is because I believe you have now charged me with the same crime twice, and intend to subject me to more false proceedings, impose another hefty fine, inappropriate victim’s levies and court costs. As per the threat made to me by the Registrar at our first meeting about these vexatious applications, that she would do that to me, if I tried to defend myself.

You have given up the right to ask for costs for this transcript, when you held the ‘hearing’ for same behind closed doors, and after I had been sent home from the court house, on the excuse that all charges had been suspended until an honest mediator could properly assess the situation. The decision was made sometime after the hearing on 5 February was adjourned at 10am. According to advice from the justice department, it was made a few days after that hearing.

I also make application that the hearing listed for 29 May 2016, Case number H60827275, be moved to a different venue, in a different town.
This is because I have a complaint in progress about Magistrate Murray, about the way he has conducted these matters, and in particular to his behaviour at the hearing on 18 April 2016. I believe it would be highly unfair of you to force me to appear before him, when he will be seeking revenge on me for lodging the complaint about him in the first place.

I also have a complaint before the NSW Ombudsman about the Registrar of Albury Court House, the corrupt CJC worker Gwen Bradley who has pushed these false applications through Albury court house, and who continues to enlist police to harrass, intimidate me and arrest me on false charges, and in unlawful ways. I have two complaints before the NSW Ombudsman about all of the officers involved in these false and unlawful arrests.

I believe it is long past time that I was given a fair hearing, at an impartial venue. Albury Court House has shown itself to not be able to be this, and is guilty of allowing this mess to continue unabated, and has granted false convictions against myself, as a favour to a mentally ill liar.

I know it is hard to believe that a mother would lie about her own children, but you had not met Janice O’Bryan before. Now you have, I think you are learning that she is not worth the trouble she causes, to everyone around her. Most of her own children hate her, as do half of her grandchildren. The only reason mine don’t, is because I have protected them from the truth about her. They will soon learn though, who has been acting illegally in all of these matters, and it was not me. And yes, it was you too, the person reading this email.

Do you feel proud of yourselves that you have been able to pervert the course of justice, and convict an innocent person? Well you shouldn’t. You should feel ashamed and disgusted with yourself, and all of your colleagues who have sat back and allowed all of this to happen.

You are equally guilty as Janice O’Bryan, Susan Ward and Gwen Bradley, of using court processes to attack an innocent person. I will be writing to the Attorney General about this hearing, and all of the corruption I have been put through after having the misfortune to have been summoned to appear in Albury Local Court and to the Minister for Police. You think you can get away with all of this do you? Well, we will see about that! Even more disgusted, with your staff than before.

Tracey Burt

 

To: traceyburt1@outlook.com
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 14:19:50 +1000
From: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au

Subject: Re: Transcript of Proceedings and Decision

Dear Ms Burt, In response to your requests below. I can confirm that a transcript of proceedings will be ordered and the Registry will contact you as soon as it is provided.

The request will be prepared by this office today and sent to Recording Services Branch, I have requested that this be prepared as quickly as possible, however I cannot confirm an exact date when it will be supplied.

I can also confirm that the Court record contains no witness statement from Jon Williams, therefore I am unable to provide this to you. In relation to witnesses that appear before the Court, it is not the role of the Registry to have any knowledge of parties witnesses. The Court presiding over the matter has the authority with regard to witness testimony.

In relation to your request for reasons why the Apprehended Violence Order was granted, the jurisdiction has no requirement for written reasons to be recorded within the Court file.

I anticipate that any reasons of the Court will be contained in the transcript. Once prepared I shall contact you regarding it’s delivery.

Yours Faithfully,
W Howard  Snr Registrar
Albury Local Court  Courts & Tribunal Services
From: traceyburt1@outlook.com
To: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 18:30:44 +1000

Subject: RE: Transcript of Proceedings and Decision

Thank you. I appreciate your co-operation and response.
Tracey Burt <traceyburt1@outlook.com
18/05/2016 11:11 AM
To “local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au” <local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au

Subject RE: Transcript of Proceedings and Decision

Dear Mr Howard

How is that transcript going? Would I be able to pick it up on Friday?

(edit – comments about Gwen Bradley and the form she signed that she wanted me arrested for having)

Please advise.

Yours faithfully

Tracey Burt

 

To: traceyburt1@outlook.com
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 12:15:18 +1000
From: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au

Subject: RE: Transcript of Proceedings and Decision

Dear Ms Burt,

I advise that the transcripts have not yet been received.

The staff at the Albury Registry will contact you when they are received. For legal advice concerning the Regulations, please telephone LawAccess on 1300 888 529 or go to their website by clicking on the link below (meaning Bradley’s authority to sign a form).

Yours faithfully

Elizabeth Leathbridge
Clerk  Albury Local Court  Courts & Tribunal Services
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 09:31:06 +1000
From: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au

Subject: Transcript

Good morning

Tracey

this email is to inform you that the transcripts that you have requested have arrived here at the Albury Local Court, my question to you is would you like them electronically sent to you or a hard copy printed and either sent to you or kept here at the Registry for you to pick up.

Regards Bruce

Bruce Moreland
Clerk
Albury Local Court  Courts & Tribunal Services

 

From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Friday, 3 June 2016 10:04 AM
To: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au

Subject: RE: Transcript

Hi Mr Moreland

You can email them to me, which will save you the cost of printing them out for me.

Thank you, for your assistance.

Tracey Burt

 

From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Sunday, 5 June 2016 4:11 PM
To: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au

Subject: Transcripts

Dear Sir/Madam

I would now like to apply for the transcripts for the hearings of 18 January and 15 February 2016, relating to all three parties, being myself, Ward and O’Bryan.

Also, the one for the Annulment hearing on 11 April 2016, being my own application to the court. Since none of those matters were very long, I’m hoping that you will once again provide them to me free of charge.

Sincerely

Tracey Burt

 

From: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au <local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au>
Sent: Wednesday, 22 June 2016 2:39 PM
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com

Subject: Transcript 29 Feb 2016

Dear Tracey Burt,

I refer to a conversation earlier today and enclose a further transcript for the Court Proceedings of the 29 February 2016.

(See attached file: Burt_T_29_02_2016.doc)

Yours faithfully,
Registrar
Albury Local Court  Court Services  Department of Justice

 

From: Tracey Burt <traceyburt1@outlook.com>
Sent: Friday, 24 June 2016 2:16 PM
To: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au

Subject: Fine/Case No: 2016/00020395

Dear Sir/Madam

Further to my email yesterday about this fine, and the conversation I had at the counter today with one of your staff.

Could you please send me a copy the court attendance notice for the first hearing of this matter on 15 February 2016, along with the brief for the criminal charge of breach. I didn’t receive any copies of those at the time.

As I pointed out, the only charge of breach listed before the court against me, that I was aware of, was was one for breaching Susan Ward’s Interim AVO, on a night that I was at home, and she was out stealing company mail.

Yet, according to the transcript of 29 February 2016, when the case was heard in my absence, I was convicted of breaching Janice O’Bryan’s Interim AVO. Again, on an unspecified date, when I was actually in the company of other people. People who aren’t mentally ill, and down at the police station making false complaints.

I still also require the transcript for the hearing of 15 February 2016, for both of their applications, and one for the hearing on 18 January 2016, where Magistrate Murray advised Gwen Bradley that her applicant’s evidence wasn’t going to win their cases.

He also appears to have dismissed all of the defence evidence, in both applications against me, and then made rulings in the matters without having considered any of it. Just the false allegations bought to the court by a Sgt Coombs, who Albury Police said doesn’t even work at their station.

Thank you for your assistance.

 

From: traceyburt1@outlook.com
To: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 13:19:44 +100

Subject: Transcript 15/2/16

Dear Sir/Madam

This is a formal request to be supplied with the transcript for the hearing held on 15 February 2016, for matters between myself, Tracey Burt, and Susan Ward and Janice O’Bryan.

As you are aware, this transcript appears to be the only record of the allegations made against me by Janice O’Bryan and Susan Ward. Police refuse to supply any record of those allegations, and Magistrate Murray refers to them in his judgement on 29th February 2016.

I plan to appeal the conviction of ‘assaulting’ Janice O’Bryan, early in February 2016, since it just didn’t even happen. I will also be lodging another formal complaint about Magistrate Murray and his illegal actions in these matters tomorrow with the Judicial Commission.

I thank you for the charge documents you sent to me on Friday, relating to the matter of breach, which had been listed by police to be heard on 5 February 2016.

I need you to answer this question one more time, just to be clear. Was that breach charge listed again for hearing on 15 February 2016, or was different criminal charge listed for that date?

Tracey Burt

 

From: Bruce.Moreland@justice.nsw.gov.au  (changes to personal email address and no subject?)
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 01:52:43 +0000

Subject: Reply

Hi Tracey

in relation to your email dated the 27/06/2016 we are still waiting upon the transcript for the 15/02/2016 as soon as we receive this transcript It will be forwarded onto you as the previous one were.

In regards to the Contravene prohibition/restriction in AVO (domestic) 2016/20395the history of this matter is it was first listed before the court on the 05/02/2016 in which you were present and was adjourned to the 18/03/2016, the matter was then relisted on the 15/02/2016 to marry up with the AVO.

The matter was adjourned to the 29/02/2016 with a letter sent to you advising that if you fail to attend the matter may be dealt with to finality in your absence (copy attached).

On the 29/02/2016 the matter was heard in your absence you were convicted and Fined $400.00 and AVO’s made against you.

You made an application for annulment and this was first heard on the 11/04/2016 and was adjourned to the 18/04/2016,  on that day the matter was heard with you in attendance and  the  application was refused by Magistrate Murray. Please note that the matter has never been listed for a HEARING

Regards Bruce
Bruce Moreland   Clerk   Court Services Courts and Tribunal Services

 

 

From: Tracey Burt [mailto:traceyburt1@outlook.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 27 July 2016 9:44 AM
To: Local Court Albury

Subject: RE: Transcript 15/2/16

Dear Sir/Madam

Is this transcript ready yet? I have an appeal of Monday of next week, a charge to defend on the 12th August, and another appeal on 15th August 2016.

It would be useful to know what occurred on 15 February, when I was unlawfully summoned to court to appear in relation to a matter which had no valid reason to be heard, especially when the AVO it claims I breached, had not been awarded, and was about to be dismissed.

As you are aware, I instead walked out of the court house, and failed to appear.

Thank you for your assistance.

Tracey Burt
From: local-court-albury@justice.nsw.gov.au
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 02:44:56 +0000

Subject: RE: Transcript 15/2/16

Hi Tracey

I have been in contact with the Transcription Centre in Wagga and as you can imagine they are extremely busy and they will try and have the transcript available on Friday 29/07/2016 when it arrives I am happy to email it to you as soon as we receive it.

Regards Bruce

 

From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Wednesday, 27 July 2016 1:24 PM
To: Local Court Albury

Subject: RE: Transcript 15/2/16

Thank you.

 

To: traceyburt1@outlook.com
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 12:43:36 +1000
From: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au

Subject: Transcript of proceedings 15/02/2016

Dear Ms Burt

Per your email requests of 05/06/2016 and 10/08/2016, please find attached transcripts for the following dates:

23/11/2015 14/12/2015 18/01/2016 x 2 15/02/2016 11/04/2016

Please note that all further transcript applications (see Local Court website – forms, for the relevant form) will attract the applicable fee as listed on the Local Court website in Miscellaneous Fees, part 10.

