BDS Huon Owns the Magistrates at Albury Court House

All of the clients of BDS Huon are entitled to $225,000 each in compensation from that company, for failing to protect their personal and financial information.

Ordinarily a person would have to prove that their information was being leaked by that company or one of their employees. However, since the owner of BDS Huon has stated in court, under oath, that he is not aware of any regulations or laws which require him not only to ask his staff not to talk about what they learn about people while preparing their tax or BAS, but to discipline anyone who is accused of doing so.

Jon  Williams appeared in court on 20 June 2017, trying to have me convicted of advising him that a member of his staff was gossiping about their clients affairs nearly every day after work. Yet my actions were not against the law, and it is those of himself and his staff member which are in violation of the federal regulations which control the taxation industry.

What’s even worse, is the arrogance of this man, and the way he acted in relation to that hearing.

He showed total contempt of the process, didn’t show up on time, lied under oath, and expected to not have to stand in line to wait for his employees charge against me to be heard.

Below is a post I made to a facebook group about what happened that day at the court house, and which again demonstrates that the owners of BDS Huon have some kind of unnatural hold over the staff and police prosecutor at the local court house, and which might explain for the fact that the real criminals in this saga continue to go unpunished, while this innocent person has been given a flogging by the court and police, for merely bringing misconduct at BDS Huon to the attention of the Tax Practitioners’ Board.

……………

One of the part owners of BDS Huon, taxation accountants based in a suburb of Albury, put on an awesome display of his control over the police prosecutor at the Albury court house, and even the Magistrate himself, earlier this week.

Jon Williams had been aware since late last year that he was going to be summoned for cross examination by myself, in relation to false allegations made against me by an employee of BDS Huon, at the rehearing of the first of those false charges.

Everyone involved in the case was at the court house at 9.30 am. The Magistrate was late, and court didn’t start until 10am. Shortly after 11, our case was called. Mr Williams was still not present. When going over the list of police witnesses, the prosecutor and the Magistrate, tried not to let me have any input into that discussion. I pulled them up, and asked if Mr Williams was present, because I would be seeking an adjournment, until he made himself available. The court advised he was definitely going to be there.

Our hearing moved along, dealing with other sundry matters, and then we were finally ready to start. The Prosecutor wanted to call Jon Williams, of BDS Huon, as their first witness. However, he was still not there. The Magistrate advised that someone had just phoned him, and he would be arriving in about 20 minutes. He had to adjourn our case until the star witness could arrive.

Mr Williams arrived about 11.50. The case which had been next in line, had been started during our adjournment. It was still going at 1pm when we all went to lunch. Upon arriving back at the court house at 2pm, the other case was still in progress, and another one was now waiting in line before my own matter.

At about 2.15 the police prosecutor interrupted the other case, and advised that she wanted to arrange for my matter to be dealt with next, even though that would mean adjourning the next case in line completely for the day, and for which two witnesses had driven up from Melbourne to appear.

The Magistrate pointed that out to the prosecutor, to which she replied that she was very aware of that, but Mr Williams, a local businessman, needed to get back to his office. The Magistrate argued again, that while that is understandable, inconveniencing two other people for him, wasn’t real cool. However, the prosecutor again argued that Mr Williams should not have to sit around the Albury court house all day, when he is such a busy and important man.

The Magistrate agreed. He called the solicitor for that case into the room, and advised her what the court wanted to do. She was annoyed. She asked to speak to her clients. She came back and again argued that they too had waited all day for their hearing, and did not want to be adjourned to another date, and have to travel 300 km back to Albury, for that. She asked if the court would at least agree to try to hear their case, after mine had ended. The Magistrate informed her that there would not be enough time left.

Their case was adjourned, and my own was called. I finally got to cross examine Jon Williams on the stand, during which he pretty much told lies and committed acts of perjury. I got to cross examine the cop who had framed me for an allegation of having committed a crime against BDS Huon, when all I had done was send the company a letter advising that one of their staff members was breaking federal relations and had some matters running through the local court which might become embarrassing his company.

The cop was surly, and tried not to answer questions, by shrugging his shoulders instead. It was obvious who had acted illegally was on the day he had framed and ‘arrested’ me, and it was not me, it was the cop, and he now was very unhappy about being forced to answer questions about that day.

I have appeared in court at least 26 times in relation to the six false charges BDS Huon have assisted their staff member to bring against me, to cover up for her illegal actions, and which related to the clients of BDS Huon. When she appears in court, Magistrate Murray would call the matter as early as he could, so that she could get back to the office. On days that she was not required to be present, Maggot Murray would leave my case until second last of the day, and make me sit there until after 4pm.

I arrive at the court house at 9.30. On most occasions I don’t get out of there until late afternoon. I might be on disability pension, so have the free time, but the hard seats, the cold and the stress, cause me all sort of health problems. .

Yet Jon Williams, resented having to leave his office, for just a couple of hours, and which included a one hour lunch break, to try to have me again convicted of the false allegations they have made against me, to protect their employee.

What a crock of shit. Now we know for sure, who has been controlling the Albury Police, when they bought these charges against me, and all of which were designed to protect BDS Huon’s business reputation, in the face of one of their employee’s being accused of misconduct.

For the record, Mr Williams stated under oath, that he is not aware of the Federal Regulations which make it an offence for any of his employees to leak information about their clients, to outside parties. He is not aware of the regulations which require that he protect his clients’ information at all times from being leaked.

Yet, I do believe he is very aware that his company could be stripped of their licence to operate a tax accountancy firm, if they fail to comply with both of those regulations. I believe the minimum penalty is $225,000 that they would have to pay to their clients, in automatic compensation, if any of them can prove that things they told that staff if that company, ended up becoming known by unconcerned parties.

And they wonder why put warnings on the internet to the people of Albury, ‘don’t get your tax done at BDS Huon, or your financial and personal information, will end up all over town, in the form of gossip’.

My case could not be finished of course, once we resumed at about 3.30pm. It had to be adjourned to be finished on another date. So, after waiting at the court house all day, I now have to go back again, and do the same again. As will the three cops who had to sit there all day, waiting to be called to give their evidence.

But Mr Williams part in the hearing, is over now. He doesn’t have to come back. He just made sure that a whole heap of other people do though, because he had work to do. F**k you, Jon Williams, corrupt business owner, controlling Albury Court House.

When Mr Williams arrived at the court house, he sat with the cop who’d arrested me, rather than with his own employee. He and the cop were very friendly. When I questioned the cop about that briefly, he stated that he has known Mr Williams for over a year, and they did not meet through these police matters.

Mr Williams stated that he thinks it is appropriate for his staff to give false statements to the police, to ensure that I am convicted of crimes against his staff member. However, I should have been protected by the public disclosure act, or whistle blowers legislation, from reprisals by that staff member and the company who sought to protect her.

Mr Williams also claims that to this very day, he has never finished reading the letter I wrote and delivered to his home address. Yet he wants me reconvicted and refined, for writing it.

This was the re-hearing of the charge, after the district court ruled in August last year, that it hadn’t even been heard in the local court. That I had just been convicted, without any kind of hearing, or chance to defend myself. That had been deliberate, and arranged by the Magistrate himself. For the re-hearing of the same charge, for which I had been paying off a fine of $560 for a couple of months last year, until it was set aside, the cop has changed the date of the offence. I was convicted and fined for having committed that ‘offence’ on 13 January 2016. For the rehearing of the same charge, it is now alleged that the offence took place on 4 December 2015. Is that even legal?

 

I personally am able to assist three individuals to claim this compensation for damages against BDS Huon. Two of whom are the people who I gave as case examples when advising Jon Williams that a person who is not employed by that company knew all about those two clients financial affairs.

The third person is someone who’s businesses’ financial status was told to me directly by the employee who continually chooses to flaunt the information she learns about people, while working with BDS Huon’s files.

There are many more victims in this matter, but I didn’t ever choose to sit around listening to the gossip fests this employee has about BDS Huon’s clients personal and financial affairs.

However, I can assure you, that this is what is happening and Jon Williams, Ross Griffin and Leasa Brown all chose to attack the whistle blower, rather than to protect their clients. Therefore, it is safe to assume that the employee is still doing this gossiping, on a regular basis, and with the blessing of her employers and ‘managers’.

 

Blog Adjourned for Two Months

I plan to head north for some warmer weather during the adjournment of the hearing of the first ‘criminal’ charge bought against me by the real criminals in these matters, and who happen to work at the local court house and Albury police station.

I’m still considering my next options in taking these matters to a higher court, or at least a more honest venue. We’ll see what happens along the way. My departure was delayed, due to some issues with my car, and which also meant I haven’t had the time and space to prepare new court submissions.

So I won’t be updating this blog much, during this two month recess.

I’ve created a new blog, which will be about the adventures I have as I travel up the roads through New South Wales, with corrupt NSW police out to get me.

https://bloggingontherun.wordpress.com/

I was hoping to spend a few days just north of Sydney, to further explore the aboriginal carvings and myths which abound in that area, but the car repairs have eaten up my accommodation funds. Again, we’ll see what happens.

Hopefully I’ll be able to get away from boring court matters for a while, and write about the spiritual experiences I have, as I go about my life.

Hopefully police won’t find a way to detain me in some remote area, and spirit me off into their human trafficking ring.

I’ll leave you with a clip from David Icke, explaining how and why pedophile rings continue to operate. What were originally written off as the rantings of a ‘crazy’ person decades ago, have continued to be proven by victim testimony, and now by way of some high profile charges and/or arrests.

Open your eyes, society is being destroyed by these people. Not your hippies, your dole bludgers, or even your ordinary criminals. It is being destroyed by the people who seek to destroy the youth, of each continuing generation. Let it end in ours.

 

19598532_1894035050920796_895333412097903463_n.jpg

 

Cardinal George Pell, Australia’s highest ranking Catholic, has been charged with historical sex offences.

http://www.smh.com.au/national/cardinal-george-pell-set-to-be-charged-with-serious-sex-offences-20170628-gx0v8y.html

 

 

19732065_10155536629744826_3708696519357877442_n

 

https://bloggingontherun.wordpress.com/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BDS Huon & Lack of Client Confidentiality

Just remember folks, this whole blog came about because the owner/managers of BDS Huon, taxation accountants in Lavington,  Albury, DO NOT CARE ABOUT YOUR RIGHT TO PRIVACY OF YOUR FINANCIAL AND PERSONAL INFORMATION.

When BDS Huon became aware that I had a complaint to make, about one of their employees gossiping about their clients information, obtained through working with their files and records, BDS Huon sent corrupt Albury police at me, to protect her.

They have put me up on five false charges of harassment, when all I did was to try to advise them that they have a situation going on there, which is violation of the Federal Regulations which protect their clients, and their information.

I was convicted of three of those false charges, by the corrupt Magistrate at the Albury Court House, Magistrate Tony Murray. All of those convictions were handed down in my absence. When I attend court, armed with proof that BDS Huon is covering up for their own misconduct and false allegations, while I have done nothing but state the truth, the Magistrate cannot find a way to convict me.

When I have health issues, and don’t make it to a hearing, then I am convicted in my absence, against all evidence which shows that I am not the one who is guilty of misconduct. I have been heavily fined, by the Magistrate who is aware that he willingly convicted me of false allegations, to cover up for BDS Huon.