If you wish to apply to waive or postpone these fees, each application for transcript must be accompanied by a completed “Application to Waive or Postpone a fee” form, for consideration by The Registrar of Albury Local Court.

Yours faithfully,

Registrar   Albury Local Court  Court Services  Department of Justice

 

To: traceyburt1@outlook.com
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 12:43:36 +1000
From: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au

Dear Ms Burt

Please find attached transcript as requested for the court proceedings on 15/02/2016.

Yours faithfully,
Registrar
Albury Local Court  Court Services  Department of Justice

(See attached file: BURT. Tracey 15.02.2016.doc)
From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Friday, 29 July 2016 1:18 PM
To: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au

Subject: RE: Transcript of proceedings 15/02/2016

Dear Sir/Madam

Thank you for that transcript. I do recall previously requesting the one for the hearing on 18 January 2016, which shows the Magistrate making certain remarks directed at Gwen Bradley of the CJC, who was in the court room on that occassion, in the company of the AVO applicants, Ward and O’Bryan.

You would be aware that it is illegal for Mrs Bradley to assist personal friends and neighbours with matters before a court house which she contracts to. You would also be aware that I lodged my first complaint with your office about her involvement in their matters on 20 January 2016. I believe this new transcript, received yesterday, proves beyond doubt that there was foul play afoot.

This perversion of the course of justice occurred sometime after 5 February 2016, and I do believe that Mrs Bradley was the person who informed the Magistrate that I had committed an act of violence, when that simply was not true.

When you have a case of the Magistrate instructing the Prosecutor about what is going on, then something is amiss. Especially when the Prosecutor appears to know nothing of the crime I was being charged with, and there is no police record of same.

I hope the Magistrate will act quickly to start clearing all of this mess up. If he does, I won’t require that other transcript.

Yours faithfully

Tracey Burt

 

From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2016 8:40 AM
To: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au

Subject: Transcripts

Dear Sir/Madam

I hereby request to be supplied with a copy of the transcripts for the three hearings which I do not have yet.

These are:

Hearing on 23 November 2015, for AVO applications by O’Bryan and Ward Hearing on 14 December 2015, for all three AVO applications for O’Bryan, Ward and Burt Hearing on 18 January 2016, for all three AVO applications for O’Bryan, Ward and Burt

Please advise if you require payment for these, or will be providing them free of charge.

They are for use in the Federal Court in Sydney, when I take my complaint about BDS Huon to that court, for professional misconduct in relation to their clients’ right to privacy.

Sincerely

Tracey Burt

 

From: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au
Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2016 11:06 AM
To: traceyburt1@outlook.com

Subject: Transcript requests

Dear Ms Burt

Per your email requests of 05/06/2016 and 10/08/2016, please find attached transcripts for the following dates: 23/11/2015 14/12/2015 18/01/2016 x 2 15/02/2016 11/04/2016

Please note that all further transcript applications (see Local Court website – forms, for the relevant form) will attract the applicable fee as listed on the Local Court website in Miscellaneous Fees, part 10.

If you wish to apply to waive or postpone these fees, each application for transcript must be accompanied by a completed “Application to Waive or Postpone a fee” form, for consideration by The Registrar of Albury Local Court.

Yours faithfully,
Registrar
Albury Local Court  Court Services  Department of Justice

 

From: Local Court Albury
Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2016 10:59 AM
To: ‘Tracey Burt’

Subject: RE: Statement of Facts, 29 February 2016

Dear Ms Burt,

Please find attached copy of facts as tendered to the court on 29/02/2016.

Yours faithfully

Belinda Brady
A/Registrar
Court Services  Department of Justice

 

From: Tracey Burt [mailto:traceyburt1@outlook.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2016 10:05 AM
To: Local Court Albury

Subject: Statement of Facts, 29 February 2016

Dear Sir/Madam

I had approached your office previously, asking for a copy of the reason the matters against me, bought by O’Bryan and Ward, were revoked from mediation. You claim that you had none.

I have also approached police, who claim they have no record of any incidence of violence.

I notice in the transcript for the hearing of 29 February 2016, for the matter of O’Bryan, a statement of facts is handed to the Magistrate.

HIS HONOUR:  That completes the three domestic violence matters, and in respect of the charge matter I note there’s no appearance of the defendant today as well.  And I do note that some private DVOs were referred by another magistrate for mediation.  These are charge matters and I had requested that the matters be – or directed rather the matters be returned to court on the 15/2 because quite clearly these are not suitable matters for referral to the CJC as quite clearly they are police prosecutions, they are not private matters

In respect of that I also requested the court to notify the lady if she failed to attend the matter may be dealt with in her absence so far as that there’s no appearance of that defendant again at 10.30. 

Matter dealt with pursuant to s 196.  Statement of facts please 

PROSECUTOR:  Your Honour I hand up the facts and record

HIS HONOUR:  Yes in respect of the matter now before the court I do note the breach has been established and the antecedents.  There’s no other prior matters of a similar type

THE LADY IS CONVICTED AND FINED THE SUM OF FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS.

I hereby request that you supply myself, in my role as my own legal representative, with a copy of that same statement of facts, which was handed to the Magistrate by the Police Prosecutor on 29 February 2016.

It would also appear once again that the allegation of breach, as a criminal charge, has been applied to the wrong AVO application. It applied to Susan Ward’s AVO and not Janice O’Bryan’s. Yet the Magistrate does not address it when awarding Susan Ward’s application, and instead only addresses it when Janice O’Bryan is the complainant.

I was previously supplied with a copy of the statement of facts, according to Con Rowan Weekley for that arrest, by police. The court had been advised that those ‘facts’ were being disputed. However, police have refused to supply with me a copy of their brief to the court. I wish to compare the two documents, and the information they contain.

I require this document before the hearing on 15 August 2016, in the District Court.

Thank you

Tracey Burt

 

From: Local Court Albury
Sent: Monday, 15 August 2016 10:37 AM
To: Tracey Burt

Subject: Re: Unable to Appear Today

Dear Ms Burt

Per this Court’s email to you on 10/08/2016, all further transcript applications made to this Court must be received in the correct format as highlighted in blue below. Once we receive the necessary paperwork from you we will then be able to place an order for the required transcript(s).

Yours faithfully,

Registrar
Albury Local Court  Court Services  Department of Justice

 

I  think I got them all. Scattered amongst them were emails to the court house advising of breaches by the protected people towards myself both at the court house, and online. Advice of the witness statement confirming perjury on both of their parts, Statutory Declarations stating there was no incidence of violence, etc, etc.

All of the above, and the ones descripted in the paragraph above, had been forwarded to Rebecca Jessingam for her investigation into the new applications for extension made by the protected people, and which she claimed proved nothing.

In fact the one where I pointed out to the Registrar about being convicted against Janice O’Bryan’s ADVO, had a comment added to the forward, that Murray must have been suffering from some kind of mental illness of the day he made that judgement.

 

 

Copies of my book arrived yesterday. Which means Wagga Wagga court house should receive theirs’ as well, the day after Cromptom handed down his corrupt judgement shown at the top of the post. Both Murray and Cromptom can see the physical results of their own dirty work, as presented to a wider audience than just this blog.

I did a bit of proof reading yesterday, and the final chapter which was printed without having been proof read, and after I had severely edited a post from this blog to be that chapter, has quite a few errors scattered through it.

I’ll set about fixing those, adding the things I ran out of time to put in the first edition, and upload a new edition, before I start promoting it all over the internet, to raise the money to pay the fine.

That would save me having to appeal it within the next 28 days. Then I can take my time with my constitutional violations complaint to the High Court, seeking to recoup that money, and more.

 

20171123_10570720171123_10573020171123_10581020171123_10583920171123_105922

 

These are some more emails extracted the other night, and which relate to the correspondences that went on behind the scenes of these corrupted proceedings, peverted away from the course of justice by the court’s own mediator, the criminally corrupt Gwen Bradley, acting on behalf of her personal friends Ward and O’Bryan.

 

<traceyburt1@outlook.com>
19/02/2016 01:11 AM
To  “local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au”

Subject: Janice O’Bryan & Susan Ward vs Bur

I think this new blog Gary Burt has set up on the net, kinda destroys the AVOs Janice and Susan claim they need to protect Gary and his wife from me.

https://free52788.wordpress.com/2016/02/18/tracey-burt-albury-35-years-of-drug-abuse/

And every single thing written on it, is not true. Criminal Slander. While everything written on my own, was, and always is, absolutely true.

Tracey Burt

 

Dear Tracey Burt

I acknowledge receipt of your email and advise that a copy of the email has been placed on the court file.

Yours faithfully, Registrar | Albury Local Court | Court Services | Department of Justice Email:  local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au | Phone 02 6023 8555 | Fax 02 6023 8585 Court House, 515 Olive Street, Albury NSW 2640 P.O. Box 64, ALBURY NSW 2640.

 

Why was this record not handed to the deciding Magistrate on 29 February 2016. Ward’s court record, added after closing of submissions, was handed to the Magistrate. Why was the record of this breach by both Ward and O’Bryan not supplied to the hearing?

(I lost the date when editing the formatting and putting them in the right order, but can retrieve it if asked after to prove the above was sent by the court house, and on what date and time.)

 

<traceyburt1@outlook.com>
Date: 19/02/2016 10:04 AM  (convicted of slandering them on the internet on 29/02/2016)
To: “local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au”

Subject: Reporting breaches by Janice and Terry O’Bryan           

As per my email of early this morning. I now advise the court that Janice O’Bryan has breached her own AVO by asking her son to publish a blog about me on the internet.

Every statement written on the blog, is an absolute lie, most of which were told to Gary by Janice O’Bryan, and then distorted by Gary Burt and his wife. They will have to sort out who added which lies. But it is all criminal slander.

As also advised, Terry O’Bryan swore at myself and my witness on 5 February 2016, immediately after the hearing. He called us ‘Fuck Wits’ as we walked past him.

Therefore, once again, I will not participate in this circus, which the court has only inflamed, while those people have continued to attack and harass, and tell lies about me, all of which can be proven to be false.

This is the problem Janice O’Bryan has caused in her own family, all of her children tell lies about each other, as told to them by her, and out of spite to try to please her. She is a sick woman, who is too stubborn to realize it is all her own doing, and too old to seek mental health help.

Her daughter Susan Ward, might have been able to be helped, had the court helped her to deal with her issues dealing with the sexual abuse inflicted upon her by Wayne Burt, when she was still a child.

You wasted your time, even buying into this woman’s lies, and poor old Gwen has been left taking the official rap for it all. Shame you couldn’t see that, from the outset.

Unfortunately, Gwen has been lied to for decades, and fell into Janice web of lies and intrigue. You giving them a platform to parade their hatred for their own family members, only made things worse.

Except for me, as I now know to never have anything to do with them, ever again. Thanks for that, I do appreciate it, and was going to do just that anyway. The court hearings have all ensured I will never forgive them, and never change my mind about that.

Tracey Burt
From: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au
Sent: Friday, 19 February 2016 11:06 AM
To: Tracey Burt

Subject: Re: Reporting breaches by Janice and Terry O’Bryan

Dear Tracey Burt

I refer to your email received at 10.04 am today. Breaches of Apprehended Violence Orders are a criminal offence and are to be reported to the Police.  It is a matter for the Police to determine what, if any, action is to be taken respect of the report. (Police refused to take action, but did not advise me that they would not, until well after I had been convicted of their applications)

This office is not able to take any action in respect of any breach or alleged breach of an Apprehended Violence Order other than to suggest that such reports are made to the Police.

A copy of your email has been placed on the court file.

Yours faithfully,

Registrar
Albury Local Court | Court Services | Department of Justice
(the email below is shown above but I’d put a copy in this file as well)

From: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au
Sent: Tuesday, 15 March 2016 1:34 PM
To: Tracey Burt

Subject: Re: Case No 2016/00020395

Dear Ms Burt I acknowledge receipt of your email below. The court record shows that you were charged by Police with –  “Knowingly Contravene Restriction/Prohibition in AVO” .

I advise the following: A transcript may be applied for in writing.

The usual fee for a transcript is $85.00 for the first 10 pages plus $10.50 for every page after that. Please allow a minimum of 6 weeks for a transcript to be prepared. You may apply to the Registrar for waiver of the fee, using the form attached, if you have insufficient funds

(See attached file: Application postpone fee_2014_10_07_12_39_11_220.pdf)

Since you were not in Court when the orders were made, you may be entitled to apply for annulment of the conviction and setting aside of the order for monetary penalty. No guarantee can be given as to the success of such an application, and you may wish to seek legal advice before commencing.

The fee for lodging an annulment application is $89.00. It is possible to apply to the Registrar for waiver of the fee. Following are links to websites that may provide more assistance with your enquiry.

Yours faithfully

Elizabeth Leathbridge |
Clerk | Albury Local Court | Courts & Tribunal Services Email:  local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au | Phone 02 6023 8555 | Fax 02 6023 8585 Court House, 515 Olive Street, Albury NSW 2640 P.O. Box 64, ALBURY NSW 2640.

 

<traceyburt1@outlook.com>
15/03/2016 11:30 AM
To: “local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au” <local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au>

Subject Case No 2016/00020395            

Dear Sir/Madam

Please be advised that I will be appealing this conviction, and will lodge the necessary paperwork for that, within the next month. In the meantime I am writing to let you know that my recent silence and non-appe

arance in court was due to having fluid on the knees and being medicated and under treatment for same. The stress of all of these recent and useless court appearances contributed to that, and for which I will be seeking compensation from Albury City or the CJC.

I will be writing a letter to Albury Council, recommending that the Registrar of Albury Court house be dismissed from her position, for indulging in helping Gwen Bradley, of the Community Justice Centre, obtain two false AVO’s against me.

I believe that the applicants were provided with these court ‘services’ free of charge, and at the tax payer’s expense, while I have now been charged court costs and a levy is not applicable, and not reversible.

The fact that I have had the victims support levy imposed onto me, when your own literature declares the matter to be exempt from same, having been about no threat of violence at any time, shows that the court has deliberately tried to punish me financially for trying to defend these false complaints.

At my meeting with the Registrar of Albury Court House at the outset of the matters, she told me quite plainly that any attempt by myself to defend the matters would result in only myself being punished, financially and with trumped up charges of being a vexatious litigant. Yet it was the applicants who were that, and who were shown to be trying to use the AVO’s to hurt and punish me, rather than being in any need of protection from myself.

I was unable to lodge my defence of this latest made up charge, organized at the court after I had left the premises on 5 February, and to which the magistrate had already indicated he was not interested in hearing, due to medical issues.

However, I had planned to lodge in a witness statement from my son confirming that Susan Ward had been threatening me for the past year, prior to coming to my premises to beat me up over a blog about my brother which merely mentioned her once, in that she was also molested by our oldest brother Wayne Burt.

In her application she gives two other reasons for coming to my property that evening, both of which are disproven by the evidence.

She and Janice O’Bryan came to beat me up, because of the mention of the sexual abuse in the blog, which at that stage, only contained one article, about my brother Gary Burt.

Janice O’Bryan then threatened me three times via text messages she asked my son to write for her, that she would have Wayne Burt beat me up if I did not remove the blog from the internet. I will require a court order for her to surrender her mobile phone, and to have those messages extracted from same. The dates they were sent, will again demonstrate that she had no right to an AVO due to the way she was choosing to handle the matter.

Gwen Bradley then obtained Interim AVO’s for these two women, based on false statements and claims of abuse and menacing behaviour. Yet that behaviour had come from them, at all times, and was proven in the original evidence. My son also will confirm that Janice O’Bryan and Susan Ward stood over him until he was in tears, on that evening, demanding he give them my address.

Yet they both claim in their statements that they asked him nicely for it, and he willingly gave it to them. He refutes this.

I am also now in possession of a letter from a policeman at Albury Police Station, who neglected to provide his rank, making further threats against me. He now claims that all of the complaints I have had to make against police officers from that station, who have been dispatched by Gwen Bradley and/or the Court to harass and intimidate me, and I suspect to drive me out of town so that her error is never proven by the evidence actually being heard, were false and he might take action against me if I don’t stop making complaints about same.

What’s also interesting is that in his letter he addresses the issue of a breach by Janice O’Bryan in allowing her son to create a blog about me on the internet, and which was full of slanderous lies. He claims that it is not a crime at all, which is why his staff did not act on the matter.

This letter is dated prior your recent conviction of me. Yet when I advised Albury Court House of the same breach, they advised me that I was not allowed to advise them directly, but had to do so via the police. So that matter went unheard officially, or we might say officially covered-up.

Yet Janice O’Bryan and Susan Ward seem to have obtained this new charge against me, and which I have now been convicted for, by again avoiding police, and going straight to the Registrar. I can only assume the Registrar herself approved it, when the Magistrate on the day of 5 February had already sent the matter to mediation, and had already refused to listen to Susan Ward squawking about breaches of same.

My blog, after doing some research, turns out to have been completely legal. In that it was a completely true story, with no exaggerations. It was also justified, in that it was retaliation for how my brother Gary’s wife had just treated me, and then spread to the rest of the family when they continued to treat me badly as well, after having started the initial aggression themselves.

Yet Albury Court House imposed Interim AVO’s onto me, due to same legal blog, and without ever having been shown any of it, and its purpose misrepresented to them.

Then charged and fined me for breaches of same questionable AVO’s. Now when I not only complain of a blog about myself, one that is lies and therefore criminal slander and libel, and a breach of Janice O’Bryan’s AVO, both your Court House and Albury Police want to claim that it is all a civil matter, and any legal action must be funded by the applicants.

I had also advised the Court House of a breach of Janice O’Bryan’s AVO on 5 February 2016, and have the witness statement from Josh White confirming that breach, and mentioning how all three of the applicants tried to intimidate him in the court room that day, and Terry O’Bryan then swore at us while leaving the court house itself.

Therefore, I would assume that any judgements made on an AVO which had already been breached, should be seen to have been invalid, and unfortunately for the Registrar, a corruption of her duty, not only for allowing them to continue, but for the role she played in working against me as a personal favour to her friend Gwen Bradley. I see that I am not able to complain to Justice NSW about a Registrar and so will have to lodge that complaint with the NSW Ombudsman.

However, since I have no faith in that process, I also intend to complain to the Mayor, about the whole situation, including the police harassment. I might have to complain about the Magistrate who heard the matter, to Justice NSW, to have an official investigation into it, through your own department.

The Registrar is now complicant in covering up the crime the sexual assault matters mentioned in the evidence, and in that someone has instructed the Albury Police not to investigate same, so that I have no defence in the AVO matters bought against me by my family at the Albury Court House.

Yet Susan Ward herself alludes to that subject in her own evidence. All three applicants being Susan Ward, Janice O’Bryan and Gary Burt have all now given false statements to an Albury detective, denying those assaults, simply to protect their false legal actions against me, and which have been pushed through unfairly and unjustly by the Registrar herself, and for Gwen Bradley. Or, that detective has lied to me, when he claimed to have interviewed them all about same.

Since you would not allow me to defend myself against my mother and sister’s false accusations in court, and clear my name, I will have to do so by proving those proceedings to have been flawed and already ‘fixed’ from the outset, by the Registrar and an employee of CJS, being of course Gwen Bradley.

Also, see attached reference written for me the day after Albury Police arrived here with mental health workers, after trying to incite me to anger on the phone, and then coming in person to my home to intimidate me. The person who wrote the reference had been interacting with me all that morning via email, and then immediately afterwards, and was actually on the phone to me when they arrived. I wonder what would have happened if he had not been able to witness what was scheduled to occur?

I have had to consider moving house recently, to avoid the illegal and unwarranted visits by Albury Police, and which are quite simply harassment.

Here is a link to the two books I have published recently, about local history. This was achieved despite the time and stress these proceeding have placed onto me. It also makes it even more important that I be exonerated of any allegations of mental illness, when I have a new career as a writer of local history just starting. You might also notice that one was published two days after mental health workers were sent to my house, and emails support that the book was delayed by a day due to same.

http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/TraceyBurt

This false conviction for same must be overturned, or I will be seeking compensation for defamation of character for same. Which brings us to another issue with these matters. One of the applicants admits in her statements that she had not seen me for the year prior to sending me a threatening email and then coming to my house to beat me up, but claims I am acting out of a drug fuelled mental illness in ‘threatening to attack her’.

The other applicant had not seen me for a few months before hand, but had asked me to move into her house while she was away for winter to keep an eye on my son, and be able to drive him to appointments, then claims three months later that she has had nothing to do with me for the past 30 years, due to same ‘mental illness’ which I do not have, and I will be challenging them to prove it.

Yet the people I interact with on a daily basis see no signs of mental illness, nor any aggression towards my family. In fact, they see the opposite. I will be calling on these people to testify at my appeal, including the landlady who will confirm that Susan Ward appeared not only unstable on the night of 6 November 2015, but that she appeared to wish to do me harm, and other threats of violence had been made towards me by them, on that same evening.

Once again it will be proven that Gwen Bradley acted on lies, by two vicious and spiteful women, and then enlisted the Registrar of Albury Court House to assist them to punish me, while continuing to work to intimidate me into submission.

All welfare agencies I was working with leading up to these events, then turned their backs on me, and a complaint to the Women’s Sexual Assault clinic cancelled by the police, when they advised the counsellor they would not be investigating my allegation, made to that clinic two months before these false AVO matters were implemented against me. Its time to stop asking other people to put their jobs on the line to protect these false AVO’s and the liars who applied for them, and start fixing this mess up.

Otherwise, I will be seeking compensation for the defamation of my true character, and the stress it has all caused to me. I will also be requiring a transcript of the court hearing on 29 February 2016, since I still do not know exactly what I was charged with, and need to prepare my appeal. If there is a cost to this, please advise what that is, and I am happy to pay it and follow whatever the procedure is to obtain it.

See you in Court

Tracey Burt

 

 

From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Monday, 30 May 2016 11:18 PM
To: vs@justice.nsw.gov.au
Subject: Abuse from the AVO holders

This is a sample of what I am being subjected to tonight, by my brother’s wife. The same one who wanted Susan Ward and Janice O’Bryan to seek AVO’s to protect herself from me. She is pretending to be my brother, she did that before, when she created a blog about me on the net.

The messages have stopped being sent now, after a steady steam of them came in for two hours. Maybe that’s only because I forwarded a lot of them to Gary Burt’s aunt, anlet them know that her family were reading them.

Stop the shit now or see what happens.

Email: gary.burt16@gmail.com Whois: http://whois.arin.net/rest/ip/60.224.16.41 (IP: 60.224.16.41)

No need to go to the police as there coming to you tomorrow

Email: gary.burt16@gmail.com Whois: http://whois.arin.net/rest/ip/60.224.16.41 (IP: 60.224.16.41)

Here is another sample of whats coming and I don’t think you can publish shit from jail. GARY BURT thats my name.