Yet BDS Huon were posting to their google review last year, that people should not listen to my warnings about that company, because I have been convicted of harassing them and a member of their staff.

But it was BDS Huon who arranged those convictions against me by way of their connection to corrupt members of the local police force, and corrupt staff working at the Albury court house. All of those allegations of criminal actions towards BDS Huon were later overturned, and will be re-heard this year in the Albury Corrupt Local Court.

At the first of those hearings, two weeks ago, one of the owners of BDS Huon committed acts of perjury while in the witness box, being cross examined by the defence.

Jon Williams claims that he is not familiar with the Codes and Regulations which require him to make sure any information given to staff at that company, remains inside the walls of that company.

Mr Williams also claimed that he was not aware that he and Ross Griffin have an obligation to enforce confidentiality at the workplace, to try to prevent leaks, and deal with any person which has taken it upon themselves to not respect that requirement.

 

Don’t get your tax done at BDS Huon, unless you don’t mind everyone else in town knowing how much money you earn, and what you do with it all.

 

Also bear in mind that a there has been almost 30 hearings, at the local court house, all designed to punish me for bringing this breach of clients’ right to privacy to
the attention of the owners of BDS Huon, and to keep that situation quiet.

All paid for by the NSW tax payer, as BDS Huon have never taken a civil case against me, for true ‘libel’, because they had a way to do that for free,
using their connection at the court house.

So both you, unconcerned people and their clients, have footed the bill
to cover up for BDS Huon’s dirty little secret.

In fact, you also paid for the Tax Practitioners’ Board to cover it up as well,
and for the Inspector General of Taxation to do the same.
At the suggestion of BDS Huon’s management.

 

 

More Dodgy Dealings in the Albury Local Court


From: Karma
Sent: Monday, 26 June 2017 3:40 PM
To: Local Court Albury; local_court_albury@agd.nsw.gov.au; Premier; investigations@abc.net.au; icac@icac.nsw.gov.au

Subject: Illegal Bail Hearing

Dear Mr Howard

At hearing on 20 June 2017, the charge bought against me by your employee, XXXX XXXXXXX of the CJC, was not mentioned in court. It was listed to be mentioned, for a new date for hearing to be set. You might recall that I lodged my defence brief with the office that morning, and with the police prosecutor in between hearings. However, the charge was not mentioned at all, and no date was set.

In fact, the Magistrate was quite clear that we would only be dealing with one charge on that day, being one of breach of ADVO bought against me by your pal, xxxxxx xxxx.

I believe we have not only had police change the date of the offence on their paperwork, but submit evidence that is not admissible, since this is the re-hearing of the charge, and not the first hearing of the charge, where all of that information should have been submitted. Since it wasn’t, I fail to see how it is admissible now.

However, I have allowed it all to be introduced, because it convicts both of the arresting officers of lying, but also because I intend to address XXXX’s witness statements during my cross examination of her, at the hearing’s continuation in mid September. However, I believe that changing the charge from contravene ADVO to Common Assault is simply not acceptable.

After that hearing had ended and the Magistrate had left the court room for the day, the prosecutor sent a clerk to instruct him to come back to his bench, to hear my bail application. I had mentioned earlier that I did want that addressed at hearing, along with XXXX’s false allegation of XXXXXX her.

Magistrate Cromptom returned to the bench and made an order that bail would continue until a date in mid September 2017. I can’t find my paperwork at the moment, due to have to relocate in my living arrangements late last week. However, that hearing in mid September relates to XXXX’s charge, and to Magistrate Murray’s ADVO applications were are being bought against me as an Act of Parliament.

I hardly think that it would be legal for the Magistrate to bail me until the next hearing of someone else’s complaint to police about me. Especially when it is the same party who’s previous collusions with xxxxxxx were the basis of my applications for motion.

Therefore, he has continued this bail indefinitely, due to not setting a new date for the hearing of the charge I am actually on bail for. I believe it is not legal to put someone on bail indefinitely.

I will be defending Murray’s new false allegations, due to the fact that Magistrate Cromptom assured me at hearing on 6 April 2017, that Magistrate Murray would no longer be involved in any matters involving myself at your court house, before dismissing my three applications for motion, as a compromise. I would have appealed his decision in the district court, but took him for his word that Murray would be kept out of proceedings from here on in. My time period to appeal that decision, has now expired.

Therefore, I will defend those new applications for ADVO’s, and which are an Act of Parliament, by submitting the transcript which shows that Magistrate Murray committed perjury on his bench on 12 December 2016, to cover up for the same collusions between XXXXXXX, XXXX and XXXXXX, when he was originally refusing to grant motion. Something I am long past being legally due, due to the amounts of corruptions in these proceedings, and which began at the outset.

Therefore, you better change the transcript when you prepare it this week. Make sure you add in remarks pretending to be from the mouth of the Magistrate, that a date was set for the hearing of (your employee)’s charge, or all of the above becomes very questionable.

I’m sure you will be able to fix that error, before it comes back to haunt you all, and to cover up for unlawful and illegal actions by both of your Magistrates.

Regards

Karma

Magistrate Murray Has Commenced an ADVO Hearing Against me, As an Act of Parliament

Collected some mail tonight. Some incriminating evidence against police, which had been put in an enveloped marked as being from the desk of the Area Commander, was amongst it.

The other notices are from the Albury Local Court, that Magistrate Murray has started a hearing against me, in my absence, and during its continuation, I will be charged by police with more false allegations, and convicted for them by the corrupt Magistrates at the Albury local court house, seeking to cover up for their own misconduct.

It is noted on the paperwork that Magistrate Cromptom will continue the hearing.

Now back in April of this year, when dismissing my applications for motion, Magistrate Cromptom assured me that while Murray had already disqualified himself from hearing the charge against me bought by his colleague at the court house, he would also now be excluded from hearing any of the criminal charges bought against me, by her friend, the BDS Huon employee.

However, a month later, Magistrate Murray was conducting the hearing, that I chose not to attend, since it involved civil matters only. My spidey senses were also picking up on lots of foul play being put in place, to be sprung on me when I did appear. So I didn’t bother dragging myself out of my sick bed to do so.

So Murray is not allowed to hear any criminal charges against me. But he can issue two ADVO orders, personally vouched for by himself and which then makes them an Act of Parliament, due to his ‘authority’.

However, he will also be for be summoned as a witness by the defence against those same criminal charges, which are to be heard on the same day. Magistrate Cromptom will also be summoned by the defence. Looks like we are going to need another Magistrate.

I’d already been petitioning parliament for Murray’s removal, due to him perverting the course of justice against me last year, other assorted acts of illegal misconduct, perjury and because he has been nominated as having been involved in the murder of William Tyrrell.

So now he goes an advises parliament that I am such a bad person, that he has acted as the judicial officer to personally accept two ADVO applications on behalf of his buddy’s personal friends, and ensure they are granted by way of more false allegations by way of the NSW Police force.

Way to go Murray. Might have been easier to just drop all this bullshit, and vexatious proceedings.

Good thing I found that last piece of evidence which convicts you all of colluding with the complainants, including NSW police, and which will finally give me grounds for motion to be granted. I will be making that application to the NSW Supreme Court, and the additional grounds for same, will be the transcript displayed on this blog, which shows perjury on the part of Magistrate Murray.

The new matter of fraud by NSW police?

They have issued a hand written document claiming that I was facing a charge of common assault on 20 June 2017, and that the witnesses for that were Jon Williams, Constable Rowan Weekley, and one more person.

Yet I prepared a brief against an allegation of writing a letter to Jon Williams, part-owner of BDS Huon, and delivering it to any empty house. All the paperwork I received last year, in relation to the charge reference number they use, stated that arrest was for that letter.

I was convicted for writing that letter on 29 February 2016. I appealed that decision in April 2016, and that was denied. However, in the district court, on appeal in August 2016, it was ruled that the case had never actually been heard in the local court in the first place. Just myself convicted on the word of a police officer, who was refusing to produce any evidence at all to the court, or willing to show any to the accused.

And by a Magistrate who was already aware that it was a false charge, and that he was being asked to hand down a conviction that would enable his colleague’s personal friends, to win their false cases against me. The defence evidence which had disproven them both, was arranged to have been dismissed by the Maggot Murray.

The conviction was set aside in the District Court and the matter sent back to the local court. As I said, I prepared a defence against that allegation and original conviction.

Police should have had to rely on the only evidence they used last time to have me convicted. A three page statement written by a crooked cop. He didn’t even tender the letter he charged me for writing, to the court. It is supposed to be a re-hearing, of the same allegations, but this time in  my presence.

Yet the constable got busy running around gathering up witness statements, and having to write his own one long after he had obtained conviction without doing any of that. The arrangement had been in place, ‘she gets convicted, regardless of the facts, so don’t both too much with it’.

Police had changed the date of the offence, in their new paperwork issued in November of last year. However, that was understandable, since I was at home that night they orignally alleged that the ‘crime’ took place, and I have witnesses to prove that I was. So now they nominate a new time and date of the ‘crime’ against BDS Huon.

But changing the offence completely. I don’t think that’s allowed.

I guess that’s also due to the fact that they had originally imposed a levy on the fine for that conviction, for having committed a violence crime, and which I later appealed. There had been no violence, nor threats of same, made by myself towards anyone.

So now we have changed the offence, so that the levy applies?!?

NSW Justice. More corrupt than one could ever imagine. And continuing to get away with it all.

I don’t have my printer set up at the moment to scan the document. I’ve taken a photo of it though.

IMG_20170623_221833IMG_20170623_224559

 

I’ll have to edit the arrest documents, and which show the same reference number quoted in the top photo, to remove any identifying names, before I can post it here.

Back soon with that.

Police have changed the date of the offence, and I have allowed that. The cop deliberately framed me, made an illegal recording of a conversation with myself then claimed I had confessed in a formal interview. The court and the police area commander both denied me access to their evidence against me, which flies in the face of Australian Law. However, I have allowed his false statement of facts to be admitted, at this stage.

But changing the offence, I don’t think I should have to put up with this shit any longer.

I had taken the arrest documents off the blog, to ensure that the blog cannot be seen to be in breach of the gag order placed on me by Murray originally, to cover up the truth.

However, in light of this new disgraceful example of corruption between both police and the court, I now repost the arrest documentation for the charge which is now being classed as ‘common assault’ – Charge No: H60077075.

So … will Jon Williams be appearing court to bear witness that I physically assaulted his employee, or is his employee person the witness in a charge that I have assaulted Jon Williams?

The transcript for the hearing, which went on to convict me, clearly shows that Magistrate Murray had somehow become aware that someone had been assaulted in February of last year. But he wasn’t sure who was the victim was, and who was the accused was. The prosecutor had no idea that any assault had occurred, and later describes same as one email and one phone call.

Rather than sort that issue out, the Magistrate was merely told that I was the one charged for a breach … therefore I must be the one who assaulted someone. Therefore I was convicted and fined, with a levy added for having committed a violent crime.

Mr Williams was excused from cross examination this week, by the Magistrate who accused me of berating him, and asking him questions that he shouldn’t have to answer. The same favour was done for the lying Cop, Framer Weekley.