Email: gary.burt16@gmail.com Whois: http://whois.arin.net/rest/ip/60.224.16.41 (IP: 60.224.16.41)

vexatious must have learnt that word when you were in the UFO

Email: gary.burt16@gmail.com Whois: http://whois.arin.net/rest/ip/60.224.16.41 (IP: 60.224.16.41)

The person that is about to loose there job is your son

Email: gary.burt16@gmail.com Whois: http://whois.arin.net/rest/ip/60.224.16.41 (IP: 60.224.16.41)

Gotta be seen as a breach this time, you’d think. (ON THEIR PART)

Tracey

 

 

From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Wednesday, 1 June 2016 12:17 AM
To: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au; cjc@justice.nsw.gov.au

Subject: Another Breach by Susan Ward

Dear Sir/Madam

Susan Ward admits in the following, that Albury Police told her today not to comment on my current blog. Yet she chose to anyway.

She claims that since I do not have an AVO against her, that she cannot be in breach. However, it is my understanding that if you take an AVO out on someone forbidding them to contact or harass you, that you also cannot do the same to them. If you do, you negate that AVO.

So in her mind, I cannot communicate with or approach her, but she is still allowed to do both of those things to me?

Please clarify, for both of our benefits.

She also appears to be asserting that I claim to have made the post about BDS Huon, after she sent a comment to my blog. No, the post about BDS Huon was already there. I had just only added it that same afternoon. It is that post which she made her comment on.

The evidence shows that quite clearly, and I do not dispute that. I do believe I have a right to be angry at BDS Huon itself for allowing all of these charges of breach to be made against me.

I do believe I have a right to be angry that they allowed her to carry on with the AVO application, even once they knew what its real purpose was, to prevent me from be able to advise them about her breaches of client privacy.

I believe the post about BDS Huon does not breach Susan Ward’s AVO, as it does not identify her, nor her position within the company.

BDS Huon itself holds no AVO preventing me from addressing these matters with them, and attempting to reach some kind of amicable resolution. However, I am unable to communicate with them at their office, due to Susan Ward’s AVO, and have no way of contacting their management after hours.

Call it breach number 4 if you want, and jail me if you want. However, I do believe that will result in more compensation for myself, once it is proven on appeal that the applicants both committed perjury when making their applications to the court, and again in their sworn statements.

Their AVO applications should never have been granted, therefore I should never have been charged with any breaches.

Susan Ward dares me twice, in the text below, to let her comment go through to the blog. The reason I do not do that, is because she has used her real name, and will therefore identify herself as the staff member who is breaching client confidentiality. Therefore, I am required by the AVO conditions to prevent that from happening.

She also claims that I wrote about BDS Huon’s investigation into the matters, and that I lie about that. I do not say that at all. I talk about the Chartered Accountant’s Association’s investigation in BDS Huon itself:

I lodged a complaint with the Chartered Accountants’ Association about being arrested for writing to Jon Williams in early April. I lodged another one a week later, about Ross Griffin, and the new charge of phoning him, to complain about being arrested for writing to BDS Huon. Their investigation into these matters in still in progress. BDS Huon have again refused to act to have the new charges bought against me dropped. A

gain, it appears to me that she has breached her own AVO by not only contacting me, but insulting me as well.

Tracey Burt

P.S. While I was writing this email, Gary Burt sent an insulting message to the blog. I will forward that next.

forwarded email begins, but with new updates inserted into its text, by Karma.

From: WordPress <donotreply@wordpress.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 31 May 2016 9:15 PM
To: traceyburt1@hotmail.com
Subject: [Government Run Corruption in Albury] Please moderate: “BDS Huon, Lavington, Tax Accountants”

 

 

New comment waiting approval on Government Run Corruption in Albury

 

This company is the only private firm which will be addressed on this blog. The other employees cited for illegal and criminal …

Sue Ward commented on BDS Huon, Lavington, Tax Accountants

 

Tracey, Vexatious Litigant (yes also used google

The police have suggested I not post anything to your latest blog (Number 3) but after today I have really had a gut full of your lies and untruths.

(Blog number two was about UFO’s Over Albury, which they trashed by attacking me via it, and their own blog which they tried to link to my own. I had to delete it from the net, so that people reading it would not be led to their libellous and criminally defamatory blog about myself)

Firstly, the comment I posted on Friday night (27 May 2016 at 7.49pm (email to confirm date and time from WordPress saved)) was after you had already linked your BDS story to your latest blog, my copy saved down at 3.34pm already had your story linked – LIE BY KARMA

(As per email above, at no time did I deny that the article about BDS was published to the blog. Ward commented on it long after it was. The heading above shows the posted these comments to that article. Why is she claiming that I had since denied it, when it is only just happening?!?)

Karma says “that the BDS Huon’s investigation into these matters is still in progress and that they have again refused to act to have the new charges brought against you dropped and that you are only being punished for being a “whistle blower” – LIE BY KARMA as no charges have ever been laid by BDS Huon and you are not being a whistle blower, you are trying your hardest to have me sacked and being a spiteful bitch.

(No, I had written in that blog post, and I do have a copy to prove it as do the police in their evidence against the blog itself, that BDS Huon were under investigation by other agencies for not investing her, and instead allowing her to have me charged with a criminal offence for advising them of her misconduct towards their clients)

Karma says in her comments dated 28 May 2016 “that another breach was committed last night by the holder of the AVO” – ANOTHER LIE BY KARMA as I cannot breach my own AVO and you do not hold one against me.

(I advised the court, and my readers that yes, I believe that her posting an insulting comment to my legal blog the night before was another breach on her part, and that the court was ignoring. Just as it had when they had attacked my UFO blog by creating their own bullshit one about myself, and got away with that too. Which is why the police also told her not to post anymore comments. They could see that her’s was a nasty insult, and that she was trying to start an argument with me, and then running to them to again have me charged for that)

Karma says “she is merely writing the truth” – ABSOLUTE LIE and SLANDER

Remember Tracey “if it’s true then it’s not slander”.

(Well why doesn’t she produce any real evidence to support her case and allegations? She had me charged with lodging my own defence statements, and for advising her employers that she was about to embarrass their company by way of her applications in the local court. That has happened, so no lie by Karma. I can prove all of what she refers to as lies, yet she cannot even begin to prove any of her lies about me, neither can her mother)

Would also like to clear up the following:

Charge laid by Jon Williams for writing to him (and personally going on his personal property to deliver it) – NO CHARGE BY JON, SUE WARD LODGED THE BREACH.

(Yet two months later I was supplied with the defence brief, and which showed that Jon Williams and company had given her a copy of the letter I had written to the company, and sent her off to have me charged, and on the advice of their lawyer. Williams not only went on to provide police with a witness statement, but testified in court about how he came into possession of that letter, but could not explain why he did not investigate her behaviour properly and professionally)

Charge laid by Ross Griffin for ringing him at BDS Huon – NO CHARGE BY ROSS, SUE WARD LODGED THE BREACH.

(Yet the brief served two months after this comment, showed that he had indeed given a statement to police, and asked another staff member who answered the call to do the same, in an attempt to get the ADVO itself awarded, back in February 2016, and after matters had been illegally revoked from mediation)

Charge laid for emailing Contact@BDS Huon and given to Ross Griffin – NO CHARGE BY BDS HUON, SUE WARD LODGED THE BREACH.

(The email advised Mr Griffin on what date the hearing of the charge was listed, and instructed him to advise Jon Williams that I would be seeking to cross examine him. It was legal correspondence, and I had forgotten to mention it on the phone, and in light of his mockery of myself. I should not have been charged for that, and according to what Murray said at the appeal hearing, it was a very serious offence for Williams to not have appeared on 5 February 2016, to give evidence. A whole lot could have been cleared up back then had he done so)

Report lodged for your vicious comments left on the BDS Website since 29 April, 5 and 6 May and14 May 2016 – NO CHARGE BY BDS HUON, SUE WARD LODGED THE BREACH.

(Vicious comments? A warning to their potential clients that they don’t respect their clients’ rights to privacy nor the federal regulations which are supposed to guarantee them, and then the proof that they had me charged for advising them that it is her personally who has created that charge against that company)

And on and on and on and on it goes, have not listed them all, Tracey you really need to read the Orders as set out in the AVO because you do not seem to be capable of understanding them.

BDS Huon will not be conforming to your blackmail and threats to withdraw any charges and only then you will remove your lies from their website because they cannot and I WILL NOT. They will also not be helping you out with any fines you incur and they will also not be assisting you in seeking any compensation from their employee (me) because in fact what has been done to you and your family is in fact your own doing.

(What I have done in retaliation to the attack you and your mother waged upon myself in the lead up to and during the court proceedings, is your own doing. I will not be paying off fines stemming from your allegations which had been proven to be false, by way of evidence, and the convictions achieved by way of illegal actions and gross misconduct. BDS Huon should have paid them for me last year and when it was only $560, and all of this would have ended then)

Finally, in respect to my “foul” comment emailed to you on Friday night, let’s be real Tracey because if it was so “foul” you would have put it up as fast as you could to justify your breach. In fact, my comment was only a few lines in respect to who was actually unethical you or BDS and I am pretty sure I said you were (lies edited out).

(My blog was not in breach, until after I had endured the assault by yourself and Stella Burt on it for a week, and then retaliation. Your own comments had first driven it into being in breach, in that it then identified you all, and you deliberately sought to identify myself. Then I replied, and yes, those comments would have been in breach of a valid order that had been served, gained by way of due legal process and applied for under your legal name. )

With all of your name calling, filthy lies and abuse you have dished out to every member of this family since October 2015, I think I have a right to a small slur on you.

(Everything I have written and/or posted to the internet about you people has been truth. You are the ones who lie, and continue to do so, and continue to be shown to be lying about having won all this, even if the face of all of the evidence of your cheating being on display here on the net. The name calling started from the idiots in Western Australia, and its about all they are capable of, especially when they had no reason to hate me, for all the dramas you have caused them)

This is the last time I will post a comment and I dare you to post it word for word. Also when the police do come feel free to give them a copy because I like you have also kept a copy of pretty much everything you print, post, email and blog and I, unlike you have never removed a line from an email like you have previously done.

(Police never came for a couple of weeks after that. Because I had then began to post all of the defence statements and evidence and the police were being shamed for their involvement in it all. So they had to tamper with the evidence and bring a charge against me for the blog. Ward and the police deliberately omit the 17 pages of abuse they dished up to me, before running crying to the police that they were being attacked online, again)

Dare you to post it as is.

(I have previously, but I think it looks better with the new updates)

Approve  Trash | Mark as Spam

 

More information about Sue Ward

URL: http://governmentcorruptionoz.wordpress.com
Email: susanward013@bigpond.com
Whois: http://whois.arin.net/rest/ip/120.155.112.34 (IP: 120.155.112.34)

 

 

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com

 

From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Thursday, 16 June 2016 3:05 PM
To: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au
Subject: RE: Meeting with the Registrar

Thanks. Pass this onto her too 😉

https://janiceburtfamilyroast.wordpress.com/2016/06/16/albury-court-refuses-to-undo-corrupt-proceedings/

To: traceyburt1@outlook.com
Subject: RE: Meeting with the Registrar
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 08:59:21 +1000
From: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au

Dear Tracey, > >

Thank you for your notification, I will pass this on to the Registrar. > >

Yours Faithfully, > >

Registrar |
Albury Local Court | Court Services | Department of Justice > Email: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au | Phone 02 6023 8555 | Fax 02 > 6023 8585 > Court House, 515 Olive Street, Albury NSW 2640 > P.O. Box 64, ALBURY NSW 2640.