I’m thinking of asking to be allowed to recall both of them, just for the last few questions I had to put to them. I could also ask them about this ‘common assault’. Also funny that I’d advised the police commissioner’s office that I will be taking a civil matter to court, for common assault, against three of his police officers not long ago, so again, they are just playing games.

So now we have a police officer pretending that I am being charged with common assault instead, for writing a letter to Jon Williams, of BDS Huon, and advising him that his employee is mentally ill, out of control, and is about to disgrace his company’s name even further by way of her actions in the local court house.

Jon had me arrested for delivering that bit of advice to him. See you in the Federal Court Mr Williams, shortly after we take this charge to the NSW Supreme Court.

 

arrest 1 p2 - Copy

arrest 1 p3

arrest 1 p 4

Senior Cunstable Rowan Weekley, Albury Police (not his real photo ;p) was promoted after framing me twice, making an illegal recording, tampering with evidence and perjury to the court. No wonder the police force is being held in such disdain by the people these days, because of rampant corruption.

weekley

 

IMG_20170624_105148 EDITIMG_20170624_105200 EDITIMG_20170624_105226 EDITIMG_20170624_105250 EDIT

 

The blog post on this site, which clearly shows Murray committing perjury while on his bench, seeking to protect the court house ‘mediator’ in December of last year, was published on 9 April 2017. The above court order is dated 22 May 2017. Now who appears to be seeking revenge?

I made the post, because the court refused to grant motion, after 4 or 5 months of jerking me around. It was made to prove that my application for motion, was valid, and should have been granted.

How can you rely on a Magistrate who lies to your face in court, and then gets laughed at by people in the audience when he has to admit to your face, that he was lying just now?

Why has Maggot Murray made this order 6 weeks afterwards?

Revenge and a strong desire to clear his own name, by having me convicted of more false allegations, even if he has to use one of his buddies to do it for him this time.

 

Murray also goes on to dictate some additional conditions on the back of the paperwork. He writes that from that point on, no one will be excused from hearings, unless they can provide a valid medical certificate.

Yet when I tendered a legal letter from my GP to explain my absence on the day that I was convicted, he simply refused to accept it. On appeal months later, the District Court Judge couldn’t see what his problem was, and ruled the letter to have been acceptable.

Murray knows that I am on disability pension, and suffer an ongoing illness. So these remarks being recorded now, are so he can make it hard for me to appeal, if I miss a hearing.

Yet when one of the complainants failed to attend a hearing last year, and without giving any valid reason why, he allowed that, and adjourned me until it was convenient for her to attend. She does work for BDS Huon afterall, and their staff do whatever they want, at the Albury local court, with the support of NSW Police.

He is also very aware that I set him up one day last year, by failing to appear. I emailed the court that morning, explained why I was ill, asked them not to hear the cases in my absence or to make any rulings while I was not there. I also offered a short defence, just in case, for two of them, but also pointed out that I assume the hearing that day would have to be postponed, until another application going through the court had been decided. If that had been decided in my favour, then the charges I was facing on the day I didn’t attend, wouldn’t not have gone ahead.

Murray used it as an opportunity to convict me of two charges, and fined me outrageously for same. So I lodged a complaint with the Judicial Commission about his actions that day. I knew he would do that, and the idiot took the bait, lol.

The convictions were easily overturned, during an appeal which they didn’t let go through to the district court, which was the other thing I was aiming for. Instead, the other Magistrate overturned them, after reading the email I had sent to the court but didn’t appear to have been put on file, or in the record. What a joke Murray is. So full of himself.

Actually I heard he was looking pretty sick and hung over one day a couple of weeks ago. Apparently years ago he was an alcoholic and would show up for court hung over and nasty. Then apparently he got his act together a bit, and appeared to have stopped drinking. Seems he slipped off the wagon recently. Maybe too much stress to deal with, coming at him through this blog.

What sort of image is that for the Queen to have representing her? A very ugly looking man, all sweaty and hung over, berating people from his bench, because he isn’t able to keep control of his temper, especially when he has a hangover.

On the days that he is in a foul mood, the sheriffs move around the foyer, quietly telling everyone to turn off their mobile phone. There are signs on display to do so, but after recesses or lunch, people often forget to turn them off, or didn’t see the sign. Any person who’s phone makes a noise in his court room is instantly berated, and moved to be last in line for the day.

I think the Queen needs to take a good hard look at some of these people sitting on ‘her’ benches in courts in Australia, and ask herself if she would like to be judged by one of them. Maybe she should have a good long look around parliament house too, and weed out some of the more corrupt politicians.

I’m going to write her a funny letter about Murray. I hope she enjoys reading it 😉

I’ll be sure to post it to the blog.

 

 

 

 

https://alburypolicecorruptionblog.wordpress.com/2017/04/09/magistrate-anthony-murray-an-act-of-perjury-while-on-his-bench/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hiding out from Corrupt Albury Police

As commented elsewhere on this blog, I had to vacate the flat I’d been renting for the whole of these court dramas, being over 18 months now.

For the first time, in that same amount of time, I have not been harassed by corrupt Albury police, nor put up on any new false charges, designed to punish me for lodging valid complaints about their initial actions towards me, and that of staff at the Albury court house.

Somewhere in this blog is also an allegation that Magistrate Anthony Murray and at least one corrupt Albury police officer, were involved in the murder of William Tyrrell. I bet police are not investigating that. No one has contacted me about the matter either. However, it does leave me living in fear of what police would do to me now, if they got hold of me.

The only information I have about that potential murder of the missing toddler, was given to me by a man I met at the Albury court house. He told me that it is the word on the street here, in the housing commission area where he lives. I have no proof of what he says, nor has Magistrate Murray ever given me any reason to believe that he might be innocent.