 

Sentencing Hearing 22 November

From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Wednesday, 22 November 2017 8:50 AM
To: local_court_Wagga_Wagga@justice.nsw.gov.au
Cc: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au; Local Court Albury; ADR_Directorate@agd.nsw.gov.au; contactus@lecc.nsw.gov.au; director_justicelegal@agd.nsw.gov.au; investigations@abc.net.au; leader.opposition@parliament.nsw.gov.au; Office of the General Counsel; senator.brandis@aph.gov.au; secretary@jca.asn.au; walt.secord@parliament.nsw.gov.au

 

Subject: Sentencing Hearing today – BURT

Dear Sir/Madam

Please print out the attached documents and ensure that they are given to the Magistrate who thinks he has some right to sentence me for a charge which was never properly heard, nor the hearing even finished.

I was not given a chance to call my witness, nor give my closing arguments on 14 September 2017. I also wanted the recording of the police interview played to the court. I had to abandon proceedings when Magistrate Cromptom was showing  actual and provable bias towards Susan Ward, under cross examination.

I do not believe the court has any right to be sentencing me, when I had advised the Magistrate  at the start of the hearing that I did not expect to receive any fair dealings from him, because Albury Local court has continued to act corruptly in all of these matters since the outset, and are prepared to act illegally to try to have me convicted of all charges, and against all evidence which has disproven them. The court also chooses to overlook the vast amounts of illegal conduct by police, in all of my ‘arrests’. I had to walk out of the hearing, due to that same corruption continuing on that day.

Now it turns out that the Albury Court House, and its Magistrates, have been allowing the re-hearing of this charge to occur, under the name of the wrong complainant.

This hearing needs to restarted, under the name of the correct complainant. Please advise the Magistrate that when he sets a date and venue for re-hearing, that it not be in Wagga or Albury, but in Sydney.

I have previously made application for the recusal of both Murray and Cromptom from all of my matters, and now I demand it.

Which is another reason the court must relist this with a new venue, if it wants the re-conviction of myself for this matter to proceed.

Yours sincerely

Tracey Burt

Attachments:

Transcripts for two hearings on 29 February 2016

Document – O’Bryan Breaches

 

The documents emailed to them are the same as were put on display here yesterday.

 

Charge of Contravene ADVO Applied to Janice O’Bryan’s ADVO Application

In all of my complaints to the court, at hearing at to the Registrar, and various other agencies, I have often bought up the following points:

  • Murray was dealing with O’Bryan’s ADVO application when he convicted me of Ward’s charge of contravene.
  • That O’Bryan’s ADVO application should never have been awarded based on a breach of another person’s ADVO.
  • On 29 February 2016, Murray claims that the original civil ADVO applications were dismissed, after being referred to mediation by Magistrate Cromptom, and had been replaced with police applications. Which is why the police prosecutor was now representing the complainants at the hearing of that same date.
  • When I bought that up to Murray at the hearing to revoke Ward’s ADVO in August, stating that I had never seen the allegations police had made against me in their applications made on behalf of the complainants. He stated that the original civil applications had not ever been dismissed, and were still before the court.
  • Those which had been disproven by defence evidence lodged on 11 and 12 January 2016, and the lack of evidence and demonstrated perjury committed by both of the complainants, lodged on 23 December 2015.

On 19 November 2017, I was working through the transcripts of 29 February 2016 again, and I discovered that a charge of contravene ADVO had been listed for hearing against O’Bryan’s ADVO application.

There was no police charge in relation to any allegation of contravening O’Bryan’s ADVO. There was no complaint made to police by her that I am aware of, which involved myself, at that or any of time.

Therefore, the police prosecutor had no right at all to be representing her civil ADVO application, but while he was doing so, he handed up to the facts to the Magistrate which related to the charge of contravene Ward’s ADVO.

Murray convicts me of that charge, after first awarding the ADVO application made by O’Bryan, based on that same charge. He completes the matter.

He then states they are both free to go. O’Bryan is the complainant. Ward had already been dismissed, and should have been sitting in the audience by then. I believe Murray is just being polite in including her in that dismissal, by saying ‘both’.

When Ward was called to the microphone when Murray was dealing with her ADVO application, the police charge of contravene is listed alongside her application.

However, Murray does not call the matter of contravene, the police charge, nor mention it at all.

He merely grants the ADVO application, and formally dismisses her. He deliberately calls Mrs O’Bryan as the next matter on the list, again, keeping the two parties matters separate from each other.

Ward’s own ADVO application was therefore unproven by anything at all in court. Just by her own application form, as handed to the Magistrate during that hearing.

That was the same evidence that was handed up on 23 November 2015 to prove her need for an Interim Order. That was granted, despite that one document alone not fulling the legal requirement to have an Interim order granted in the absence of the accused.

For that, they were both required to present another document, outlining why their need was urgent and demonstrating that they were facing an imminent attack

No police arrest documents were tendered to the court, or Magistrate, in relation to Ward’s ADVO application on 29 February 2016.

The prosecutor only mentions phone calls and emails. The arrest and charge was for a typed letter, therefore again remains unmentioned by the prosecutor.

However, that does all mean that when I was convicted of the first police charge of contravene ADVO, it was bought against me in relation to Janice O’Bryan’s interim ADVO.

Good news for police is, that the final order for that one was served, so they can now  legally now go ahead with rehearing that charge.

The court has been re-hearing it, but with Susan Ward as the complainant and police witness. But that complainant should actually be O’Bryan. The police witness should have been O’Bryan, along with Jon Williams, and Framer Weekley.

In relation to the four charges of breach that were bought against me in relation to Ward’s final order granted on 29 February 2016, I again advise the court that final order was never served on the accused, and therefore never came into effect.

The summons to court for that was made in the name of Burt, so I do not acknowledge the Interim Order stemming from that application which was in the name of Ward.

Ward’s application was disproven by defence evidence lodged on 11 and 12 January 2016, and the grounds for the application negated by both her and BDS Huon’s admission that they had already been advised that she was gossiping about clients’ affairs outside work hours, by herself lodging those documents with the court, outside the permitted time frame.

Ward’s application was therefore never proven by way of a charge of contravene breach, because although it was assigned to her ADVO, it was also assigned to the application of another party’s ADVO application by the court, and was then heard in relation to that complainant’s matters, being an ADVO application which was based on the allegation of breach.

Therefore, I request that prior to sentencing for the rehearing of that charge of contravene, that the Magistrate declare the rehearing of the charge which occurred on 20 June and 14 September 2017, to have been a mistrial. It must be restarted, with O’Bryan as the complainant.

The conviction stems from the ADVO application made by and granted to O’Bryan. Therefore the rehearing of the charge must also be on behalf of the same complainant.

Please advise me when a date has been set for the new hearing of the charge, and please ensure that Mr Williams attends court on time, for that occasion.

Tracey Burt
21 November 2017

 

IN THE LOCAL COURT
ALBURY
MAGISTRATE MURRAY
MONDAY 29 FEBRUARY 2016

R  v  Tracey Gwendoline BURT
EX PARTE

OFFENCE         Contravene AVO
COMPLAINT     Apprehended violence order

Sergeant Coombs for the Complainant O’Bryan
No appearance of or for Defendant

HIS HONOUR:  The next matter is Miss Janice Evelyn O’Bryan, and again that lady – ma’am is that you?

COMPLAINANT:  Yes.

HIS HONOUR:  I note she is present, and again there’s no appearance of Tracey Burt at 10.30.  Again there’s no reason placed before the court for the

lady’s non-attendance, and, again, that matter is dealt with ex parte.

I note the evidence relied upon by the applicant and the lady is, as I said, not here.   That matter is dealt with ex parte.

I AM SATISFIED THE COMPLAINANT HOLDS FEARS AND THOSE FEARS ARE REASONABLY HELD.  SO A FINAL ORDER MADE FOR 12 MONTHS IN TERMS OF INTERIM ORDER.

HIS HONOUR:  That completes the three domestic violence matters, and in respect of the charge matter I note there’s no appearance of the defendant today as well.  And I do note that some private DVOs were referred by another magistrate for mediation.  These are charge matters and I had requested that the matters be – or directed rather the matters be returned to court on the 15/2 because quite clearly these are not suitable matters for referral to the CJC as quite clearly they are police prosecutions, they are not private matters.

In respect of that I also requested the court to notify the lady if she failed to attend the matter may be dealt with in her absence  So far as that there’s no appearance of that defendant again at 10.30.

Matter dealt with pursuant to s 196.  Statement of facts please

 

PROSECUTOR:  Your Honour I hand up the facts and record.

HIS HONOUR:  Yes in respect of the matter now before the court I do note the breach has been established and the antecedents.  There’s no other prior matters of a similar type.

THE LADY IS CONVICTED AND FINED THE SUM OF FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS.

That completes the matter.  Thank you, you’re both free to go.

COMPLAINANT O’BRYAN:  Thank you.

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS – CHARGE H60077075 – WEEKLEY – POLICE CHARGE HANDED UP TO THE MAGISTRATE, CONVICTION AND  FINE IMPOSED, AFTER THE ADVO WAS GRANTED

THIS IS THE CONVICTION I HAVE BEEN APPEALING THIS IS THE COMPLAINANT WHO’S CHARGE I HAVE BEEN APPEALING

NOT WARD

O’BRYAN IS THE COMPLAINANT, IN THE CHARGE I WAS CONVICTED FOR IN COURT

WARD WAS THE INFORMANT IN THE MATTER, AND POLICE DID CHARGE ME FOR THIS AS AN BREACH OF HER ADVO, BUT I WAS CONVICTED FOR THIS CHARGE OF CONTRAVANE AGAINST O’BRYAN’S ADVO

THE POLICE CHARGE WAS ASSIGNED TO BOTH OF THESE PEOPLE, WARD AND O’BRYAN.

MURRAY DID NOT CONVICT ME OF IT, WHEN DEALING WITH WARD.

HE CONVICTED ME OF IT, WHEN DEALING WITH O’BRYAN.

START THE RE-HEARING OF THIS CHARGE, WITH THE RIGHT COMPLAINANT AS THE POLICE WITNESS AND VICTIM

 

IN THE LOCAL COURT
ALBURY
MAGISTRATE MURRAY
MONDAY 29 FEBRUARY 2016

R  v  Tracey BURT

OFFENCE         Contravene apprehended violence order
COMPLAINT     Apprehended violence order(2)

Sergeant A Coombs for the Informant
No appearance of or for the Accused

HIS HONOUR:  I firstly deal with the matter in respect of Susan Ward and Tracey Burt.  Who is Susan Ward ‑ that’s you, ma’am.  The matter was relisted by the Court and I do note the Court vacated the orders for the referral of a CJC, bearing in mind there was incidence of violence.  In respect to that matter the matter then came before the Court on the last occasion when the matter was adjourned.  The lady was present but left without further explanation, she is not here at 10.30.  Ms Ward, you’re seeking to continue with your application?

WARD:  Yes, your Honour.

EXHIBIT #1 COURT RECORD AND STATEMENT OF SERVICE TENDERED, ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION

HIS HONOUR:  I AM SATISFIED THE COMPLAINANT HOLDS FEARS IN THE INFORMATION THAT HAS BEEN FILED BY THE COMPLAINANT, THERE IS NO APPEARANCE OF THE DEFENDANT NOR ANY REASON WHY SHE IS NOT HERE.  IN LIGHT OF THAT, THE FINAL ORDER MADE.

PROSECUTOR:  Your Honour, is there any way we could tighten them up because of the continued breaching, that she not be allowed phone, email.

HIS HONOUR:  THE FINAL ORDER MADE FOR A PERIOD OF 12 MONTHS FROM TODAY.

Ma’am, if there is an application for variation of the conditions you’re going to have to make that but the order itself is in place in respect of you and that lady now.  In respect of the matter of which Ms Burt was the complainant and Ms Ward was the respondent, again there is no appearance of the complainant at 10.30 or any reason placed before the Court for a non‑attendance.  The defendant is present and again I note the same orders were made and indicated that the matter may be dismissed if she fails to attend.  There is no reason for her non‑attendance today.

THAT MATTER IS MARK DISMISSED.

 

 

NO CONVICTION OF A POLICE CHARGE, JUST A COURT RECORD USED TO PROVE THE ADVO APPLICATION

I HAVE NO  IDEA WHAT THAT COURT RECORD WAS, BUT IT WAS OBVIOUSLY NOT THE ARREST DOCUMENTATION

 

For the record. When the clerk at Albury court House, a Mr or Ms Howard, emailed me a copy of the above transcripts in July I think it was last year, they only emailed one to me, at first.

A week later, when I was still emailing questions about what went on with regard to my conviction, they then sent the other one, claiming that had forgotten to the first time. 

The reason I jumped to the conclusion above, that the court record handed to the Magistrate on 29 February, in relation to Ward’s application would have only been a copy of her original application was because I once emailed the court house asking to provide me with a copy of the document handed to Murray at the first hearing, and which had ‘proven’ their need for an interim order to be issued, without myself being given a chance to defend their allegations.

The court replied that what was handed to Murray was just a copy of their original allegation. Yet I had read that process required for them to have written an additional statement at the court house on the day, giving some reasons why their need was so urgent. While the court pretended that they did, it turned out to be just a copy of the document it was supposed to support.

In thinking more about it, I came to realize that it is probably the documents that Ward lodged with the court house on 12 January 2016, outside the cut off date for lodgement. My letter to  BDS Huon, plus what she described under cross examination as a letter from herself, to the deciding Magistrate. However, when giving statements to police, she describes the other document as an email from BDS Huon themselves, confirming how they came into possession of my letter.

Apparently a copy of those documents is waiting for me to pick up from the court house at the moment, after I had to issue a Notice to Produce, because I’d never been made aware that the existed, until Ward was finally under cross examination for the charge which should have been heard on 5 February 2016. I can’t walk into that court house, so can’t pick up the documents, so can only speculate about what the second one is.

But I’d like to tell this story, about court records. I also noticed when going through the emails to the court, asking for the transcripts, that I noticed they claim to have put a copy of my notification of breach, by the interim ADVO holders on around 23 February 2016 (from memory) on the court record. Or to have created one about it, despite claiming at first they had no ability to do so.

Why was that record not handed to the Magistrate, after matters had been revoked from mediation and he was preparing to award the ADVO’s and convict me of the allegation of breach, made by police? Same police who’d refuse to act of my allegation of their blog being in breach of their own orders.

Why was her court record handed to the Magistrate, and not mine?

When I went to lodge my original defence statements against Con Framer Weekley’s charge, I wanted them put with my defence statements for the ADVO’s. I wrote a letter to the registrar, seeking permission to have them added to those papers, so they were available to be read by the deciding Magistrate before he was prejudiced against me by the police charge, when he looked through the matters prior to hearing.

He admits on 5 February that he had read everything, before even coming into the court room. I was already aware that was the process, having worked at a court house once.

The clerk showed the registrar my letter and she had to agree to let him pretend to see if that was allowable. He consulted with two other clerks after that, just to get his information correct.

He advised that since I was lodging extra information outside the allotted time period, that the Magistrate did not have to read it. That it could be put into the file, at the bottom, and had to be bought to his attention by myself, because he would have stopped reading before he got to it. I agreed that I would be there to ensure that he did. And I was. Yet again, he didn’t even call the matter. Cromptom of course.

In hindsight, I can see that since I was addressing a police charge, then it really had nothing to do with the lodgement of documents in the civil matters. I had every right to lodge that defence, and for the Magistrate to read it.

Yet the court pretended that I did not.

But when it comes to Susan Ward, lodging new information outside of the time period, it is automatically handed up to the Magistrate, and taken into consideration by him, and her ADVO granted.

Then when hearing the criminal charge immediately afterwards, once he was dealing with O’Bryan’s matters, he deliberately ignores those legal and valid defence statements against the criminal charge, dismissing them in the pile of defence documents for the civil matters, which he declares the police charge eliminates them from proceedings completely.

So they played that game right up until the end, and continue to do so. That my defence statements against a criminal police charge of breach, were merely additional statements to support my defence case in the civil matters, which ‘were dismissed and replaced with police applications’.

Or, maybe above, they did just hand up a copy of her original application to prove her original application. We won’t know until I get a copy of those documents, or the chance to cross examine both Ward, Williams and the framer cop, all over again.

However, I think I have grounds to have the whole charge dismissed. All of the above corruption, when coupled the corruption at its original ‘hearing’, show that Albury court house has no desire nor ability to hear this charge fairly. Since they won’t grant motion, I believe it must then be dismissed.

Especially in light of the fact, that police charged me for ‘assaulting’ one person, and then I was convicted in court for having committed that assault against a different person altogether. And the Magistrate was too stupid to even admit that’s what happened, when he handed down his latest judgement, and which makes no sense in the eyes of legal process and the evidence.

Put myself into triple jeopardy in their corrupt hands, no way. This conviction will not be appealed in the Albury District Court. It will be appealed and overturned by way of other methods. Even if those methods land Murray and Cromptom in court and a jail cell.

Better then than me, since they are the ones who have been breaking the law all the way through these 2 years of court bullshit and false dramas.

Why should I be jailed to cover up for that, and for the fact that both complainants signed ADVO application forms which clearly state on the front, that to write anything untruth on there will result in a $1,000 fine, for having made false allegations to a court of law?

Why is that warning to applicants, not being upheld?

Of course there is also a chance that the court record handed to the Magistrate which saw me convicted of Ward’s false civil application, was a recommendation from the court’s own mediator, that it be granted, and because there had been an incidence of violence towards Susan, or that she might loose her job if this did not end, and then Gwen Bradley’s daughter would have to find a new tenant.

If the court record was written by Bradley, there is little chance of me ever being supplied with a copy of that, as it would result in a well paying law suit against the CJC and Local Courts NSW. This whole thing still might, if I can be bothered with civil action next year. I saw recently that I do in fact have a couple of years in which I can defer that ‘revenge’ or karma, so might have a nice rest up first.

So again, it was either nothing at all, or it was her advice that I had written to BDS Huon. Yet the court had already come into that same information, on the same day, by way of my own defence statements. And which read with the letter, prove the ADVO applications were both fraudulent, and that both applications were seeking to cover up other issues, and protect Wards’ employment from allegations they both knew she was guilty of.

Misuse of process, is the legal name for that. By Gwen Bradley, the ADVO mediator, misusing that process, for her own nefarious reasons.

Its also illegal and supposed to be overturned, when it happens.

 

Defence brief, as ignored by the Magistrate, because it proved corruption by NSW Police, and Albury Court House staff, including the other Magistrate

Defence H60077075 Weekley pdf

Police ‘formal’ interview, which commenced 7 minutes before they knocked on my door, according to this heavily edited version of the illegal recording he made of our ‘informal’ chat.

 

 

10. Fair Trial – A common law right

The right to a fair trial has been described as ‘a central pillar of our criminal justice system’, ‘fundamental and absolute’ and a ‘cardinal requirement of the rule of law’.

Fundamentally, a fair trial is designed to prevent innocent people being convicted of crimes. It protects liberty, property, reputation and other fundamental interests. Being wrongly convicted of a crime has been called a ‘deep injustice and a substantial moral harm’.

 Fairness also gives a trial its integrity and moral legitimacy or authority.

Furthermore, fair trials are presumably more likely to reach correct verdicts than unfair trials, and therefore they may not only help prevent wrongful convictions of the innocent, but also indirectly promote the prosecution and punishment of the guilty.

The right to a fair trial is ‘manifested in rules of law and of practice designed to regulate the course of the trial’.

 Strictly speaking, it is ‘a right not to be tried unfairly’ or ‘an immunity against conviction otherwise than after a fair trial’, because ‘no person has the right to insist upon being prosecuted or tried by the State’.


10.

This chapter discusses the source and rationale of the right to a fair trial; how the right is protected from statutory encroachment; and when Commonwealth laws that limit accepted principles of a fair trial may be justified. It focuses on some widely recognised components of a fair trial that have been subject to statutory limits, for example

  • a trial should be held in public and the court’s reasons for its decision should be delivered in public;
  • a defendant has a right to a lawyer; and
  • a defendant has the right to confront the prosecution’s witnesses and to test the evidence said to prove his or her guilt.

 

The right to a fair trial ‘extends to the whole course of the criminal process

It has been said that there is ‘no aspect of preparation for trial or of criminal procedure which is not touched by, or indeed determined by, the principle of a fair trial’.

 

Attributes of a fair trial

 Widely accepted general attributes of a fair trial—some traceable to the common law, others to important Parliamentary reforms—may now be found set out in international treaties, conventions, human rights statutes and bills of rights.

 As found in art 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), these include the following*

 independent court

  • the court must be ‘competent, independent and impartial’;

 public trial

  • the trial should be held in public and judgment given in public;

presumption of innocence

  • the defendant should be presumed innocent until proved guilty—the prosecution therefore bears the onus of proof and must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt;

 defendant told of charge

  • the defendant should be informed of the nature and cause of the charge against him—promptly, in detail, and in a language which he or she understands;

 time and facilities to prepare

  • the defendant must have adequate time and facilities to prepare a defence and to communicate with counsel of his own choosing;

trial without undue delay

  • the defendant must be tried without undue delay— (Gwen Fucking Bradley!)
  •  that is, undue delay between arrest and the trial, perhaps having regard to such things as the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, and whether there was any prejudice to the accused;

right to a lawyer

  • the defendant must be ‘tried in his presence, and to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing; to be informed, if he does not have legal assistance, of this right; and to have legal assistance assigned to him, in any case where the interests of justice so require, and without payment by him in any such case if he does not have sufficient means to pay for it’

right to examine witnesses

  • the defendant must have the opportunity to ‘examine, or have examined, the witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him’;

 right to an interpreter

  • the defendant is entitled to the ‘free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court’;

right not to testify against oneself

  • the defendant has a right ‘not to be compelled to testify against himself or to confess guilt’;

no double jeopardy

  • no one shall be ‘liable to be tried or punished again for an offence for which he has already been finally convicted or acquitted in accordance with the law and penal procedure of each country’.

 

The elements of a fair trial appear to be related to the defining or essential characteristics of a court, which have been said to include * the reality and appearance of the court’s independence and its impartiality; the application of procedural fairness; adherence, as a general rule, to the open court principle; and that a court generally gives reasons for its decisions.