One could accuse me of libel, in making that post to the internet. However, if it is the truth, the rumour needs to come up off the street, and into being officially investigated.

Magistrate Murray deliberately and unlawfully convicted me of false allegations on 29 February 2016, by perverting the course of justice against me. This resulted in large amounts of defamation of character, and slander and libel.

Maybe it is his own karma to have now been shamed on the internet, and not just for that issue, but for his corruption of court proceedings and unprofessional conduct while on his bench. He has held me up for ridicule and openly mocked and berated me in a public court room, while he was the one acting corruptly at the time. Now he is being subject to the same treatment.

However, he appears to not be interested in taking a civil case against me. Instead, he is preferring to use the previous false convictions that he handed down against me, to silence and punish me. And to put me into the hands of Albury police, once again.

Albury court house continues to insist on hearing a charge bought against me, by one of their own employees, at that same court house. It was to be heard before Magistrate Murray, and police had already advised him that he would be handing down a jail sentence upon myself.

For causing offence to the person who arranged for Murray to pervert the course of justice against me in the first place, in February of last year.

Police assaulted me during the arrest for that charge, and charged me with resist arrest. They added in a second charge of resist arrest on a day that I was not arrested, and hadn’t seen a cop for over a month.

The charge is illegal, due to it involving a legal complaint to the Ombudsman and NSW Attorney General, about police corruption in Albury, as organized by staff of the court house.

The charge also cannot be proven against me in a court of law, because police have failed to match the email address of the ‘offensive’ emails to an IP address or a valid telecommunications account.

Yet Murray plans to use this charge, to silence and punish me. That was put in place, before I made the information public, regarding the allegation of his involvement in this unsolved crime. He might have been aware that I had made the report, and I did go on to advise the Chief Executive of the NSW Judicial Commission that I had done so, but no one else was aware of that ‘grudge’ he might hold against me. Which is why I posted it here, and to another location on the internet.

Slander and libel, against someone who had done the same to me? No, I made the post to protect myself.

After making a report about same to crime stoppers, Albury police showed up at the house the sim card I’d used to send the emails from, was registered to. They laughed off their visit, when it didn’t lead them to myself, but to another person involved in the matters before the court.

As stated elsewhere on the blog, if police had gone there in relation to the charge of ‘offence’ via internet, then they would have included that information in their charge sheet, and pointed out my relationship to the owner of the sim card, to the court.

Instead, they choose to keep that visit very quiet. They don’t seem to want anyone to know that my IP was in fact traced.

But maybe not from emails sent to a private email address, but from the IP that connected to the crime stoppers website, and nominated Murray and an Albury police officer as having been involved in the murder of William Tyrrell, after he had been abducted from the north coast of NSW.

I guess Murray can’t afford to have a conviction by himself handed down against the owner of the IP who made that report about him, on the record, in light of future appeals made against the sentence.

Which I guess is why he was happy to disqualify himself in the end, and rely instead upon another Magistrate to enact his revenge for me.

Again, I make this post as an act of self protection and self preservation. The police have not known where I have been staying for the past 6 weeks or so, nor been able to easily trace my mobile phone, as I have limited reception, made worse recently by clouds and rain.

They have had no way to punish me, or silence me, for making that post here on the blog since the time that I made it. I have stayed home, out of town, to avoid being detected by them, so that I could remain free to prepare for their upcoming cases against myself.

I did not appear in court the last time I was supposed to, on 22 May 2017, for the same reasons.

That hearing was for civil matters, and I’d been having such bad vibes in the lead up to that hearing, that I chose not to attend. I was also suffering a migraine headache from the stress of it all.

Whatever trap they tried to spring on me that day, was thwarted. I believe I have been sent some mail, relating to that day, but I have not yet been able to pick that up.

Now I find that an officer from the Albury police station phoned me a few days ago. I guess they are calling to instruct me to hand myself in, because they are revoking my bail. Her voice mail message was breaking up constantly, when I tried to listen to it. I couldn’t try again, as I lost reception completely after that.

I have lodged further complaints about staff of the Albury court house during the weeks that I have been in hiding, including concrete proof of the conspiracy to frame me for false allegations initially, and which involved a staff member at same court house.

I guess I have caused offence.

Yet I am the one who has evidence of Magistrate Murray deliberately perverting the course of justice against me, committing perjury during a hearing he was presiding over, changing decisions after hearings and listing criminal charges that are not even valid, and were bought against me illegally, by corrupt police working on instruction from his court house.

But yes, it appears I will be in jail before being able to finish preparing my defence, for any of these charges, because this blog, outlining corruption in a state run revenue raising business, is offensive to all of the people involved in it.

Yet it is my common law right to do so.

Maybe the cop is just phoning to say why the hearing of the charge at which I was to be sentenced to that jail term, has been delayed. I’d mentioned in a complaint the other day, that I might seek a permanent stay in that hearing, due to the delays being experienced and that I have not been notified as to why they are occurring.

However, its best to assume the worst when dealing with Albury police and court house.

I have to appear in the Albury court again next wee. I was originally facing two criminal charges, both of which just happened to be illegal.

One has been relisted for mention only, to set a new date for its hearing. Which also means the NSW Attorney General has still not acted to direct his employee to drop her illegal charge against me.

The other charge, is for writing to BDS Huon, in December 2015. If I can defend that successfully this time, and having been provided with the police brief has certainly increased my ability to do so this time, then all of the other charges stemming from it will just fall away, and I will finally be free of this shit.

I wouldn’t even bother attending that hearing, since it is an invalid charge which cannot be legally heard in court, due to lack of service of a final order, but they have me on bail for the one that has been postponed, so that I have to attend.