 

 

 

Open Notice to Cromptom, Re: Failure to Appear 22 November 2017

or

Charge of Contravene ADVO Applied to Janice O’Bryan’s ADVO Application

In all of my complaints to the court, at hearing at to the Registrar, and various other agencies, I have often bought up the following points:

  • Murray was dealing with O’Bryan’s ADVO application when he convicted me of Ward’s charge of contravene.
  • That O’Bryan’s ADVO application should never have been awarded based on a breach of another person’s ADVO.
  • On 29 February 2016, Murray claims that the original civil ADVO applications were dismissed, after being referred to mediation by Magistrate Cromptom, and had been replaced with police applications. Which is why the police prosecutor was now representing the complainants at the hearing of that same date.
  • When I bought that up to Murray at the appeal hearing on 18 April 2016, stating that I had never seen the allegations police had made against me in their applications made on behalf of the complainants, he stated that the original civil applications had not ever been dismissed, and were what had been processed by the court.
  • Those which had been disproven by defence evidence lodged on 11 and 12 January 2016, and the lack of evidence and demonstrated perjury committed by both of the complainants, lodged on 23 December 2015.

On 19 November 2017, I was working through the transcripts of 29 February 2016 again, and I discovered that a charge of contravene ADVO had been listed for hearing against O’Bryan’s ADVO application on that date.

There was no police charge in relation to any allegation of contravening O’Bryan’s ADVO. There was no complaint made to police by her that I am aware of, which involved myself, at that or any of time.

Therfore, the police prosecutor had no right at all to be representing her civil ADVO application, but while he was doing so, he handed up to the facts to the Magistrate which related to the charge of contravene Ward’s ADVO.

Murray convicts me of that charge, after first awarding the ADVO application made by O’Bryan, based on that same charge. He completes the matter.

He then states they are both free to go. O’Bryan is the complainant. Ward had already been dismissed, and should have been sitting in the audience by then. I believe Murray is just being polite in including her in that dismissal, by saying ‘both’.

When Ward was called to the microphone when Murray was dealing with her ADVO application, the police charge of contravene is listed alongside her application.

However, Murray does not call the matter of contravene, the police charge, nor mention it at all.

He merely grants the ADVO application, and formally dismisses her. He deliberately calls Mrs O’Bryan as the next matter on the list, again, keeping the two parties matters separate from each other.

Ward’s own ADVO application was therefore unproven by anything at all in court. Just by her own application form, as handed to the Magistrate during that hearing.

That was the same evidence that was handed up on 23 November 2015 to prove her need for an Interim Order. That was granted, despite that one document alone not fulling the legal requirement to have an Interim order granted in the absence of the accused.

For that, they were both required to present another document, outlining why their need was urgent and demonstrating that they were facing an imminent attack

No police arrest documents were tendered to the court, or Magistrate, in relation to Ward’s ADVO application on 29 February 2016.

The prosecutor only mentions phone calls and emails. The arrest and charge was for a typed letter, therefore again remains unmentioned by the prosecutor.

However, that does all mean that when I was convicted of the first police charge of contravene ADVO, it was bought against me in relation to Janice O’Bryan’s interim ADVO.

Good news for police is, that the final order for that one was served, so they can now  legally now go ahead with rehearing that charge.

The court has been re-hearing it, but with Susan Ward as the complainant and police witness. But that complainant should actually be O’Bryan. The police witness should have been O’Bryan, along with Jon Williams, and Framer Weekley.

In relation to the four charges of breach that were bought against me in relation to Ward’s final order granted on 29 February 2016, I again advise the court that final order was never served on the accused, and therefore never came into effect.

The summons to court for that was made in the name of Burt, so I do not acknowledge the Interim Order stemming from that application which was in the name of Ward.

Ward’s application was disproven by defence evidence lodged on 11 and 12 January 2016, and the grounds for the application negated by both her and BDS Huon’s admission that they had already been advised that she was gossiping about clients’ affairs outside work hours, by herself lodging those documents with the court, outside the permitted time frame.

Ward’s application was therefore never proven by way of a charge of contravene breach, because although it was assigned to her ADVO, it was also assigned to the application of another party’s ADVO application by the court, and was then heard in relation to that complainant’s matters, being an ADVO application which was based on the allegation of breach.

Therefore, I request that prior to sentencing for the rehearing of that charge of contravene, that the Magistrate declare the rehearing of the charge which occurred on 20 June and 14 September 2017, to have been a mistrial. It must be restarted, with O’Bryan as the complainant.

The conviction stems from the ADVO application made by and granted to O’Bryan. Therefore the rehearing of the charge must also be on behalf of the same complainant.

 

  • In checking the ‘interim’ order just now, for the above document and before posting this, I seem to not have a copy of it. I was served with a summons to appear in court on 23 November 2015, in the form of the two separate ADVO applications. 
  • I recall the serving cop telling me when I had to be in court, and then Weekley telling me to be there on Monday morning. Somehow I new the date was to be 14 December 2015, though.
  • I did go to the court house on the Monday morning, was given ADVO applications forms and went back to lodge those counter applications the next day.
  • She listed them for hearing on the same day that I was to appear in court for the first time. I wrote the letter to Jon Williams some time after that, working from the conditions assigned on the application itself.
  • I’ll have to go through everything, to see if I do have a copy of the Interim Order, issued in my absence and ignorance, on 23 November 2015.
  • Maybe it was posted to me after the hearing, I can’t recall now. But I do know I was never served anything else, after that initial application, until they tried to serve O’Bryan’s final order on 4 March 2016.
  • I refused to open the screen security door to accept it, told them it had nothing to do with me since it had been disproven by evidence, and they had to then just leave it on the doorstep. That was the same day they forgot to bring one relating to Ward.
  • I assumed her’s had not been granted, as per the registrar describing it as illegal, or that BDS Huon had forced her to drop hers before the hearing of 29 February 2016.
  • I only became aware that it had been granted, when I received the fine notice in the mail several days later.
  • I had to email the court house to ask what I had been charged and fined for. Again, as I was unaware that Ward even held an order now, but that was the only ADVO application I had been charged against.

 

IN THE LOCAL COURT
ALBURY
MAGISTRATE MURRAY

MONDAY 29 FEBRUARY 2016

R  v  Tracey BURT
OFFENCE         Contravene apprehended violence order
COMPLAINT     Apprehended violence order(2)

Sergeant A Coombs for the Informant
No appearance of or for the Accused

HIS HONOUR:  I firstly deal with the matter in respect of Susan Ward and Tracey Burt.  Who is Susan Ward ‑ that’s you, ma’am.  The matter was relisted by the Court and I do note the Court vacated the orders for the referral of a CJC, bearing in mind there was incidence of violence.  In respect to that matter the matter then came before the Court on the last occasion when the matter was adjourned.  The lady was present but left without further explanation, she is not here at 10.30.  Ms Ward, you’re seeking to continue with your application?

WARD:  Yes, your Honour.

EXHIBIT #1 COURT RECORD AND STATEMENT OF SERVICE TENDERED, ADMITTED WITHOUT OBJECTION (Application for ADVO made on 17 November 2015 or the documents tendered outside of the lodgement date being the letter to Jon Williams and BDS Huon’s email to the court. Either way, it wasn’t the arrest documentation therefore I was not convicted of any crime against Ward)

HIS HONOUR:  I AM SATISFIED THE COMPLAINANT HOLDS FEARS IN THE INFORMATION THAT HAS BEEN FILED BY THE COMPLAINANT, THERE IS NO APPEARANCE OF THE DEFENDANT NOR ANY REASON WHY SHE IS NOT HERE.  IN LIGHT OF THAT, THE FINAL ORDER MADE.

PROSECUTOR:  Your Honour, is there any way we could tighten them up because of the continued breaching, that she not be allowed phone, email.

HIS HONOUR:  THE FINAL ORDER MADE FOR A PERIOD OF 12 MONTHS FROM TODAY.

Ma’am, if there is an application for variation of the conditions you’re going to have to make that but the order itself is in place in respect of you and that lady now.  In respect of the matter of which Ms Burt was the complainant and Ms Ward was the respondent, again there is no appearance of the complainant at 10.30 or any reason placed before the Court for a non‑attendance.  The defendant is present and again I note the same orders were made and indicated that the matter may be dismissed if she fails to attend.  There is no reason for her non‑attendance today.

THAT MATTER IS MARK DISMISSED.

 

IN THE LOCAL COURT
ALBURY
MAGISTRATE MURRAY
MONDAY 29 FEBRUARY 2016

R  v  Tracey Gwendoline BURT
EX PART
OFFENCE         Contravene AVO

COMPLAINT     Apprehended violence order

Sergeant Coombs for the Complainant O’Bryan
No appearance of or for Defendant

HIS HONOUR:  The next matter is Miss Janice Evelyn O’Bryan, and again that lady – ma’am is that you?

COMPLAINANT:  Yes.

HIS HONOUR:  I note she is present, and again there’s no appearance of Tracey Burt at 10.30.  Again there’s no reason placed before the court for the lady’s non-attendance, and, again, that matter is dealt with ex parte.

I note the evidence relied upon by the applicant and the lady is, as I said, not here.   That matter is dealt with ex parte.

I AM SATISFIED THE COMPLAINANT HOLDS FEARS AND THOSE FEARS ARE REASONABLY HELD.  SO A FINAL ORDER MADE FOR 12 MONTHS IN TERMS OF INTERIM ORDER.

HIS HONOUR:  That completes the three domestic violence matters, and in respect of the charge matter I note there’s no appearance of the defendant today as well.  And I do note that some private DVOs were referred by another magistrate for mediation.  These are charge matters and I had requested that the matters be – or directed rather the matters be returned to court on the 15/2 because quite clearly these are not suitable matters for referral to the CJC as quite clearly they are police prosecutions, they are not private matters.

In respect of that I also requested the court to notify the lady if she failed to attend the matter may be dealt with in her absence  So far as that there’s no appearance of that defendant again at 10.30.

Matter dealt with pursuant to s 196.  Statement of facts please?

PROSECUTOR:  Your Honour I hand up the facts and record. (Charge H60077075 – Arresting Officer Weekley)

HIS HONOUR:  Yes in respect of the matter now before the court I do note the breach has been established and the antecedents.  There’s no other prior matters of a similar type.

THE LADY IS CONVICTED AND FINED THE SUM OF FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS.

That completes the matter.  Thank you, you’re both free to go.

COMPLAINANT O’BRYAN:  Thank you.

 

 

It must have been at the application to revoke hearings, that I bought up the police applications from the above hearings. I don’t have a copy of the transcript of that. Now they will go and change it, lol.

Because at the appeal, I still had not seen the transcripts, and so was still unaware of the incidence of violence allegation which had seen matters revoked, I did not know what the hearing of 15 February 2017 was to entail, and only found out that it was adjourned, by way of the ensuing summons for the date of 29 February 2016.

The Registry finally provided me with a copy of the transcripts, after the appeal. I had been asking for them for months by that time.

So it had to have been the revoke hearings in August, where I was able to bring it up to Murray, and against as a reason to address the events of 29 February 2016, in court, for the first time.

As stated above, he denied his own words as shown above. the same has happened again this year, as mentioned previously in the blog. They change them to police matters when they are loosing, and back to civil matters when they have been backed into a corner. That should leave it to the complainants to deal with things themselves, but they never have to. Because Murray handles their matters for them, and only gives them over to the prosecutor when he needs him to play his role.

The registry did supply me with a copy of the appeal transcript, for free, and after that point refused to give me anymore, without myself having to pay the exorbitant fees.

However, as I say, I have all the ones which matter the most. And which should have seen all of this overturned, the moment the Judicial Commission got to see and hear them.