I need to go to where it is warm, for winter. I am sick, with other issues which have arisen during these proceedings, apart from my usual slipped discs and arthritic pain. I need some rest, and to recover from this 18 month long ordeal, and to find the strength to continue to fight it. I might have to ask for a three month adjournment.

While I have destroyed the melanoma, or potentially cancerous ulcer, which had formed on my chest last August, by using a natural remedy, the hole it has created in my skin will simply not heal and close up. It’s time I consulted a GP. However, I would have liked more time to continue to treat it naturally, before agreeing to having it treated with life threatening cancer treatments.

A bit less stress would go a long way to helping it heal. I have a different kind of skin cancer on my face, which appeared at the height of these proceedings last August, and which is also refusing to clear up.

(BDS Huon have been advised by way of a previous blog that they should drop all of these ‘SLAP’* cases against me, because I need to attend to these medical conditions. They declined to allow that, and instead chose once against to continue with them, even though that constantly becomes to their own detriments.

Murray was advised at the hearing on 12 December 2016 that I was trying to have the melanoma treated. It is shown in the transcript on display here. I was also asking for a few months off, from their assault on me, due to that and the health issues which were still affecting me after the assault by police on 22 October 2016.

He is once again completely ignoring those two issues, plus the issues which put me on dsp in the first place, and making rulings in May 2017 that I am not allowed advise that I am too sick to attend a hearing, and setting it up that I cannot appeal on the basis of not being present. Yet when I was present in court in the lead up to all of this drama, he couldn’t convict me when I was there to argue the truth, only when I was too sick to attend, or setting him up to disgrace himself. Which is why I really didn’t appear in May this year, so that they could convict me of the new allegations, and then I could just appeal it up to the District court and out of Murray’s cesspit of a court room. Instead, they only part heard it, when they had every legal excuse to grant it without hearing it in my presence, so that they could continue it later on, and again, prevent me from stepping up to the higher court. More waste of tax payer’s funds, and themselves keeping themselves in work, even if that is by criminal actions against a person who was innocent when first summoned there, and still is innocent of any act that could be defined as criminal, in its own right?)

That will also give some government agencies and the Tax Practitioners’ Board time to finally investigate all of the allegations of corruption I have been making since January 2016, and maybe end proceedings before any more injustices occur.

I can’t rely on the local court to do that, because it is the local court who is covering up for itself, and won’t let me out of its arena. Murray continues to try to convict me, to protect himself, and his colleagues, of allegations of proven misconduct.

I was also told in the final days of last year, that a person had called his connection at the Albury police station, to make enquiries about all of the charges I am facing. He was told that police were not aware of me, or any other charges. My friend was advised that the police are not putting them on the books, or the record.

I noticed with the very first charge, they had logged it with a police officer in Griffith, and two were later logged with an officer in Holbrook. One place I have never been to, and the second, I do drive through whenever I travel between here and Sydney, which hasn’t been often.

So once I am sentenced by Murray, and if those charges don’t actually appear in any real police records, where do I end up? Do the court records then simply disappear as well?

I did have all the transcripts published here previously, and which prove this all happened, along with all of the police arrest documents and defence statements, but had to take them out when threatened with a new gag order.

Also, police assaulted me once they’d read the defence documents, and knew they would lose all of their cases. If I get the matters before an honest Magistrate that is.

Is there one of those in NSW? Please advise me if you know of one, and I will apply for a change of venue to his court, and have all this shit overturned, due to its corrupted processes.

There is also an investigation finally starting now, into the Registrar and matters of collusion. I’ll be asking the matters involved in that investigation be postponed from being heard until after that has been finalized.

 

 

I might also do some research into what Shane Dowling from Kangaroo Court is doing, and start advising all of the Attorney Generals, in each state, that violations of common law rights, and therefore federal law, is going on at the Albury local court and needs to be stopped.

Removing Murray from the bench would go a long way to fixing the problem. I’d already started petitioning politicians to remove him from the bench, so going through the AG’s might be a way of bringing that about.

Can I get him investigated, and/or fired, before he can jail me of false accusations and false charges? The race is on.

 

Its a shame he has implicated Magistrate Cromptom in this as well, and stained his career, at it outset, just to keep his own corrupt decisions in play.

 

The level of corruption on at the Albury court house, cannot be allowed to continue, if anyone is to have any faith in law enforcement in this area.

Law enforcement will not be honest, unless the staff of same are kept honest, by open investigations into allegations of corruption, and disciplinary acts being affected.

The NSW Ombudsman, ICAC and Police Commissioners Office all dropped the ball on this one and allowed it to continue, for reasons of their own.

Yet it has not yet gone away, it continues to throw itself in their faces, and will do so until they resolve it in a legal and honest fashion.

Not by throwing me in a jail cell, to silence me about their own illegal behaviours.

 

At least I can say I didn’t go quietly ;D

June 14 Stats

 

Nearly 100 new blog viewers, within just the past 9 days. I bet we make it to 700 today, due to the links I have placed on some facebook groups.

june stats.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Summons to Court – BDS Huon

Update 26 June 2017:

Five complaints lodged this morning with the Tax Practitioners’ Board about BDS Huon, and matters of misconduct arising from the hearing last week at the Albury Local court, into the charge they assisted their employee to bring against me, after I had accused her of misconduct towards themselves. 

I will be taking those complaints to the Federal Court, if BDS Huon do not cease and desist with this harassment, and corrupt and unlawful court proceedings.

 

To the owners of BDS HUon

As you are aware, I am unable to contact you to discuss our matters before the Albury local court.

I’ve also been experiencing computer problems recently, and lack of a private space to finish preparing my defence for the five charges you again have me facing this year, and so am behind in my paperwork, and still preparing my defence strategies against the first charge, bought against me on 20 January 2016, by Con Rowan Weekley.