 

 

From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Tuesday, 21 November 2017 3:38 PM
To: local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au; Local Court Albury; senator.brandis@aph.gov.au; cmo@justice.nsw.gov.au
Subject: FW: Failure to Appear Before Michael Cromptom, 22 November 2017

Please advise Mr Cromptom why I didn’t bother getting out of bed and applying make up and nice clothes to appear before him tomorrow.

He can’t even get the complainant right, in the charge that is being reheard!

The previous two rehearings of Charge number H60077075 , held on 20 June and 14 September 2017, before himself, have to be marked a mistrial, and a new date set to rehear the charge, with Mrs O’Bryan as the complainant.

Attached is a copy of my statement to him for you to print out and present to him during my sentencing hearing on 22 November 2017, and copies of the relevant transcripts.

Please advise me when a date has been set for the new hearing of the charge, and please ensure that Mr Williams attends court on time, for that occasion.

Tracey Burt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Book …

I see that my post which is scheduled to appear after my arrest got loose again today, as it did yesterday. It appeared for five minutes yesterday afternoon at 4, and again today for 20 minutes at high noon. 😉

Back later with a new public post.

 

Reposted from my facebook page:

I would have never thought that my first book meant for the public, would be about my dysfunctional family, who seek to control, dominate and hinder me at every turn, and try to cause me as much unhappiness as they possibly can.

The novel I have wanted to write about my trip to Uluru in 1999, has been sitting untouched since I bought it to a point last year of nearly being ready to be published. It just needs a final edit and then I can release it.

Instead, I have been dealing with these family court dramas for another year running. That’s two years of my life they have now robbed me of, while seeking to destroy me completely.

They were so angry that they were left out of my ancestry books last year, that they dobbed me into Centrelink, claiming that I was making money from the sales of them. However, they had already approached all of my relatives and instructed them not to buy anything from me, so there were no sales of that book, except for by myself and two members of my extended family.

They contacted the book publishing company, who’s site I was testing out to use for my own books, when I published the ancestry ones. They told the company that my two books were full of false information and they demanded a refund of the copies they had bought, of each book, looking for a breach they could use in court against me.

There was none, since they aren’t mentioned in there, as per their court orders. They were so infuriated, they thought they should not be forced to pay for them, when they could not use them against me.

Since they have set things up to have me jailed this week, I have just spent the past two and a half days preparing a book about them. Just them, and what they did to me in court. I wonder if they will be happy now, lol?

http://www.lulu.com/shop/tracey-burt/framed-in-the-albury-local-court/paperback/product-23415417.html

 

The other reason for this book: my ‘family’ claim I never made it to Uluru.

They claim I broke down and never made it there.

They claim that they had to rescue myself and children, in the outback, and take us the rest of the way there.

They claim that no ceremony occurred while I was there, and so there was no reason for me to have gone all that way.

One of them even claims to have spoken to the Inuit Shaman who’s quest to cleanse the sacred sites, drew me into that cause, that trip, and those ceremonies and been told that he thinks it was child abuse on my part, to have taken my children on that adventure.

So they have destroyed my book, before I could release it, by telling lies about its contents for the past 20 years. Before I even typed it up.

Yet I still have the handwritten journal that disproves all of their lies.

They never realized I had plans to turn it into a book way back then, and certainly don’t agree that I have the skills, or intelligence to do so. So once again, they have tried to destroy all of my hopes and dreams, before I could set about achieving them.

So, I instead have released this book, proving that they had me framed in court, by a corrupt Magistrate, think that’s hilarious, are still playing the victims, and are now seeking to jail me to remove the egg from their own faces. Cops and Magistrates included.

My friends know I made it to Uluru back then, because they saw the photos, the souveniers and postcards we bought, and read the article I had published back then about that trip.

My family have never bothered to do any of that, so think they have the right to say that its all lies.

Yet it has have been proven in court that they are liars and perjurors. The only reason they are not in jail, is because their friend ensured they had the whole of the staff of the court house in their pockets, and they used them.

Yet what they did win in the long run, apart from exposure for being the cunts that they are?

 

I advised Constable Framer Weekley last year, that I would make him famous, for his corruption and illegal ways of going about his job. Police assaulted me not long after.

The body of the above book, is the initial court transcripts, showing how Bradley and Murray perverted the course of justice.

The next chapter is my defence statements against Weekley, and his arrest to frame me to have the ADVO orders granted.

BDS Huon is of course mentioned throughout those statements.

The next chapter is my defence statements in relation to the arrest and assault by Albury police, seeking to cover this all up, and to punish me for dobbing Detective Glynn in for dealing ICE. Oh, and that other little issue of the murder of William Tyrrell, and which it is alleged that Murray also played a role in.

So Albury police officers feature in the book, as do the appearances by Ward and O’Bryan in the court room. Since they were allowed to say what they wanted, and I was usually forbidden to speak at all, they get a lot more mentions than what I do.

That’s karma for ya. In action, and still publishing the truth, at all costs to her own personal safety. 😉

I purchased a few copies for myself, two to be put aside for my children once they are old enough to want to understand what really went on here, and I might have one dropped off to Constable Framer Weekley at the police station. By another person of course, as I would be bashed and arrested if I tried to deliver it in person.

One copy though, was ordered just for Magistrate Cromptom, and will be delivered to the Wagga Wagga court house, this week. I hope he gets it before he sentences me on my birthday.

Not sure if it will result in a more lenient, or harsher sentence. That depends on his own reaction I guess.

Either way, I won’t be sent off to jail quietly, and this book will continue to talk for me, once I have been silenced by the court and local police.

 

Reposted from my facebook page about corruption in NSW courts:

The book which shows I was framed in the Albury Local Court, is now available.

Hastily prepared over the past few days, it’s now on sale for people to be able to read about my plight while I sit in jail, after being framed for fun and kicks by people I am biologically related to, and then by corrupt NSW cops and a corrupt Magistrate seeking to cover up their own illegal conduct, and silence my blogs about pedophiles in the NSW public service.

This is not a novel, it is mostly court transcripts, defence statements, and other documents which show, once you are in the clutches of NSW Justice, and they want to deliberately convict you, then you have no hope, and are given no opportunity to stop it.

Any evidence proving that you have been set up, will not be considered admissible by the court.

Politicians and other agencies will not step in to halt illegal actions going on at the Albury Local Court, so its safe to assume this is wide spread throughout NSW.

NSW Police, are not only not investigated when they act illegally and outside of their powers and any sense of human decency, but they are allowed to continue to harass the complainant, and continue to bring false charges against them, to deflect attention from their own actions.

Which is why I ended up facing 6 false charges, in the Albury Local Court.

Proceeds from the sale of the book will be put into my bank account by the publishers, while I spend my time in jail, and will be of assistance once I am released. If I do ever get out of there. I believe arrangements will be made to dispose of me permanently, again, to protect Magistrate Murray of the Albury Local Court from truthful and proven allegations of corrupt dealings towards the public.

On the other hand, this book is to help promote my petition, calling for an investigation into what was done to me, by Gwen Bradley, using her position at the Albury Local Court house to convict and harass, even assault, an innocent person. She had been made a fool of, when the applications by her personal friends which she was illegally putting through that same court house, were thoroughly disproven by evidence, and all three of them made to look like the lying fools they are. She had the Magistrate dismiss all of that defence evidence, and replace it with criminal charges against myself. The Magistrates played along with her game, all of the way through.

When I ordered a few copies of the book for myself, I paid to have one delivered to the Wagga Wagga Court House. Before the end of the week, Magistrate Cromptom will see what comes from misconduct, and continually attacking an innocent person, to cover up for the corrupt Maggot Murray.

o  o  o  o

 

For continued readers of this blog, the book contains only information which is already on display here. There is nothing new in it, and the short articles I have written to introduce the chapters, were taken from this blog and edited to fit.

Please buy a copy though if you would like to keep a record of these events, if the courts manage to have this blog removed, or would like to support myself financially in my continued attempts to clear my own name.

Or, for when I get out of jail, and have no income, no home, and all of my current possessions have been disposed of, when I was not around to keep them safe and cherished.

Bear in mind that when I fled my home a few years ago, under attack from the NSW government run pedophile ring, I only  kept my most valued possessions. A few books, but every photograph of my children I took while they were growing up, all the mothers’ day and easter cards they made for me at school, and the ornaments they bought for me as gifts over the years. Plus my clothes of course.

My family want to ensure that I loose all of those things now,  permanently, so they can tell their friends that I am a disgrace, homeless and have now lost everything I ever had, and valued.

With family like that, who needs enemies, right? ;p

 

Uluru Closed

 

Uluru

 

 

From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Monday, 20 November 2017 2:32 PM
To: contactus@lecc.nsw.gov.au

Subject: FW: New Book About Court Processes in NSW Courts

Hi there

I didn’t include you in the email below, because I had wanted to include a special note for yourselves.

The letter you sent me, dated 20 October, is republished on the final two pages of the book.

Your first mention, in a paperback, I believe!?

I hope that has not breached any copyright claims you might think you have on that letter.

However, it was the perfect end for the book, as it shows what caused all of this, failure to act by the people employed to keep police and court employees honest.

I will be jailed on Thursday, in relation to the arrest by Constable Weekley, and which you claim was dealt with properly and affectively by the Ombudsman, when they dismissed it without taking any real action, or investigation.

So thanks again for all of your assistance.

Tracey Burt

 

 

From: Tracey Burt
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 2:21:15 PM
To: john.botherway@hcourt.gov.au; bwickham@hcourt.gov.au
Cc: Joe Blackshield; auburn@parliament.nsw.gov.au; ADR_Directorate@agd.nsw.gov.au; belinda.brady@justice.nsw.gov.au; cjc@justice.nsw.gov.au; coordinator@msb.org.au; dubbo@parliament.nsw.gov.au; dean.marshall@hcourt.gov.au; Office of the General Counsel; eLodgment_admin; ElectorateOffice Auburn; fairfield@parliament.nsw.gov.au; farrer@aph.gov.au; Grant_Office_Email; general@sklegal.com.au; investigations@abc.net.au; info@justice.org.au; info@alburylegal.com.au; jsmart@hcourt.gov.au; keira@parliament.nsw.gov.au; Kerry.Lloyd@masonlloyd.com.au; liverpool@parliament.nsw.gov.au; leader.opposition@parliament.nsw.gov.au; maitland@parliament.nsw.gov.au; media@courts.nsw.gov.au ; Office@upton.minister.nsw.gov.au; Premier; Regulatory Assurance; senator.brandis@aph.gov.au; secretary@jca.asn.au; sc.feedback@justice.nsw.gov.au; sc.bails@justice.nsw.gov.au; TPBEnquiryManagement; walt.secord@parliament.nsw.gov.au ; Zari.Austin@fedcourt.gov.au

Subject: New Book About Court Processes in NSW Courts

Dear Mr Botherway

Since you are attached to the library of the High Court of Australia, you might be interested in the book I published last night.

http://www.lulu.com/shop/tracey-burt/framed-in-the-albury-local-court/paperback/product-23415417.html

I purchased a copy for Magistrate Cromptom, and that will be delivered to the Wagga Wagga court house some time this week.

Hopefully the book will generate some income for me, while I endure my time in jail, sent there to cover up for misconduct and illegal actions by Magistate Murray originally, and then by Cromptom as well.

I remain disgusted that it was allowed to occur at all, let alone be continued to this point.

Regards

Tracey Burt