Jon Williams was always required to attend that hearing, to be cross examined by the defence, as he is nominated by the ‘victim’ and the arresting officer as having been a witness to the ‘crime’.

However, the victim goes on to describe the actions of Ross Griffin and Leasa Brown, in relation to that same crime, and the actions they took regarding it, in her witness statement to the police. The defence had not had access to that statement until November 2016.

The defence has therefore decided to call Mr Griffin and Ms Brown to give evidence at that first hearing on 20 June 2016.

Mr Griffin was not going to be cross examined until the second charge is heard, when he appears as a police witness at that hearing. Ms Brown is to appear as a witness for the police at the hearing of the third charge.

I believe that we might be able to avoid some of those other hearings, if the Magistrate on the day hears the case honestly this time, and actually considers at least some of the defence statements and evidence.

However, that might not be the case, and those employees will be summoned, along with other staff, in relation to the other matters, over the course of the following four to five months.

Therefore, please consider this to be preliminary notice that you are required to attend the Albury local court on 20 June 2017, to give evidence at the hearing into the criminal charge.

I will get a copy of the notice to summon you, to police, asap. I have no desire to walk into their cesspit of corruption to give it to them, nor am I allowed to email Con Weekley or I will again be assaulted and arrested for ‘internet crimes’. I will try to get it in the mail this week, to the arresting officer.

It will be nice to finally meet you all face to face.

I will then confirm to the current investigation into these issues, by the Tax Practitioners Board, that you did all show up, and did all try to have me convicted of crimes that you are very aware were not crimes at all.

 

And yes, BDS Huon ARE under investigation as we speak, by the TPB, for issues which were not properly investigated last year.

BDS Huon claimed on the Google Review platform, that they don’t even know who the TPB are, and that they were investigated and exonerated, but also that they were never investigated and exonerated.

I think those police witness statements have provided the proof the complaint needed, to make it undeniable.

I must get around to sending the rest of them, now that I am back online.

 

Just for the readers information:

I was also facing another charge on 20 June 2017, bought against me by a staff member of the Albury court house, for lodging complaints about the police involved in all of these questionable charges surrounding BDS Huon. She claims those complaints are internet crimes, and victimization of herself.

However, in checking the court list last week, I see that the hearing of her charge has been removed, and replaced with ‘to be mentioned’.

Meaning, it has been delayed again, and without myself being notified, or advised what has created the delay. That’s actually illegal, but staff at the Albury court house don’t understand the word ‘legal’ anyway.

Police say I will be sentenced to a jail term, for those internet crimes which caused offence to one person. So my time in jail has been delayed for a bit longer.

I will continue to try to avoid that all together, by having a higher court acknowledge that it is an illegal charge, and for which police have not only tampered with the evidence, and acted unlawfully in other ways, but because police have failed to provide my IP and telecommunications account details in their arrest documentation, and therefore, the charge cannot proceed until they do so.

They are aware they would have to arrest and charge another person for that allegation of a crime having been committed from their telecommunications account. Yet they have chosen not to do that. I wonder why?

 

Tax Practitioners Code of Conduct

Confidentiality of client information

You must not disclose information relating to a client’s affairs to a third party unless you have:

  • obtained your client’s permission; or
  • a legal duty to do so.

This is one of the obligations (item 6) under the Code of Professional Conduct (Code).

‘Information’ refers to knowledge you have acquired or derived about a client, whether directly or indirectly. It is only necessary that the information relates to the affairs of a client. Further, the information does not have to necessarily belong to the client.

A ‘third party’ is any entity other than you and your client and could, for example, include entities:

  • to which you outsource your tax agent services
  • within the same service trust structure, unless the client is defined (for example, in the engagement letter) as the whole structure
  • maintaining offsite data storage systems (including ‘cloud storage’).

We recognise that tax practitioners are increasingly engaging in outsourcing or cloud storage arrangements. However, the obligations under Code item 6 have not changed – you must ensure confidentiality of client information, including appropriate disclosure of such arrangements to your clients to ensure you comply with your obligations under this Code item.

Failure to maintain confidentiality of your client’s information

If you disclose information relating to a client’s affairs to a third party without the client’s permission or a legal duty to do so, the TPB may find that you have breached the Code and may impose sanctions for that breach.

https://www.tpb.gov.au/confidentiality-client-information

 

Failing to comply with your obligations

All registered tax practitioners must comply with the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (TASA), including the Code of Professional Conduct (Code) and the civil penalties provisions. We consider allegations that a tax practitioner has failed to comply with the TASA very seriously.

If we receive a complaint that a tax practitioner is suspected of failing to comply with the TASA including the Code, we will look into the matter further by making preliminary enquiries. Where we consider it appropriate, we will initiate a formal investigation.

If we find that a tax practitioner has failed to comply with the TASA we may impose one or more administrative sanctions or seek a Court imposed civil penalty. Administrative sanctions for breach of the Code can include:

  • a written caution
  • an order requiring the tax practitioner to:
    • complete a course of education or training we specify
    • only provide certain services
    • provide services only under supervision
  • suspension of registration for a certain period
  • termination of registration.

The severity of a sanction depends on the nature and extent of the breach and the individual circumstances of each case.

If an administrative sanction is imposed (other than a written caution), details of the sanction are listed against the tax practitioner on the TPB Register.

Civil penalties

There are a number of civil penalty provisions in the TASA relating to certain conduct of registered tax practitioners, and certain activities of those who are acting as unregistered tax practitioners.

The Federal Court has the power to impose penalties of up to $45,000 for individuals and $225,000 for corporations for each breach.

More information

For more information, refer to: